Search

Your search keyword '"Hopper, John"' showing total 368 results
Start Over Author "Hopper, John" Topic breast cancer
368 results on '"Hopper, John"'

1. Evaluation of European-based polygenic risk score for breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish women in Israel

Author

Levi, Hagai, Carmi, Shai, Rosset, Saharon, Yerushalmi, Rinat, Zick, Aviad, Yablonski-Peretz, Tamar, Consortium, The BCAC, Wang, Qin, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lush, Michael, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Auvinen, Päivi, Freeman, Laura Beane, Beckmann, Matthias, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Bodelon, Clara, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brenner, Hermann, Byers, Helen, Camp, Nicola, Castelao, Jose, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chirlaque, María-Dolores, Chung, Wendy, Clarke, Christine, Collaborators, NBCS, Collee, Margriet J, Colonna, Sarah, Consortium, CTS, Couch, Fergus, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary, Devilee, Peter, Dork, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, Gareth, Fasching, Peter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, Garcia-Saenz, Jose Angel, Genkinger, Jeanine, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark, Guénel, Pascal, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, He, Wei, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John, Investigators, ABCTB, Jakovchevska, Simona, Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther, Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Michael, Vijai, Joseph, Kaaks, Rudolf, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Lindblom, Annika, Loibl, Sibylle, Lori, Adriana, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Menon, Usha, Mulligan, AnnaMarie, Murphy, Rachel, Nevelsteen, Ines, Newman, William G, and Obi, Nadia

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Genome-Wide Association Study, Jews, Israel, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Risk Factors, Multifactorial Inheritance, Transcription Factors, Genomics, Polymorphism, Genetic, BCAC Consortium, NBCS Collaborators, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, Polymorphism, Genetic, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Clinical sciences
Abstract

BackgroundPolygenic risk score (PRS), calculated based on genome-wide association studies (GWASs), can improve breast cancer (BC) risk assessment. To date, most BC GWASs have been performed in individuals of European (EUR) ancestry, and the generalisation of EUR-based PRS to other populations is a major challenge. In this study, we examined the performance of EUR-based BC PRS models in Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) women.MethodsWe generated PRSs based on data on EUR women from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). We tested the performance of the PRSs in a cohort of 2161 AJ women from Israel (1437 cases and 724 controls) from BCAC (BCAC cohort from Israel (BCAC-IL)). In addition, we tested the performance of these EUR-based BC PRSs, as well as the established 313-SNP EUR BC PRS, in an independent cohort of 181 AJ women from Hadassah Medical Center (HMC) in Israel.ResultsIn the BCAC-IL cohort, the highest OR per 1 SD was 1.56 (±0.09). The OR for AJ women at the top 10% of the PRS distribution compared with the middle quintile was 2.10 (±0.24). In the HMC cohort, the OR per 1 SD of the EUR-based PRS that performed best in the BCAC-IL cohort was 1.58±0.27. The OR per 1 SD of the commonly used 313-SNP BC PRS was 1.64 (±0.28).ConclusionsExtant EUR GWAS data can be used for generating PRSs that identify AJ women with markedly elevated risk of BC and therefore hold promise for improving BC risk assessment in AJ women.

Published
2023

2. A Likelihood Ratio Approach for Utilizing Case-Control Data in the Clinical Classification of Rare Sequence Variants: Application to BRCA1 and BRCA2

Author

Zanti, Maria, O'Mahony, Denise G, Parsons, Michael T, Li, Hongyan, Dennis, Joe, Aittomäkkiki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Brown, Melissa A, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Caputo, Sandrine M, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Collaborators, GC-HBOC study, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, De Nicolo, Arcangela, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giele, Willemina RR Geurts-, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Goldberg, Mark S, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Güendert, Melanie, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houdayer, Claude, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Investigators, ABCTB, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Léoné, Melanie, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Lush, Michael, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Murphy, Rachel A, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Offit, Kenneth, Park, Sue K, James, Paul, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rashid, Muhammad U, Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Rosenberg, Efraim H, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, and Shu, Xiao-Ou

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Biotechnology, Women's Health, Human Genome, Prevention, Genetic Testing, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Humans, Case-Control Studies, BRCA2 Protein, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Female, BRCA1 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Likelihood Functions, Genetic Variation, Penetrance, GC-HBOC study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, ACMG/AMP, BRCA, PS4, VUS, case-control, likelihood ratio, variant classification, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Clinical sciences
Abstract

A large number of variants identified through clinical genetic testing in disease susceptibility genes, are of uncertain significance (VUS). Following the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the frequency in case-control datasets (PS4 criterion), can inform their interpretation. We present a novel case-control likelihood ratio-based method that incorporates gene-specific age-related penetrance. We demonstrate the utility of this method in the analysis of simulated and real datasets. In the analyses of simulated data, the likelihood ratio method was more powerful compared to other methods. Likelihood ratios were calculated for a case-control dataset of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and compared with logistic regression results. A larger number of variants reached evidence in favor of pathogenicity, and a substantial number of variants had evidence against pathogenicity - findings that would not have been reached using other case-control analysis methods. Our novel method provides greater power to classify rare variants compared to classical case-control methods. As an initiative from the ENIGMA Analytical Working Group, we provide user-friendly scripts and pre-formatted excel calculators for implementation of the method for rare variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and other high-risk genes with known penetrance.

Published
2023

3. Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer‐specific survival

Author

Morra, Anna, Schreurs, Maartje AC, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Augustinsson, Annelie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Broeks, Annegien, Buys, Saundra S, Camp, Nicola J, Castelao, Jose E, Cessna, Melissa H, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Chung, Wendy K, Sahlberg, Kristine K, Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise, Gram, Inger Torhild, Olsen, Karina Standahl, Engebråten, Olav, Naume, Bjørn, Geisler, Jürgen, OSBREAC, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Colonna, Sarah V, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fehm, Tanja N, Figueroa, Jonine D, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago‐Dominguez, Manuela, García‐Closas, Montserrat, García‐Sáenz, José A, Genkinger, Jeanine, Grassmann, Felix, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Clarke, Christine, Marsh, Deborah, Scott, Rodney, Baxter, Robert, Yip, Desmond, Carpenter, Jane, Davis, Alison, Pathmanathan, Nirmala, Simpson, Peter, Graham, J Dinny, Sachchithananthan, Mythily, Amor, David, Andrews, Lesley, Antill, Yoland, Balleine, Rosemary, Beesley, Jonathan, Bennett, Ian, Bogwitz, Michael, Botes, Leon, Brennan, Meagan, Brown, Melissa, Buckley, Michael, Burke, Jo, Butow, Phyllis, Caldon, Liz, Campbell, Ian, Cao, Michelle, Chakrabarti, Anannya, Chauhan, Deepa, Chauhan, Manisha, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia, Christian, Alice, Cohen, Paul, Colley, Alison, Crook, Ashley, Cui, James, Courtney, Eliza, Cummings, Margaret, and Dawson, Sarah‐Jane

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Clinical Research, Prevention, Women's Health, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Germ-Line Mutation, Heterozygote, Proportional Hazards Models, CHEK2 c.1100delC germline genetic variant, contralateral breast cancer risk, radiotherapy, survival, systemic treatment, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC-specific survival (BCSS) compared to non-carriers.AimTo assessed the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS.MethodsAnalyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with a first primary invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow-up was 9.1 years. Differential associations with treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi-state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death.ResultsThere was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status. The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.55-0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi-state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non-carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR (95% CI): 1.30 (1.09-1.56)].ConclusionSystemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk.

Published
2023

4. Associations of a Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score With Tumor Characteristics and Survival

Author

Lopes Cardozo, Josephine MN, Andrulis, Irene L, Bojesen, Stig E, Dörk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana M, Fasching, Peter A, Hooning, Maartje J, Keeman, Renske, Nevanlinna, Heli, Rutgers, Emiel JT, Easton, Douglas F, Hall, Per, Pharoah, Paul DP, van 't Veer, Laura J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Ahearn, Thomas U, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Boyle, Terry, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Camp, Nicola J, Canzian, Federico, Cardoso, Fatima, Castelao, Jose E, Cessna, Melissa H, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Colonna, Sarah V, Copson, Ellen, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Drukker, Caroline A, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Genkinger, Jeanine, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hein, Alexander, Ho, Weang-Kee, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Michael E, Joseph, Vijai, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M, Koppert, Linetta B, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, and Koutros, Stella

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Breast, Breast Cancer Association Consortium and MINDACT Collaborators, Clinical Sciences, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeA polygenic risk score (PRS) consisting of 313 common genetic variants (PRS313) is associated with risk of breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association of the PRS313 with clinicopathologic characteristics of, and survival following, breast cancer.MethodsWomen with invasive breast cancer were included, 98,397 of European ancestry and 12,920 of Asian ancestry, from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and 683 women from the European MINDACT trial. Associations between PRS313 and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the 70-gene signature for MINDACT, were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Associations of PRS313 (continuous, per standard deviation) with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated with Cox regression, adjusted for clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment.ResultsThe PRS313 was associated with more favorable tumor characteristics. In BCAC, increasing PRS313 was associated with lower grade, hormone receptor-positive status, and smaller tumor size. In MINDACT, PRS313 was associated with a low risk 70-gene signature. In European women from BCAC, higher PRS313 was associated with better OS and BCSS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.98), but the association disappeared after adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics (and treatment): OS HR, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.05) and BCSS HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.07). The results in MINDACT and Asian women from BCAC were consistent.ConclusionAn increased PRS313 is associated with favorable tumor characteristics, but is not independently associated with prognosis. Thus, PRS313 has no role in the clinical management of primary breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. Nevertheless, breast cancer mortality rates will be higher for women with higher PRS313 as increasing PRS313 is associated with an increased risk of disease. This information is crucial for modeling effective stratified screening programs.

Published
2023

5. A genome-wide gene-environment interaction study of breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry

Author

Middha, Pooja, Wang, Xiaoliang, Behrens, Sabine, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thaïs, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dossus, Laure, Dugué, Pierre-Antoine, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Grassmann, Felix, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hankinson, Susan E, Harkness, Elaine F, Holleczek, Bernd, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Ingvar, Christian, Isaksson, Karolin, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Nicole L, Larsson, Susanna, Le Marchand, Loic, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Li, Shuai, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Mulot, Claire, Murphy, Rachel A, Newman, William G, Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Norman, Aaron, O’Brien, Katie M, Olson, Janet E, Patel, Alpa V, Prentice, Ross, Rees-Punia, Erika, Rennert, Gad, Rhenius, Valerie, Ruddy, Kathryn J, and Sandler, Dale P

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Genomics, Human Genome, Estrogen, Cancer, Women's Health, Genetics, Prevention, Aging, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adult, Female, Humans, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Neoplasms, Bayes Theorem, Genome-Wide Association Study, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Case-Control Studies, Breast cancer, Gene-environment interactions, Genetic epidemiology, European ancestry, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide studies of gene-environment interactions (G×E) may identify variants associated with disease risk in conjunction with lifestyle/environmental exposures. We conducted a genome-wide G×E analysis of ~ 7.6 million common variants and seven lifestyle/environmental risk factors for breast cancer risk overall and for estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer.MethodsAnalyses were conducted using 72,285 breast cancer cases and 80,354 controls of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Gene-environment interactions were evaluated using standard unconditional logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and for ER + breast cancer. Bayesian False Discovery Probability was employed to assess the noteworthiness of each SNP-risk factor pairs.ResultsAssuming a 1 × 10-5 prior probability of a true association for each SNP-risk factor pairs and a Bayesian False Discovery Probability

Published
2023

6. Aggregation tests identify new gene associations with breast cancer in populations with diverse ancestry

Author

Mueller, Stefanie H, Lai, Alvina G, Valkovskaya, Maria, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Abu-Ful, Zomoruda, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thais, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Buys, Saundra S, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Chung, Wendy K, Colonna, Sarah V, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Yu-Tang, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Genkinger, Jeanine, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Grassmann, Felix, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Harkness, Elaine F, Harrington, Patricia A, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hartman, Mikael, Hein, Alexander, Ho, Weang-Kee, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Huo, Dezheng, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Khusnutdinova, Elza K, Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kwong, Ava, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, and Le Marchand, Loic

Subjects
Breast Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Black People, Genetic Testing, Genome-Wide Association Study, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Formins, Breast cancer susceptibility, Diverse ancestry, Rare variants, Gene regulation, Genome-wide association study, NBCS Collaborators, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, Clinical Sciences
Abstract

BackgroundLow-frequency variants play an important role in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility. Gene-based methods can increase power by combining multiple variants in the same gene and help identify target genes.MethodsWe evaluated the potential of gene-based aggregation in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium cohorts including 83,471 cases and 59,199 controls. Low-frequency variants were aggregated for individual genes' coding and regulatory regions. Association results in European ancestry samples were compared to single-marker association results in the same cohort. Gene-based associations were also combined in meta-analysis across individuals with European, Asian, African, and Latin American and Hispanic ancestry.ResultsIn European ancestry samples, 14 genes were significantly associated (q

Published
2023

7. Distinct Reproductive Risk Profiles for Intrinsic-Like Breast Cancer Subtypes: Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies

Author

Jung, Audrey Y, Ahearn, Thomas U, Behrens, Sabine, Middha, Pooja, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Carey, Lisa A, Consortium, CTS, Czene, Kamila, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Giles, Graham G, Guénel, Pascal, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Hüsing, Anika, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Lacey, James V, Le Marchand, Loic, Lissowska, Jolanta, Loizidou, Maria A, Mannermaa, Arto, Maurer, Tabea, Murphy, Rachel A, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Patel, Alpa V, Perou, Charles M, Rennert, Gad, Shibli, Rana, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Southey, Melissa C, Stone, Jennifer, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Troester, Melissa A, Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Sophia S, Wolk, Alicja, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zheng, Wei, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Schmidt, Marjanka K, García-Closas, Montserrat, and Chang-Claude, Jenny

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Aging, Reproductive health and childbirth, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, CTS Consortium, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundReproductive factors have been shown to be differentially associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. However, their associations with intrinsic-like subtypes are less clear.MethodsAnalyses included up to 23 353 cases and 71 072 controls pooled from 31 population-based case-control or cohort studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium across 16 countries on 4 continents. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the association between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, HER2-enriched-like, and triple-negative breast cancer) and by invasiveness. All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsCompared with nulliparous women, parous women had a lower risk of luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, and HER2-enriched-like disease. This association was apparent only after approximately 10 years since last birth and became stronger with increasing time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.71; and OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.46 for multiparous women with luminal A-like tumors 20 to less than 25 years after last birth and 45 to less than 50 years after last birth, respectively). In contrast, parous women had a higher risk of triple-negative breast cancer right after their last birth (for multiparous women: OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.83) that was attenuated with time but persisted for decades (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.34, for multiparous women 25 to less than 30 years after last birth). Older age at first birth (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) and breastfeeding (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) were associated with lower risk of triple-negative breast cancer but not with other disease subtypes. Younger age at menarche was associated with higher risk of all subtypes; older age at menopause was associated with higher risk of luminal A-like but not triple-negative breast cancer. Associations for in situ tumors were similar to luminal A-like.ConclusionsThis large and comprehensive study demonstrates a distinct reproductive risk factor profile for triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes, with implications for the understanding of disease etiology and risk prediction.

Published
2022

8. Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study

Author

Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C, Lewis, Sarah J, Martin, Richard M, English, Dallas R, Boyle, Terry, Giles, Graham G, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Investigators, ABCTB, Ahearn, Thomas U, Ambrosone, Christine B, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Auvinen, Päivi, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Buys, Saundra S, Camp, Nicola J, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Cessna, Melissa H, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Goldberg, Mark S, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Häberle, Lothar, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hart, Steven N, Harvie, Michelle, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Loibl, Sibylle, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, and Manoochehri, Mehdi

Subjects
Aging, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Clinical Research, Cancer, Prevention, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Exercise, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Sedentary Behavior, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Breast, Physical activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Engineering, Medical and Health Sciences, Education, Sport Sciences
Abstract

ObjectivesPhysical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are associated with higher breast cancer risk in observational studies, but ascribing causality is difficult. Mendelian randomisation (MR) assesses causality by simulating randomised trial groups using genotype. We assessed whether lifelong physical activity or sedentary time, assessed using genotype, may be causally associated with breast cancer risk overall, pre/post-menopause, and by case-groups defined by tumour characteristics.MethodsWe performed two-sample inverse-variance-weighted MR using individual-level Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control data from 130 957 European-ancestry women (69 838 invasive cases), and published UK Biobank data (n=91 105-377 234). Genetic instruments were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated in UK Biobank with wrist-worn accelerometer-measured overall physical activity (nsnps=5) or sedentary time (nsnps=6), or accelerometer-measured (nsnps=1) or self-reported (nsnps=5) vigorous physical activity.ResultsGreater genetically-predicted overall activity was associated with lower breast cancer overall risk (OR=0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.83 per-standard deviation (SD;~8 milligravities acceleration)) and for most case-groups. Genetically-predicted vigorous activity was associated with lower risk of pre/perimenopausal breast cancer (OR=0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87,≥3 vs. 0 self-reported days/week), with consistent estimates for most case-groups. Greater genetically-predicted sedentary time was associated with higher hormone-receptor-negative tumour risk (OR=1.77; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.92 per-SD (~7% time spent sedentary)), with elevated estimates for most case-groups. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses examining pleiotropy (including weighted-median-MR, MR-Egger).ConclusionOur study provides strong evidence that greater overall physical activity, greater vigorous activity, and lower sedentary time are likely to reduce breast cancer risk. More widespread adoption of active lifestyles may reduce the burden from the most common cancer in women.

Published
2022

9. Cancer Risks Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

Author

Li, Shuai, Silvestri, Valentina, Leslie, Goska, Rebbeck, Timothy R, Neuhausen, Susan L, Hopper, John L, Nielsen, Henriette Roed, Lee, Andrew, Yang, Xin, McGuffog, Lesley, Parsons, Michael T, Andrulis, Irene L, Arnold, Norbert, Belotti, Muriel, Borg, Åke, Buecher, Bruno, Buys, Saundra S, Caputo, Sandrine M, Chung, Wendy K, Colas, Chrystelle, Colonna, Sarah V, Cook, Jackie, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, de Pauw, Antoine, Delhomelle, Hélène, Eason, Jacqueline, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Faust, Ulrike, Fehm, Tanja N, Fostira, Florentia, Fountzilas, George, Frone, Megan, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, Garre, Pilar, Gauthier-Villars, Marion, Gehrig, Andrea, Glendon, Gord, Goldgar, David E, Golmard, Lisa, Greene, Mark H, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hanson, Helen, Hassan, Tiara, Hentschel, Julia, Horvath, Judit, Izatt, Louise, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jiao, Yue, John, Esther M, Karlan, Beth Y, Kim, Sung-Won, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kwong, Ava, Laugé, Anthony, Lee, Jong Won, Lesueur, Fabienne, Mebirouk, Noura, Meindl, Alfons, Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle, Musgrave, Hannah, Yie, Joanne Ngeow Yuen, Niederacher, Dieter, Park, Sue K, Pedersen, Inge Sokilde, Ramser, Juliane, Ramus, Susan J, Rantala, Johanna, Rashid, Muhammad U, Reichl, Florian, Ritter, Julia, Rump, Andreas, Santamariña, Marta, Saule, Claire, Schmidt, Gunnar, Schmutzler, Rita K, Senter, Leigha, Shariff, Saba, Singer, Christian F, Southey, Melissa C, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Sutter, Christian, Tan, Yen, Teo, Soo Hwang, Terry, Mary Beth, Thomassen, Mads, Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda E, Torres, Diana, Vega, Ana, Wagner, Sebastian A, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Weber, Bernhard HF, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Spurdle, Amanda B, Easton, Douglas F, and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia

Subjects
Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Urologic Diseases, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Digestive Diseases, Aging, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Male, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heterozygote, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Risk, Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeTo provide precise age-specific risk estimates of cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers associated with pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 for effective cancer risk management.MethodsWe used data from 3,184 BRCA1 and 2,157 BRCA2 families in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 to estimate age-specific relative (RR) and absolute risks for 22 first primary cancer types adjusting for family ascertainment.ResultsBRCA1 PVs were associated with risks of male breast (RR = 4.30; 95% CI, 1.09 to 16.96), pancreatic (RR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.51 to 3.68), and stomach (RR = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.77) cancers. Associations with colorectal and gallbladder cancers were also suggested. BRCA2 PVs were associated with risks of male breast (RR = 44.0; 95% CI, 21.3 to 90.9), stomach (RR = 3.69; 95% CI, 2.40 to 5.67), pancreatic (RR = 3.34; 95% CI, 2.21 to 5.06), and prostate (RR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.63 to 3.03) cancers. The stomach cancer RR was higher for females than males (6.89 v 2.76; P = .04). The absolute risks to age 80 years ranged from 0.4% for male breast cancer to approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer for BRCA1 carriers and from approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer to 27% for prostate cancer for BRCA2 carriers.ConclusionIn addition to female breast and ovarian cancers, BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs are associated with increased risks of male breast, pancreatic, stomach, and prostate (only BRCA2 PVs) cancers, but not with the risks of other previously suggested cancers. The estimated age-specific risks will refine cancer risk management in men and women with BRCA1/2 PVs.

Published
2022

11. PredictCBC-2.0: a contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model developed and validated in ~ 200,000 patients

Author

Giardiello, Daniele, Hooning, Maartje J, Hauptmann, Michael, Keeman, Renske, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, BAM, Becher, Heiko, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Camp, Nicola J, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Eccles, Diana M, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine D, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Leeuwen, Floor E, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Nevanlinna, Heli, Nevelsteen, Ines, Pelders, Saskia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Siesling, Sabine, Southey, Melissa C, van der Hout, Annemieke H, van Hest, Liselotte P, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Hall, Per, Easton, Douglas F, Steyerberg, Ewout W, and Schmidt, Marjanka K

Subjects
Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Mastectomy, Prophylactic Mastectomy, Germ-Line Mutation, Risk Factors, Contralateral breast cancer, Risk prediction, Contralateral preventive mastectomy, Clinical decision-making, Breast cancer genetic predisposition, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, BCAC, Prediction performance, BRCA1/2 germline mutation, Polygenic risk score, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundPrediction of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk is challenging due to moderate performances of the known risk factors. We aimed to improve our previous risk prediction model (PredictCBC) by updated follow-up and including additional risk factors.MethodsWe included data from 207,510 invasive breast cancer patients participating in 23 studies. In total, 8225 CBC events occurred over a median follow-up of 10.2 years. In addition to the previously included risk factors, PredictCBC-2.0 included CHEK2 c.1100delC, a 313 variant polygenic risk score (PRS-313), body mass index (BMI), and parity. Fine and Gray regression was used to fit the model. Calibration and a time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) at 5 and 10 years were assessed to determine the performance of the models. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the net benefit of PredictCBC-2.0 and previous PredictCBC models.ResultsThe discrimination of PredictCBC-2.0 at 10 years was higher than PredictCBC with an AUC of 0.65 (95% prediction intervals (PI) 0.56-0.74) versus 0.63 (95%PI 0.54-0.71). PredictCBC-2.0 was well calibrated with an observed/expected ratio at 10 years of 0.92 (95%PI 0.34-2.54). Decision curve analysis for contralateral preventive mastectomy (CPM) showed the potential clinical utility of PredictCBC-2.0 between thresholds of 4 and 12% 10-year CBC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers.ConclusionsAdditional genetic information beyond BRCA1/2 germline mutations improved CBC risk prediction and might help tailor clinical decision-making toward CPM or alternative preventive strategies. Identifying patients who benefit from CPM, especially in the general breast cancer population, remains challenging.

Published
2022

12. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author

Ahearn, Thomas U, Zhang, Haoyu, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Lush, Michael, Wang, Qin, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kauppila, Saila, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Krüger, Ute, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Lambrechts, Diether, Lee, Derrick G, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, MacInnis, Robert J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, and McLean, Catriona

Subjects
Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk, Breast cancer, Etiologic heterogeneity, Genetic predisposition, Common breast cancer susceptibility variants, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER) status, but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear.MethodsAmong 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes.ResultsEighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate

Published
2022

13. Rare germline copy number variants (CNVs) and breast cancer risk

Author

Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Walker, Logan C, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dorling, Leila, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brenner, Hermann, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Nicole L, Linet, Martha, Ogrodniczak, Alicja, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, Murphy, Rachel A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Perou, Charles M, Peterlongo, Paolo, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Pylkäs, Katri, Rennert, Gad, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Shibli, Rana, Smeets, Ann, and Soucy, Penny

Subjects
Human Genome, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Germ Cells, Humans, Risk Factors, NBCS Collaborators, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators
Abstract

Germline copy number variants (CNVs) are pervasive in the human genome but potential disease associations with rare CNVs have not been comprehensively assessed in large datasets. We analysed rare CNVs in genes and non-coding regions for 86,788 breast cancer cases and 76,122 controls of European ancestry with genome-wide array data. Gene burden tests detected the strongest association for deletions in BRCA1 (P = 3.7E-18). Nine other genes were associated with a p-value

Published
2022

14. Association of germline genetic variants with breast cancer-specific survival in patient subgroups defined by clinic-pathological variables related to tumor biology and type of systemic treatment

Author

Morra, Anna, Escala-Garcia, Maria, Beesley, Jonathan, Keeman, Renske, Canisius, Sander, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Buys, Saundra S, Caan, Bette, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Clarke, Christine L, Colonna, Sarah V, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Sáenz, José A, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hart, Steven N, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Hartmann, Arndt, He, Wei, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keupers, Machteld, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Lush, Michael, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Martinez, Maria Elena, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, and Nielsen, Sune F

Subjects
Clinical Research, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Common germline genetic variants, Breast cancer-specific survival, Patient subgroups, Tumor biology, Systemic treatment, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundGiven the high heterogeneity among breast tumors, associations between common germline genetic variants and survival that may exist within specific subgroups could go undetected in an unstratified set of breast cancer patients.MethodsWe performed genome-wide association analyses within 15 subgroups of breast cancer patients based on prognostic factors, including hormone receptors, tumor grade, age, and type of systemic treatment. Analyses were based on 91,686 female patients of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, including 7531 breast cancer-specific deaths over a median follow-up of 8.1 years. Cox regression was used to assess associations of common germline variants with 15-year and 5-year breast cancer-specific survival. We assessed the probability of these associations being true positives via the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP

Published
2021

15. Mendelian randomisation study of smoking exposure in relation to breast cancer risk

Author

Park, Hanla A, Neumeyer, Sonja, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Han, Sileny, Harkness, Elaine F, Hart, Steven N, He, Wei, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Koppert, Linetta B, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lo, Wing-Yee, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Meindl, Alfons, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, and Nevanlinna, Heli

Subjects
Genetics, Cancer, Substance Misuse, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Prevention, Drug Abuse (NIDA only), Breast Cancer, Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cigarette Smoking, Female, Genetic Pleiotropy, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundDespite a modest association between tobacco smoking and breast cancer risk reported by recent epidemiological studies, it is still equivocal whether smoking is causally related to breast cancer risk.MethodsWe applied Mendelian randomisation (MR) to evaluate a potential causal effect of cigarette smoking on breast cancer risk. Both individual-level data as well as summary statistics for 164 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reported in genome-wide association studies of lifetime smoking index (LSI) or cigarette per day (CPD) were used to obtain MR effect estimates. Data from 108,420 invasive breast cancer cases and 87,681 controls were used for the LSI analysis and for the CPD analysis conducted among ever-smokers from 26,147 cancer cases and 26,072 controls. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address pleiotropy.ResultsGenetically predicted LSI was associated with increased breast cancer risk (OR 1.18 per SD, 95% CI: 1.07-1.30, P = 0.11 × 10-2), but there was no evidence of association for genetically predicted CPD (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.78-1.19, P = 0.85). The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results and showed no strong evidence of pleiotropic effect.ConclusionOur MR study provides supportive evidence for a potential causal association with breast cancer risk for lifetime smoking exposure but not cigarettes per day among smokers.

Published
2021

16. Germline variants and breast cancer survival in patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis.

Author

Escala-Garcia, Maria, Canisius, Sander, Keeman, Renske, Beesley, Jonathan, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Geisler, Jürgen, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jacot, William, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peterlongo, Paolo, Pharoah, Paul DP, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, Romero, Atocha, Roylance, Rebecca, Rüdiger, Thomas, Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Christopher, Southey, Melissa C, Surowy, Harald, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Thomas, Emilie, Tomlinson, Ian, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, and Wolk, Alicja

Subjects
kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Cancer, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract

Breast cancer metastasis accounts for most of the deaths from breast cancer. Identification of germline variants associated with survival in aggressive types of breast cancer may inform understanding of breast cancer progression and assist treatment. In this analysis, we studied the associations between germline variants and breast cancer survival for patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis. We used data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) including 1062 women of European ancestry with metastatic breast cancer, 606 of whom died of breast cancer. We identified two germline variants on chromosome 1, rs138569520 and rs146023652, significantly associated with breast cancer-specific survival (P = 3.19 × 10-8 and 4.42 × 10-8). In silico analysis suggested a potential regulatory effect of the variants on the nearby target genes SDE2 and H3F3A. However, the variants showed no evidence of association in a smaller replication dataset. The validation dataset was obtained from the SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study and included 293 patients with metastatic primary breast cancer at diagnosis. Ultimately, larger replication studies are needed to confirm the identified associations.

Published
2021

17. The predictive ability of the 313 variant-based polygenic risk score for contralateral breast cancer risk prediction in women of European ancestry with a heterozygous BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant.

Author

Lakeman, Inge MM, van den Broek, Alexandra J, Vos, Juliën AM, Barnes, Daniel R, Adlard, Julian, Andrulis, Irene L, Arason, Adalgeir, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Balmaña, Judith, Barrowdale, Daniel, Benitez, Javier, Borg, Ake, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, Collée, J Margriet, Couch, Fergus J, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Dhawan, Mallika, Domchek, Susan M, Eeles, Ros, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Feliubadaló, Lidia, Foretova, Lenka, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Gayther, Simon A, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldgar, David E, Hahnen, Eric, Hake, Christopher R, Hamann, Ute, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Hulick, Peter J, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, OCGN Investigators, HEBON Investigators, KconFab Investigators, Isaacs, Claudine, Izatt, Louise, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul A, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jensen, Uffe Birk, Jiao, Yue, John, Esther M, Joseph, Vijai, Karlan, Beth Y, Kets, Carolien M, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kwong, Ava, Legrand, Clémentine, Leslie, Goska, Lesueur, Fabienne, Loud, Jennifer T, Lubiński, Jan, Manoukian, Siranoush, McGuffog, Lesley, Miller, Austin, Gomes, Denise Molina, Montagna, Marco, Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle, Nathanson, Katherine L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Yie, Joanne Ngeow Yuen, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Park, Sue K, Parsons, Michael T, Peterlongo, Paolo, Piedmonte, Marion, Radice, Paolo, Rantala, Johanna, Rennert, Gad, Risch, Harvey A, Schmutzler, Rita K, Sharma, Priyanka, Simard, Jacques, Singer, Christian F, Stadler, Zsofia, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Sutter, Christian, Tan, Yen Yen, Teixeira, Manuel R, Teo, Soo Hwang, Teulé, Alex, Thomassen, Mads, and Thull, Darcy L

Subjects
GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, OCGN Investigators, HEBON Investigators, KconFab Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk Factors, Retrospective Studies, Heterozygote, Mutation, Adult, Female, Prevention, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Genetics & Heredity, Genetics, Clinical Sciences
Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the association between a previously published 313 variant-based breast cancer (BC) polygenic risk score (PRS313) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk, in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant heterozygotes.MethodsWe included women of European ancestry with a prevalent first primary invasive BC (BRCA1 = 6,591 with 1,402 prevalent CBC cases; BRCA2 = 4,208 with 647 prevalent CBC cases) from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA), a large international retrospective series. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between overall and ER-specific PRS313 and CBC risk.ResultsFor BRCA1 heterozygotes the estrogen receptor (ER)-negative PRS313 showed the largest association with CBC risk, hazard ratio (HR) per SD = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.06-1.18), C-index = 0.53; for BRCA2 heterozygotes, this was the ER-positive PRS313, HR = 1.15, 95% CI (1.07-1.25), C-index = 0.57. Adjusting for family history, age at diagnosis, treatment, or pathological characteristics for the first BC did not change association effect sizes. For women developing first BC

Published
2021

18. Functional annotation of the 2q35 breast cancer risk locus implicates a structural variant in influencing activity of a long-range enhancer element

Author

Baxter, Joseph S, Johnson, Nichola, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Gillespie, Andrea, Maguire, Sarah, Brough, Rachel, Fachal, Laura, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Cai, Qiuyin, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Collaborators, NBCS, Colonna, Sarah, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Chi, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hatse, Sigrid, Hauke, Jan, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hou, Ming-Feng, Investigators, kConFab, Investigators, ABCTB, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Joseph, Vijai, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kim, Sung-Won, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kwong, Ava, and Lacey, James V

Subjects
Human Genome, Genetics, Cancer, Estrogen, Prevention, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cell Line, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Variation, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Risk Factors, Sequence Deletion, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, breast cancer risk, functional annotation, risk locus, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

A combination of genetic and functional approaches has identified three independent breast cancer risk loci at 2q35. A recent fine-scale mapping analysis to refine these associations resulted in 1 (signal 1), 5 (signal 2), and 42 (signal 3) credible causal variants at these loci. We used publicly available in silico DNase I and ChIP-seq data with in vitro reporter gene and CRISPR assays to annotate signals 2 and 3. We identified putative regulatory elements that enhanced cell-type-specific transcription from the IGFBP5 promoter at both signals (30- to 40-fold increased expression by the putative regulatory element at signal 2, 2- to 3-fold by the putative regulatory element at signal 3). We further identified one of the five credible causal variants at signal 2, a 1.4 kb deletion (esv3594306), as the likely causal variant; the deletion allele of this variant was associated with an average additional increase in IGFBP5 expression of 1.3-fold (MCF-7) and 2.2-fold (T-47D). We propose a model in which the deletion allele of esv3594306 juxtaposes two transcription factor binding regions (annotated by estrogen receptor alpha ChIP-seq peaks) to generate a single extended regulatory element. This regulatory element increases cell-type-specific expression of the tumor suppressor gene IGFBP5 and, thereby, reduces risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.74-0.81, p = 3.1 × 10-31).

Published
2021

19. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association ConsortiumBreast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival By Tumor Subtype

Author

Morra, Anna, Jung, Audrey Y, Behrens, Sabine, Keeman, Renske, Ahearn, Thomas U, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Auvinen, Päivi K, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Brucker, Sara Y, Camp, Nicola J, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Investigators, for the ABCTB, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Egan, Kathleen M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Han, Sileny N, Hart, Steven N, Hartman, Mikael, Heyworth, Jane S, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Ito, Hidemi, Jager, Agnes, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Collaborators, for the NBCS, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Lush, Michael, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mariapun, Shivaani, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, Newman, William G, Noh, Dong-Young, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Obi, Nadia, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Petridis, Christos, Pharoah, Paul DP, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Presneau, Nadege, Rashid, Muhammad U, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, and Rhenius, Valerie

Subjects
Health Services and Systems, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Aging, Estrogen, Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundIt is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype.MethodsWe analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype.ResultsThere was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (P adj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5-25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06-1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27-1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21-0.86)], age ≥30 years versus 0-

Published
2021

20. Combined Associations of a Polygenic Risk Score and Classical Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk.

Author

Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Mavaddat, Nasim, Choudhury, Parichoy Pal, Wilcox, Amber N, Lindström, Sara, Behrens, Sabine, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dennis, Joe, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Jung, Audrey, Abu-Ful, Zomoroda, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bernstein, Leslie, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Cai, Qiuyin, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dai, James Y, Earp, H Shelton, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Chi, Gapstur, Susan M, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hatse, Sigrid, Heyworth, Jane, Holleczek, Bernd, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, MacInnis, Robert J, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, McLean, Catriona, Neuhausen, Susan L, Newman, William G, Norman, Aaron, O'Brien, Katie M, Olshan, Andrew F, Olson, Janet E, Olsson, Håkan, and Orr, Nick

Subjects
ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Receptors, Estrogen, Medical History Taking, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, White People, Aging, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Clinical Research, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

We evaluated the joint associations between a new 313-variant PRS (PRS313) and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors for women of European ancestry, using 72 284 cases and 80 354 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Interactions were evaluated using standard logistic regression and a newly developed case-only method for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen receptor status. After accounting for multiple testing, we did not find evidence that per-standard deviation PRS313 odds ratio differed across strata defined by individual risk factors. Goodness-of-fit tests did not reject the assumption of a multiplicative model between PRS313 and each risk factor. Variation in projected absolute lifetime risk of breast cancer associated with classical risk factors was greater for women with higher genetic risk (PRS313 and family history) and, on average, 17.5% higher in the highest vs lowest deciles of genetic risk. These findings have implications for risk prevention for women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Published
2021

21. A case-only study to identify genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Author

Coignard, Juliette, Lush, Michael, Beesley, Jonathan, O'Mara, Tracy A, Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Barnes, Daniel R, McGuffog, Lesley, Leslie, Goska, Bolla, Manjeet K, Adank, Muriel A, Agata, Simona, Ahearn, Thomas, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Augustinsson, Annelie, Azzollini, Jacopo, Barrowdale, Daniel, Baynes, Caroline, Becher, Heiko, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campa, Daniele, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, Collée, J Margriet, Conroy, Don M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Friedman, Eitan, Fritschi, Lin, Frost, Debra, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Gayther, Simon A, Gehrig, Andrea, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Giles, Graham G, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, He, Wei, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, and Hopper, John L

Subjects
GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk Factors, Genotype, Linkage Disequilibrium, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Quantitative Trait Loci, Adult, Middle Aged, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Genetic Testing, Human Genome, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers varies by genetic and familial factors. About 50 common variants have been shown to modify BC risk for mutation carriers. All but three, were identified in general population studies. Other mutation carrier-specific susceptibility variants may exist but studies of mutation carriers have so far been underpowered. We conduct a novel case-only genome-wide association study comparing genotype frequencies between 60,212 general population BC cases and 13,007 cases with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We identify robust novel associations for 2 variants with BC for BRCA1 and 3 for BRCA2 mutation carriers, P

Published
2021

22. CYP3A7*1C allele: linking premenopausal oestrone and progesterone levels with risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers

Author

Johnson, Nichola, Maguire, Sarah, Morra, Anna, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Jones, Michael E, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Gilham, Clare, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baynes, Caroline, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Linet, Martha, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Mayes, Rebecca, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Obi, Nadia, Olshan, Andrew F, and Olson, Janet E

Subjects
Estrogen, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, Estrone, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Pregnanediol, Premenopause, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, NBCS Collaborators, AOCS Group, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundEpidemiological studies provide strong evidence for a role of endogenous sex hormones in the aetiology of breast cancer. The aim of this analysis was to identify genetic variants that are associated with urinary sex-hormone levels and breast cancer risk.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study of urinary oestrone-3-glucuronide and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide levels in 560 premenopausal women, with additional analysis of progesterone levels in 298 premenopausal women. To test for the association with breast cancer risk, we carried out follow-up genotyping in 90,916 cases and 89,893 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. All women were of European ancestry.ResultsFor pregnanediol-3-glucuronide, there were no genome-wide significant associations; for oestrone-3-glucuronide, we identified a single peak mapping to the CYP3A locus, annotated by rs45446698. The minor rs45446698-C allele was associated with lower oestrone-3-glucuronide (-49.2%, 95% CI -56.1% to -41.1%, P = 3.1 × 10-18); in follow-up analyses, rs45446698-C was also associated with lower progesterone (-26.7%, 95% CI -39.4% to -11.6%, P = 0.001) and reduced risk of oestrogen and progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, P = 6.9 × 10-8).ConclusionsThe CYP3A7*1C allele is associated with reduced risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer possibly mediated via an effect on the metabolism of endogenous sex hormones in premenopausal women.

Published
2021

23. Gene-Environment Interactions Relevant to Estrogen and Risk of Breast Cancer: Can Gene-Environment Interactions Be Detected Only among Candidate SNPs from Genome-Wide Association Studies?

Author

Park, JooYong, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Choi, Jaesung, Chung, Seokang, Song, Nan, Park, Sue K, Han, Wonshik, Noh, Dong-Young, Ahn, Sei-Hyun, Lee, Jong Won, Kim, Mi Kyung, Jee, Sun Ha, Wen, Wanqing, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Shah, Mitul, Conroy, Don M, Harrington, Patricia A, Mayes, Rebecca, Czene, Kamila, Hall, Per, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet E, Sawyer, Elinor J, Roylance, Rebecca, Bojesen, Stig E, Flyger, Henrik, Lambrechts, Diether, Baten, Adinda, Matsuo, Keitaro, Ito, Hidemi, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Keeman, Renske, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Wu, Anna H, Tseng, Chiu-Chen, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, kConFab Investigators, Andrulis, Irene L, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Wu, Pei-Ei, Shen, Chen-Yang, Fasching, Peter A, Ekici, Arif B, Muir, Kenneth, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Jones, Michael E, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Hoppe, Reiner, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Hartman, Mikael, Li, Jingmei, Mannermaa, Arto, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Benitez, Javier, González-Neira, Anna, Haiman, Christopher A, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Teo, Soo Hwang, Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Grip, Mervi, Winqvist, Robert, Blomqvist, Carl, Nevanlinna, Heli, Lindblom, Annika, Wendt, Camilla, Kristensen, Vessela N, Nbcs Collaborators, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Radice, Paolo, Bonanni, Bernardo, Hamann, Ute, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Lacey, James V, Martinez, Maria Elena, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Easton, Douglas F, Yoo, Keun-Young, and Kang, Daehee

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Estrogen, Prevention, Aging, Genetics, Women's Health, Clinical Research, Cancer, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, breast cancer, estrogen, gene-environment interaction, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

In this study we aim to examine gene-environment interactions (GxEs) between genes involved with estrogen metabolism and environmental factors related to estrogen exposure. GxE analyses were conducted with 1970 Korean breast cancer cases and 2052 controls in the case-control study, the Seoul Breast Cancer Study (SEBCS). A total of 11,555 SNPs from the 137 candidate genes were included in the GxE analyses with eight established environmental factors. A replication test was conducted by using an independent population from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), with 62,485 Europeans and 9047 Asians. The GxE tests were performed by using two-step methods in GxEScan software. Two interactions were found in the SEBCS. The first interaction was shown between rs13035764 of NCOA1 and age at menarche in the GE|2df model (p-2df = 1.2 × 10-3). The age at menarche before 14 years old was associated with the high risk of breast cancer, and the risk was higher when subjects had homozygous minor allele G. The second GxE was shown between rs851998 near ESR1 and height in the GE|2df model (p-2df = 1.1 × 10-4). Height taller than 160 cm was associated with a high risk of breast cancer, and the risk increased when the minor allele was added. The findings were not replicated in the BCAC. These results would suggest specificity in Koreans for breast cancer risk.

Published
2021

24. Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk

Author

Kramer, Iris, Hooning, Maartje J, Mavaddat, Nasim, Hauptmann, Michael, Keeman, Renske, Steyerberg, Ewout W, Giardiello, Daniele, Antoniou, Antonis C, Pharoah, Paul DP, Canisius, Sander, Abu-Ful, Zumuruda, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud, Bremer, Michael, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Giles, Graham G, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Hou, Ming-Feng, Howell, Anthony, Ito, Hidemi, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kang, Daehee, Kets, C Marleen, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Muranen, Taru A, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Olshan, Andrew F, Olson, Janet E, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, and Peto, Julian

Subjects
Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Adult, Aged, Asian People, Breast Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Female, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk Assessment, White People, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Receptor, erbB-2, contralateral breast cancer, epidemiology, genetic, polygenic risk score, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

Previous research has shown that polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can be used to stratify women according to their risk of developing primary invasive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association between a recently validated PRS of 313 germline variants (PRS313) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk. We included 56,068 women of European ancestry diagnosed with first invasive breast cancer from 1990 onward with follow-up from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Metachronous CBC risk (N = 1,027) according to the distribution of PRS313 was quantified using Cox regression analyses. We assessed PRS313 interaction with age at first diagnosis, family history, morphology, ER status, PR status, and HER2 status, and (neo)adjuvant therapy. In studies of Asian women, with limited follow-up, CBC risk associated with PRS313 was assessed using logistic regression for 340 women with CBC compared with 12,133 women with unilateral breast cancer. Higher PRS313 was associated with increased CBC risk: hazard ratio per standard deviation (SD) = 1.25 (95%CI = 1.18-1.33) for Europeans, and an OR per SD = 1.15 (95%CI = 1.02-1.29) for Asians. The absolute lifetime risks of CBC, accounting for death as competing risk, were 12.4% for European women at the 10th percentile and 20.5% at the 90th percentile of PRS313. We found no evidence of confounding by or interaction with individual characteristics, characteristics of the primary tumor, or treatment. The C-index for the PRS313 alone was 0.563 (95%CI = 0.547-0.586). In conclusion, PRS313 is an independent factor associated with CBC risk and can be incorporated into CBC risk prediction models to help improve stratification and optimize surveillance and treatment strategies.

Published
2020

25. Assessment of interactions between 205 breast cancer susceptibility loci and 13 established risk factors in relation to breast cancer risk, in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Author

Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Lindström, Sara, Behrens, Sabine, Wang, Xiaoliang, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Kraft, Peter, García-Closas, Montserrat, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bernstein, Leslie, Berrandou, Takiy, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brock, Ian W, Broeks, Annegien, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Butterbach, Katja, Cai, Qiuyin, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Clarke, Christine L, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dai, James Y, Dite, Gillian S, Earp, H Shelton, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hankinson, Susan E, Harkness, Elaine F, Harstad, Tricia, He, Wei, Heyworth, Jane, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Humphreys, Keith, Hunter, David J, Marrón, Pablo Isidro, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Krüger, Ute, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, and Makalic, Enes

Subjects
Genetics, Estrogen, Clinical Research, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Europe, Factor XIII, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, White People, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Europeans, Gene-environment interaction, breast cancer, epidemiology, risk factors, single nucleotide polymorphism, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract

BackgroundPrevious gene-environment interaction studies of breast cancer risk have provided sparse evidence of interactions. Using the largest available dataset to date, we performed a comprehensive assessment of potential effect modification of 205 common susceptibility variants by 13 established breast cancer risk factors, including replication of previously reported interactions.MethodsAnalyses were performed using 28 176 cases and 32 209 controls genotyped with iCOGS array and 44 109 cases and 48 145 controls genotyped using OncoArray from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Gene-environment interactions were assessed using unconditional logistic regression and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen-receptor (ER) status. Bayesian false discovery probability was used to assess the noteworthiness of the meta-analysed array-specific interactions.ResultsNoteworthy evidence of interaction at ≤1% prior probability was observed for three single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-risk factor pairs. SNP rs4442975 was associated with a greater reduction of risk of ER-positive breast cancer [odds ratio (OR)int = 0.85 (0.78-0.93), Pint = 2.8 x 10-4] and overall breast cancer [ORint = 0.85 (0.78-0.92), Pint = 7.4 x 10-5) in current users of estrogen-progesterone therapy compared with non-users. This finding was supported by replication using OncoArray data of the previously reported interaction between rs13387042 (r2 = 0.93 with rs4442975) and current estrogen-progesterone therapy for overall disease (Pint = 0.004). The two other interactions suggested stronger associations between SNP rs6596100 and ER-negative breast cancer with increasing parity and younger age at first birth.ConclusionsOverall, our study does not suggest strong effect modification of common breast cancer susceptibility variants by established risk factors.

Published
2020

26. A network analysis to identify mediators of germline-driven differences in breast cancer prognosis.

Author

Escala-Garcia, Maria, Abraham, Jean, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Ashworth, Alan, Auer, Paul L, Auvinen, Päivi, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beesley, Jonathan, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldas, Carlos, Canzian, Federico, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chin, Suet-Feung, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dunn, Janet A, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Earl, Helena M, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, George, Angela, Giles, Graham G, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Guo, Qi, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hiller, Louise, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Huang, Chiun-Sheng, Huang, Guanmengqian, Hunter, David J, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Olshan, Andrew F, Olson, Janet E, and Olsson, Håkan

Subjects
Germ Cells, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11, Receptors, Estrogen, Prognosis, Computational Biology, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Genotype, Female, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Circadian Clocks, Gq-G11, Receptors, Estrogen, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract

Identifying the underlying genetic drivers of the heritability of breast cancer prognosis remains elusive. We adapt a network-based approach to handle underpowered complex datasets to provide new insights into the potential function of germline variants in breast cancer prognosis. This network-based analysis studies ~7.3 million variants in 84,457 breast cancer patients in relation to breast cancer survival and confirms the results on 12,381 independent patients. Aggregating the prognostic effects of genetic variants across multiple genes, we identify four gene modules associated with survival in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and one in ER-positive disease. The modules show biological enrichment for cancer-related processes such as G-alpha signaling, circadian clock, angiogenesis, and Rho-GTPases in apoptosis.

Published
2020

27. Adherence to the 2020 American Cancer Society Guideline for Cancer Prevention and risk of breast cancer for women at increased familial and genetic risk in the Breast Cancer Family Registry: an evaluation of the weight, physical activity, and alcohol consumption recommendations

Author

Geczik, Ashley M., Ferris, Jennifer S., Terry, Mary Beth, Andrulis, Irene L., Buys, Saundra S., Daly, Mary B., Hopper, John L., John, Esther M., Kurian, Allison W., Southey, Melissa C., Liao, Yuyan, and Genkinger, Jeanine M.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk.

Author

Dörk, Thilo, Peterlongo, Paolo, Mannermaa, Arto, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Canzian, Federico, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Chi, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hauke, Jan, Hein, Alexander, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Tony, Huo, Dezheng, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Marchand, Loic Le, Li, Jingmei, Lindström, Sara, Linet, Martha, Lo, Wing-Yee, Long, Jirong, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubiński, Jan, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Elena, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitris, and Meindl, Alfons

Subjects
ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Fanconi Anemia, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Case-Control Studies, Sequence Deletion, Female, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group C Protein, Genetic Variation, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Other Physical Sciences
Abstract

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95%CI 0.44-1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.

Published
2019

29. Mendelian randomisation study of height and body mass index as modifiers of ovarian cancer risk in 22,588 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Author

Qian, Frank, Rookus, Matti A, Leslie, Goska, Risch, Harvey A, Greene, Mark H, Aalfs, Cora M, Adank, Muriel A, Adlard, Julian, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Ahmed, Munaza, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Azzollini, Jacopo, Barrowdale, Daniel, Barwell, Julian, Benitez, Javier, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Bonadona, Valérie, Borde, Julika, Borg, Ake, Bradbury, Angela R, Brunet, Joan, Buys, Saundra S, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Collonge-Rame, Marie-Agnès, Couch, Fergus J, Daly, Mary B, Delnatte, Capucine, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Eason, Jacqueline, Easton, Douglas F, Eeles, Ros, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Faivre, Laurence, Feliubadaló, Lidia, Foretova, Lenka, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, Gehrig, Andrea, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Gómez Garcia, Encarna B, Hamann, Ute, Hauke, Jan, Hopper, John L, Hulick, Peter J, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Izatt, Louise, Jakubowska, Anna, Janavicius, Ramunas, John, Esther M, Karlan, Beth Y, Kets, Carolien M, Laitman, Yael, Lázaro, Conxi, Leroux, Dominique, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne, Loud, Jennifer T, Lubiński, Jan, Łukomska, Alicja, McGuffog, Lesley, Mebirouk, Noura, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne EJ, Meindl, Alfons, Miller, Austin, Montagna, Marco, Mooij, Thea M, Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle, Nathanson, Katherine L, Nehoray, Bita, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Nielsen, Finn C, Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Ong, Kai-ren, Oosterwijk, Jan C, Ottini, Laura, Parsons, Michael T, Peterlongo, Paolo, Pfeiler, Georg, and Pradhan, Nisha

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Aging, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adult, Aged, Body Height, Body Mass Index, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Heterozygote, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Menopause, Middle Aged, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proportional Hazards Models, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, CIMBA, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundHeight and body mass index (BMI) are associated with higher ovarian cancer risk in the general population, but whether such associations exist among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is unknown.MethodsWe applied a Mendelian randomisation approach to examine height/BMI with ovarian cancer risk using the Consortium of Investigators for the Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) data set, comprising 14,676 BRCA1 and 7912 BRCA2 mutation carriers, with 2923 ovarian cancer cases. We created a height genetic score (height-GS) using 586 height-associated variants and a BMI genetic score (BMI-GS) using 93 BMI-associated variants. Associations were assessed using weighted Cox models.ResultsObserved height was not associated with ovarian cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07 per 10-cm increase in height, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.23). Height-GS showed similar results (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85-1.23). Higher BMI was significantly associated with increased risk in premenopausal women with HR = 1.25 (95% CI: 1.06-1.48) and HR = 1.59 (95% CI: 1.08-2.33) per 5-kg/m2 increase in observed and genetically determined BMI, respectively. No association was found for postmenopausal women. Interaction between menopausal status and BMI was significant (Pinteraction

Published
2019

30. Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer.

Author

Ferreira, Manuel A, Gamazon, Eric R, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Asseryanis, Ella, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barnes, Daniel R, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Borg, Ake, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campa, Daniele, Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Jonathan, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, GEMO Study Collaborators, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Ganz, Patricia A, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, He, Wei, Heyworth, Jane, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Hulick, Peter J, Humphreys, Keith, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, and BCFR Investigators

Subjects
EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, GEMO Study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, BCFR Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Expression Profiling, Quantitative Trait Loci, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Prevention, Cancer, Human Genome, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.

Published
2019

31. Height and Body Mass Index as Modifiers of Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Author

Qian, Frank, Wang, Shengfeng, Mitchell, Jonathan, McGuffog, Lesley, Barrowdale, Daniel, Leslie, Goska, Oosterwijk, Jan C, Chung, Wendy K, Evans, D Gareth, Engel, Christoph, Kast, Karin, Aalfs, Cora M, Adank, Muriel A, Adlard, Julian, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Arun, Banu K, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Azzollini, Jacopo, Barouk-Simonet, Emmanuelle, Barwell, Julian, Belotti, Muriel, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Borg, Ake, Bradbury, Angela R, Brunet, Joan, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Caputo, Sandrine M, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Claes, Kathleen BM, Margriet Collée, J, Couch, Fergus J, Coupier, Isabelle, Daly, Mary B, Davidson, Rosemarie, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Donaldson, Alan, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Eeles, Ros, Feliubadaló, Lidia, Foretova, Lenka, Fowler, Jeffrey, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Gómez Garcia, Encarna B, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Henderson, Alex, Hendricks, Carolyn B, Hopper, John L, Hulick, Peter J, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Izatt, Louise, Izquierdo, Ángel, Jakubowska, Anna, Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Kang, Eunyoung, Karlan, Beth Y, Kets, Carolien M, Kim, Sung-Won, Kim, Zisun, Kwong, Ava, Laitman, Yael, Lasset, Christine, Hyuk Lee, Min, Won Lee, Jong, Lee, Jihyoun, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne, Loud, Jennifer T, Lubinski, Jan, Mebirouk, Noura, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne EJ, Meindl, Alfons, Miller, Austin, Montagna, Marco, Mooij, Thea M, Morrison, Patrick J, Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle, Nathanson, Katherine L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Niederacher, Dieter, Nielsen, Finn C, Nussbaum, Robert L, and Offit, Kenneth

Subjects
Breast Cancer, Prevention, Genetic Testing, Cancer, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Clinical Research, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adult, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Body Height, Body Mass Index, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Risk Factors, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, EMBRACE, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundBRCA1/2 mutations confer high lifetime risk of breast cancer, although other factors may modify this risk. Whether height or body mass index (BMI) modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers remains unclear.MethodsWe used Mendelian randomization approaches to evaluate the association of height and BMI on breast cancer risk, using data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 with 14 676 BRCA1 and 7912 BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 11 451 cases of breast cancer. We created a height genetic score using 586 height-associated variants and a BMI genetic score using 93 BMI-associated variants. We examined both observed and genetically determined height and BMI with breast cancer risk using weighted Cox models. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsObserved height was positively associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 1.09 per 10 cm increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0 to 1.17; P = 1.17). Height genetic score was positively associated with breast cancer, although this was not statistically significant (per 10 cm increase in genetically predicted height, HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.17; P = .47). Observed BMI was inversely associated with breast cancer risk (per 5 kg/m2 increase, HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.98; P = .007). BMI genetic score was also inversely associated with breast cancer risk (per 5 kg/m2 increase in genetically predicted BMI, HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98; P = .02). BMI was primarily associated with premenopausal breast cancer.ConclusionHeight is associated with overall breast cancer and BMI is associated with premenopausal breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Incorporating height and BMI, particularly genetic score, into risk assessment may improve cancer management.

Published
2019

32. The association of age at menarche and adult height with mammographic density in the International Consortium of Mammographic Density

Author

Ward, Sarah V., Burton, Anya, Tamimi, Rulla M., Pereira, Ana, Garmendia, Maria Luisa, Pollan, Marina, Boyd, Norman, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Maskarinec, Gertraud, Perez-Gomez, Beatriz, Vachon, Celine, Miao, Hui, Lajous, Martín, López-Ridaura, Ruy, Bertrand, Kimberly, Kwong, Ava, Ursin, Giske, Lee, Eunjung, Ma, Huiyan, Vinnicombe, Sarah, Moss, Sue, Allen, Steve, Ndumia, Rose, Vinayak, Sudhir, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Mariapun, Shivaani, Peplonska, Beata, Bukowska-Damska, Agnieszka, Nagata, Chisato, Hopper, John, Giles, Graham, Ozmen, Vahit, Aribal, Mustafa Erkin, Schüz, Joachim, Van Gils, Carla H., Wanders, Johanna O. P., Sirous, Reza, Sirous, Mehri, Hipwell, John, Kim, Jisun, Lee, Jong Won, Dickens, Caroline, Hartman, Mikael, Chia, Kee-Seng, Scott, Christopher, Chiarelli, Anna M., Linton, Linda, Flugelman, Anath Arzee, Salem, Dorria, Kamal, Rasha, McCormack, Valerie, and Stone, Jennifer

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

33. Genome-wide and transcriptome-wide association studies of mammographic density phenotypes reveal novel loci

Author

Chen, Hongjie, Fan, Shaoqi, Stone, Jennifer, Thompson, Deborah J., Douglas, Julie, Li, Shuai, Scott, Christopher, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Li, Christopher, Peters, Ulrike, Hopper, John L., Southey, Melissa C., Nguyen-Dumont, Tu, Nguyen, Tuong L., Fasching, Peter A., Behrens, Annika, Cadby, Gemma, Murphy, Rachel A., Aronson, Kristan, Howell, Anthony, Astley, Susan, Couch, Fergus, Olson, Janet, Milne, Roger L., Giles, Graham G., Haiman, Christopher A., Maskarinec, Gertraud, Winham, Stacey, John, Esther M., Kurian, Allison, Eliassen, Heather, Andrulis, Irene, Evans, D. Gareth, Newman, William G., Hall, Per, Czene, Kamila, Swerdlow, Anthony, Jones, Michael, Pollan, Marina, Fernandez-Navarro, Pablo, McConnell, Daniel S., Kristensen, Vessela N., Rothstein, Joseph H., Wang, Pei, Habel, Laurel A., Sieh, Weiva, Dunning, Alison M., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Easton, Douglas F., Gierach, Gretchen L., Tamimi, Rulla M., Vachon, Celine M., and Lindström, Sara

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. Comparison of AI-integrated pathways with human-AI interaction in population mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Author

Frazer, Helen M. L., Peña-Solorzano, Carlos A., Kwok, Chun Fung, Elliott, Michael S., Chen, Yuanhong, Wang, Chong, Al-Qershi, Osamah, Fox, Samantha K., Hill, Brendan, Karthik, Ravishankar, Kunicki, Katrina, Li, Shuai, Makalic, Enes, Nguyen, Tuong L., Ralalage, Prabhathi Basnayake, Schmidt, Daniel, Weideman, Prue C., Lippey, Jocelyn F., Hopper, John L., and Brotchie, Peter

Subjects
ARTIFICIAL intelligence, MEDICAL screening, EARLY detection of cancer, BREAST cancer, MAMMOGRAMS
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) readers of mammograms compare favourably to individual radiologists in detecting breast cancer. However, AI readers cannot perform at the level of multi-reader systems used by screening programs in countries such as Australia, Sweden, and the UK. Therefore, implementation demands human-AI collaboration. Here, we use a large, high-quality retrospective mammography dataset from Victoria, Australia to conduct detailed simulations of five potential AI-integrated screening pathways, and examine human-AI interaction effects to explore automation bias. Operating an AI reader as a second reader or as a high confidence filter improves current screening outcomes by 1.9–2.5% in sensitivity and up to 0.6% in specificity, achieving 4.6–10.9% reduction in assessments and 48–80.7% reduction in human reads. Automation bias degrades performance in multi-reader settings but improves it for single-readers. This study provides insight into feasible approaches for AI-integrated screening pathways and prospective studies necessary prior to clinical adoption. Successful human-AI collaboration could greatly contribute to breast cancer mammographic screening. Here, the authors use a large-scale retrospective mammography dataset to simulate and compare five plausible AI-integrated screening pathways, finding optimal ways in which human-AI collaboration could be implemented in real-world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. A transcriptome-wide association study of 229,000 women identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast cancer

Author

Wu, Lang, Shi, Wei, Long, Jirong, Guo, Xingyi, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Beesley, Jonathan, Bolla, Manjeet K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Lu, Yingchang, Cai, Qiuyin, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Rozali, Esdy, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Li, Bingshan, Zeng, Chenjie, Feng, Helian, Gusev, Alexander, Barfield, Richard T, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, J Esteban, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Xiaoqing, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Collée, Margriet, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, David, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eilber, Ursula, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fachal, Laura, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hein, Alexander, Hicks, Belynda, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, and Huang, Guanmengqian

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Genetics, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Prevention, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Generic health relevance, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Female, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Transcriptome, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Agricultural biotechnology, Bioinformatics and computational biology
Abstract

The breast cancer risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies explain only a small fraction of the familial relative risk, and the genes responsible for these associations remain largely unknown. To identify novel risk loci and likely causal genes, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study evaluating associations of genetically predicted gene expression with breast cancer risk in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry. We used data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project to establish genetic models to predict gene expression in breast tissue and evaluated model performance using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Of the 8,597 genes evaluated, significant associations were identified for 48 at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P

Published
2018

36. The BRCA2 c.68‐7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity

Author

Colombo, Mara, Lòpez‐Perolio, Irene, Meeks, Huong D, Caleca, Laura, Parsons, Michael T, Li, Hongyan, Vecchi, Giovanna, Tudini, Emma, Foglia, Claudia, Mondini, Patrizia, Manoukian, Siranoush, Behar, Raquel, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Meindl, Alfons, Montagna, Marco, Niederacher, Dieter, Schmidt, Ane Y, Varesco, Liliana, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Wang, Qin, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly‐Fadel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, García‐Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González‐Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hauke, Jan, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jung, Audrey, Kosma, Veli‐Matti, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loid, Lindblom, Annika, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Miao, Hui, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pylkäs, Katri, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Schoemaker, Minouk J, See, Mee Hoong, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony, Teo, Soo H, Toland, Amanda E, Tomlinson, Ian, Truong, Thérèse, Asperen, Christi J, Ouweland, Ans MW den, der Kolk, Lizet E, Winqvist, Robert, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Zheng, Wei, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Dunning, Alison M, and Easton, Douglas F

Subjects
Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, BRCA2 Protein, Base Sequence, Calibration, Cell Line, Exons, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Mitomycin, Models, Genetic, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, BRCA2, digital PCR, multifactorial likelihood analysis, quantitative real-time PCR, spliceogenic variants, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

Although the spliceogenic nature of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant has been demonstrated, its association with cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, we accurately quantified by real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR), the BRCA2 isoforms retaining or missing exon 3. In addition, the combined odds ratio for causality of the variant was estimated using genetic and clinical data, and its associated cancer risk was estimated by case-control analysis in 83,636 individuals. Co-occurrence in trans with pathogenic BRCA2 variants was assessed in 5,382 families. Exon 3 exclusion rate was 4.5-fold higher in variant carriers (13%) than controls (3%), indicating an exclusion rate for the c.68-7T > A allele of approximately 20%. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was 7.44 × 10-115 . There was neither evidence for increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.24) nor for a deleterious effect of the variant when co-occurring with pathogenic variants. Our data provide for the first time robust evidence of the nonpathogenicity of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A. Genetic and quantitative transcript analyses together inform the threshold for the ratio between functional and altered BRCA2 isoforms compatible with normal cell function. These findings might be exploited to assess the relevance for cancer risk of other BRCA2 spliceogenic variants.

Published
2018

37. PHIP - a novel candidate breast cancer susceptibility locus on 6q14.1

Author

Jiao, Xiang, Aravidis, Christos, Marikkannu, Rajeshwari, Rantala, Johanna, Picelli, Simone, Adamovic, Tatjana, Liu, Tao, Maguire, Paula, Kremeyer, Barbara, Luo, Liping, von Holst, Susanna, Kontham, Vinaykumar, Thutkawkorapin, Jessada, Margolin, Sara, Du, Quan, Lundin, Johanna, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Ambrosone, Christine B, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Boeckx, Bram, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Deming-Halverson, Sandra L, Devilee, Peter, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dörk, Thilo, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Guo, Qi, Gündert, Melanie, Haiman, Christopher A, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Huang, Guanmengqian, Jakubowska, Anna, Jones, Michael E, Kerin, Michael J, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela N, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Martens, John WM, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Peto, Julian, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rhenius, Valerie, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Simard, Jacques, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Truong, Thérèse, Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert, Zheng, Wei, Benitez, Javier, Dunning, Alison M, and Pharoah, Paul DP

Subjects
Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Human Genome, Genetic Testing, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, familial breast cancer, linkage analysis, risk haplotype, sequencing, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

Most non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families have no identified genetic cause. We used linkage and haplotype analyses in familial and sporadic breast cancer cases to identify a susceptibility locus on chromosome 6q. Two independent genome-wide linkage analysis studies suggested a 3 Mb locus on chromosome 6q and two unrelated Swedish families with a LOD >2 together seemed to share a haplotype in 6q14.1. We hypothesized that this region harbored a rare high-risk founder allele contributing to breast cancer in these two families. Sequencing of DNA and RNA from the two families did not detect any pathogenic mutations. Finally, 29 SNPs in the region were analyzed in 44,214 cases and 43,532 controls from BCAC, and the original haplotypes in the two families were suggested as low-risk alleles for European and Swedish women specifically. There was also some support for one additional independent moderate-risk allele in Swedish familial samples. The results were consistent with our previous findings in familial breast cancer and supported a breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q14.1 around the PHIP gene.

Published
2017

38. Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk.

Author

Day, Felix R, Thompson, Deborah J, Helgason, Hannes, Chasman, Daniel I, Finucane, Hilary, Sulem, Patrick, Ruth, Katherine S, Whalen, Sean, Sarkar, Abhishek K, Albrecht, Eva, Altmaier, Elisabeth, Amini, Marzyeh, Barbieri, Caterina M, Boutin, Thibaud, Campbell, Archie, Demerath, Ellen, Giri, Ayush, He, Chunyan, Hottenga, Jouke J, Karlsson, Robert, Kolcic, Ivana, Loh, Po-Ru, Lunetta, Kathryn L, Mangino, Massimo, Marco, Brumat, McMahon, George, Medland, Sarah E, Nolte, Ilja M, Noordam, Raymond, Nutile, Teresa, Paternoster, Lavinia, Perjakova, Natalia, Porcu, Eleonora, Rose, Lynda M, Schraut, Katharina E, Segrè, Ayellet V, Smith, Albert V, Stolk, Lisette, Teumer, Alexander, Andrulis, Irene L, Bandinelli, Stefania, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bergmann, Sven, Bochud, Murielle, Boerwinkle, Eric, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broer, Linda, Brüning, Thomas, Buring, Julie E, Campbell, Harry, Catamo, Eulalia, Chanock, Stephen, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Corre, Tanguy, Couch, Fergus J, Cousminer, Diana L, Cox, Angela, Crisponi, Laura, Czene, Kamila, Davey Smith, George, de Geus, Eco JCN, de Mutsert, Renée, De Vivo, Immaculata, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Eriksson, Johan G, Fasching, Peter A, Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay, Ferrucci, Luigi, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Franke, Lude, Gabrielson, Marike, Gandin, Ilaria, Giles, Graham G, Grallert, Harald, Gudbjartsson, Daniel F, Guénel, Pascal, Hall, Per, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harris, Tamara B, Hartman, Catharina A, Heiss, Gerardo, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Hu, Frank, Hunter, David J, Ikram, M Arfan, Im, Hae Kyung, Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta, Joshi, Peter K, Karasik, David, and Kellis, Manolis

Subjects
LifeLines Cohort Study, InterAct Consortium, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, PRACTICAL consortium, Humans, Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Ribonucleoproteins, Membrane Proteins, Body Mass Index, Risk Factors, Age Factors, Genomic Imprinting, Puberty, Menarche, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Databases, Genetic, Adolescent, Female, Male, Genome-Wide Association Study, Aging, Breast Cancer, Biotechnology, Cancer, Human Genome, Genetics, Prostate Cancer, Urologic Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract

The timing of puberty is a highly polygenic childhood trait that is epidemiologically associated with various adult diseases. Using 1000 Genomes Project-imputed genotype data in up to ∼370,000 women, we identify 389 independent signals (P < 5 × 10-8) for age at menarche, a milestone in female pubertal development. In Icelandic data, these signals explain ∼7.4% of the population variance in age at menarche, corresponding to ∼25% of the estimated heritability. We implicate ∼250 genes via coding variation or associated expression, demonstrating significant enrichment in neural tissues. Rare variants near the imprinted genes MKRN3 and DLK1 were identified, exhibiting large effects when paternally inherited. Mendelian randomization analyses suggest causal inverse associations, independent of body mass index (BMI), between puberty timing and risks for breast and endometrial cancers in women and prostate cancer in men. In aggregate, our findings highlight the complexity of the genetic regulation of puberty timing and support causal links with cancer susceptibility.

Published
2017

39. BRCA2 Hypomorphic Missense Variants Confer Moderate Risks of Breast Cancer

Author

Shimelis, Hermela, Mesman, Romy LS, Von Nicolai, Catharina, Ehlen, Asa, Guidugli, Lucia, Martin, Charlotte, Calléja, Fabienne MGR, Meeks, Huong, Hallberg, Emily, Hinton, Jamie, Lilyquist, Jenna, Hu, Chunling, Aalfs, Cora M, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Brouwers, Barbara, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Ching-Yu, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Dennis, Joe, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hogervorst, Frans B, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Kang, Daehee, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela, Lai, Kah-Nyin, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubinski, Jan, Machackova, Eva, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Matsuo, Keitaro, Miao, Hui, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Muir, Kenneth, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olson, Janet E, Olswold, Curtis, Oosterwijk, Jan JC, Osorio, Ana, Peterlongo, Paolo, Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul DP, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rashid, Muhammad Usman, Rhenius, Valerie, Rudolph, Anja, Sangrajrang, Suleeporn, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Shen, Chen-Yang, and Shrubsole, Martha

Subjects
Breast Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Aged, Amino Acid Substitution, Animals, BRCA2 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genotype, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Mice, Mutation, Missense, Risk, for kConFab/AOCS Investigators, for NBCS Collaborators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case-control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789-99. ©2017 AACR.

Published
2017

40. Genetic modifiers of CHEK2*1100delC-associated breast cancer risk

Author

Muranen, Taru A, Greco, Dario, Blomqvist, Carl, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Khan, Sofia, Hogervorst, Frans, Verhoef, Senno, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dunning, Alison M, Shah, Mitul, Luben, Robert, Bojesen, Stig E, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Schoemaker, Minouk, Swerdlow, Anthony, García-Closas, Montserrat, Figueroa, Jonine, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Hall, Per, Li, Jingmei, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Bermisheva, Marina, Kristensen, Vessela, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Investigators, NBCS, Peto, Julian, dos Santos Silva, Isabel, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet E, Hillemans, Peter, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Brauch, Hiltrud, Hamann, Ute, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Meindl, Alfons, Schmutzler, Rita K, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Lambrechts, Diether, Moisse, Matthieu, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Martens, John WM, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Andrulis, Irene L, Knight, Julia A, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Giles, Graham G, Milne, Roger L, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Mannermaa, Arto, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Devilee, Peter, Seynaeve, Caroline, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, John, Esther M, Whittemore, Alice S, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dennis, Joe, Easton, Douglas F, Schmidt, Marjanka K, and Nevanlinna, Heli

Subjects
Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast Neoplasms, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Female, Genes, Modifier, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Odds Ratio, Penetrance, Sequence Deletion, breast cancer, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, CHEK2*1100delC, common variants, polygenic risk score, NBCS Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Genetics, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

PurposeCHEK2*1100delC is a founder variant in European populations that confers a two- to threefold increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Epidemiologic and family studies have suggested that the risk associated with CHEK2*1100delC is modified by other genetic factors in a multiplicative fashion. We have investigated this empirically using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC).MethodsUsing genotype data from 39,139 (624 1100delC carriers) BC patients and 40,063 (224) healthy controls from 32 BCAC studies, we analyzed the combined risk effects of CHEK2*1100delC and 77 common variants in terms of a polygenic risk score (PRS) and pairwise interaction.ResultsThe PRS conferred odds ratios (OR) of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.21-2.09) per standard deviation for BC for CHEK2*1100delC carriers and 1.58 (1.55-1.62) for noncarriers. No evidence of deviation from the multiplicative model was found. The OR for the highest quintile of the PRS was 2.03 (0.86-4.78) for CHEK2*1100delC carriers, placing them in the high risk category according to UK NICE guidelines. The OR for the lowest quintile was 0.52 (0.16-1.74), indicating a lifetime risk close to the population average.ConclusionOur results confirm the multiplicative nature of risk effects conferred by CHEK2*1100delC and the common susceptibility variants. Furthermore, the PRS could identify carriers at a high lifetime risk for clinical actions.Genet Med advance online publication 06 October 2016.

Published
2017

41. Association of breast cancer risk with genetic variants showing differential allelic expression: Identification of a novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 4q21

Author

Hamdi, Yosr, Soucy, Penny, Adoue, Véronique, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Canisius, Sander, Lemaçon, Audrey, Droit, Arnaud, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Baynes, Caroline, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Broeks, Annegien, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Grenaker-Alnæs, Grethe, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hallberg, Emily, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jones, Michael, Kabisch, Maria, Kataja, Vesa, Lambrechts, Diether, Marchand, Loic Le, Lindblom, Annika, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Maranian, Mel, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Olswold, Curtis, Peto, Julian, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Pylkäs, Katri, Radice, Paolo, Rudolph, Anja, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, Tomlinson, Ian, Torres, Diana, Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine, Van Den Ouweland, Ans MW, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Zheng, Wei, Benitez, Javier, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Kristensen, Vessela, Hall, Per, Easton, Douglas F, Pastinen, Tomi, Nord, Silje, and Simard, Jacques

Subjects
Human Genome, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Genetics, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Canada, Carrier Proteins, Case-Control Studies, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, DNA Helicases, Europe, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Mitochondrial Proteins, Odds Ratio, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, breast cancer, genetic susceptibility, association studies, differential allelic expression, cis-regulatory variants, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

There are significant inter-individual differences in the levels of gene expression. Through modulation of gene expression, cis-acting variants represent an important source of phenotypic variation. Consequently, cis-regulatory SNPs associated with differential allelic expression are functional candidates for further investigation as disease-causing variants. To investigate whether common variants associated with differential allelic expression were involved in breast cancer susceptibility, a list of genes was established on the basis of their involvement in cancer related pathways and/or mechanisms. Thereafter, using data from a genome-wide map of allelic expression associated SNPs, 313 genetic variants were selected and their association with breast cancer risk was then evaluated in 46,451 breast cancer cases and 42,599 controls of European ancestry ascertained from 41 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The associations were evaluated with overall breast cancer risk and with estrogen receptor negative and positive disease. One novel breast cancer susceptibility locus on 4q21 (rs11099601) was identified (OR = 1.05, P = 5.6x10-6). rs11099601 lies in a 135 kb linkage disequilibrium block containing several genes, including, HELQ, encoding the protein HEL308 a DNA dependant ATPase and DNA Helicase involved in DNA repair, MRPS18C encoding the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein S18C and FAM175A (ABRAXAS), encoding a BRCA1 BRCT domain-interacting protein involved in DNA damage response and double-strand break (DSB) repair. Expression QTL analysis in breast cancer tissue showed rs11099601 to be associated with HELQ (P = 8.28x10-14), MRPS18C (P = 1.94x10-27) and FAM175A (P = 3.83x10-3), explaining about 20%, 14% and 1%, respectively of the variance inexpression of these genes in breast carcinomas.

Published
2016

42. PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS

Author

Southey, Melissa C, Goldgar, David E, Winqvist, Robert, Pylkäs, Katri, Couch, Fergus, Tischkowitz, Marc, Foulkes, William D, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Heikkinen, Tuomas, Nevanlinna, Heli, Hopper, John L, Dörk, Thilo, Claes, Kathleen BM, Reis-Filho, Jorge, Teo, Zhi Ling, Radice, Paolo, Catucci, Irene, Peterlongo, Paolo, Tsimiklis, Helen, Odefrey, Fabrice A, Dowty, James G, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Broeks, Annegien, Hogervorst, Frans B, Verhoef, Senno, Carpenter, Jane, Clarke, Christine, Scott, Rodney J, Fasching, Peter A, Haeberle, Lothar, Ekici, Arif B, Beckmann, Matthias W, Peto, Julian, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Bolla, Manjeet K, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Kerin, Michael J, Miller, Nicola, Marme, Federik, Burwinkel, Barbara, Yang, Rongxi, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Menegaux, Florence, Sanchez, Marie, Bojesen, Stig, Nielsen, Sune F, Flyger, Henrik, Benitez, Javier, Zamora, M Pilar, Perez, Jose Ignacio Arias, Menéndez, Primitiva, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Neuhausen, Susan, Ziogas, Argyrios, Clarke, Christina A, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Stegmaier, Christa, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brüning, Thomas, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Muranen, Taru A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Spurdle, Amanda B, Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Wauters, Els, Smeets, Dominiek, Beuselinck, Benoit, Floris, Giuseppe, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Seibold, Petra, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Olson, Janet E, Vachon, Celine, Pankratz, Vernon S, McLean, Catriona, Haiman, Christopher A, Henderson, Brian E, Schumacher, Fredrick, Le Marchand, Loic, Kristensen, Vessela, Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, and Zheng, Wei

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Ovarian Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Urologic Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Male, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Cancer: breast, Cancer: ovary, Cancer: prostate, cancer predisposition, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Clinical sciences
Abstract

BackgroundThe rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study.MethodsWe genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant.ResultsFor European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10-5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10-8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants.ConclusionsThis report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.

Published
2016

43. Evidence that the 5p12 Variant rs10941679 Confers Susceptibility to Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer through FGF10 and MRPS30 Regulation

Author

Ghoussaini, Maya, French, Juliet D, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Nord, Silje, Beesley, Jonathan, Canisus, Sander, Hillman, Kristine M, Kaufmann, Susanne, Sivakumaran, Haran, Marjaneh, Moradi, Lee, Jason S, Dennis, Joe, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dicks, Ed, Milne, Roger L, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Broeks, Annegien, Muir, Kenneth, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Bojesen, Stig E, Flyger, Henrik, Benitez, Javier, González-Neira, Anna, Alonso, M Rosario, Pita, Guillermo, Neuhausen, Susan L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Meindl, Alfons, Schmutzler, Rita K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Hamann, Ute, Tessier, Daniel C, Vincent, Daniel, Nevanlinna, Heli, Khan, Sofia, Matsuo, Keitaro, Ito, Hidemi, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Mannermaa, Arto, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Wu, Anna H, Van Den Berg, David, Lambrechts, Diether, Floris, Giuseppe, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Radice, Paolo, Barile, Monica, Couch, Fergus J, Hallberg, Emily, Giles, Graham G, Haiman, Christopher A, Le Marchand, Loic, Goldberg, Mark S, Teo, Soo H, Yip, Cheng Har, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Collaborators, NBCS, Zheng, Wei, Cai, Qiuyin, Winqvist, Robert, Pylkäs, Katri, Andrulis, Irene L, Devilee, Peter, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, García-Closas, Montserrat, Figueroa, Jonine, Hall, Per, Czene, Kamila, Brand, Judith S, Darabi, Hatef, Eriksson, Mikael, Hooning, Maartje J, Koppert, Linetta B, Li, Jingmei, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Zheng, Ying, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Shah, Mitul, and Rhenius, Valerie

Subjects
Prevention, Genetics, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cell Line, Tumor, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Fibroblast Growth Factor 10, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Haplotypes, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2, Receptors, Estrogen, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have revealed increased breast cancer risk associated with multiple genetic variants at 5p12. Here, we report the fine mapping of this locus using data from 104,660 subjects from 50 case-control studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). With data for 3,365 genotyped and imputed SNPs across a 1 Mb region (positions 44,394,495-45,364,167; NCBI build 37), we found evidence for at least three independent signals: the strongest signal, consisting of a single SNP rs10941679, was associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (per-g allele OR ER+ = 1.15; 95% CI 1.13-1.18; p = 8.35 × 10-30). After adjustment for rs10941679, we detected signal 2, consisting of 38 SNPs more strongly associated with ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer (lead SNP rs6864776: per-a allele OR ER- = 1.10; 95% CI 1.05-1.14; p conditional = 1.44 × 10-12), and a single signal 3 SNP (rs200229088: per-t allele OR ER+ = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09-1.15; p conditional = 1.12 × 10-05). Expression quantitative trait locus analysis in normal breast tissues and breast tumors showed that the g (risk) allele of rs10941679 was associated with increased expression of FGF10 and MRPS30. Functional assays demonstrated that SNP rs10941679 maps to an enhancer element that physically interacts with the FGF10 and MRPS30 promoter regions in breast cancer cell lines. FGF10 is an oncogene that binds to FGFR2 and is overexpressed in ∼10% of human breast cancers, whereas MRPS30 plays a key role in apoptosis. These data suggest that the strongest signal of association at 5p12 is mediated through coordinated activation of FGF10 and MRPS30, two candidate genes for breast cancer pathogenesis.

Published
2016

44. Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.

Author

Watt, Gordon P, Keshavamurthy, Krishna N, Nguyen, Tuong L, Lobbes, Marc B I, Jochelson, Maxine S, Sung, Janice S, Moskowitz, Chaya S, Patel, Prusha, Liang, Xiaolin, Woods, Meghan, Hopper, John L, Pike, Malcolm C, and Bernstein, Jonine L

Subjects
BREAST cancer, MAMMOGRAMS
Abstract

Women with high mammographic density have an increased risk of breast cancer. They may be offered contrast-enhanced mammography to improve breast cancer screening performance. Using a cohort of women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography, we evaluated whether conventional and modified mammographic density measures were associated with breast cancer. Sixty-six patients with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer were frequency matched on the basis of age to 133 cancer-free control individuals. On low-energy craniocaudal contrast-enhanced mammograms (equivalent to standard mammograms), we measured quantitative mammographic density using CUMULUS software at the conventional intensity threshold ("Cumulus") and higher-than-conventional thresholds ("Altocumulus," "Cirrocumulus"). The measures were standardized to enable estimation of odds ratio per adjusted standard deviation (OPERA). In multivariable logistic regression of case-control status, only the highest-intensity measure (Cirrocumulus) was statistically significantly associated with breast cancer (OPERA = 1.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.04 to 1.89). Conventional Cumulus did not contribute to model fit. For women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography, Cirrocumulus mammographic density may better predict breast cancer than conventional quantitative mammographic density. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

45. Fine‐scale mapping of 8q24 locus identifies multiple independent risk variants for breast cancer

Author

Shi, Jiajun, Zhang, Yanfeng, Zheng, Wei, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Ghoussaini, Maya, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Milne, Roger L, Shu, Xiao‐Ou, Beesley, Jonathan, Kar, Siddhartha, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Zhao, Zhiguo, Guo, Xingyi, Benitez, Javier, Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Blot, William, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broeks, Annegien, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Hui, Canisius, Sander, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Choi, Ji‐Yeob, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Devilee, Peter, Droit, Arnaud, Dork, Thilo, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Gaborieau, Valerie, García‐Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Guenel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Miao, Hui, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Hsiung, Chia‐Ni, Investigators, kConFab, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Johnson, Nichola, Torres, Diana, Kabisch, Maria, Kang, Daehee, Khan, Sofia, Knight, Julia A, Kosma, Veli‐Matti, Lambrechts, Diether, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Le Marchand, Loic, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, Matsuo, Keitaro, McLean, Catriona, Meindl, Alfons, Muir, Kenneth, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Nord, Silje, Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise, Olson, Janet E, Orr, Nick, van den Ouweland, Ans MW, Peterlongo, Paolo, Putti, Thomas Choudary, Rudolph, Anja, Sangrajrang, Suleeporn, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Shen, Chen‐Yang, Hou, Ming‐Feng, Shrubsole, Matha J, and Southey, Melissa C

Subjects
Genetics, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8, Female, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Odds Ratio, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk, White People, breast cancer, genetic susceptibility, 8q24, fine-mapping, single nucleotide polymorphism, Mervi Grip, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

Previous genome-wide association studies among women of European ancestry identified two independent breast cancer susceptibility loci represented by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs13281615 and rs11780156 at 8q24. A fine-mapping study across 2.06 Mb (chr8:127,561,724-129,624,067, hg19) in 55,540 breast cancer cases and 51,168 controls within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium was conducted. Three additional independent association signals in women of European ancestry, represented by rs35961416 (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.97, conditional p = 5.8 × 10(-6) ), rs7815245 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91-0.96, conditional p = 1.1 × 10(-6) ) and rs2033101 (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.07, conditional p = 1.1 × 10(-4) ) were found. Integrative analysis using functional genomic data from the Roadmap Epigenomics, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project, the Cancer Genome Atlas and other public resources implied that SNPs rs7815245 in Signal 3, and rs1121948 in Signal 5 (in linkage disequilibrium with rs11780156, r(2)  = 0.77), were putatively functional variants for two of the five independent association signals. The results highlighted multiple 8q24 variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility in women of European ancestry.

Published
2016

46. Genome-Wide Meta-Analyses of Breast, Ovarian, and Prostate Cancer Association Studies Identify Multiple New Susceptibility Loci Shared by at Least Two Cancer Types

Author

Kar, Siddhartha P, Beesley, Jonathan, Olama, Ali Amin Al, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Tyrer, Jonathan, Kote-Jarai, ZSofia, Lawrenson, Kate, Lindstrom, Sara, Ramus, Susan J, Thompson, Deborah J, Investigators, ABCTB, Kibel, Adam S, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Michael, Agnieszka, Dieffenbach, Aida K, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Whittemore, Alice S, Wolk, Alicja, Monteiro, Alvaro, Peixoto, Ana, Kierzek, Andrzej, Cox, Angela, Rudolph, Anja, Gonzalez-Neira, Anna, Wu, Anna H, Lindblom, Annika, Swerdlow, Anthony, Study, AOCS Study Group amp Australian Cancer, BioResource, APCB, Ziogas, Argyrios, Ekici, Arif B, Burwinkel, Barbara, Karlan, Beth Y, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Blomqvist, Carl, Phelan, Catherine, McLean, Catriona, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Vachon, Celine, Cybulski, Cezary, Slavov, Chavdar, Stegmaier, Christa, Maier, Christiane, Ambrosone, Christine B, Høgdall, Claus K, Teerlink, Craig C, Kang, Daehee, Tessier, Daniel C, Schaid, Daniel J, Stram, Daniel O, Cramer, Daniel W, Neal, David E, Eccles, Diana, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Wokozorczyk, Dominika, Levine, Douglas A, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Sawyer, Elinor J, Bandera, Elisa V, Poole, Elizabeth M, Goode, Ellen L, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Høgdall, Estrid, Song, Fengju, Bruinsma, Fiona, Heitz, Florian, Modugno, Francesmary, Hamdy, Freddie C, Wiklund, Fredrik, Giles, Graham G, Olsson, Håkan, Wildiers, Hans, Ulmer, Hans-Ulrich, Pandha, Hardev, Risch, Harvey A, Darabi, Hatef, Salvesen, Helga B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Gronberg, Henrik, Brenner, Hermann, Brauch, Hiltrud, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Song, Honglin, Lim, Hui-Yi, McNeish, Iain, Campbell, Ian, Vergote, Ignace, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubiński, Jan, Stanford, Janet L, Benítez, Javier, Doherty, Jennifer A, Permuth, Jennifer B, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Donovan, Jenny L, Dennis, Joe, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Schleutker, Johanna, and Hopper, John L

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Cancer, Aging, Urologic Diseases, Prostate Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Chromosome Mapping, Datasets as Topic, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Female, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Organ Specificity, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quantitative Trait Loci, Signal Transduction, ABCTB Investigators, AOCS Study Group & Australian Cancer Study, APCB BioResource, kConFab Investigators, NBCS Investigators, GENICA Network, PRACTICAL consortium, Biochemistry and cell biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

UnlabelledBreast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P < 10(-8) seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type-specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer-gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P < 10(-5) in the three-cancer meta-analysis.SignificanceWe demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052-67. ©2016 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932.

Published
2016

47. Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Risk: Mendelian Randomization Analyses of Data from 145,000 Women of European Descent.

Author

Guo, Yan, Warren Andersen, Shaneda, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Milne, Roger L, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Dunning, Allison, Bojesen, Stig E, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Casey, Graham, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dumont, Martine, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Gammon, Marilie, Giles, Graham G, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jasmine, Farzana, Jenkins, Mark, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Michael E, Kabisch, Maria, Kibriya, Muhammad, Knight, Julia A, Koppert, Linetta B, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Luben, Robert, Lubinski, Jan, Malone, Kathi E, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, McLean, Catriona, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, Meindl, Alfons, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Olson, Janet E, Perez, Jose IA, Perkins, Barbara, Peterlongo, Paolo, Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Pylkäs, Katri, Rudolph, Anja, Santella, Regina, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul, Shrubsole, Martha J, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Toland, Amanda E, Tomlinson, Ian, Torres, Diana, Truong, Thérèse, Ursin, Giske, Van Der Luijt, Rob B, and Verhoef, Senno

Subjects
Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Body Mass Index, Models, Statistical, Risk Factors, Menopause, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Middle Aged, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Models, Statistical, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genetics, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Nutrition, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aging, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, General & Internal Medicine, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract

BackgroundObservational epidemiological studies have shown that high body mass index (BMI) is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women but an increased risk in postmenopausal women. It is unclear whether this association is mediated through shared genetic or environmental factors.MethodsWe applied Mendelian randomization to evaluate the association between BMI and risk of breast cancer occurrence using data from two large breast cancer consortia. We created a weighted BMI genetic score comprising 84 BMI-associated genetic variants to predicted BMI. We evaluated genetically predicted BMI in association with breast cancer risk using individual-level data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) (cases  =  46,325, controls  =  42,482). We further evaluated the association between genetically predicted BMI and breast cancer risk using summary statistics from 16,003 cases and 41,335 controls from the Discovery, Biology, and Risk of Inherited Variants in Breast Cancer (DRIVE) Project. Because most studies measured BMI after cancer diagnosis, we could not conduct a parallel analysis to adequately evaluate the association of measured BMI with breast cancer risk prospectively.ResultsIn the BCAC data, genetically predicted BMI was found to be inversely associated with breast cancer risk (odds ratio [OR]  =  0.65 per 5 kg/m2 increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.75, p = 3.32 × 10-10). The associations were similar for both premenopausal (OR   =   0.44, 95% CI:0.31-0.62, p  =  9.91 × 10-8) and postmenopausal breast cancer (OR  =  0.57, 95% CI: 0.46-0.71, p  =  1.88 × 10-8). This association was replicated in the data from the DRIVE consortium (OR  =  0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.84, p   =   1.64 × 10-7). Single marker analyses identified 17 of the 84 BMI-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in association with breast cancer risk at p

Published
2016

48. Age- and Tumor Subtype–Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for CHEK2*1100delC Carriers

Author

Schmidt, Marjanka K, Hogervorst, Frans, van Hien, Richard, Cornelissen, Sten, Broeks, Annegien, Adank, Muriel A, Meijers, Hanne, Waisfisz, Quinten, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Schutte, Mieke, van den Ouweland, Ans, Hooning, Maartje, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Antoniou, Antonis C, Arndt, Volker, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dunning, Alison M, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Galle, Eva, García-Closas, Montserrat, Giles, Graham G, Haeberle, Lothar, Hall, Per, Hillemanns, Peter, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Knight, Julia A, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kristensen, Vessela, Lee, Andrew, Lindblom, Annika, Lubinski, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, Newcomb, Polly A, Offit, Kenneth, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul DP, Robson, Mark, Rudolph, Anja, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Seynaeve, Caroline, Soens, Julie, Southey, Melissa C, Spurdle, Amanda B, Surowy, Harald, Swerdlow, Anthony, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, Tomlinson, Ian, Trentham-Dietz, Amy, Vachon, Celine, Wang, Qin, Whittemore, Alice S, Ziogas, Argyrios, van der Kolk, Lizet, Nevanlinna, Heli, Dörk, Thilo, Bojesen, Stig, and Easton, Douglas F

Subjects
Clinical Research, Genetics, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Humans, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk Assessment, Sequence Deletion, Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeCHEK2*1100delC is a well-established breast cancer risk variant that is most prevalent in European populations; however, there are limited data on risk of breast cancer by age and tumor subtype, which limits its usefulness in breast cancer risk prediction. We aimed to generate tumor subtype- and age-specific risk estimates by using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, including 44,777 patients with breast cancer and 42,997 controls from 33 studies genotyped for CHEK2*1100delC.Patients and methodsCHEK2*1100delC genotyping was mostly done by a custom Taqman assay. Breast cancer odds ratios (ORs) for CHEK2*1100delC carriers versus noncarriers were estimated by using logistic regression and adjusted for study (categorical) and age. Main analyses included patients with invasive breast cancer from population- and hospital-based studies.ResultsProportions of heterozygous CHEK2*1100delC carriers in controls, in patients with breast cancer from population- and hospital-based studies, and in patients with breast cancer from familial- and clinical genetics center-based studies were 0.5%, 1.3%, and 3.0%, respectively. The estimated OR for invasive breast cancer was 2.26 (95%CI, 1.90 to 2.69; P = 2.3 × 10(-20)). The OR was higher for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease (2.55 [95%CI, 2.10 to 3.10; P = 4.9 × 10(-21)]) than it was for ER-negative disease (1.32 [95%CI, 0.93 to 1.88; P = .12]; P interaction = 9.9 × 10(-4)). The OR significantly declined with attained age for breast cancer overall (P = .001) and for ER-positive tumors (P = .001). Estimated cumulative risks for development of ER-positive and ER-negative tumors by age 80 in CHEK2*1100delC carriers were 20% and 3%, respectively, compared with 9% and 2%, respectively, in the general population of the United Kingdom.ConclusionThese CHEK2*1100delC breast cancer risk estimates provide a basis for incorporating CHEK2*1100delC into breast cancer risk prediction models and into guidelines for intensified screening and follow-up.

Published
2016

49. Association of genetic susceptibility variants for type 2 diabetes with breast cancer risk in women of European ancestry.

Author

Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Casey, Graham, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Couch, Fergus, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Dumont, Martine, Fasching, Peter, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Gammon, Marilie, Giles, Graham, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hartman, Mikael, Hooning, Maartje, Hopper, John, Jakubowska, Anna, Jasmine, Farzana, John, Esther, Johnson, Nichola, Kabisch, Maria, Khan, Sofia, Kibriya, Muhammad, Knight, Julia, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kriege, Mieke, Kristensen, Vessela, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Luben, Robert, Lubinski, Jan, Malone, Kathleen, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, McLean, Catriona, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, Meindl, Alfons, Miao, Hui, Muir, Kenneth, Neuhausen, Susan, Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Olson, Janet, Perkins, Barbara, Peterlongo, Paolo, Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Pylkäs, Katri, Rudolph, Anja, Santella, Regina, Sawyer, Elinor, Schmutzler, Rita, Schoemaker, Minouk, Shah, Mitul, Shrubsole, Martha, Southey, Melissa, Swerdlow, Anthony, Toland, Amanda, Tomlinson, Ian, Torres, Diana, Truong, Thérèse, Ursin, Giske, Van Der Luijt, Rob, Verhoef, Senno, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Whittemore, Alice, Winqvist, Robert, Pilar Zamora, M, Zhao, Hui, Dunning, Alison, Simard, Jacques, Hall, Per, Kraft, Peter, Pharoah, Paul, Hunter, David, Easton, Douglas, and Zheng, Wei

Subjects
Breast cancer, Epidemiology, GWAS, Genetic susceptibility, Type 2 diabetes, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, White People
Abstract

PURPOSE: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer. It is unclear, however, whether this association is due to shared genetic factors. METHODS: We constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) using risk variants from 33 known independent T2D susceptibility loci and evaluated its relation to breast cancer risk using the data from two consortia, including 62,328 breast cancer patients and 83,817 controls of European ancestry. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to derive adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to measure the association of breast cancer risk with T2D GRS or T2D-associated genetic risk variants. Meta-analyses were conducted to obtain summary ORs across all studies. RESULTS: The T2D GRS was not found to be associated with breast cancer risk, overall, by menopausal status, or for estrogen receptor positive or negative breast cancer. Three T2D associated risk variants were individually associated with breast cancer risk after adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method (at p < 0.001), rs9939609 (FTO) (OR 0.94, 95 % CI = 0.92-0.95, p = 4.13E-13), rs7903146 (TCF7L2) (OR 1.04, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.06, p = 1.26E-05), and rs8042680 (PRC1) (OR 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.95-0.99, p = 8.05E-04). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that several genetic risk variants were associated with the risk of both T2D and breast cancer. However, overall genetic susceptibility to T2D may not be related to breast cancer risk.

Published
2016

50. Association of genetic susceptibility variants for type 2 diabetes with breast cancer risk in women of European ancestry

Author

Zhao, Zhiguo, Wen, Wanqing, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Zhang, Ben, Long, Jirong, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Milne, Roger L, García-Closas, Montserrat, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Lindstrom, Sara, Bojesen, Stig E, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Casey, Graham, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Dumont, Martine, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fostira, Florentia, Gammon, Marilie, Giles, Graham G, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hartman, Mikael, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Jasmine, Farzana, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Kabisch, Maria, Khan, Sofia, Kibriya, Muhammad, Knight, Julia A, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kriege, Mieke, Kristensen, Vessela, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Luben, Robert, Lubinski, Jan, Malone, Kathleen E, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Marme, Frederik, McLean, Catriona, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, Meindl, Alfons, Miao, Hui, Muir, Kenneth, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Neven, Patrick, Olson, Janet E, Perkins, Barbara, Peterlongo, Paolo, Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Pylkäs, Katri, Rudolph, Anja, Santella, Regina, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk, Shah, Mitul, Shrubsole, Martha, Southey, Melissa C, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Toland, Amanda E, and Tomlinson, Ian

Subjects
Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Diabetes, Aging, Cancer, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, White People, Type 2 diabetes, Genetic susceptibility, GWAS, Breast cancer, Epidemiology, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services
Abstract

PurposeType 2 diabetes (T2D) has been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer. It is unclear, however, whether this association is due to shared genetic factors.MethodsWe constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) using risk variants from 33 known independent T2D susceptibility loci and evaluated its relation to breast cancer risk using the data from two consortia, including 62,328 breast cancer patients and 83,817 controls of European ancestry. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to derive adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to measure the association of breast cancer risk with T2D GRS or T2D-associated genetic risk variants. Meta-analyses were conducted to obtain summary ORs across all studies.ResultsThe T2D GRS was not found to be associated with breast cancer risk, overall, by menopausal status, or for estrogen receptor positive or negative breast cancer. Three T2D associated risk variants were individually associated with breast cancer risk after adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method (at p < 0.001), rs9939609 (FTO) (OR 0.94, 95 % CI = 0.92-0.95, p = 4.13E-13), rs7903146 (TCF7L2) (OR 1.04, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.06, p = 1.26E-05), and rs8042680 (PRC1) (OR 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.95-0.99, p = 8.05E-04).ConclusionsWe have shown that several genetic risk variants were associated with the risk of both T2D and breast cancer. However, overall genetic susceptibility to T2D may not be related to breast cancer risk.

Published
2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results