Search

Aim: To compare the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in preoperative assessment of local extent of breast cancer. Materials and methods: Lesion sizes of breast cancers on DBT and FFDM images were independently evaluated by breast radiologists. Each lesion was flagged as either mis-sized or not depending on whether the assessment of size at imaging was within 1 cm of the lesion size at surgery. Additional analyses were made by mammographic parenchymal density and by lesion size, using 2 cm as the boundary to separate the two subgroups. Statistical comparisons were performed using a repeated measures linear model on the percent mis-sized. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The dataset included 173 malignant breast lesions (mean size 23.8 mm, 43% of lesions were ≤2 cm in size) in 169 patients, two-thirds of which had heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts. Overall, the percentage of lesions mis-sized at DBT was significantly lower than at FFDM (19% versus 29%, p = 0.003). There was significantly less mis-sizing at DBT in both heterogeneously dense breasts (11.1% difference between DBT and FFDM, p = 0.016) and extremely dense breasts (15.8% difference, p = 0.024). DBT also had significantly less mis-sizing than FFDM in the subgroup of lesions that were ≤2 cm in size (14.7% difference, p = 0.005). Conclusion: DBT was significantly superior to FFDM for the evaluation of lesion size overall, and specifically for small lesions and for lesions in dense breasts. The superiority of DBT versus FFDM increased with parenchymal density. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Aims To investigate whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with primary breast cancer is predictive of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival and to determine the prognostic factors indicating survival. Materials and methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and the requirement for informed consent was waived. From 2009 to 2010, 828 women with primary breast cancer and preoperative MRI were matched with 1613 women without such imaging. Patients were matched with regards to 25 patient and tumour-related covariates. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the time to recurrence and to estimate the hazard ratio for preoperative MRI. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards survival analysis were carried out on total recurrence DFS and overall survival in the unmatched datasets. Results In total, 799 matched pairs were available for survival analysis. The MRI group showed a tendency towards better survival outcome; however, there were no significant differences in DFS and overall survival. Age at diagnosis (DFS hazard ratio = 0.98; overall survival hazard ratio = 1.04), larger tumour size (DFS hazard ratio = 1.01; overall survival hazard ratio = 1.02), triple negative breast cancer (DFS hazard ratio = 2.64; overall survival hazard ratio = 3.44) and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (DFS hazard ratio = 2.12; overall survival hazard ratio = 2.70) were independent significant variables for worse DFS and overall survival. Conclusion Preoperative MRI did not result in an improvement in a patient's outcome. Age at diagnosis, tumour size, molecular subtype and lymphovascular invasion were significant independent factors affecting both DFS and overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]