Author: "Schoemaker, Minouk J." / Topic: breast cancer - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Schoemaker, Minouk J."' showing total 42 results

Start Over Author "Schoemaker, Minouk J." Topic breast cancer

42 results on '"Schoemaker, Minouk J."'

1. Incorporating progesterone receptor expression into the PREDICT breast prognostic model

Author: Grootes, Isabelle, Keeman, Renske, Blows, Fiona M, Milne, Roger L, Giles, Graham G, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Fasching, Peter A, Abubakar, Mustapha, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Beckmann, Matthias W, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Briceno, Ignacio, Burwinkel, Barbara, Camp, Nicola J, Castelao, Jose E, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Eriksson, Mikael, Ernst, Kristina, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fink, Visnja, Floris, Giuseppe, Fox, Stephen, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Sáenz, José A, González-Neira, Anna, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Hartman, Mikael, Hein, Alexander, Hooning, Maartje J, Hou, Ming-Feng, Howell, Sacha J, Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kang, Daehee, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Li, Jingmei, Lubiński, Jan, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro, Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Offit, Kenneth, Osorio, Ana, Park, Sue K, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Presneau, Nadege, Pylkäs, Katri, Rack, Brigitte, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Schochter, Fabienne, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shen, Chen-Yang, Shibli, Rana, Sinn, Peter, Tapper, William J, Tawfiq, Essa, Teo, Soo Hwang, Teras, Lauren R, Torres, Diana, Vachon, Celine M, van Deurzen, Carolien HM, Wendt, Camilla, and Williams, Justin A
Subjects: Cancer, Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Progesterone, Prognosis, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Progesterone, PREDICT Breast, breast cancer, Progesterone receptor, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundPredict Breast (www.predict.nhs.uk) is an online prognostication and treatment benefit tool for early invasive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to incorporate the prognostic effect of progesterone receptor (PR) status into a new version of PREDICT and to compare its performance to the current version (2.2).MethodThe prognostic effect of PR status was based on the analysis of data from 45,088 European patients with breast cancer from 49 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for PR status. Data from a New Zealand study of 11,365 patients with early invasive breast cancer were used for external validation. Model calibration and discrimination were used to test the model performance.ResultsHaving a PR-positive tumour was associated with a 23% and 28% lower risk of dying from breast cancer for women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive breast cancer, respectively. The area under the ROC curve increased with the addition of PR status from 0.807 to 0.809 for patients with ER-negative tumours (p = 0.023) and from 0.898 to 0.902 for patients with ER-positive tumours (p = 2.3 × 10-6) in the New Zealand cohort. Model calibration was modest with 940 observed deaths compared to 1151 predicted.ConclusionThe inclusion of the prognostic effect of PR status to PREDICT Breast has led to an improvement of model performance and more accurate absolute treatment benefit predictions for individual patients. Further studies should determine whether the baseline hazard function requires recalibration.
Published: 2022

2. Hypertensive conditions of pregnancy, preterm birth, and premenopausal breast cancer risk: a premenopausal breast cancer collaborative group analysis

Author: Nichols, Hazel B., House, Melissa G., Yarosh, Rina, Mitra, Sara, Goldberg, Mandy, Bertrand, Kimberly A., Eliassen, A. Heather, Giles, Graham G., Jones, Michael E., Milne, Roger L., O’Brien, Katie M., Palmer, Julie R., Sandin, Sven, Willett, Walter C., Yin, Weiyao, Sandler, Dale P., Swerdlow, Anthony J., and Schoemaker, Minouk J.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

3. Genome-wide interaction analysis of menopausal hormone therapy use and breast cancer risk among 62,370 women

Author: Wang, Xiaoliang, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Auer, Paul L, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Wang, Qin, Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Aronson, Kristan J, Murphy, Rachel A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lee, Derrick G, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Mulot, Claire, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, Rudolf, Hoppe, Reiner, Lo, Wing-Yee, Brüning, Thomas, Hamann, Ute, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, Eriksson, Mikael, Jung, Audrey, Becher, Heiko, Couch, Fergus J, Larson, Nicole L, Olson, Janet E, Ruddy, Kathryn J, Giles, Graham G, MacInnis, Robert J, Southey, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Wilkens, Lynne R, Haiman, Christopher A, Olsson, Håkan, Augustinsson, Annelie, Krüger, Ute, Wagner, Philippe, Scott, Christopher, Winham, Stacey J, Vachon, Celine M, Perou, Charles M, Olshan, Andrew F, Troester, Melissa A, Hunter, David J, Eliassen, Heather A, Tamimi, Rulla M, Brantley, Kristen, Andrulis, Irene L, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Ahearn, Thomas U, García-Closas, Montserrat, Evans, Gareth D, Newman, William G, van Veen, Elke M, Howell, Anthony, Wolk, Alicja, Håkansson, Niclas, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Jones, Michael E, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Kitahara, Cari M, Linet, Martha, Prentice, Ross L, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Kraft, Peter, Chang-Claude, Jenny, and Lindström, Sara
Subjects: Genetics, Cancer, Aging, Human Genome, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Estrogen, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Female, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Humans, Male, Menopause, Risk Factors
Abstract: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values
Published: 2022

4. Germline variants and breast cancer survival in patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis.

Author: Escala-Garcia, Maria, Canisius, Sander, Keeman, Renske, Beesley, Jonathan, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Geisler, Jürgen, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jacot, William, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peterlongo, Paolo, Pharoah, Paul DP, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, Romero, Atocha, Roylance, Rebecca, Rüdiger, Thomas, Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Christopher, Southey, Melissa C, Surowy, Harald, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Thomas, Emilie, Tomlinson, Ian, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, and Wolk, Alicja
Subjects: kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Cancer, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract: Breast cancer metastasis accounts for most of the deaths from breast cancer. Identification of germline variants associated with survival in aggressive types of breast cancer may inform understanding of breast cancer progression and assist treatment. In this analysis, we studied the associations between germline variants and breast cancer survival for patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis. We used data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) including 1062 women of European ancestry with metastatic breast cancer, 606 of whom died of breast cancer. We identified two germline variants on chromosome 1, rs138569520 and rs146023652, significantly associated with breast cancer-specific survival (P = 3.19 × 10-8 and 4.42 × 10-8). In silico analysis suggested a potential regulatory effect of the variants on the nearby target genes SDE2 and H3F3A. However, the variants showed no evidence of association in a smaller replication dataset. The validation dataset was obtained from the SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study and included 293 patients with metastatic primary breast cancer at diagnosis. Ultimately, larger replication studies are needed to confirm the identified associations.
Published: 2021

5. Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among 62,370 Women

Author: Wang, Xiaoliang, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Auer, Paul L, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Wang, Qin, Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Aronson, Kristan J, Murphy, Rachel A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lee, Derrick G, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Mulot, Claire, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, Rudolf, Hoppe, Reiner, Lo, Wing-Yee, Brüning, Thomas, Hamann, Ute, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, Eriksson, Mikael, Jung, Audrey, Becher, Heiko, Couch, Fergus J, Larson, Nicole L, Olson, Janet E, Ruddy, Kathryn J, Giles, Graham G, MacInnis, Robert J, Southey, Melissa C, Marchand, Loic Le, Wilkens, Lynne R, Haiman, Christopher A, Olsson, Håkan, Augustinsson, Annelie, Krüger, Ute, Wagner, Philippe, Scott, Christopher, Winham, Stacey J, Vachon, Celine M, Perou, Charles M, Olshan, Andrew F, Troester, Melissa A, Hunter, David J, Eliassen, A Heather, Tamimi, Rulla M, Brantley, Kristen, Andrulis, Irene L, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Ahearn, Thomas U, García-Closas, Montserrat, Evans, Gareth D, Newman, William G, Veen, Elke M van, Howell, Anthony, Wolk, Alicja, Håkansson, Niclas, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Jones, Michael E, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Kitahara, Cari M, Linet, Martha, Prentice, Ross L, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Kraft, Peter, Chang-Claude, Jenny, and Lindström, Sara
Subjects: Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Human Genome, Aging, Estrogen, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being
Abstract: Abstract Background: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values
Published: 2021

6. CYP3A7*1C allele: linking premenopausal oestrone and progesterone levels with risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers

Author: Johnson, Nichola, Maguire, Sarah, Morra, Anna, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Jones, Michael E, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Gilham, Clare, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baynes, Caroline, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Linet, Martha, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Mayes, Rebecca, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Obi, Nadia, Olshan, Andrew F, and Olson, Janet E
Subjects: Estrogen, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, Estrone, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Pregnanediol, Premenopause, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, NBCS Collaborators, AOCS Group, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundEpidemiological studies provide strong evidence for a role of endogenous sex hormones in the aetiology of breast cancer. The aim of this analysis was to identify genetic variants that are associated with urinary sex-hormone levels and breast cancer risk.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study of urinary oestrone-3-glucuronide and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide levels in 560 premenopausal women, with additional analysis of progesterone levels in 298 premenopausal women. To test for the association with breast cancer risk, we carried out follow-up genotyping in 90,916 cases and 89,893 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. All women were of European ancestry.ResultsFor pregnanediol-3-glucuronide, there were no genome-wide significant associations; for oestrone-3-glucuronide, we identified a single peak mapping to the CYP3A locus, annotated by rs45446698. The minor rs45446698-C allele was associated with lower oestrone-3-glucuronide (-49.2%, 95% CI -56.1% to -41.1%, P = 3.1 × 10-18); in follow-up analyses, rs45446698-C was also associated with lower progesterone (-26.7%, 95% CI -39.4% to -11.6%, P = 0.001) and reduced risk of oestrogen and progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, P = 6.9 × 10-8).ConclusionsThe CYP3A7*1C allele is associated with reduced risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer possibly mediated via an effect on the metabolism of endogenous sex hormones in premenopausal women.
Published: 2021

7. Circulating vitamin D and breast cancer risk: an international pooling project of 17 cohorts

Author: Visvanathan, Kala, Mondul, Alison M., Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, Wang, Molin, Gail, Mitchell H., Yaun, Shiaw-Shyuan, Weinstein, Stephanie J., McCullough, Marjorie L., Eliassen, A. Heather, Cook, Nancy R., Agnoli, Claudia, Almquist, Martin, Black, Amanda, Buring, Julie E., Chen, Chu, Chen, Yu, Clendenen, Tess, Dossus, Laure, Fedirko, Veronika, Gierach, Gretchen L., Giovannucci, Edward L., Goodman, Gary E., Goodman, Marc T., Guénel, Pascal, Hallmans, Göran, Hankinson, Susan E., Horst, Ronald L., Hou, Tao, Huang, Wen-Yi, Jones, Michael E., Joshu, Corrine E., Kaaks, Rudolf, Krogh, Vittorio, Kühn, Tilman, Kvaskoff, Marina, Lee, I-Min, Mahamat-Saleh, Yahya, Malm, Johan, Manjer, Jonas, Maskarinec, Gertraud, Millen, Amy E., Mukhtar, Toqir K., Neuhouser, Marian L., Robsahm, Trude E., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Sieri, Sabina, Sund, Malin, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Thomson, Cynthia A., Ursin, Giske, Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Wang, Ying, Wilkens, Lynne R., Wu, Yujie, Zoltick, Emilie, Willett, Walter C., Smith-Warner, Stephanie A., and Ziegler, Regina G.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

8. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author: Ahearn, Thomas U., Zhang, Haoyu, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L., Bolla, Manjeet K., Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M., Lush, Michael, Wang, Qin, Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J., Auer, Paul L., Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E., Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S., Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J., Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L., Collée, J. Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S., Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M., Evans, D. Gareth, Fasching, Peter A., Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M., García-Sáenz, José A., Gaudet, Mia M., Giles, Graham G., Goldberg, Mark S., González-Neira, Anna, Alnæs, Grethe I. Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A., Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F., Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette A. M., Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoover, Robert N., Hopper, John L., Howell, Anthony, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M., Jones, Michael E., Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kauppila, Saila, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M., Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N., Krüger, Ute, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W., Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Lambrechts, Diether, Lee, Derrick G., Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, MacInnis, Robert J., Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, McLean, Catriona, Meindl, Alfons, Menon, Usha, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G., Nodora, Jesse, Offit, Kenneth, Olsson, Håkan, Orr, Nick, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V., Peto, Julian, Pita, Guillermo, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Prentice, Ross, Punie, Kevin, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Rüdiger, Thomas, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sampson, Sarah, Sandler, Dale P., Sawyer, Elinor J., Schmutzler, Rita K., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Schöttker, Ben, Sherman, Mark E., Shu, Xiao-Ou, Smichkoska, Snezhana, Southey, Melissa C., Spinelli, John J., Swerdlow, Anthony J., Tamimi, Rulla M., Tapper, William J., Taylor, Jack A., Teras, Lauren R., Terry, Mary Beth, Torres, Diana, Troester, Melissa A., Vachon, Celine M., van Deurzen, Carolien H. M., van Veen, Elke M., Wagner, Philippe, Weinberg, Clarice R., Wendt, Camilla, Wesseling, Jelle, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Yang, Xiaohong R., Zheng, Wei, Couch, Fergus J., Simard, Jacques, Kraft, Peter, Easton, Douglas F., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Schmidt, Marjanka K., García-Closas, Montserrat, and Chatterjee, Nilanjan
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. The BRCA2 c.68‐7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity

Author: Colombo, Mara, Lòpez‐Perolio, Irene, Meeks, Huong D, Caleca, Laura, Parsons, Michael T, Li, Hongyan, Vecchi, Giovanna, Tudini, Emma, Foglia, Claudia, Mondini, Patrizia, Manoukian, Siranoush, Behar, Raquel, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Meindl, Alfons, Montagna, Marco, Niederacher, Dieter, Schmidt, Ane Y, Varesco, Liliana, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Wang, Qin, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly‐Fadel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, García‐Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González‐Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hauke, Jan, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jung, Audrey, Kosma, Veli‐Matti, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loid, Lindblom, Annika, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Miao, Hui, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pylkäs, Katri, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Schoemaker, Minouk J, See, Mee Hoong, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony, Teo, Soo H, Toland, Amanda E, Tomlinson, Ian, Truong, Thérèse, Asperen, Christi J, Ouweland, Ans MW den, der Kolk, Lizet E, Winqvist, Robert, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Zheng, Wei, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Dunning, Alison M, and Easton, Douglas F
Subjects: Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, BRCA2 Protein, Base Sequence, Calibration, Cell Line, Exons, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Mitomycin, Models, Genetic, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, BRCA2, digital PCR, multifactorial likelihood analysis, quantitative real-time PCR, spliceogenic variants, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Although the spliceogenic nature of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant has been demonstrated, its association with cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, we accurately quantified by real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR), the BRCA2 isoforms retaining or missing exon 3. In addition, the combined odds ratio for causality of the variant was estimated using genetic and clinical data, and its associated cancer risk was estimated by case-control analysis in 83,636 individuals. Co-occurrence in trans with pathogenic BRCA2 variants was assessed in 5,382 families. Exon 3 exclusion rate was 4.5-fold higher in variant carriers (13%) than controls (3%), indicating an exclusion rate for the c.68-7T > A allele of approximately 20%. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was 7.44 × 10-115 . There was neither evidence for increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.24) nor for a deleterious effect of the variant when co-occurring with pathogenic variants. Our data provide for the first time robust evidence of the nonpathogenicity of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A. Genetic and quantitative transcript analyses together inform the threshold for the ratio between functional and altered BRCA2 isoforms compatible with normal cell function. These findings might be exploited to assess the relevance for cancer risk of other BRCA2 spliceogenic variants.
Published: 2018

10. BRCA2 Hypomorphic Missense Variants Confer Moderate Risks of Breast Cancer

Author: Shimelis, Hermela, Mesman, Romy LS, Von Nicolai, Catharina, Ehlen, Asa, Guidugli, Lucia, Martin, Charlotte, Calléja, Fabienne MGR, Meeks, Huong, Hallberg, Emily, Hinton, Jamie, Lilyquist, Jenna, Hu, Chunling, Aalfs, Cora M, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Brouwers, Barbara, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Ching-Yu, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Dennis, Joe, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hogervorst, Frans B, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Kang, Daehee, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela, Lai, Kah-Nyin, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubinski, Jan, Machackova, Eva, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Matsuo, Keitaro, Miao, Hui, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Muir, Kenneth, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Olswold, Curtis, Oosterwijk, Jan JC, Osorio, Ana, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul DP, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rashid, Muhammad Usman, Rhenius, Valerie, Rudolph, Anja, Sangrajrang, Suleeporn, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Shen, Chen-Yang, and Shrubsole, Martha
Subjects: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Aged, Amino Acid Substitution, Animals, BRCA2 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genotype, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Mice, Mutation, Missense, Risk, for kConFab/AOCS Investigators, for NBCS Collaborators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case-control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789-99. ©2017 AACR.
Published: 2017

11. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry

Author: Pal Choudhury, Parichoy, Brook, Mark N., Hurson, Amber N., Lee, Andrew, Mulder, Charlotta V., Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Swerdlow, Anthony J., Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Antoniou, Antonis C., and Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

12. Inherited variants in the inner centromere protein (INCENP) gene of the chromosomal passenger complex contribute to the susceptibility of ER-negative breast cancer

Author: Kabisch, Maria, Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo, Dünnebier, Thomas, Ying, Shibo, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Shah, Mitul, Perkins, Barbara J, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Eriksson, Mikael, Bojesen, Stig E, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Nielsen, Sune F, Flyger, Henrik, Lambrechts, Diether, Neven, Patrick, Peeters, Stephanie, Weltens, Caroline, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet E, Wang, Xianshu, Purrington, Kristen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Seibold, Petra, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Peto, Julian, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Johnson, Nichola, Fletcher, Olivia, Nevanlinna, Heli, Muranen, Taru A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Broeks, Annegien, Cornelissen, Sten, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Li, Jingmei, Brand, Judith S, Humphreys, Keith, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Menegaux, Florence, Sanchez, Marie, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marmé, Frederik, Yang, Rongxi, Bugert, Peter, González-Neira, Anna, Benitez, Javier, Zamora, M Pilar, Perez, Jose I Arias, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Reed, Malcolm WR, Andrulis, Irene L, Knight, Julia A, Glendon, Gord, Tchatchou, Sandrine, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Kerin, Michael J, Miller, Nicola, Haiman, Christopher A, Schumacher, Fredrick, Henderson, Brian E, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Hooning, Maartje J, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Kriege, Mieke, Koppert, Linetta B, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Tsimiklis, Helen, Apicella, Carmel, Slettedahl, Seth, Toland, Amanda E, Vachon, Celine, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Giles, Graham G, Milne, Roger L, McLean, Catriona, Fasching, Peter A, Ruebner, Matthias, Ekici, Arif B, Beckmann, Matthias W, Brenner, Hermann, Dieffenbach, Aida K, Arndt, Volker, Stegmaier, Christa, Ashworth, Alan, Orr, Nicholas, Schoemaker, Minouk J, and Swerdlow, Anthony
Subjects: Cancer, Human Genome, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 3' Untranslated Regions, Aurora Kinase B, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk, Survivin, White People, kConFab Investigators, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, GENICA Network, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of cell division. Therefore, inherited CPC variability could influence tumor development. The present candidate gene approach investigates the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding key CPC components and breast cancer risk. Fifteen SNPs in four CPC genes (INCENP, AURKB, BIRC5 and CDCA8) were genotyped in 88 911 European women from 39 case-control studies of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Possible associations were investigated in fixed-effects meta-analyses. The synonymous SNP rs1675126 in exon 7 of INCENP was associated with overall breast cancer risk [per A allele odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.98, P = 0.007] and particularly with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumors (per A allele OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95, P = 0.0005). SNPs not directly genotyped were imputed based on 1000 Genomes. The SNPs rs1047739 in the 3' untranslated region and rs144045115 downstream of INCENP showed the strongest association signals for overall (per T allele OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, P = 0.0009) and ER-negative breast cancer risk (per A allele OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10, P = 0.0002). Two genotyped SNPs in BIRC5 were associated with familial breast cancer risk (top SNP rs2071214: per G allele OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21, P = 0.002). The data suggest that INCENP in the CPC pathway contributes to ER-negative breast cancer susceptibility in the European population. In spite of a modest contribution of CPC-inherited variants to the total burden of sporadic and familial breast cancer, their potential as novel targets for breast cancer treatment should be further investigated.
Published: 2015

13. Genetic variation at CYP3A is associated with age at menarche and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.

Author: Johnson, Nichola, Dudbridge, Frank, Orr, Nick, Gibson, Lorna, Jones, Michael E, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Folkerd, Elizabeth J, Haynes, Ben P, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Dite, Gillian S, Apicella, Carmel, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Broeks, Annegien, Van't Veer, Laura J, Atsma, Femke, Muir, Kenneth, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif B, Renner, Stefan P, Sawyer, Elinor, Tomlinson, Ian, Kerin, Michael, Miller, Nicola, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Sohn, Christof, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Therese, Cordina, Emilie, Menegaux, Florence, Bojesen, Stig E, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Flyger, Henrik, Milne, Roger, Zamora, M Pilar, Arias Perez, Jose Ignacio, Benitez, Javier, Bernstein, Leslie, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Clarke Dur, Christina, Brenner, Hermann, Müller, Heiko, Arndt, Volker, Dieffenbach, Aida Karina, Meindl, Alfons, Heil, Joerg, Bartram, Claus R, Schmutzler, Rita K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Justenhoven, Christina, Ko, Yon-Dschun, GENICA (Gene Environment Interaction and Breast Cancer in Germany) Network, Nevanlinna, Heli, Muranen, Taru A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl, Matsuo, Keitaro, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Lindblom, Annika, Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Beesley, Jonathan, kConFab Investigators, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Wu, Anna H, Van den Berg, David, Tseng, Chiu-Chen, Lambrechts, Diether, Smeets, Dominiek, Neven, Patrick, Wildiers, Hans, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Nickels, Stefan, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Radice, Paolo, Peterlongo, Paolo, Bonanni, Bernardo, Pensotti, Valeria, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet E, Wang, Xianshu, Fredericksen, Zachary, Pankratz, Vernon S, Giles, Graham G, Severi, Gianluca, Baglietto, Laura, Haiman, Chris, Simard, Jacques, and Goldberg, Mark S
Subjects: GENICA (Gene Environment Interaction and Breast Cancer in Germany) Network, kConFab Investigators, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Reproductive History, Risk Factors, Age Factors, Age of Onset, Premenopause, Menarche, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, Genetic Association Studies, Human Genome, Aging, Clinical Research, Cancer, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract: IntroductionWe have previously shown that a tag single nucleotide polymorphism (rs10235235), which maps to the CYP3A locus (7q22.1), was associated with a reduction in premenopausal urinary estrone glucuronide levels and a modest reduction in risk of breast cancer in women age ≤50 years.MethodsWe further investigated the association of rs10235235 with breast cancer risk in a large case control study of 47,346 cases and 47,570 controls from 52 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Genotyping of rs10235235 was conducted using a custom Illumina Infinium array. Stratified analyses were conducted to determine whether this association was modified by age at diagnosis, ethnicity, age at menarche or tumor characteristics.ResultsWe confirmed the association of rs10235235 with breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry but found no evidence that this association differed with age at diagnosis. Heterozygote and homozygote odds ratios (ORs) were OR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.94, 1.01; P = 0.2) and OR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.69, 0.93; P = 0.004), respectively (P(trend) = 0.02). There was no evidence of effect modification by tumor characteristics. rs10235235 was, however, associated with age at menarche in controls (P(trend) = 0.005) but not cases (P(trend) = 0.97). Consequently the association between rs10235235 and breast cancer risk differed according to age at menarche (P(het) = 0.02); the rare allele of rs10235235 was associated with a reduction in breast cancer risk for women who had their menarche age ≥15 years (OR(het) = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75, 0.94; OR(hom) = 0.81, 95% CI 0.51, 1.30; P(trend) = 0.002) but not for those who had their menarche age ≤11 years (OR(het) = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95, 1.19, OR(hom) = 1.07, 95% CI 0.67, 1.72; P(trend) = 0.29).ConclusionsTo our knowledge rs10235235 is the first single nucleotide polymorphism to be associated with both breast cancer risk and age at menarche consistent with the well-documented association between later age at menarche and a reduction in breast cancer risk. These associations are likely mediated via an effect on circulating hormone levels.
Published: 2014

14. Epigenome-wide association study for lifetime estrogen exposure identifies an epigenetic signature associated with breast cancer risk

Author: Johansson, Annelie, Palli, Domenico, Masala, Giovanna, Grioni, Sara, Agnoli, Claudia, Tumino, Rosario, Giurdanella, Maria Concetta, Fasanelli, Francesca, Sacerdote, Carlotta, Panico, Salvatore, Mattiello, Amalia, Polidoro, Silvia, Jones, Michael E., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Orr, Nick, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Johnson, Nichola, Fletcher, Olivia, Perduca, Vittorio, Baglietto, Laura, Dugué, Pierre-Antoine, Southey, Melissa C., Giles, Graham G., English, Dallas R., Milne, Roger L., Severi, Gianluca, Ambatipudi, Srikant, Cuenin, Cyrille, Chajès, Veronique, Romieu, Isabelle, Herceg, Zdenko, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Vineis, Paolo, and Flanagan, James M.
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

15. Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure

Author: Brewer, Hannah R., Jones, Michael E., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Ashworth, Alan, and Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

16. Maternal breast cancer risk in relation to birthweight and gestation of her offspring

Author: Swerdlow, Anthony J., Wright, Lauren B., Schoemaker, Minouk J., and Jones, Michael E.
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

17. Risk of breast cancer in men in relation to weight change: A national case‐control study in England and Wales.

Author: Swerdlow, Anthony J., Bruce, Cydney, Cooke, Rosie, Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J., and Jones, Michael E.
Subjects: MALE breast cancer, DISEASE risk factors, CASE-control method, BODY mass index, CANCER patients
Abstract: Breast cancer is uncommon in men and knowledge about its causation limited. Obesity is a risk factor but there has been no investigation of whether weight change is an independent risk factor, as it is in women. In a national case‐control study, 1998 men with breast cancer incident in England and Wales during 2005 to 2017 and 1597 male controls were interviewed about risk factors for breast cancer including anthropometric factors at several ages. Relative risks of breast cancer in relation to changes in body mass index (BMI) and waist/height ratios at these ages were obtained by logistic regression modelling. There were significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk with increase in BMI from age 20 to 40 (odds ratio [OR] 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05‐1.17] per 2 kg/m2 increase in BMI; P <.001), and from age 40 to 60 (OR 1.12 [1.04‐1.20]; P =.003), and with increase in self‐reported adiposity compared to peers at age 11 to BMI compared with peers at age 20 (OR 1.19 [1.09‐1.30]; P <.001). Increase in waist/height ratio from age 20 to 5 years before diagnosis was also highly significantly associated with risk (OR 1.13 [1.08‐1.19]; P <.001). The associations with increases in BMI and waist/height ratio were significant independently of each other and of BMI or waist/height ratio at the start of the period of change analysed, and effects were similar for invasive and in situ tumours separately. Increases in BMI and abdominal obesity are each risk factors for breast cancer in men, independently of obesity per se. These associations might relate to increasing oestrogen levels with weight gain, but this needs investigation. What's new? Although obesity is an established risk factor for breast cancer in men, there have been no investigations of whether weight change is an independent risk factor, as it is in women. In an interview case‐control study including 1998 cases and 1597 controls, authors found that increase in body mass index and in abdominal obesity are each significant risk factors for breast cancer in men, independent of obesity per se. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

18. Transcriptome‐wide association study of breast cancer risk by estrogen‐receptor status

Author: Feng, Helian, Gusev, Alexander, Pasaniuc, Bogdan, Wu, Lang, Long, Jirong, Abu-Full, Zomoroda, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Asseryanis, Ella, Auer, Paul L, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barnes, Daniel R, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blanco, Ana, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Broeks, Annegien, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Canisius, Sander, Campa, Daniele, Carter, Brian D, Carter, Jonathan, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC study Collaborators, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, De Leeneer, Kim, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Friedman, Eitan, Fritschi, Lin, Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike, Ganz, Patricia A, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hake, Christopher, He, Wei, Heyworth, Jane, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Huang, Guanmengqian, Hulick, Peter J, Humphreys, Keith, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, BCFR Investigators, OCGN Investigators, Isaacs, Claudine, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jankowitz, Rachel C, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Joseph, Vijai, Jung, Audrey, Karlan, Beth Y, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kiiski, Johanna I, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kristensen, Vessela N, Laitman, Yael, Lambrechts, Diether, Lazaro, Conxi, Leroux, Dominique, Leslie, Goska, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne, Lindor, Noralane, Lindström, Sara, Lo, Wing-Yee, Loud, Jennifer T, Lubiński, Jan, Makalic, Enes, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Martinez, Maria E, Matricardi, Laura, Maurer, Tabea, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, McGuffog, Lesley, Meindl, Alfons, Menon, Usha, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Kapoor, Pooja M, Miller, Austin, Montagna, Marco, Moreno, Fernando, Moserle, Lidia, Mulligan, Anna M, Muranen, Taru A, Nathanson, Katherine L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Nevelsteen, Ines, Nielsen, Finn C, Nikitina-Zake, Liene, Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Olsson, Håkan, Osorio, Ana, Papp, Janos, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Parsons, Michael T, Pedersen, Inge S, Peixoto, Ana, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul DP, Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Poppe, Bruce, Pradhan, Nisha, Prajzendanc, Karolina, Presneau, Nadege, Punie, Kevin, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rantala, Johanna, Rashid, Muhammad Usman, Rennert, Gad, Risch, Harvey A, Robson, Mark, Romero, Atocha, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P, Santos, Catarina, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmidt, Daniel F, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Rodney J, Sharma, Priyanka, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Simard, Jacques, Singer, Christian F, Skytte, Anne-Bine, Soucy, Penny, Southey, Melissa C, Spinelli, John J, Spurdle, Amanda B, Stone, Jennifer, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tapper, William J, Taylor, Jack A, Teixeira, Manuel R, Terry, Mary Beth, Teulé, Alex, Thomassen, Mads, Thöne, Kathrin, Thull, Darcy L, Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda E, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, Torres, Diana, Truong, Thérèse, Tung, Nadine, Vachon, Celine M, van Asperen, Christi J, van den Ouweland, Ans MW, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Vega, Ana, Viel, Alessandra, Vieiro-Balo, Paula, Wang, Qin, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Weinberg, Clarice R, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert, Yang, Xiaohong R, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Ziogas, Argyrios, Milne, Roger L, Easton, Douglas F, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Zheng, Wei, Kraft, Peter, Jiang, Xia, Læknadeild (HÍ), Faculty of Medicine (UI), Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ), School of Health Sciences (UI), Háskóli Íslands, University of Iceland, Antoniou, Antonis [0000-0001-9223-3116], Barnes, Daniel [0000-0002-3781-7570], Dennis, Joe [0000-0003-4591-1214], Dunning, Alison [0000-0001-6651-7166], Leslie, Goska [0000-0001-5756-6222], Pharoah, Paul [0000-0001-8494-732X], Tischkowitz, Marc [0000-0002-7880-0628], Easton, Douglas [0000-0003-2444-3247], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Medical Oncology, Clinical Genetics, Medicum, Research Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology (GSB) Research Program, HUSLAB, Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital Area, University of Helsinki, HUS Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Clinicum, INDIVIDRUG - Individualized Drug Therapy, HUS Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Biosciences, Institut Català de la Salut, [Feng H] Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. [Gusev A] Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. [Pasaniuc B] UCLA Path & Lab Med, Los Angeles, California. [Wu L] Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii. [Long J] Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. [Abu-full Z] Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel. [Balmaña J] High Risk and Cancer Prevention Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Diez O] Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain, and Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Subjects: Oncology, Epidemiology, Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Breast Neoplasms [DISEASES], Genetic Phenomena::Genotype::Genetic Predisposition to Disease [PHENOMENA AND PROCESSES], Vesicular Transport Proteins, Estrogen receptor, Genome-wide association study, VARIANTS, Transcriptome, Breast cancer, Brjóstakrabbamein, Receptors, Medicine and Health Sciences, GWAS, skin and connective tissue diseases, Estrogen Receptor Status, Genetics (clinical), Genetics & Heredity, neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias de la mama [ENFERMEDADES], 0303 health sciences, Gen, 030305 genetics & heredity, 1184 Genetics, developmental biology, physiology, Causal gene, Genomics, CARRIERS, STATISTICS, 3. Good health, Receptors, Estrogen, breast cancer subtype, causal gene, TWAS, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogens, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Risk Assessment, Genome-Wide Association Study, Medical genetics, Breast Cancer Genetics, Erfðarannsóknir, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, EXPRESSION, medicine.medical_specialty, SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI, 3122 Cancers, Estrògens, Biology, Article, Càncer de mama, 03 medical and health sciences, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Internal medicine, Krabbameinsrannsóknir, medicine, fenómenos genéticos::genotipo::predisposición genética a la enfermedad [FENÓMENOS Y PROCESOS], 030304 developmental biology, Genetic association, Science & Technology, IDENTIFICATION, medicine.disease, Estrogen, TISSUE, Breast cancer subtype, Mama - Càncer - Aspectes genètics, Mathematical & Computational Biology
Abstract: Publisher's version (útgefin grein), Previous transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) have identified breast cancer risk genes by integrating data from expression quantitative loci and genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but analyses of breast cancer subtype-specific associations have been limited. In this study, we conducted a TWAS using gene expression data from GTEx and summary statistics from the hitherto largest GWAS meta-analysis conducted for breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor subtypes (ER+ and ER−). We further compared associations with ER+ and ER− subtypes, using a case-only TWAS approach. We also conducted multigene conditional analyses in regions with multiple TWAS associations. Two genes, STXBP4 and HIST2H2BA, were specifically associated with ER+ but not with ER– breast cancer. We further identified 30 TWAS-significant genes associated with overall breast cancer risk, including four that were not identified in previous studies. Conditional analyses identified single independent breast-cancer gene in three of six regions harboring multiple TWAS-significant genes. Our study provides new information on breast cancer genetics and biology, particularly about genomic differences between ER+ and ER− breast cancer., The authors thank the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment. The breast cancer genome‐wide association (BCAC) is funded by Cancer Research UK (C1287/A16563, C1287/A10118), the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant nos. 634935 and 633784 for BRIDGES and B‐CAST, respectively), and by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement number 223175 (grant no. HEALTH‐F2‐2009‐223175) (COGS). The EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme funding source had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. Genotyping of the OncoArray was funded by the NIH grant U19 CA148065, and Cancer UK grant C1287/A16563 and the PERSPECTIVE project supported by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant GPH‐129344), and the Ministère de l’Économie, Science et Innovation du Québec through Genome Québec and the PSRSIIRI‐701 grant, and the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation. Funding for the iCOGS infrastructure came from: the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 223175 (HEALTH‐F2‐2009‐223175; COGS), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, and C8197/A16565), the National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post‐Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065, and 1U19 CA148112—the GAME‐ON initiative), the Department of Defence (W81XWH‐10‐1‐0341), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer, and Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. The DRIVE Consortium was funded by U19 CA148065. The Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS) was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the USA Government or the BCFR. The ABCFS was also supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the New South Wales Cancer Council, the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (Australia) and the Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium. J. L. H. is a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Principal Research Fellow. M. C. S. is an NHMRC Senior Research Fellow. The ABCS study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (grants NKI 2007‐3839; 2009 4363). The Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB) is generously supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, The Cancer Institute NSW and the National Breast Cancer Foundation. The ACP study is funded by the Breast Cancer Research Trust, UK. The AHS study is supported by the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute (grant no. Z01‐CP010119), and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant no. Z01‐ES049030). The work of the BBCC was partly funded by ELAN‐Fond of the University Hospital of Erlangen. The BBCS is funded by Cancer Research UK and Breast Cancer Now and acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN). The BCEES was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia and the Cancer Council Western Australia and acknowledges funding from the National Breast Cancer Foundation (JS). For the BCFR‐NY, BCFR‐PA, BCFR‐UT this work was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government or the BCFR. For BIGGS, E. S. is supported by NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London, United Kingdom. I. T. is supported by the Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. B. O. C. S. is supported by funds from Cancer Research UK (C8620/A8372/A15106) and the Institute of Cancer Research (UK). B. O. C. S. acknowledges NHS funding to the Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research NIHR Specialist Cancer Biomedical Research Centre. The BREast Oncology GAlician Network (BREOGAN) is funded by Acción Estratégica de Salud del Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS PI12/02125/Cofinanciado FEDER; Acción Estratégica de Salud del Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS Intrasalud (PI13/01136); Programa Grupos Emergentes, Cancer Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica Galicia Sur. Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo‐SERGAS, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; Grant 10CSA012E, Consellería de Industria Programa Sectorial de Investigación Aplicada, PEME I + D e I + D Suma del Plan Gallego de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica de la Consellería de Industria de la Xunta de Galicia, Spain (grant EC11‐192). Fomento de la Investigación Clínica Independiente, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Spain; and Grant FEDER‐Innterconecta. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Xunta de Galicia, Spain. The BSUCH study was supported by the Dietmar‐Hopp Foundation, the Helmholtz Society and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). The CAMA study was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT; SALUD‐2002‐C01‐7462). Sample collection and processing were funded in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI R01CA120120 and K24CA169004). C. B. C. S. is funded by the Canadian Cancer Society (grant no. 313404) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. C. C. G. P. is supported by funding from the University of Crete. The CECILE study was supported by Fondation de France, Institut National du Cancer (INCa), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR). The CGPS was supported by the Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund, the Danish Medical Research Council, and Herlev and Gentofte Hospital. The CNIO‐BCS was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer and grants from the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer and the Fondo de Investigación Sanitario (PI11/00923 and PI12/00070). COLBCCC is supported by the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Diana Torres was in part supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. The American Cancer Society funds the creation, maintenance, and updating of the CPS‐II cohort. The CTS was initially supported by the California Breast Cancer Act of 1993 and the California Breast Cancer Research Fund (contract 97‐10500) and is currently funded through the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA77398, UM1 CA164917, and U01 CA199277). The collection of cancer incidence data was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885. HAC receives support from the Lon V Smith Foundation (LVS39420). The University of Westminster curates the DietCompLyf database funded by Against Breast Cancer Registered Charity No. 1121258 and the NCRN. The coordination of EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DG‐SANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) (France); German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation, the Stavros Niarchos Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro‐AIRC‐Italy and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands); Health Research Fund (FIS), PI13/00061 to Granada, PI13/01162 to EPIC‐Murcia, Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020) (Spain); Cancer Research UK (14136 to EPIC‐Norfolk; C570/A16491 and C8221/A19170 to EPIC‐Oxford), Medical Research Council (1000143 to EPIC‐Norfolk, MR/M012190/1 to EPIC‐Oxford) (United Kingdom). The ESTHER study was supported by a grant from the Baden Württemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Arts. Additional cases were recruited in the context of the VERDI study, which was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe). FHRISK is funded from NIHR grant PGfAR 0707‐10031. The GC‐HBOC (German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer) is supported by the German Cancer Aid (grant no 110837, coordinator: Rita K. Schmutzler, Cologne). This work was also funded by the European Regional Development Fund and Free State of Saxony, Germany (LIFE—Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, project numbers 713‐241202, 713‐241202, 14505/2470, 14575/2470). The GENICA was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany grants 01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0 and 01KW0114, the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, the Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, as well as the Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany. The GEPARSIXTO study was conducted by the German Breast Group GmbH. The GESBC was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e. V. (70492) and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). GLACIER was supported by Breast Cancer Now, CRUK and Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The HABCS study was supported by the Claudia von Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research, by the Lower Saxonian Cancer Society, and by the Rudolf Bartling Foundation. The HEBCS was financially supported by the Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund, the Finnish Cancer Society, and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. The HERPACC was supported by MEXT Kakenhi (No. 170150181 and 26253041) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan, by a Grant‐in‐Aid for the Third Term Comprehensive 10‐Year Strategy for Cancer Control from Ministry Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Research on Applying Health Technology from Ministry Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, by National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, and “Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control (15ck0106177h0001)” from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED, and Cancer Bio Bank Aichi. The HMBCS was supported by a grant from the Friends of Hannover Medical School and by the Rudolf Bartling Foundation. The HUBCS was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (RUS08/017) and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations for supporting the Bioresource collections and RFBR grants 14‐04‐97088, 17‐29‐06014, and 17‐44‐020498. ICICLE was supported by Breast Cancer Now, CRUK and Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. Financial support for KARBAC was provided through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Cancer Society, The Gustav V Jubilee foundation and Bert von Kantzows foundation. The KARMA study was supported by Märit and Hans Rausings Initiative Against Breast Cancer. The KBCP was financially supported by the special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital grants, Cancer Fund of North Savo, the Finnish Cancer Organizations, and the strategic funding of the University of Eastern Finland. The kConFab Follow‐Up Study is supported by grants from Cancer Australia, the Australian National Breast Cancer Foundation, the National Health and Medical Research Council, the National Institute of Health USA, the Queensland Cancer Fund, the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia, and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. KAP is an Australian National Breast Cancer Foundation Practitioner Fellow. Financial support for the AOCS was provided by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD17‐01‐1‐0729), Cancer Council Victoria, Queensland Cancer Fund, Cancer Council New South Wales, Cancer Council South Australia, The Cancer Foundation of Western Australia, Cancer Council Tasmania and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; 400413, 400281, and 199600). G. C. T. and P. W. are supported by the NHMRC. R. B. was a Cancer Institute NSW Clinical Research Fellow. The KOHBRA study was partially supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), and the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI16C1127; 1020350; 1420190). L. A. A. B. C. is supported by grants (1RB‐0287, 3PB‐0102, 5PB‐0018, and 10PB‐0098) from the California Breast Cancer Research Program. Incident breast cancer cases were collected by the USC Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP) which is supported under subcontract by the California Department of Health. The CSP is also part of the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, under contract number N01CN25403. L. M. B. C. is supported by the “Stichting tegen Kanker.” D. L. is supported by the FWO. The MABCS study is funded by the Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology “Georgi D. Efremov” and supported by the German Academic Exchange Program, DAAD. The MARIE study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. (70‐2892‐BR I, 106332, 108253, 108419, 110826, 110828), the Hamburg Cancer Society, the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany (01KH0402). MBCSG is supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) and by funds from the Italian citizens who allocated the 5/1,000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to Italian laws (INT‐Institutional strategic projects “5 × 1,000”). The MCBCS was supported by the NIH grants CA192393, CA116167, CA176785, and NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation. The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further augmented by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council grants 209057, 396414, and 1074383 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. Cases and their vital status were ascertained through the Victorian Cancer Registry and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, including the National Death Index and the Australian Cancer Database.” The MEC was supported by NIH grants CA63464, CA54281, CA098758, CA132839, and CA164973. The MISS study is supported by funding from ERC‐2011‐294576 Advanced grant, Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council, Local hospital funds, Berta Kamprad Foundation, Gunnar Nilsson. The MMHS study was supported by NIH grants CA97396, CA128931, CA116201, CA140286, and CA177150. M. S. K. C. C. is supported by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Cancer Genetics Initiative. The work of MTLGEBCS was supported by the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the “CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer” program—grant no. CRN‐87521 and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade—grant no. PSR‐SIIRI‐701. MYBRCA is funded by research grants from the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (UM.C/HlR/MOHE/06) and Cancer Research Malaysia. MYMAMMO is supported by research grants from Yayasan Sime Darby LPGA Tournament and Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (RP046B‐15HTM). The NBCS has been supported by the Research Council of Norway grant 193387/V50 (to A.‐L. B.‐D. and V. N. K.) and grant 193387/H10 (to A.‐L. B.‐D. and V. N. K.), South‐Eastern Norway Health Authority (grant 39346 to A.‐L.B‐D. and 27208 to V. N. K.) and the Norwegian Cancer Society (to A.‐L. B.‐D. and 419616‐71248‐PR‐2006‐0282 to V. N. K.). It has received funding from the K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research (2012‐2015). The NBHS was supported by NIH grant R01CA100374. Biological sample preparation was conducted the Survey and Biospecimen Shared Resource, which is supported by P30 CA68485. The Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry (NC‐BCFR) and Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry (OFBCR) were supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the USA Government or the BCFR. The Carolina Breast Cancer Study was funded by Komen Foundation, the National Cancer Institute (P50 CA058223, U54 CA156733, and U01 CA179715), and the North Carolina University Cancer Research Fund. The NGOBCS was supported by Grants‐in‐Aid for the Third Term Comprehensive Ten‐Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, and for Scientific Research on Priority Areas, 17015049 and for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, 221S0001, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. The NHS was supported by NIH grants P01 CA87969, UM1 CA186107, and U19 CA148065. The NHS2 was supported by NIH grants UM1 CA176726 and U19 CA148065. The OBCS was supported by research grants from the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Academy of Finland (grant no. 250083, 122715 and Center of Excellence grant no. 251314), the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the University of Oulu, the University of Oulu Support Foundation and the special Governmental EVO funds for Oulu University Hospital‐based research activities. The ORIGO study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (RUL 1997‐1505) and the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI‐NL CP16). The PBCS was funded by Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. Genotyping for PLCO was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. The PLCO is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and supported by contracts from the Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. The POSH study is funded by Cancer Research UK (grants C1275/A11699, C1275/C22524, C1275/A19187, C1275/A15956, and Breast Cancer Campaign 2010PR62, 2013PR044. PROCAS is funded from NIHR grant PGfAR 0707‐10031. The RBCS was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (DDHK 2004‐3124, DDHK 2009‐4318). The SASBAC study was supported by funding from the Agency for Science, Technology, and Research of Singapore (A*STAR), the US National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The SBCGS was supported primarily by NIH grants R01CA64277, R01CA148667, UMCA182910, and R37CA70867. Biological sample preparation was conducted the Survey and Biospecimen Shared Resource, which is supported by P30 CA68485. The scientific development and funding of this project were, in part, supported by the Genetic Associations and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME‐ON) Network U19 CA148065. The SBCS was supported by Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and Breast Cancer Now Tissue Bank. The SCCS is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA092447). Data on SCCS cancer cases used in this publication were provided by the Alabama Statewide Cancer Registry; Kentucky Cancer Registry, Lexington, KY; Tennessee Department of Health, Office of Cancer Surveillance; Florida Cancer Data System; North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, North Carolina Division of Public Health; Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry; Louisiana Tumor Registry; Mississippi Cancer Registry; South Carolina Central Cancer Registry; Virginia Department of Health, Virginia Cancer Registry; Arkansas Department of Health, Cancer Registry, 4815 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205. The Arkansas Central Cancer Registry is fully funded by a grant from the National Program of Cancer Registries, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data on SCCS cancer cases from Mississippi were collected by the Mississippi Cancer Registry which participates in the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC or the Mississippi Cancer Registry. SEARCH is funded by Cancer Research UK (C490/A10124 and C490/A16561) and supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. The University of Cambridge has received salary support for PDPP from the NHS in the East of England through the Clinical Academic Reserve. SEBCS was supported by the BRL (Basic Research Laboratory) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012‐0000347). SGBCC is funded by the NUS start‐up Grant, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS) Centre Grant and the NMRC Clinician Scientist Award. Additional controls were recruited by the Singapore Consortium of Cohort Studies‐Multi‐ethnic cohort (SCCS‐MEC), which was funded by the Biomedical Research Council, grant no. 05/1/21/19/425. The Sister Study (SISTER) is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01‐ES044005 and Z01‐ES049033). The Two Sister Study (2SISTER) was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01‐ES044005 and Z01‐ES102245), and, also by a grant from Susan G. Komen for the Cure, grant FAS0703856. SKKDKFZS is supported by the DKFZ. The SMC is funded by the Swedish Cancer Foundation. The SZBCS and IHCC were supported by Grant PBZ_KBN_122/P05/2004 and the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education under the name “Regional Initiative of Excellence” in 2019–2022 project number 002/RID/2018/19 amount of financing 12,000,000 PLN. The TBCS was funded by The National Cancer Institute of Thailand. The TNBCC was supported by a Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation. The TWBCS is supported by the Taiwan Biobank project of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. The UCIBCS component of this research was supported by the NIH (CA58860 and CA92044) and the Lon V Smith Foundation (LVS39420). The UKBGS is funded by Breast Cancer Now and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), London and also thank the study participants, study staff, and the doctors, nurses and other health care providers and health information sources who have contributed to the study. ICR acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The UKOPS study was funded by The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The US3SS study was supported by Massachusetts (K. M. E., R01CA47305), Wisconsin (P. A. N., R01 CA47147), and New Hampshire (L. T.‐E., R01CA69664) centers, and Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. The USRT Study was funded by Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. The WAABCS study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA89085 and P50 CA125183 and the D43 TW009112 grant), Susan G. Komen (SAC110026), Dr. Ralph and Marian Falk Medical Research Trust, and the Avon Foundation for Women. The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the US National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN268201100003C, HHSN268201100004C, and HHSN271201100004C). This work was also funded by NCI U19 CA148065‐01. D. G. E. is supported by the all Manchester NIHR Biomedical research center Manchester (IS‐BRC‐1215‐20007). HUNBOCS, Hungarian Breast, and Ovarian Cancer Study were supported by Hungarian Research Grant KTIA‐OTKA CK‐80745, NKFI_OTKA K‐112228. C. I. received support from the Survey, Recruitment, and Biospecimen Shared Resource at Georgetown University (NIH/NCI P30‐CA‐51008) and the Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research. K. M. is supported by CRUK C18281/A19169. City of Hope Clinical Cancer Community Research Network and the Hereditary Cancer Research Registry, supported in part by Award Number RC4CA153828 (PI: J Weitzel) from the National Cancer Institute and the office of the Director, National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The ICO study is supported by the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), The Instituto de Salud Carlos III (organismo adscrito al Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) and “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), una manera de hacer Europa” (PI10/01422, PI13/00285, PIE13/00022, PI15/00854, PI16/00563, and CIBERONC) and The Institut Català de la Salut and Autonomous Government of Catalonia (2009SGR290, 2014SGR338 and PERIS Project MedPerCan). Dr. Beth Karlan is funded by the American Cancer Society Early Detection Professorship (SIOP‐06‐258‐01‐COUN) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), grant UL1TR000124. A.V. is supported by the Spanish Health Research Foundation, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), partially supported by FEDER funds through Research Activity Intensification Program (contract grant nos. INT15/00070, INT16/00154, INT17/00133), and through Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enferemdades Raras CIBERER (ACCI 2016: ER17P1AC7112/2018); Autonomous Government of Galicia (Consolidation and structuring program: IN607B), and by the Fundación Mutua Madrileña (call 2018). The GEMO resource was initially funded by the French National Institute of Cancer (INCa, PHRC Ile de France, grant AOR 01 082, 2001–2003, grant 2013‐1‐BCB‐01‐ICH‐1), the Association “Le cancer du sein, parlons‐en!” Award (2004) the Association for International Cancer Research (2008–2010), and the Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer (grant PJA 20151203365). It also received support from the Canadian Institute of Health Research for the “CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer” program (2008–2013), and the European commission FP7, Project «Collaborative Ovarian, breast and prostate Gene‐environment Study (COGS), Large‐scale integrating project» (2009–2013). G. E. M. O. is currently supported by the INCa grant SHS‐E‐SP 18‐015. OSUCCC was funded by the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. Leigha Senter, Kevin Sweet, Caroline Craven, Julia Cooper, Amber Aielts, and Michelle O'Conor aided in the recruitment of BRCA1/2 study participants and data collection. Robert Pilarski aided in recruitment and data collection of TNBC cases from the Stefanie Spielman Breast Bank. Clinical Genetics Branch, NCI: the Intramural Research Program of the US National Cancer Institute, NIH, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, and by support services contracts NO2‐CP‐11019‐50, N02‐CP‐21013‐63 and N02‐CP‐65504 with Westat, Inc, Rockville, MD. ILUH was funded by the Icelandic Association “Walking for Breast Cancer Research” and by the Landspitali University Hospital Research Fund. The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON) consists of the following Collaborating Centers: Netherlands Cancer Institute (coordinating center), Amsterdam, NL: M.A. Rookus, F.B.L. Hogervorst, F.E. van Leeuwen, M.A. Adank, M.K. Schmidt, D.J. Jenner; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, NL: J.M. Collée, A.M.W. van den Ouweland, M.J. Hooning, I.A. Boere; Leiden University Medical Center, NL: C.J. van Asperen, P. Devilee, R.B. van der Luijt, T.C.T.E.F. van Cronenburg; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, NL: M.R. Wevers, A.R. Mensenkamp; University Medical Center Utrecht, NL: M.G.E.M. Ausems, M.J. Koudijs; Amsterdam Medical Center, NL: E.J. Meijers‐Heijboer, T.A.M. van Os; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, NL: K. van Engelen, J.J.P. Gille; Maastricht University Medical Center, NL: E.B. Gómez‐Garcia, M.J. Blok, M. de Boer; University of Groningen, NL: J.C. Oosterwijk, A.H. van der Hout, M.J.E. Mourits, G.H. de Bock; The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL): S. Siesling, J. Verloop; The nationwide network and registry of histo‐ and cyto‐pathology in the Netherlands (PALGA): E.C. van den Broek. HEBON thanks the study participants and the registration teams of IKNL and PALGA for part of the data collection. The HEBON study is supported by the Dutch Cancer Society grants NKI1998‐1854, NKI2004‐3088, NKI2007‐3756, the Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research grant NWO 91109024, the Pink Ribbon grants 110005 and 2014‐187.WO76, the BBMRI grant NWO 184.021.007/CP46, and the Transcan grant JTC 2012 Cancer 12‐054. N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants 17‐00‐00171, 18‐515‐45012 and 19‐515‐25001).
Published: 2020

19. Breast cancer risk in relation to history of preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum: Prospective analysis in the Generations Study

Author: Wright, Lauren B., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Ashworth, Alan, and Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Subjects: Adult, Receptor, ErbB-2, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, United Kingdom, preeclampsia, Postmenopause, breast cancer, Pre-Eclampsia, Premenopause, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Hyperemesis Gravidarum, cohort study, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Prospective Studies, Breast Carcinoma In Situ, skin and connective tissue diseases, Cancer Epidemiology, Follow-Up Studies, Proportional Hazards Models
Abstract: Preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum are pregnancy complications associated with altered sex hormone levels. Previous studies suggest preeclampsia may be associated with a decreased risk of subsequent breast cancer and hyperemesis with an increased risk, but the evidence remains unclear. We used data from the Generations Study, a large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom, to estimate relative risks of breast cancer in relation to a history of preeclampsia and hyperemesis using Cox regression adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors. During 7.5 years average follow‐up of 82,053 parous women, 1,969 were diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer. Women who had experienced preeclampsia during pregnancy had a significantly decreased risk of premenopausal breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR) =0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.90) and of HER2‐enriched tumours (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12–0.91), but there was no association with overall (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.80–1.02) or postmenopausal (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85–1.12) breast cancer risk. Risk reductions among premenopausal women were strongest within 20 years since the last pregnancy with preeclampsia. Hyperemesis was associated with a significantly increased risk of HER2‐enriched tumours (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.07–2.87), but not with other intrinsic subtypes or breast cancer risk overall. These results provide evidence that preeclampsia is associated with a decreased risk of premenopausal and HER2‐enriched breast cancer and that hyperemesis, although not associated with breast cancer risk overall, may be associated with raised risk of HER2‐enriched tumours., What's new? Although the link of preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum with altered sex hormone levels is well established, relatively little is known about the association of these pregnancy complications with breast cancer risk. Here, the authors found that a history of preeclampsia decreased the risk of premenopausal breast cancer and tumors enriched for the receptor tyrosine‐protein kinase HER2. In contrast, hyperemesis gravidarum increased the risk to develop HER2‐enriched tumors, pointing to nuanced differences of sex hormone alterations during pregnancy with respect to breast cancer subtypes and menopausal status.
Published: 2018

20. Timing of pubertal stages and breast cancer risk: the Breakthrough Generations Study

Author: Bodicoat, Danielle H, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Jones, Michael E, McFadden, Emily, Griffin, James, Ashworth, Alan, and Swerdlow, Anthony J
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

21. Gestational diabetes and risk of breast cancer before age 55 years.

Author: Bertrand, Kimberly A, O'Brien, Katie M, Wright, Lauren B, Palmer, Julie R, Blot, William J, Eliassen, A Heather, Rosenberg, Lynn, Sandin, Sven, Tobias, Deirdre, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Zheng, Wei, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Nichols, Hazel B, and Sandler, Dale P
Subjects: YOUNG women, BREAST cancer, DISEASE risk factors, GESTATIONAL diabetes, PROTEINS, PARITY (Obstetrics), RESEARCH funding, BREAST tumors, LONGITUDINAL method
Abstract: Background: The history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been associated with breast cancer risk in some studies, particularly in young women, but results of cohort studies are conflicting.Methods: We pooled data from 257 290 young (age <55 years) women from five cohorts. We used multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between GDM history and risk of breast cancer, overall and by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, before age 55 years, adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors.Results: Five percent of women reported a history of GDM and 6842 women reported an incident breast-cancer diagnosis (median follow-up = 16 years; maximum = 24 years). Compared with parous women without GDM, women with a history of GDM were not at increased risk of young-onset breast cancer overall (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.03) or by ER status (HR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.16 for ER-positive; HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.47 for ER-negative). Compared with nulliparous women, parous women with a history of GDM had a lower risk of breast cancer overall (HR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.91) and of ER-positive (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.02) but not ER-negative (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.54) invasive breast cancer. These results were consistent with the HRs comparing parous women without GDM to nulliparous women.Conclusions: Results of this analysis do not support the hypothesis that GDM is a risk factor for breast cancer in young women. Our findings suggest that the well-established protective effect of parity on risk of ER-positive breast cancer persists even for pregnancies complicated by GDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

22. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Circulating Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentration in Healthy Premenopausal Women.

Author: Clendenen, Tess V., Ge, Wenzhen, Koenig, Karen L., Afanasyeva, Yelena, Agnoli, Claudia, Bertone-Johnson, Elizabeth, Brinton, Louise A., Darvishian, Farbod, Dorgan, Joanne F., Eliassen, A. Heather, Falk, Roni T., Hallmans, Göran, Hankinson, Susan E., Hoffman-Bolton, Judith, Key, Timothy J., Krogh, Vittorio, Nichols, Hazel B., Sandler, Dale P., Schoemaker, Minouk J., and Sluss, Patrick M.
Subjects: BREAST cancer, ORAL contraceptives, BIOPSY, PERIMENOPAUSE, RESEARCH, BREAST diseases, CROSS-sectional method, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL cooperation, EVALUATION research, OVARIAN reserve, COMPARATIVE studies, SEX hormones, CANCER treatment, RESEARCH funding, BODY mass index, BREAST tumors, LONGITUDINAL method
Abstract: Context: We previously reported that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a marker of ovarian reserve, is positively associated with breast cancer risk, consistent with other studies.Objective: This study assessed whether risk factors for breast cancer are correlates of AMH concentration.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 3831 healthy premenopausal women (aged 21-57, 87% aged 35-49) from 10 cohort studies among the general population.Results: Adjusting for age and cohort, AMH positively associated with age at menarche (P < 0.0001) and parity (P = 0.0008) and inversely associated with hysterectomy/partial oophorectomy (P = 0.0008). Compared with women of normal weight, AMH was lower (relative geometric mean difference 27%, P < 0.0001) among women who were obese. Current oral contraceptive (OC) use and current/former smoking were associated with lower AMH concentration than never use (40% and 12% lower, respectively, P < 0.0001). We observed higher AMH concentrations among women who had had a benign breast biopsy (15% higher, P = 0.03), a surrogate for benign breast disease, an association that has not been reported. In analyses stratified by age (<40 vs ≥40), associations of AMH with body mass index and OCs were similar in younger and older women, while associations with the other factors (menarche, parity, hysterectomy/partial oophorectomy, smoking, and benign breast biopsy) were limited to women ≥40 (P-interaction < 0.05).Conclusion: This is the largest study of AMH and breast cancer risk factors among women from the general population (not presenting with infertility), and it suggests that most associations are limited to women over 40, who are approaching menopause and whose AMH concentration is declining. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

23. Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer

Author: Milne, Roger L., Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B., Michailidou, Kyriaki, Beesley, Jonathan, Kar, Siddhartha, Lindstrom, Sara, Hui, Shirley, Lemaçon, Audrey, Soucy, Penny, Dennis, Joe, Jiang, Xia, Rostamianfar, Asha, Finucane, Hilary, Bolla, Manjeet K., McGuffog, Lesley, Wang, Qin, Aalfs, Cora M., Abctctb, Investigators, Adams, Marcia, Adlard, Julian, Agata, Simona, Ahmed, Shahana, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittom, Kristiina Äki, Fares, Al Ejeh, Allen, Jamie, Ambrosone, Christine B., Amos, Christopher I., Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N., Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Aronson, Kristan J., Auber, Bernd, Auer, Paul L., Ausems, Margreet G.M., Azzollini, Jacopo, François, Bacot, Balma, Judith Nã, Barile, Monica, Barjhoux, Laure, Barkardottir, Rosa B., Barrdahl, Myrto, Barnes, Daniel, Barrowdale, Daniel, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W., Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Bignon, Yves Jean, Blazer, Kathleen R., Blok, Marinus J., Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bobolis, Kristie, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E., Bonanni, Bernardo, Anne-Lise, Børresen Dale, Bozsik, Aniko, Bradbury, Angela R., Brand, Judith S., Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brigitte, Bressac De Paillerets, Brewer, Carole, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Angela, Brooks Wilson, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S., Byun, Jinyoung, Cai, Qiuyin, Cald, Trinidad És, Caligo, Maria A., Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Caron, Olivier, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D., Esteban, Castelao, Castera, Laurent, Virginie, Caux Moncoutier, Chan, Salina B., Jenny, Chang Claude, Chanock, Stephen J., Chen, Xiaoqing, Cheng, Ting Yuan David, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Christiansen, Hans, Claes, Kathleen B., Clarke, Christine L., Conner, Thomas, Conroy, Don M., Cook, Jackie, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Coupier, Isabelle, Cox, Angela, Cox, David G., Cross, Simon S., Cuk, Katarina, Cunningham, J. M., Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., Damiola, Francesca, Darabi, Hatef, Davidson, Rosemarie, Leeneer, Kim De L., Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Ditsch, Nina, Doheny, Kimberly F., Domchek, Susan M., Dorfling, Cecilia M., Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dubois, Stéphane, Dugué, Pierre Antoine, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M., Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Dworniczak, Bernd, Eccles, Diana, Eeles, Ros, Ehrencrona, Hans, Eilber, Ursula, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B., Eliassen, A. Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fachal, Laura, Faivre, Laurence, Fasching, Peter A., Faust, Ulrike, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Foulkes, William D., Friedman, Eitan, Fritschi, Lin, Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike, Gaddam, Pragna, Gammon, Marilie D., Ganz, Patricia A., Gapstur, Susan M., Garber, Judy, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, Garciá-Saénz, José A., Gaudet, Mia M., Gauthier-Villars, Marion, Gehrig, Andrea, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Gerdes, Anne Marie, Giles, Graham G., Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K., Goldberg, Mark S., Goldgar, David E., González-Neira, Anna, Goodfellow, Paul, Greene, Mark H., Grenaker, Grethe Alnæs I., Grip, Mervi, Gronwald, Jacek, Grundy, Anne, Gschwantler, Daphne Kaulich, Guénel, Pascal, Guo, Qi, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A., Håkansson, Niclas, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Hamel, Nathalie, Hankinson, Susan, Hansen, Thomas V., Harrington, Patricia, Hart, Steven N., Hartikainen, Jaana M., Healey, Catherine S., Hein, Alexander, Helbig, Sonja, Henderson, Alex, Heyworth, Jane, Hicks, Belynda, Hillemanns, Peter, Hodgson, Shirley, Hogervorst, Frans B., Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoover, Bob, Hopper, John L., Hu, Chunling, Huang, Guanmengqian, Hulick, Peter J., Humphreys, Keith, Hunter, David J., Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Isaacs, Claudine, Iwasaki, Motoki, Izatt, Louise, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul, Janavicius, Ramunas, Janni, Wolfgang, Jensen, Uffe Birk, John, Esther M., Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Kristine, Jones, Michael, Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kabisch, Maria, Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Kang, Daehee, Kast, Karin, Keeman, Renske, Kerin, Michael J., Kets, Carolien M., Keupers, Mac Hteld, Khan, Sofia, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kiiski, Johanna I., Kim, Sung Won, Knight, Julia A., Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kosma, Veli Matti, Kristensen, Vessela N., Kruse, Torben A., Kwong, Ava, Lænkholm, Anne Vibeke, Laitman, Yael, Lalloo, Fiona, Lambrechts, Diether, Landsman, Keren, Lasset, Christine, Lazaro, Conxi, Marchand, Loic Le, Lindström, Sara, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Margreet, G. M.Ausems, Bacot, François, Børresen-Dale, Anne Lise, Bressac-De, Brigitte Paillerets, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Castelao, J. Esteban, Caux-Moncoutier, Virginie, Chang-Claude, Jenny, McLaes, Kathleen B., Leeneer, Kim De, Dieter, Flesch Janys, Gschwantler-Kaulich, Daphne, Keupers, MacHteld, Lecarpentier, Julie, Lee, Andrew, Lee, Eunjung, Won, Jong Lee, Lee, Min Hyuk, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Lesueur, Fabienne, Li, Jingmei, Lilyquist, Jenna, Lincoln, Anne, Lindblom, Annika, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lo, Wing Yee, Loibl, Sibylle, Long, Jirong, Loud, Jennifer T., Lubinski, Jan, Luccarini, Craig, Lush, Michael, MacInnis, Robert J., Maishman, Tom, Makalic, Enes, Kostovska, Ivana Maleva, Malone, Kathleen E., Siranoush, Manoukian, Manson, Joann E., Margolin, Sara, Martens, John W., Martinez, Maria Elena, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Mazoyer, Sylvie, McLean, Catriona, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, Menéndez, Primitiva, Meyer, Jeffery, Miao, Hui, Miller, Austin, Miller, Nicola, Mitchell, Gillian, Montagna, Marco, Muir, Kenneth, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Mulot, Claire, Nadesan, Sue, Nathanson, Katherine L., Neuhausen, Susan L., Nevanlinna, Heli, Nevelsteen, Ines, Niederacher, Dieter, Nielsen, Sune F., Nordestgaard, Børge G., Norman, Aaron, Nussbaum, Robert L., Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Olson, Janet E., Olswold, Curtis, Ong, Kai Ren, Oosterwijk, Jan C., Orr, Nick, Osorio, Ana, Pankratz, V. Shane, Papi, Laura, Park-Simon, Tjoung Won, Paulsson-Karlsson, Ylva, Lloyd, Rachel, Pedersen, Inge Søkilde, Peissel, Bernard, Peixoto, Ana, Perez, Jose I., Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pfeiler, Georg, Phelan, Catherine M., Pinchev, Mila, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Poppe, Bruce, Porteous, Mary E., Prentice, Ross, Presneau, Nadege, Prokofieva, Darya, Pugh, Elizabeth, Pujana, Miquel Angel, Pylkäs, Katri, Rack, Brigitte, Radice, Paolo, Rahman, Nazneen, Rantala, Johanna, Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Christine, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S., Rhenius, Valerie, Rhiem, Kerstin, Richardson, Andrea, Rodriguez, Gustavo C., Romero, Atocha, Romm, Jane, Rookus, Matti A., Rudolph, Anja, Ruediger, Thomas, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sanders, Joyce, Sandler, Dale P., Sangrajrang, Suleeporn, Sawyer, Elinor J., Schmidt, Daniel F., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Schumacher, Fredrick, Schürmann, Peter, Schwentner, Lukas, Scott, Christopher, Scott, Rodney J., Seal, Sheila, Senter, Leigha, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Priyanka, Shen, Chen Yang, Sheng, Xin, Shimelis, Hermela, Shrubsole, Martha J., Shu, Xiao Ou, Side, Lucy E., Singer, Christian F., Sohn, Christof, Southey, Melissa C., Spinelli, John J., Spurdle, Amanda B., Stegmaier, Christa, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Surowy, Harald, Sutter, Christian, Swerdlow, Anthony, Szabo, Csilla I., Tamimi, Rulla M., Tan, Yen Y., Taylor, Jack A., Tejada, Maria Isabel, Tengström, Maria, Teo, Soo H., Terry, Mary B., Tessier, Daniel C., Teul, Alex E., Thöne, Kathrin, Thull, Darcy L., Tibiletti, Maria Grazia, Tihomirova, Laima, Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda E., Tollenaar, Rob A.M., Tomlinson, Ian, Tong, Ling, Torres, Diana, Tranchant, Martine, Truong, Thérèse, Tucker, Kathy, Tung, Nadine, Tyrer, Jonathan, Ulmer, Hans Ulrich, Vachon, Celine, Christi, Van Asperen J., Den Berg, David Van, Ouweland, Ans M.Vanden, Rensburg, Elizabeth J., Varesco, Liliana, Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Vega, Ana, Viel, Alessandra, Vijai, Joseph, Vincent, Daniel, Vollenweider, Jason, Walker, Lisa, Wang, Zhaoming, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Weinberg, Clarice R., Weitzel, Jeffrey N., Wendt, Camilla, Wesseling, Jelle, Whittemore, Alice S., Wijnen, Juul T., Willett, Walter, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Wu, Anna H., Xia, Lucy, Yang, Xiaohong R., Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Zaffaroni, Daniela, Zheng, Wei, Zhu, Bin, Ziogas, Argyrios, Ziv, Elad, Zorn, Kristin K., Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Mannermaa, Arto, Olsson, Håkan, Teixeira, Manuel R., Stone, Jennifer, Offit, Kenneth, Ottini, Laura, Park, Sue K., Thomassen, Mads, Hall, Per, Meindl, Alfons, Schmutzler, Rita K., Droit, Arnaud, Bader, Gary D., Pharoah, Paul D., Couch, Fergus J., Easton, Douglas F., Kraft, Peter, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Garciá-Closas, Montserrat, Schmidt, Marjanka K., Antoniou, Antonis C., Simard, Jacques, Damage and Repair in Cancer Development and Cancer Treatment (DARE), Targeted Gynaecologic Oncology (TARGON), Human Genetics, CCA - Cancer biology and immunology, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Complex Trait Genetics, Human genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), Clinical Genetics, Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology, MUMC+: DA KG Lab Centraal Lab (9), and RS: GROW - R4 - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Estrogen receptor, Genome-wide association study, consortium, Gene mutation, DISEASE, Breast cancer, Risk Factors, Receptors, common variants, BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS, Medicine and Health Sciences, CONFER SUSCEPTIBILITY, skin and connective tissue diseases, ovarian cancers, BRCA1 Protein, COMMON VARIANTS, Single Nucleotide, OVARIAN CANCERS, 3. Good health, Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17], Receptors, Estrogen, functional variants, Female, estrogen receptor, SNPs, EXPRESSION, medicine.medical_specialty, Heterozygote, SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI, European Continental Ancestry Group, Breast cancer, estrogen receptor, SNPs, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Breast Neoplasms, Biology, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Article, Càncer de mama, 03 medical and health sciences, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Internal medicine, expression, medicine, Genetic predisposition, Genetics, Journal Article, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, ddc:610, Risk factor, Polymorphism, GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION, FUNCTIONAL VARIANTS, disease, CONSORTIUM, Case-control study, Biology and Life Sciences, medicine.disease, confer susceptibility, Estrogen, susceptibility loci, 030104 developmental biology, Mutation, genome-wide association, brca2 mutation carriers, Genome-Wide Association Study
Abstract: Most common breast cancer susceptibility variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease1. We conducted a GWAS using 21,468 ER-negative cases and 100,594 controls combined with 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer), all of European origin. We identified independent associations at P < 5 × 10−8 with ten variants at nine new loci. At P < 0.05, we replicated associations with 10 of 11 variants previously reported in ER-negative disease or BRCA1mutation carrier GWAS and observed consistent associations with ER-negative disease for 105 susceptibility variants identified by other studies. These 125 variants explain approximately 16% of the familial risk of this breast cancer subtype. There was high genetic correlation (0.72) between risk of ER-negative breast cancer and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. These findings may lead to improved risk prediction and inform further fine-mapping and functional work to better understand the biological basis of ER-negative breast cancer.
Published: 2017

24. Adult weight change and premenopausal breast cancer risk: A prospective pooled analysis of data from 628,463 women.

Author: Schoemaker, Minouk J., Nichols, Hazel B., Wright, Lauren B., Brook, Mark N., Jones, Michael E., O'Brien, Katie M., Adami, Hans‐Olov, Baglietto, Laura, Bernstein, Leslie, Bertrand, Kimberly A., Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine, Chen, Yu, Connor, Avonne E., Dossus, Laure, Eliassen, A. Heather, Giles, Graham G., Gram, Inger T., Hankinson, Susan E., Kaaks, Rudolf, and Key, Timothy J.
Subjects: BREAST cancer, DATA analysis, BODY size, WEIGHT gain, BODY weight
Abstract: Early‐adulthood body size is strongly inversely associated with risk of premenopausal breast cancer. It is unclear whether subsequent changes in weight affect risk. We pooled individual‐level data from 17 prospective studies to investigate the association of weight change with premenopausal breast cancer risk, considering strata of initial weight, timing of weight change, other breast cancer risk factors and breast cancer subtype. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using Cox regression. Among 628,463 women, 10,886 were diagnosed with breast cancer before menopause. Models adjusted for initial weight at ages 18–24 years and other breast cancer risk factors showed that weight gain from ages 18–24 to 35–44 or to 45–54 years was inversely associated with breast cancer overall (e.g., HR per 5 kg to ages 45–54: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95–0.98) and with oestrogen‐receptor(ER)‐positive breast cancer (HR per 5 kg to ages 45–54: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94–0.98). Weight gain from ages 25–34 was inversely associated with ER‐positive breast cancer only and weight gain from ages 35–44 was not associated with risk. None of these weight gains were associated with ER‐negative breast cancer. Weight loss was not consistently associated with overall or ER‐specific risk after adjusting for initial weight. Weight increase from early‐adulthood to ages 45–54 years is associated with a reduced premenopausal breast cancer risk independently of early‐adulthood weight. Biological explanations are needed to account for these two separate factors. What's new? Body weight in childhood and early adulthood plays a key role in determining premenopausal breast cancer risk but little is conclusively known about how subsequent weight changes affect this risk. Here the authors pooled results from existing studies on weight changes and breast cancer risk including more than 600,000 premenopausal women. The results show that weight gain >10–15 kg from early adulthood on lowers the risk of developing premenopausal breast cancer, providing further evidence of body weight as an important determinant of breast cancer risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

25. Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification.

Author: Choudhury, Parichoy Pal, Wilcox, Amber N, Brook, Mark N, Zhang, Yan, Ahearn, Thomas, Orr, Nick, Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Jones, Michael E, Gail, Mitchell H, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, and Pal Choudhury, Parichoy
Subjects: BREAST cancer, PREDICTION models, POPULATION forecasting, PROSTATE cancer, CANCER prevention, RELATIVE medical risk, RESEARCH, RESEARCH evaluation, RESEARCH methodology, EVALUATION research, MEDICAL cooperation, COMPARATIVE studies, RESEARCH funding, STATISTICAL models, BREAST tumors
Abstract: Background: External validation of risk models is critical for risk-stratified breast cancer prevention. We used the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) as a flexible tool for risk model development and comparative model validation and to make projections for population risk stratification.Methods: Performance of two recently developed models, one based on the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium analysis (iCARE-BPC3) and another based on a literature review (iCARE-Lit), were compared with two established models (Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study Model) based on classical risk factors in a UK-based cohort of 64 874 white non-Hispanic women (863 patients) age 35-74 years. Risk projections in a target population of US white non-Hispanic women age 50-70 years assessed potential improvements in risk stratification by adding mammographic breast density (MD) and polygenic risk score (PRS).Results: The best calibrated models were iCARE-Lit (expected to observed number of cases [E/O] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 1.11) for women younger than 50 years, and iCARE-BPC3 (E/O = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.09) for women 50 years or older. Risk projections using iCARE-BPC3 indicated classical risk factors can identify approximately 500 000 women at moderate to high risk (>3% 5-year risk) in the target population. Addition of MD and a 313-variant PRS is expected to increase this number to approximately 3.5 million women, and among them, approximately 153 000 are expected to develop invasive breast cancer within 5 years.Conclusions: iCARE models based on classical risk factors perform similarly to or better than BCRAT or IBIS in white non-Hispanic women. Addition of MD and PRS can lead to substantial improvements in risk stratification. However, these integrated models require independent prospective validation before broad clinical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

26. Mortality and cancer incidence in carriers of constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) translocations: A prospective study.

Author: Schoemaker, Minouk J, Jones, Michael E, Higgins, Craig D, Wright, Alan F, and Swerdlow, Anthony J
Subjects: CANCER-related mortality, LONGITUDINAL method, POPULATION, BREAST cancer, CHROMOSOME banding
Abstract: The constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) translocation is the only recurrent non‐Robertsonian translocation known in humans. Carriers are phenotypically normal and are usually referred for cytogenetic testing because of multiple miscarriages, infertility, or having aneuploidy in offspring. A breast cancer predisposition has been suggested, but previous studies have been small and had methodological shortcomings. We therefore conducted a long‐term prospective study of cancer and mortality risk in carriers. We followed 65 male and 101 female carriers of t(11;22)(q23;q11) diagnosed in cytogenetic laboratories in Britain during 1976–2005 for cancer and deaths for an average of 21.4 years per subject. Standardised mortality (SMR) and incidence (SIR) ratios were calculated comparing the numbers of observed events with those expected from national age‐, sex‐, country‐ and calendar‐period‐specific population rates. Cancer incidence was borderline significantly raised for cancer overall (SIR = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.98–2.36, n = 22), and significantly raised for invasive breast cancer (SIR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.18–5.40, n = 8) and in situ breast cancer (SIR = 13.0, 95% CI: 3.55–33.4, n = 4). Breast cancer risks were particularly increased at ages <50 (SIR = 4.37, 95% CI: 1.42–10.2 for invasive, SIR = 22.8, 95% CI: 2.76–82.5 for in situ). Mortality was borderline significantly raised for breast cancer (SMR = 4.82, 95% CI: 0.99–14.1) but not significantly raised for other cancers or causes. Individuals diagnosed with t(11;22)(q23;q11) appear to be at several‐fold increased breast cancer risk, with the greatest risks at premenopausal ages. Further research is required to understand the genetic mechanism involving 11q23 and 22q11 and there may be a need for enhanced breast cancer surveillance among female carriers. What's new? The constitutional translocation between chromosome bands 11q23 and 22q11 is recurrent in human populations, with highly consistent breakpoints. A breast cancer predisposition among carriers has been suggested, but previous studies have been small and had methodological shortcomings. In this first long‐term follow‐up study of site‐specific cancer and mortality risks among carriers, an increased risk of breast cancer was observed compared to the general population, with greatest risks in younger women. The results suggest that carriers of t(11;22)(q23;q11) may require enhanced surveillance for breast cancer and point to the importance of the chromosomal regions 11q23 and 22q11 in breast cancer development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

27. Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Prospective Studies.

Author: Nichols, Hazel B., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Cai, Jianwen, Xu, Jiawei, Wright, Lauren B., Brook, Mark N., Jones, Michael E., Adami, Hans-Olov, Baglietto, Laura, Bertrand, Kimberly A., Blot, William J., Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Dorronsoro, Miren, Dossus, Laure, Eliassen, A. Heather, Giles, Graham G., Gram, Inger T., Hankinson, Susan E., Hoffman-Bolton, Judy, and Kaaks, Rudolf
Subjects: *CHILDBIRTH, *BREAST cancer, *BREASTFEEDING, *PROPORTIONAL hazards models, *EPIDERMAL growth factor receptors, *BREAST tumor diagnosis, *PROTEIN analysis, *BREAST tumors, *COMPARATIVE studies, *DISEASE susceptibility, *LABOR (Obstetrics), *LONGITUDINAL method, *MATERNAL age, *RESEARCH methodology, *MEDICAL cooperation, *RESEARCH, *RESEARCH funding, *PERIMENOPAUSE, *EVALUATION research, *PARITY (Obstetrics)
Abstract: Background: Parity is widely recognized as protective for breast cancer, but breast cancer risk may be increased shortly after childbirth. Whether this risk varies with breastfeeding, family history of breast cancer, or specific tumor subtype has rarely been evaluated.Objective: To characterize breast cancer risk in relation to recent childbirth.Design: Pooled analysis of individual-level data from 15 prospective cohort studies.Setting: The international Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.Participants: Women younger than 55 years.Measurements: During 9.6 million person-years of follow-up, 18 826 incident cases of breast cancer were diagnosed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression.Results: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had an HR for breast cancer that peaked about 5 years after birth (HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.63 to 1.99]) before decreasing to 0.77 (CI, 0.67 to 0.88) after 34 years. The association crossed over from positive to negative about 24 years after birth. The overall pattern was driven by estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer; no crossover was seen for ER-negative cancer. Increases in breast cancer risk after childbirth were pronounced when combined with a family history of breast cancer and were greater for women who were older at first birth or who had more births. Breastfeeding did not modify overall risk patterns.Limitations: Breast cancer diagnoses during pregnancy were not uniformly distinguishable from early postpartum diagnoses. Data on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene overexpression were limited.Conclusion: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women have an increased risk for breast cancer for more than 20 years after childbirth. Health care providers should consider recent childbirth a risk factor for breast cancer in young women.Primary Funding Source: The Avon Foundation, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Breast Cancer Now and the UK National Health Service, and the Institute of Cancer Research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

28. Circulating anti‐Müllerian hormone and breast cancer risk: A study in ten prospective cohorts.

Author: Ge, Wenzhen, Clendenen, Tess V., Afanasyeva, Yelena, Koenig, Karen L., Agnoli, Claudia, Brinton, Louise A., Dorgan, Joanne F., Eliassen, A. Heather, Falk, Roni T., Hallmans, Göran, Hankinson, Susan E., Hoffman‐Bolton, Judith, Key, Timothy J., Krogh, Vittorio, Nichols, Hazel B., Sandler, Dale P., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Sluss, Patrick M., Sund, Malin, and Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Abstract: A strong positive association has been observed between circulating anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH), a biomarker of ovarian reserve, and breast cancer risk in three prospective studies. Confirming this association is important because of the paucity of biomarkers of breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. We conducted a consortium study including ten prospective cohorts that had collected blood from premenopausal women. A nested case–control design was implemented within each cohort. A total of 2,835 invasive (80%) and in situ (20%) breast cancer cases were individually matched to controls (n = 3,122) on age at blood donation. AMH was measured using a high sensitivity enzyme‐linked immunoabsorbent assay. Conditional logistic regression was applied to the aggregated dataset. There was a statistically significant trend of increasing breast cancer risk with increasing AMH concentration (ptrend across quartiles <0.0001) after adjusting for breast cancer risk factors. The odds ratio (OR) for breast cancer in the top vs. bottom quartile of AMH was 1.60 (95% CI = 1.31–1.94). Though the test for interaction was not statistically significant (pinteraction = 0.15), the trend was statistically significant only for tumors positive for both estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR): ER+/PR+: ORQ4–Q1 = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.46–2.64, ptrend <0.0001; ER+/PR−: ORQ4–Q1 = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.40–1.68, ptrend = 0.51; ER−/PR+: ORQ4–Q1 = 3.23, 95% CI = 0.48–21.9, ptrend = 0.26; ER−/PR−: ORQ4–Q1 = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.63–2.09, ptrend = 0.60. The association was observed for both pre‐ (ORQ4–Q1= 1.35, 95% CI = 1.05–1.73) and post‐menopausal (ORQ4–Q1 = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.03–2.53) breast cancer (pinteraction = 0.34). In this large consortium study, we confirmed that AMH is associated with breast cancer risk, with a 60% increase in risk for women in the top vs. bottom quartile of AMH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

29. Psychological stress, adverse life events and breast cancer incidence: a cohort investigation in 106,000 women in the United Kingdom.

Author: Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Wright, Lauren B., Griffin, James, McFadden, Emily, Ashworth, Alan, and Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Subjects: PSYCHOLOGICAL stress, BREAST cancer, LIFE change events, BEREAVEMENT, RELATIVE medical risk, BREAST tumors, PUBLIC health surveillance, RISK assessment, DISEASE incidence, PROPORTIONAL hazards models, ODDS ratio
Abstract: Background: Women diagnosed with breast cancer frequently attribute their cancer to psychological stress, but scientific evidence is inconclusive. We investigated whether experienced frequency of stress and adverse life events affect subsequent breast cancer risk.Methods: Breast cancer incidence was analysed with respect to stress variables collected at enrolment in a prospective cohort study of 106,000 women in the United Kingdom, with 1783 incident breast cancer cases. Relative risks (RR) were obtained as hazard ratios using Cox proportional hazards models.Results: There was no association of breast cancer risk overall with experienced frequency of stress. Risk was reduced for death of a close relative during the 5 years preceding study entry (RR = 0.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.97), but not for death of a spouse/partner or close friend, personal illness/injury, or divorce/separation. There was a positive association of divorce with oestrogen-receptor-negative (RR = 1.54, 95 % CI: 1.01-2.34), but not with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Risk was raised in women who were under age 20 at the death of their mother (RR = 1.31, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.67), but not of their father, and the effect was attenuated after excluding mothers with breast or ovarian cancer (RR = 1.17, 95 % CI: 0.85-1.61).Conclusions: This large prospective study did not show consistent evidence for an association of breast cancer risk with perceived stress levels or adverse life events in the preceding 5 years, or loss of parents during childhood and adolescence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2016
Full Text: View/download PDF

30. Genetic predisposition to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Author: Petridis, Christos, Brook, Mark N., Shah, Vandna, Kohut, Kelly, Gorman, Patricia, Caneppele, Michele, Levi, Dina, Papouli, Efterpi, Orr, Nick, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S., dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Peto, Julian, Swerdlow, Anthony, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Bolla, Manjeet K., Qin Wang, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, and Benitez, Javier
Subjects: BREAST cancer research, DUCTAL carcinoma, GENETIC polymorphisms, ESTROGEN receptors, DISEASE susceptibility, ADENOCARCINOMA, BREAST cancer, BREAST tumors, CELL receptors, GENETIC techniques, PROTEINS, RESEARCH funding, TUMOR markers, GENOTYPES
Abstract: Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive form of breast cancer. It is often associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and is considered to be a non-obligate precursor of IDC. It is not clear to what extent these two forms of cancer share low-risk susceptibility loci, or whether there are differences in the strength of association for shared loci.Methods: To identify genetic polymorphisms that predispose to DCIS, we pooled data from 38 studies comprising 5,067 cases of DCIS, 24,584 cases of IDC and 37,467 controls, all genotyped using the iCOGS chip.Results: Most (67 %) of the 76 known breast cancer predisposition loci showed an association with DCIS in the same direction as previously reported for invasive breast cancer. Case-only analysis showed no evidence for differences between associations for IDC and DCIS after considering multiple testing. Analysis by estrogen receptor (ER) status confirmed that loci associated with ER positive IDC were also associated with ER positive DCIS. Analysis of DCIS by grade suggested that two independent SNPs at 11q13.3 near CCND1 were specific to low/intermediate grade DCIS (rs75915166, rs554219). These associations with grade remained after adjusting for ER status and were also found in IDC. We found no novel DCIS-specific loci at a genome wide significance level of P < 5.0x10(-8).Conclusion: In conclusion, this study provides the strongest evidence to date of a shared genetic susceptibility for IDC and DCIS. Studies with larger numbers of DCIS are needed to determine if IDC or DCIS specific loci exist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2016
Full Text: View/download PDF

31. No clinical utility of KRAS variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer

Author: Hollestelle, Antoinette, van der Baan, Frederieke H., Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E., Aben, Katja K., Agnarsson, Bjarni A., Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N., Antoniou, Antonis C., Apicella, Carmel, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K., Arver, Brita, Ashworth, Alan, Baglietto, Laura, Balleine, Rosemary, Bandera, Elisa V., Barrowdale, Daniel, Bean, Yukie T., Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W., Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Beuselinck, Benoit, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E., Bolla, Manjeet K., Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S., Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Bunker, Clareann H., Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S., Caligo, Maria A., Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J., Claes, Kathleen B.M., Collée, J. Margriet, Cook, Linda S., Couch, Fergus J., Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel William, Cross, Simon S., Cunningham, Julie M., Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joseph, Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed M., Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A., Domchek, Susan M., Dorfling, Cecilia M., Dörk, Thilo, Silva, Isabel Dos Santos, du Bois, Andreas, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M., Duran, Mercedes, Easton, Douglas F., Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P., Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B., Ellis, Steve D., Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A., Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Fontaine, Annette, Fortuzzi, Stefano, Fostira, Florentia, Fridley, Brooke L., Friebel, Tara, Friedman, Eitan, Friel, Grace, Frost, Debra, Garber, Judy Ellen, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gayther, Simon A., Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Giles, Graham G., Glasspool, Rosalind, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K., Goodman, Marc T., Gore, Martin, Greene, Mark H., Grip, Mervi, Gronwald, Jacek, Gschwantler Kaulich, Daphne, Guénel, Pascal, Guzman, Starr R., Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A., Hall, Per, Halverson, Sandra L., Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas V.O., Harter, Philipp, Hartikainen, Jaana M., Healey, Sue, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Henderson, Brian E., Herzog, Josef, T Hildebrandt, Michelle A., Høgdall, Claus K., Høgdall, Estrid, Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Hopper, John L., Humphreys, Keith, Huzarski, Tomasz, Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jaworska, Katarzyna, Jensen, Allan, Jensen, Uffe Birk, Johnson, Nichola, Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja, Kabisch, Maria, Karlan, Beth Y., Kataja, Vesa, Kauff, Noah, Kelemen, Linda E., Kerin, Michael J., Kiemeney, Lambertus A., Kjaer, Susanne K., Knight, Julia A., Knol-Bout, Jacoba P., Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Krakstad, Camilla, Kristensen, Vessela, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B., Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Laitman, Yael, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Larson, Melissa C., Lasa, Adriana, Laurent-Puig, Pierre, Lazaro, Conxi, Le, Nhu D., Le Marchand, Loic, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A., Li, Jingmei, Liang, Dong, Lindblom, Annika, Lindor, Noralane, Lissowska, Jolanta, Long, Jirong, Lu, Karen H., Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Lurie, Galina, Mai, Phuong L., Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Mariette, Frederique, Marme, Frederik, Martens, John W.M., Massuger, Leon F.A.G., Maugard, Christine, Mazoyer, Sylvie, McGuffog, Lesley, McGuire, Valerie, McLean, Catriona, McNeish, Iain, Meindl, Alfons, Menegaux, Florence, Menéndez, Primitiva, Menkiszak, Janusz, Menon, Usha, Mensenkamp, Arjen R., Miller, Nicola, Milne, Roger L., Modugno, Francesmary, Montagna, Marco, Moysich, Kirsten B., Müller, Heiko, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Muranen, Taru A., Narod, Steven A., Nathanson, Katherine L., Ness, Roberta B., Neuhausen, Susan L., Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Nielsen, Finn C., Nielsen, Sune F., Nordestgaard, Børge G., Nussbaum, Robert L., Odunsi, Kunle, Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Olson, Janet E., Olson, Sara H., Oosterwijk, Jan C., Orlow, Irene, Orr, Nick, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Ottini, Laura, Paul, James, Pearce, Celeste L., Pedersen, Inge Sokilde, Peissel, Bernard, Pejovic, Tanja, Pelttari, Liisa M., Perkins, Jo, Permuth-Wey, Jenny, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Phelan, Catherine M., Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Piedmonte, Marion, Pike, Malcolm C., Platte, Radka, Plisiecka-Halasa, Joanna, Poole, Elizabeth M., Poppe, Bruce, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Ramus, Susan J., Rebbeck, Timothy R, Reed, Malcolm W.R., Rennert, Gad, Risch, Harvey A., Robson, Mark, Rodriguez, Gustavo C., Romero, Atocha, Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H., Rudolph, Anja, Runnebaum, Ingo, Salani, Ritu, Salvesen, Helga B., Sawyer, Elinor J., Schildkraut, Joellen M., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Schmutzler, Rita K., Schneeweiss, Andreas, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Schrauder, Michael G., Schumacher, Fredrick, Schwaab, Ira, Scuvera, Giulietta, Sellers, Thomas A., Severi, Gianluca, Seynaeve, Caroline M., Shah, Mitul, Shrubsole, Martha, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Sieh, Weiva, Simard, Jacques, Singer, Christian F., Sinilnikova, Olga M., Smeets, Dominiek, Sohn, Christof, Soller, Maria, Song, Honglin, Soucy, Penny, Southey, Melissa C., Stegmaier, Christa, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Sucheston, Lara, Swerdlow, Anthony, Tangen, Ingvild L., Tea, Muy-Kheng, Teixeira, Manuel R., Terry, Kathryn Lynne, Terry, Mary Beth, Thomassen, Mads, Thompson, Pamela J., Tihomirova, Laima, Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda Ewart, Tollenaar, Rob A.E.M., Tomlinson, Ian, Torres, Diana, Truong, Thérèse, Tsimiklis, Helen, Tung, Nadine Muskatel, Tworoger, Shelley Slate, Tyrer, Jonathan P., Vachon, Celine M., Van, Laura J., van Altena, Anne M., Van Asperen, C.J., van den Berg, David, van den Ouweland, Ans M.W., van Doorn, Helena C., Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J., Vergote, Ignace, Verhoef, Senno, Vierkant, Robert A., Vijai, Joseph, Vitonis, Allison F., von Wachenfeldt, Anna, Walsh, Christine, Wang, Qin, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Weischer, Maren, Weitzel, Jeffrey N., Weltens, Caroline, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S., Wilkens, Lynne R., Winqvist, Robert, Wu, Anna H., Wu, Xifeng, Yang, Hannah P., Zaffaroni, Daniela, Pilar Zamora, M., Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul D.P., Rookus, Matti A., Hooning, Maartje J., and Goode, Ellen L.
Subjects: KRAS variant, Breast cancer, Ovarian cancer, Genetic association, Clinical outcome
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Clinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370. METHODS: Centralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers). RESULTS: We found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations. CONCLUSIONS: rs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers., Other Research Unit
Published: 2016
Full Text: View/download PDF

32. Identification of independent association signals and putative functional variants for breast cancer risk through fine-scale mapping of the 12p11 locus

Author: Zeng, Chenjie, Guo, Xingyi, Long, Jirong, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B., Droit, Arnaud, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Ghoussaini, Maya, Kar, Siddhartha, Freeman, Adam, Hopper, John L., Milne, Roger L., Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Agata, Simona, Ahmed, Shahana, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N., Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Arun, Banu K., Arver, Brita, Bacot, Francois, Barrowdale, Daniel, Baynes, Caroline, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William J., Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Stig E., Bonanni, Bernardo, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith S., Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S., Cai, Qiuyin, Caldes, Trinidad, Campbell, Ian, Carpenter, Jane, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Claes, Kathleen B. M., Clarke, Christine, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S., Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., de la Hoya, Miguel, De Leeneer, Kim, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M., Doody, Michele, Dorfling, Cecilia M., Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dwek, Miriam, Dworniczak, Bernd, Egan, Kathleen, Eilber, Ursula, Einbeigi, Zakaria, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ellis, Steve, Frost, Debra, Lalloo, Fiona, Fasching, Peter A., Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Friedlander, Michael, Friedman, Eitan, Gambino, Gaetana, Gao, Yu-Tang, Garber, Judy, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gehrig, Andrea, Damiola, Francesca, Lesueur, Fabienne, Mazoyer, Sylvie, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Giles, Graham G., Godwin, Andrew K., Goldgar, David E., González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H., Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A., Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas V. O., Hart, Steven, Hartikainen, Jaana M., Hartman, Mikael, Hassan, Norhashimah, Healey, Sue, Hogervorst, Frans B. L., Verhoef, Senno, Hendricks, Carolyn B., Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hulick, Peter J., Hunter, David J., Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Isaacs, Claudine, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna, Jensen, Uffe Birk, John, Esther M., Joly Beauparlant, Charles, Jones, Michael, Kabisch, Maria, Kang, Daehee, Karlan, Beth Y., Kauppila, Saila, Kerin, Michael J., Khan, Sofia, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Knight, Julia A., Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kraft, Peter, Kwong, Ava, Laitman, Yael, Lambrechts, Diether, Lazaro, Conxi, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Chuen Neng, Lee, Min Hyuk, Lester, Jenny, Li, Jingmei, Liljegren, Annelie, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubinski, Jan, Mai, Phuong L., Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuffog, Lesley, Meindl, Alfons, Menegaux, Florence, Montagna, Marco, Muir, Kenneth, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Nathanson, Katherine L., Neuhausen, Susan L., Nevanlinna, Heli, Newcomb, Polly A., Nord, Silje, Nussbaum, Robert L., Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Olswold, Curtis, Osorio, Ana, Papi, Laura, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Paulsson-Karlsson, Ylva, Peeters, Stephanie, Peissel, Bernard, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pfeiler, Georg, Phelan, Catherine M., Presneau, Nadege, Radice, Paolo, Rahman, Nazneen, Ramus, Susan J., Rashid, Muhammad Usman, Rennert, Gad, Rhiem, Kerstin, Rudolph, Anja, Salani, Ritu, Sangrajrang, Suleeporn, Sawyer, Elinor J., Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Schürmann, Peter, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shen, Chen-Yang, Shrubsole, Martha J., Shu, Xiao-Ou, Sigurdson, Alice, Singer, Christian F., Slager, Susan, Soucy, Penny, Southey, Melissa, Steinemann, Doris, Swerdlow, Anthony, Szabo, Csilla I., Tchatchou, Sandrine, Teixeira, Manuel R., Teo, Soo H., Terry, Mary Beth, Tessier, Daniel C., Teulé, Alex, Thomassen, Mads, Tihomirova, Laima, Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda E., Tung, Nadine, Turnbull, Clare, van den Ouweland, Ans M. W., van Rensburg, Elizabeth J., ven den Berg, David, Vijai, Joseph, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Weitzel, Jeffrey N., Whittemore, Alice S., Winqvist, Robert, Wong, Tien Y., Wu, Anna H., Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Yu, Jyh-Cherng, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Hall, Per, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Dunning, Alison M., Simard, Jacques, Couch, Fergus J., Antoniou, Antonis C., Easton, Douglas F., and Zheng, Wei
Subjects: Fine-scale mapping, Genetic risk factor, Breast cancer
Abstract: Background: Multiple recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs10771399, at 12p11 that is associated with breast cancer risk. Method We performed a fine-scale mapping study of a 700 kb region including 441 genotyped and more than 1300 imputed genetic variants in 48,155 cases and 43,612 controls of European descent, 6269 cases and 6624 controls of East Asian descent and 1116 cases and 932 controls of African descent in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC; http://bcac.ccge.medschl.cam.ac.uk/), and in 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify independent association signals. Data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project (ENCODE) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used for functional annotation. Results: Analysis of data from European descendants found evidence for four independent association signals at 12p11, represented by rs7297051 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–1.12; P = 3 × 10-9), rs805510 (OR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 1.04–1.12, P = 2 × 10-5), and rs1871152 (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 1.02–1.06; P = 2 × 10-4) identified in the general populations, and rs113824616 (P = 7 × 10-5) identified in the meta-analysis of BCAC ER-negative cases and BRCA1 mutation carriers. SNPs rs7297051, rs805510 and rs113824616 were also associated with breast cancer risk at P < 0.05 in East Asians, but none of the associations were statistically significant in African descendants. Multiple candidate functional variants are located in putative enhancer sequences. Chromatin interaction data suggested that PTHLH was the likely target gene of these enhancers. Of the six variants with the strongest evidence of potential functionality, rs11049453 was statistically significantly associated with the expression of PTHLH and its nearby gene CCDC91 at P < 0.05. Conclusion: This study identified four independent association signals at 12p11 and revealed potentially functional variants, providing additional insights into the underlying biological mechanism(s) for the association observed between variants at 12p11 and breast cancer risk. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0718-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Published: 2016
Full Text: View/download PDF

33. Correction to: Timing of pubertal stages and breast cancer risk: the Breakthrough Generations Study.

Author: Bodicoat, Danielle H., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., McFadden, Emily, Griffin, James, Ashworth, Alan, and Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Subjects: TUMOR classification, BREAST cancer, GENERATIONS
Abstract: As a consequence of responding to colleagues who asked about the publication of the original article [1], the authors have determined that the data published in Table 4 of the paper are incorrect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

34. Breast cancer risk prediction in women aged 35-50 years: impact of including sex hormone concentrations in the Gail model.

Author: Clendenen, Tess V., Ge, Wenzhen, Koenig, Karen L., Afanasyeva, Yelena, Agnoli, Claudia, Brinton, Louise A., Darvishian, Farbod, Dorgan, Joanne F., Eliassen, A. Heather, Falk, Roni T., Hallmans, Göran, Hankinson, Susan E., Hoffman-Bolton, Judith, Key, Timothy J., Krogh, Vittorio, Nichols, Hazel B., Sandler, Dale P., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Sluss, Patrick M., and Sund, Malin
Subjects: BREAST cancer
Abstract: Background: Models that accurately predict risk of breast cancer are needed to help younger women make decisions about when to begin screening. Premenopausal concentrations of circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a biomarker of ovarian reserve, and testosterone have been positively associated with breast cancer risk in prospective studies. We assessed whether adding AMH and/or testosterone to the Gail model improves its prediction performance for women aged 35-50.Methods: In a nested case-control study including ten prospective cohorts (1762 invasive cases/1890 matched controls) with pre-diagnostic serum/plasma samples, we estimated relative risks (RR) for the biomarkers and Gail risk factors using conditional logistic regression and random-effects meta-analysis. Absolute risk models were developed using these RR estimates, attributable risk fractions calculated using the distributions of the risk factors in the cases from the consortium, and population-based incidence and mortality rates. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the discriminatory accuracy of the models with and without biomarkers.Results: The AUC for invasive breast cancer including only the Gail risk factor variables was 55.3 (95% CI 53.4, 57.1). The AUC increased moderately with the addition of AMH (AUC 57.6, 95% CI 55.7, 59.5), testosterone (AUC 56.2, 95% CI 54.4, 58.1), or both (AUC 58.1, 95% CI 56.2, 59.9). The largest AUC improvement (4.0) was among women without a family history of breast cancer.Conclusions: AMH and testosterone moderately increase the discriminatory accuracy of the Gail model among women aged 35-50. We observed the largest AUC increase for women without a family history of breast cancer, the group that would benefit most from improved risk prediction because early screening is already recommended for women with a family history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

35. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry

Author: Pal Choudhury, Parichoy, Brook, Mark N., Hurson, Amber N., Lee, Andrew, Mulder, Charlotta V., Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Swerdlow, Anthony J., Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Antoniou, Antonis C., and Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Subjects: Breast cancer, Tyrer-Cuzick, Model validation, Short Report, IBIS, BOADICEA, Absolute risk, Prospective cohort, Risk prediction, 3. Good health
Abstract: Background: The Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) and the Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk prediction models are commonly used in clinical practice and have recently been extended to include polygenic risk scores (PRS). In addition, BOADICEA has also been extended to include reproductive and lifestyle factors, which were already part of Tyrer-Cuzick model. We conducted a comparative prospective validation of these models after incorporating the recently developed 313-variant PRS. Methods: Calibration and discrimination of 5-year absolute risk was assessed in a nested case-control sample of 1337 women of European ancestry (619 incident breast cancer cases) aged 23–75 years from the Generations Study. Results: The extended BOADICEA model with reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS was well calibrated across risk deciles; expected-to-observed ratio (E/O) at the highest risk decile :0.97 (95 % CI 0.51 − 1.86) for women younger than 50 years and 1.09 (0.66 − 1.80) for women 50 years or older. Adding reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS to the BOADICEA model improved discrimination modestly in younger women (area under the curve (AUC) 69.7 % vs. 69.1%) and substantially in older women (AUC 64.6 % vs. 56.8%). The Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS showed evidence of overestimation at the highest risk decile: E/O = 1.54(0.81 − 2.92) for younger and 1.73 (1.03 − 2.90) for older women. Conclusion: The extended BOADICEA model identified women in a European-ancestry population at elevated breast cancer risk more accurately than the Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS. With the increasing availability of PRS, these analyses can inform choice of risk models incorporating PRS for risk stratified breast cancer prevention among women of European ancestry.

36. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry

Author: Pal Choudhury, Parichoy, Brook, Mark N., Hurson, Amber N., Lee, Andrew, Mulder, Charlotta V., Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Swerdlow, Anthony J., Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Antoniou, Antonis C., and Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Subjects: Breast cancer, Tyrer-Cuzick, Model validation, Short Report, IBIS, BOADICEA, Absolute risk, Prospective cohort, Risk prediction, 3. Good health
Abstract: Background: The Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) and the Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk prediction models are commonly used in clinical practice and have recently been extended to include polygenic risk scores (PRS). In addition, BOADICEA has also been extended to include reproductive and lifestyle factors, which were already part of Tyrer-Cuzick model. We conducted a comparative prospective validation of these models after incorporating the recently developed 313-variant PRS. Methods: Calibration and discrimination of 5-year absolute risk was assessed in a nested case-control sample of 1337 women of European ancestry (619 incident breast cancer cases) aged 23–75 years from the Generations Study. Results: The extended BOADICEA model with reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS was well calibrated across risk deciles; expected-to-observed ratio (E/O) at the highest risk decile :0.97 (95 % CI 0.51 − 1.86) for women younger than 50 years and 1.09 (0.66 − 1.80) for women 50 years or older. Adding reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS to the BOADICEA model improved discrimination modestly in younger women (area under the curve (AUC) 69.7 % vs. 69.1%) and substantially in older women (AUC 64.6 % vs. 56.8%). The Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS showed evidence of overestimation at the highest risk decile: E/O = 1.54(0.81 − 2.92) for younger and 1.73 (1.03 − 2.90) for older women. Conclusion: The extended BOADICEA model identified women in a European-ancestry population at elevated breast cancer risk more accurately than the Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS. With the increasing availability of PRS, these analyses can inform choice of risk models incorporating PRS for risk stratified breast cancer prevention among women of European ancestry.

37. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author: Ahearn, Thomas U, Zhang, Haoyu, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Lush, Michael, Wang, Qin, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, ABCTB Investigators, KConFab/AOCS Investigators, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kauppila, Saila, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Krüger, Ute, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Lambrechts, Diether, Lee, Derrick G, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, MacInnis, Robert J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, McLean, Catriona, Meindl, Alfons, Menon, Usha, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Nodora, Jesse, Offit, Kenneth, Olsson, Håkan, Orr, Nick, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peto, Julian, Pita, Guillermo, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Prentice, Ross, Punie, Kevin, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Rüdiger, Thomas, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sampson, Sarah, Sandler, Dale P, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Schöttker, Ben, Sherman, Mark E, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Smichkoska, Snezhana, Southey, Melissa C, Spinelli, John J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Tapper, William J, Taylor, Jack A, Teras, Lauren R, Terry, Mary Beth, Torres, Diana, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Van Deurzen, Carolien HM, Van Veen, Elke M, Wagner, Philippe, Weinberg, Clarice R, Wendt, Camilla, Wesseling, Jelle, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zheng, Wei, Couch, Fergus J, Simard, Jacques, Kraft, Peter, Easton, Douglas F, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schmidt, Marjanka K, García-Closas, Montserrat, and Chatterjee, Nilanjan
Subjects: Common breast cancer susceptibility variants, Risk, Receptor, ErbB-2, Genetic predisposition, Etiologic heterogeneity, Breast Neoplasms, 3. Good health, Breast cancer, Receptors, Estrogen, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Receptors, Progesterone, Genome-Wide Association Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER) status, but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear. METHODS: Among 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate < 5%), most commonly ER and grade, followed by PR and HER2. Models for intrinsic-like subtypes found nearly all of these variants (83 of 85) associated at p < 0.05 with risk for at least one luminal-like subtype, and approximately half (41 of 85) of the variants were associated with risk of at least one non-luminal subtype, including 32 variants associated with triple-negative (TN) disease. Ten variants were associated with risk of all subtypes in different magnitude. Five variants were associated with risk of luminal A-like and TN subtypes in opposite directions. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates a high level of complexity in the etiology heterogeneity of breast cancer susceptibility variants and can inform investigations of subtype-specific risk prediction.

38. Prospective evaluation of a breast-cancer risk model integrating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in 15 cohorts from six countries

Author: Hurson, Amber N, Pal Choudhury, Parichoy, Gao, Chi, Hüsing, Anika, Eriksson, Mikael, Shi, Min, Jones, Michael E, Evans, D Gareth R, Milne, Roger L, Gaudet, Mia M, Vachon, Celine M, Chasman, Daniel I, Easton, Douglas F, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Kraft, Peter, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Scott, Christopher G, Carter, Brian D, Martin, Kara, Harkness, Elaine F, Brook, Mark N, Ahearn, Thomas U, Mavaddat, Nasim, Antoniou, Antonis C, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Simard, Jacques, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Sampson, Sarah, Newman, William G, van Veen, Elke M, MacInnis, Robert J, Giles, Graham G, Southey, Melissa, Gapstur, Susan M, Winham, Stacey J, Brandt, Kathy, Norman, Aaron, Sandler, Dale P, Weinberg, Clarice R, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, van Gils, Carla H, Khaw, Kay-Tee, Barrdahl, Myrto, Kaaks, Rudolf, Ridker, Paul M, and Buring, Julie E
Subjects: Adult, 0301 basic medicine, Multifactorial Inheritance, Epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms, Risk Assessment, Prospective evaluation, Risk category, Decile, Young Adult, 03 medical and health sciences, Risk model, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, Risk Factors, Germany, Breast Cancer, Humans, Medicine, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Risk threshold, Aged, business.industry, General Medicine, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, 3. Good health, 030104 developmental biology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Risk stratification, Female, Polygenic risk score, business, Demography
Abstract: Background Rigorous evaluation of the calibration and discrimination of breast-cancer risk-prediction models in prospective cohorts is critical for applications under clinical guidelines. We comprehensively evaluated an integrated model incorporating classical risk factors and a 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict breast-cancer risk. Methods Fifteen prospective cohorts from six countries with 239 340 women (7646 incident breast-cancer cases) of European ancestry aged 19–75 years were included. Calibration of 5-year risk was assessed by comparing expected and observed proportions of cases overall and within risk categories. Risk stratification for women of European ancestry aged 50–70 years in those countries was evaluated by the proportion of women and future cases crossing clinically relevant risk thresholds. Results Among women Conclusion Integrating a 313-variant PRS with classical risk factors can improve the identification of European-ancestry women at elevated risk who could benefit from targeted risk-reducing strategies under current clinical guidelines.
Full Text: View/download PDF

39. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author: Ahearn, Thomas U, Zhang, Haoyu, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Lush, Michael, Wang, Qin, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, B��rresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Br��ning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Coll��e, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, D��rk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, Garc��a-S��enz, Jos�� A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Gonz��lez-Neira, Anna, Aln��s, Grethe I Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Gu��nel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, ABCTB Investigators, KConFab/AOCS Investigators, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kauppila, Saila, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kr��ger, Ute, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Lambrechts, Diether, Lee, Derrick G, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, MacInnis, Robert J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, McLean, Catriona, Meindl, Alfons, Menon, Usha, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Nodora, Jesse, Offit, Kenneth, Olsson, H��kan, Orr, Nick, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peto, Julian, Pita, Guillermo, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Prentice, Ross, Punie, Kevin, Pylk��s, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, R��diger, Thomas, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sampson, Sarah, Sandler, Dale P, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Sch��ttker, Ben, Sherman, Mark E, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Smichkoska, Snezhana, Southey, Melissa C, Spinelli, John J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Tapper, William J, Taylor, Jack A, Teras, Lauren R, Terry, Mary Beth, Torres, Diana, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Van Deurzen, Carolien HM, Van Veen, Elke M, Wagner, Philippe, Weinberg, Clarice R, Wendt, Camilla, Wesseling, Jelle, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zheng, Wei, Couch, Fergus J, Simard, Jacques, Kraft, Peter, Easton, Douglas, Pharoah, Paul, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Garc��a-Closas, Montserrat, and Chatterjee, Nilanjan
Subjects: Common breast cancer susceptibility variants, Breast cancer, Genetic predisposition, Etiologic heterogeneity, 3. Good health, Research Article
Abstract: Funder: Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Funder: G��nome Qu��bec; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013062, Funder: Foundation for the National Institutes of Health; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000009, Funder: Center for Inherited Disease Research, Funder: Cancer Research UK, Funder: Odense University Hospital Research Foundation, Funder: National R&D Program for Cancer Control��Ministry of Health and Welfare, Funder: Italian Association for Cancer Research, Funder: Carol M. Baldwin Breast Cancer Research Fund; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100002645, Funder: National Health and Medical Research Council, Funder: Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007311, Funder: European Union, Funder: National Institutes of Health; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, Funder: National Cancer Institute, Funder: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Funder: Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Komen Wyoming Affiliate; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005987, Funder: Ovarian Cancer Research Fund; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001282, Funder: National Cancer Institute (NCI), BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER) status, but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear. METHODS: Among 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate

40. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry

Author: Pal Choudhury, Parichoy, Brook, Mark N., Hurson, Amber N., Lee, Andrew, Mulder, Charlotta V., Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Swerdlow, Anthony J., Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Antoniou, Antonis C., and Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Subjects: Breast cancer, Tyrer-Cuzick, Model validation, Short Report, IBIS, BOADICEA, Absolute risk, Prospective cohort, Risk prediction, 3. Good health
Abstract: Background: The Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) and the Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk prediction models are commonly used in clinical practice and have recently been extended to include polygenic risk scores (PRS). In addition, BOADICEA has also been extended to include reproductive and lifestyle factors, which were already part of Tyrer-Cuzick model. We conducted a comparative prospective validation of these models after incorporating the recently developed 313-variant PRS. Methods: Calibration and discrimination of 5-year absolute risk was assessed in a nested case-control sample of 1337 women of European ancestry (619 incident breast cancer cases) aged 23–75 years from the Generations Study. Results: The extended BOADICEA model with reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS was well calibrated across risk deciles; expected-to-observed ratio (E/O) at the highest risk decile :0.97 (95 % CI 0.51 − 1.86) for women younger than 50 years and 1.09 (0.66 − 1.80) for women 50 years or older. Adding reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS to the BOADICEA model improved discrimination modestly in younger women (area under the curve (AUC) 69.7 % vs. 69.1%) and substantially in older women (AUC 64.6 % vs. 56.8%). The Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS showed evidence of overestimation at the highest risk decile: E/O = 1.54(0.81 − 2.92) for younger and 1.73 (1.03 − 2.90) for older women. Conclusion: The extended BOADICEA model identified women in a European-ancestry population at elevated breast cancer risk more accurately than the Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS. With the increasing availability of PRS, these analyses can inform choice of risk models incorporating PRS for risk stratified breast cancer prevention among women of European ancestry.

41. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry

Author: Pal Choudhury, Parichoy, Brook, Mark N, Hurson, Amber N, Lee, Andrew, Mulder, Charlotta V, Coulson, Penny, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Jones, Michael E, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Antoniou, Antonis C, and Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Subjects: Adult, Multifactorial Inheritance, Tyrer-Cuzick, Model validation, Breast Neoplasms, Absolute risk, Prospective cohort, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Risk Assessment, Risk prediction, White People, 3. Good health, Young Adult, Breast cancer, Risk Factors, Population Surveillance, IBIS, Humans, BOADICEA, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Algorithms, Aged
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) and the Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk prediction models are commonly used in clinical practice and have recently been extended to include polygenic risk scores (PRS). In addition, BOADICEA has also been extended to include reproductive and lifestyle factors, which were already part of Tyrer-Cuzick model. We conducted a comparative prospective validation of these models after incorporating the recently developed 313-variant PRS. METHODS: Calibration and discrimination of 5-year absolute risk was assessed in a nested case-control sample of 1337 women of European ancestry (619 incident breast cancer cases) aged 23-75 years from the Generations Study. RESULTS: The extended BOADICEA model with reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS was well calibrated across risk deciles; expected-to-observed ratio (E/O) at the highest risk decile :0.97 (95 % CI 0.51 - 1.86) for women younger than 50 years and 1.09 (0.66 - 1.80) for women 50 years or older. Adding reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS to the BOADICEA model improved discrimination modestly in younger women (area under the curve (AUC) 69.7 % vs. 69.1%) and substantially in older women (AUC 64.6 % vs. 56.8%). The Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS showed evidence of overestimation at the highest risk decile: E/O = 1.54(0.81 - 2.92) for younger and 1.73 (1.03 - 2.90) for older women. CONCLUSION: The extended BOADICEA model identified women in a European-ancestry population at elevated breast cancer risk more accurately than the Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS. With the increasing availability of PRS, these analyses can inform choice of risk models incorporating PRS for risk stratified breast cancer prevention among women of European ancestry.

42. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair

Author: Lynne J. Hocking, Caterina Barbieri, Jenny Chang-Claude, David Karasik, Dieter Flesch-Janys, James F. Wilson, Mark S. Goldberg, Henry Voelzke, Archie Campbell, Stig E. Bojesen, David R. Weir, Ailith Pirie, Megan L. Grove, Melissa Wellons, Georg Homuth, Corrado Masciullo, Jennifer A. Brody, Hermann Brenner, Paolo Gasparini, Andrew D. Johnson, Patrick Neven, Graham G. Giles, Peter Kraft, André G. Uitterlinden, Wei Zheng, Alkes L. Price, Anja Rudolph, Arto Mannermaa, Nicholas G. Martin, Christopher A. Haiman, Massimo Mangino, Melissa C. Southey, Daniela Ruggiero, Toshiko Tanaka, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Julie E. Buring, John R. B. Perry, Robert Winqvist, Laufey Tryggvadottir, Angela Cox, Serena Sanna, Nicola Pirastu, Anna Jakubowska, Paul D.P. Pharoah, David J. Porteous, Dragana Vuckovic, Andrea D. Coviello, Giorgia Girotto, Sara Lindstroem, Patrick Sulem, Astrid Petersmann, Xin Li, Maartje J. Hooning, Lili Milani, Sven Bergmann, Marek Zygmunt, Javier Benitez, Vilmundur Gudnason, Fernando Rivadeneira, Volker Arndt, Marina Ciullo, Caroline Hayward, Sheila Ulivi, Janet E. Olson, Hoda Anton-Culver, Maria Kabisch, Sara Margolin, Vessela N. Kristensen, Patrick F. McArdle, Tanguy Corre, Nora Franceschini, Veli-Matti Kosma, Hiltrud Brauch, Roger L. Milne, Eric Boerwinkle, Matthias W. Beckmann, Charles Kooperberg, Qin Wang, Jessica D. Faul, Stephen J. Chanock, Alexander Teumer, Mark O. Goodarzi, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, R Maegi, Paul M. Ridker, Antonis C. Antoniou, Ozren Polasek, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Barbara McKnight, Melissa E. Garcia, Manjeet K. Bolla, Alanna C. Morrison, Paolo Radice, Xiuqing Guo, Lude L. Franke, Michela Traglia, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Heli Nevanlinna, Teresa Nutile, Cinzia Sala, Pascal Guénel, Jennifer E. Huffman, Stephen T. Turner, Anna Murray, Carl Blomqvist, Margaux F. Keller, Samuel E. Jones, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Ivana Kolcic, Anne B. Newman, Jan Lubinski, Albert Hofman, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva, Hilary K. Finucane, Anne Lise Børresen-Dale, Alexander P. Reiner, Tim D. Spector, Gonneke Willemsen, John D. Eicher, Douglas F. Easton, Claudia Langenberg, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Natalia Bogdanova, Alison M. Dunning, Giorgio Pistis, Tõnu Esko, Behrooz Z. Alizadeh, Martina Mueller-Nurasyid, Eleonora Porcu, Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong, Leslie J. Raffel, Laura Crisponi, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Jerome I. Rotter, Yii-Der Ida Chen, Antonietta Robino, Katri Pylkaes, Ken K. Ong, Thibaud Boutin, Elinor J. Sawyer, Daniel I. Chasman, Brian E. Henderson, Frank B. Hu, Leslie Bernstein, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Tamara B. Harris, Dorret I. Boomsma, Katherine S. Ruth, Jie Yao, Keith Humphreys, Jennifer A. Smith, Elisabeth Altmaier, Ulrike Peters, Doris Stoeckl, Eva Albrecht, Tatijana Zemunik, Jenny A. Visser, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Diego Vozzi, Thilo Doerk, J. Ross Chapman, Irene L. Andrulis, Joanne M. Murabito, Alan F. Wright, Lisette Stolk, Jonathan Marten, Alice M. Arnold, Paolo Peterlongo, Harry Campbell, Natalia Pervjakova, Jingmei Li, Jennifer Kriebel, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Immaculata De Vivo, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Kari Stefansson, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Brendan Bulik-Sullivan, Evelin Mihailov, Chunyan He, Joe Dennis, Nicholas J. Wareham, Yongmei Liu, Sharon L.R. Kardia, Lynda M. Rose, Felix R. Day, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Albert V. Smith, David J. Hunter, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Christian Gieger, Konstantin Strauch, Igor Rudan, Jacques Simard, Jian'an Luan, Robert A. Scott, Kyriaki Michailidou, Bruce M. Psaty, Per Hall, Suzette J. Bielinski, Rita K. Schmutzler, Julian Peto, Ellen W. Demerath, Ursula M. Schick, Rossella Sorice, Wei Zhao, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Andres Metspalu, Jonine D. Figueroa, Julia A. Knight, Barbara Burwinkel, Thomas Bruening, Judith Manz, Anna González-Neira, Ilaria Gandin, Ian Tomlinson, Thérèse Truong, Kent D. Taylor, Amanda E. Toland, Deborah J. Thompson, Alfons Meindl, Caroline M. Seynaeve, Benjamin M. Neale, Fergus J. Couch, Mike A. Nalls, Ute Hamann, Kamila Czene, John L. Hopper, Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel, Grant W. Montgomery, Hatef Darabi, Daniela Toniolo, Jinyan Huang, Peter Devilee, Cathy E. Elks, David Schlessinger, Luigi Ferrucci, Frank Schmidt, Peter A. Fasching, Diether Lambrechts, Najaf Amin, Day, Felix R, Ruth, Katherine S, Thompson, Deborah J, Lunetta, Kathryn L, Pervjakova, Natalia, Chasman, Daniel I, Stolk, Lisette, Finucane, Hilary K, Sulem, Patrick, Bulik Sullivan, Brendan, Esko, Tõnu, Johnson, Andrew D, Elks, Cathy E, Franceschini, Nora, He, Chunyan, Altmaier, Elisabeth, Brody, Jennifer A, Franke, Lude L, Huffman, Jennifer E, Keller, Margaux F, Mcardle, Patrick F, Nutile, Teresa, Porcu, Eleonora, Robino, Antonietta, Rose, Lynda M, Schick, Ursula M, Smith, Jennifer A, Teumer, Alexander, Traglia, Michela, Vuckovic, Dragana, Yao, Jie, Zhao, Wei, Albrecht, Eva, Amin, Najaf, Corre, Tanguy, Hottenga, Jouke Jan, Mangino, Massimo, Smith, Albert V, Tanaka, Toshiko, Abecasis, Gonçalo R, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Alice M, Barbieri, CATERINA MARIA, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bernstein, Leslie, Bielinski, Suzette J, Blomqvist, Carl, Boerwinkle, Eric, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Borresen Dale, Anne Lise, Boutin, Thibaud S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thoma, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campbell, Archie, Campbell, Harry, Chanock, Stephen J, Chapman, J. Ro, Chen, Yii Der Ida, Chenevix Trench, Georgia, Couch, Fergus J, Coviello, Andrea D, Cox, Angela, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, De Vivo, Immaculata, Demerath, Ellen W, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dos Santos Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Eicher, John D, Fasching, Peter A, Faul, Jessica D, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch Janys, Dieter, Gandin, Ilaria, Garcia, Melissa E, García Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Girotto, Giorgia, Goldberg, Mark S, González Neira, Anna, Goodarzi, Mark O, Grove, Megan L, Gudbjartsson, Daniel F, Guénel, Pascal, Guo, Xiuqing, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Henderson, Brian E, Hocking, Lynne J, Hofman, Albert, Homuth, Georg, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Hu, Frank B, Huang, Jinyan, Humphreys, Keith, Hunter, David J, Jakubowska, Anna, Jones, Samuel E, Kabisch, Maria, Karasik, David, Knight, Julia A, Kolcic, Ivana, Kooperberg, Charle, Kosma, Veli Matti, Kriebel, Jennifer, Kristensen, Vessela, Lambrechts, Diether, Langenberg, Claudia, Li, Jingmei, Li, Xin, Lindström, Sara, Liu, Yongmei, Luan, Jian'An, Lubinski, Jan, Mägi, Reedik, Mannermaa, Arto, Manz, Judith, Margolin, Sara, Marten, Jonathan, Martin, Nicholas G, Masciullo, Corrado, Meindl, Alfon, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Mihailov, Evelin, Milani, Lili, Milne, Roger L, Müller Nurasyid, Martina, Nalls, Michael, Neale, Benjamin M, Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Newman, Anne B, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Olson, Janet E, Padmanabhan, Sandosh, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peters, Ulrike, Petersmann, Astrid, Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul D. P, Pirastu, Nicola, Pirie, Ailith, Pistis, Giorgio, Polasek, Ozren, Porteous, David, Psaty, Bruce M, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Raffel, Leslie J, Rivadeneira, Fernando, Rudan, Igor, Rudolph, Anja, Ruggiero, Daniela, Sala, Cinzia F, Sanna, Serena, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schlessinger, David, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmidt, Frank, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Robert A, Seynaeve, Caroline M, Simard, Jacque, Sorice, Rossella, Southey, Melissa C, Stöckl, Dori, Strauch, Konstantin, Swerdlow, Anthony, Taylor, Kent D, Thorsteinsdottir, Unnur, Toland, Amanda E, Tomlinson, Ian, Truong, Thérèse, Tryggvadottir, Laufey, Turner, Stephen T, Vozzi, Diego, Wang, Qin, Wellons, Melissa, Willemsen, Gonneke, Wilson, James F, Winqvist, Robert, Wolffenbuttel, Bruce B. H. R, Wright, Alan F, Yannoukakos, Drakouli, Zemunik, Tatijana, Zheng, Wei, Zygmunt, Marek, Bergmann, Sven, Boomsma, Dorret I, Buring, Julie E, Ferrucci, Luigi, Montgomery, Grant W, Gudnason, Vilmundur, Spector, Tim D, van Duijn, Cornelia M, Alizadeh, Behrooz Z, Ciullo, Marina, Crisponi, Laura, Easton, Douglas F, Gasparini, Paolo, Gieger, Christian, Harris, Tamara B, Hayward, Caroline, Kardia, Sharon L. R, Kraft, Peter, Mcknight, Barbara, Metspalu, Andre, Morrison, Alanna C, Reiner, Alex P, Ridker, Paul M, Rotter, Jerome I, Toniolo, Daniela, Uitterlinden, André G, Ulivi, Sheila, Völzke, Henry, Wareham, Nicholas J, Weir, David R, Yerges Armstrong, Laura M, Price, Alkes L, Stefansson, Kari, Visser, Jenny A, Ong, Ken K, Chang Claude, Jenny, Murabito, Joanne M, Perry, John R. B, Murray, Anna, Internal Medicine, Epidemiology, Medical Oncology, Clinical Genetics, Biological Psychology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam - Neurobiology of Mental Health, EMGO+ - Lifestyle, Overweight and Diabetes, PRACTICAL Consortium, kConFab Investigators, AOCS Investigators, EPIC-InterAct Consortium, LifeLines Cohort Study, Generation, Scotland, Groningen Institute for Gastro Intestinal Genetics and Immunology (3GI), Lifestyle Medicine (LM), Life Course Epidemiology (LCE), Center for Liver, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (CLDM), Stem Cell Aging Leukemia and Lymphoma (SALL), and Real World Studies in PharmacoEpidemiology, -Genetics, -Economics and -Therapy (PEGET)
Subjects: Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), Aging, DNA Repair, LOCI, Genome-wide association study, BLOOD-PRESSURE, Disease, CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY, Bioinformatics, HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION, PREMATURE OVARIAN FAILURE, Genotype, BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS, WIDE ASSOCIATION, Gene Regulatory Networks, NATURAL MENOPAUSE, Genetics, education.field_of_study, menopause, DDR, BODY-MASS INDEX, CELL-TYPES, BRCA1 Protein, Reproduction, BRCA1-mediated DNA repair, Age Factors, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine, Genomics, Middle Aged, 3. Good health, Menopause, Phenotype, Female, medicine.symptom, Signal Transduction, Delayed puberty, Adult, DNA repair, Population, Hypothalamus, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Breast Neoplasms, Biology, Lower risk, DDR, Article, Breast cancer, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Mendelian randomization, medicine, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Allele, education, Genetic association, Models, Genetic, business.industry, Genetic Variation, medicine.disease, Aging/genetics, BRCA1 Protein/genetics, Breast Neoplasms/genetics, Gene Regulatory Networks/genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics, Genome-Wide Association Study/methods, Genomics/methods, Hypothalamus/metabolism, Menopause/genetics, Reproduction/genetics, Signal Transduction/genetics, business, Genome-Wide Association Study
Abstract: Menopause timing has a major impact on infertility and risk of disease. Younger age at natural (nonsurgical) menopause (ANM) is associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes and a lower risk of breast cancer. Late menopause is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer. It is well known that the age at which women go through menopause is partly determined by genes, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Genome-wide association studies have identified 18 common genetic variants associated with ANM. These variants explain less than 5% of the variation in ANM compared with the 21% explained by all common variants on genome-wide association study arrays. This genome-wide association study was the collaborative effort of researchers from 177 institutions worldwide. The study was designed to investigate genetic variants associated with timing of menopause among a population of approximately 70,000 women of European ancestry. A dual strategy was used to identify both common and, for the first time, low-frequency coding variants associated with ANM. The causal relationship between ANM and breast cancer was investigated using a Mendelian randomization approach. Combined analysis identified 1208 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of a total of approximately 2.6 million that reached the genome-wide significance threshold for association with ANM. Forty-four regions with common variants were identified; among these 44 loci were 2 rare low-frequency missense alleles of large effect. A majority of ANM SNPs were enriched in DNA damage response (DDR) genes, including the first common coding variant in BRCA1 associated with any complex trait. Mendelian randomization analyses supported a causal relationship between delayed ANM and breast cancer risk; there was approximately 6% increase in risk per year; P = 3 × 10-14); increased risk with delayed menopause appeared to be mediated primarily by prolonged sex hormone exposure in a woman’s lifetime, not DDR mechanisms. This is the first study to confirm the link between early and late menopause and breast cancer risk using genetic information. Age at natural menopause genetic variants influence breast cancer risk primarily through variation in menopause timing. Although carrying higher numbers of ANM-increasing variants and enrichment in DDR genes are associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk, the major mechanism for increased risk appears to be prolonged estrogen and/or progesterone exposure due to delayed menopause.
Published: 2015

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Region

Database

Publisher

42 results on '"Schoemaker, Minouk J."'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources