Search

Atypical ductal hyperplasia and low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are regarded as precursor lesions of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive breast cancer. In HER2 -amplified invasive breast cancer, a precursor lesion before DCIS has not yet been described. Here we introduce a case of HER2-positive lobules in the breast without histological abnormality. A 39-year-old premenopausal woman visited a hospital due to identification of microcalcifications on screening mammography. The subsequent biopsy confirmed high-grade DCIS. She underwent wide excision, and a residual high-grade DCIS with a size of 1.4 cm was found. The tumor cells were hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Around DCIS, there were terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs) showing strong HER2 positivity on IHC. These HER2-positive lobules were 7 mm away from the high-grade DCIS and was 1.1 mm in size. These HER2-positive lobules showed no histologic abnormality and had no difference compared with the surrounding normal TDLUs. Nevertheless, in addition to showing HER2 overexpression in IHC, HER2 amplification was also identified in HER2 silver in situ hybridization. HER2 amplification plays an important role in breast cancer development, and HER2 amplification is known to occur as an early event in cancer development. There have been studies identifying driver mutations in normal tissues of other organs. These findings suggest that HER2 amplification in the breast without histological abnormality could occur, and the HER2-positive lobules could be "at risk" for transformation into the precursor lesion of HER2-positive breast cancer, although the biological significance of these findings is unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast carcinomas due to HER2 amplification are associated with aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. Anti-HER2-targeted therapies are widely used to treat HER2-positive breast carcinomas with excellent outcomes. Accurate identification of HER2 amplification status in breast carcinomas is of important diagnostic and treatment value. Currently, HER2 amplification status is routinely determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing. This study will review our past HER2 data to determine and characterize discordant results between HER2 IHC and FISH. It will also determine a potential impact of HER2 amplification status by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on these patients. Methods We reviewed a total of 4884 breast carcinomas with coexisting HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2010 to 2022. 57 cases also had a Next-Generation-Sequencing-based (NGS) gene panel performed. Given the advances in biostatic analysis pipelines, NGS methods were utilized to provide results on HER2 amplification status along with somatic mutations. Results While the majority (ranging from 98.5% with IHC score of 0 and 93.1% with IHC score of 1 +) of 4884 breast carcinomas had concordant results from HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH testing, a small percentage of patients (ranging from 1.5% in those with IHC score of 0, to 6.9% with IHC score of 1 +) had discordant results, with negative HER2 IHC and positive HER2 FISH results. These patients could be reported as HER2-negative breast carcinomas if only HER2 IHC testing has been performed according to a current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. 57 patients had HER2 amplification status determined by NGS, and all patients had concordant results between HER2 NGS and FISH tests. A HER2-amplified breast carcinoma by NGS had a negative IHC and a positive HER2 FISH result. This case was classified as a HER2-positive breast carcinoma, had anti-HER2-targeted therapy, and achieved a complete clinical response. Conclusions A small percentage of HER2-positive breast carcinomas are unidentified because of a negative HER2 IHC based on our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. It is not feasible and affordable in routine clinical practice to perform HER2 FISH for the cases with negative HER2 IHC (IHC score 0 and 1 +). Therefore, NGS assays capable of simultaneously detecting both somatic mutations and HER2 amplification could provide a more comprehensive genetic profiling for breast carcinomas in a clinical setting. Identification of HER2 amplification by NGS in HER2-positive breast carcinomas with negative HER2 IHC results is important since these cases are concealed by our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy with IHC first (for all cases) and FISH reflex (only for cases with IHC score of 2 +), and would offer the opportunity for potentially beneficial anti-HER2-targeted therapies for these patients.

Despite the great progress made in the understanding of the biological behavior of certain types of invasive breast cancer, there is still no single histological or molecular classification that encompasses such diversity and accurately predicts the clinical course of distinct breast cancer subtypes. The long-lasting classification of breast cancer as HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative has recently come into question with the discovery of new antibody drug conjugates (ADC), which are proven to be remarkably efficient in treating HER2-low breast cancer. The HER2-low paradigm has challenged the traditional understanding of HER2 overexpression and emphasized the need for more robust HER2 testing in order to encompass HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity and spatial distribution more accurately. It is yet to be seen if low HER2 will remain merely a marker of HER2-equipped tumors targetable with ADCs or if distinctive molecular and phenotypic groups within HER2-low tumors will eventually be discerned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-HER2 therapies have dramatically improved the prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing cancers. However, the correlation between the HER2 copy number and the response rate to anti-HER2 remains unclear. Here, following the PRISMA method, we performed a meta-analysis in the neoadjuvant setting in breast cancer to study the association between the HER2 amplification level and the pathological complete response (pCR) to anti-HER2 therapies. Nine articles (four clinical trials, five observational studies) were retrieved after full-text screening, involving 11,238 women with locally advanced breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. The median HER2/CEP17 ratio cut-off value was 5.0 ± 5.0 (min-max = 1.0–14.0). For the overall population, the median pCR rate was 48% using the random effect model. The studies were categorized in quartiles as follows: ≤2 (Class 1); 2.1 to 5.0 (Class 2); 5.1 to 7.0 (Class 3); and >7.0 (Class 4). After grouping, the pCR rates were 33%, 49%, 57%, and 79%, respectively. When we excluded the study by Greenwell et al., which accounted for 90% of the patients, using the same quartiles, we still observed an increasing rate of pCR as the HER2/CEP17 ratio increased. This is the first meta-analysis demonstrating the relationship between the HER2 amplification level and the percentage of pCR in the neoadjuvant setting among women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, with potential therapeutic applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast carcinomas due to HER2 amplification are associated with aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. Anti-HER2-targeted therapies are widely used to treat HER2-positive breast carcinomas with excellent outcomes. Accurate identification of HER2 amplification status in breast carcinomas is of important diagnostic and treatment value. Currently, HER2 amplification status is routinely determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing. This study will review our past HER2 data to determine and characterize discordant results between HER2 IHC and FISH. It will also determine a potential impact of HER2 amplification status by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on these patients. Methods: We reviewed a total of 4884 breast carcinomas with coexisting HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2010 to 2022. 57 cases also had a Next-Generation-Sequencing-based (NGS) gene panel performed. Given the advances in biostatic analysis pipelines, NGS methods were utilized to provide results on HER2 amplification status along with somatic mutations. Results: While the majority (ranging from 98.5% with IHC score of 0 and 93.1% with IHC score of 1 +) of 4884 breast carcinomas had concordant results from HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH testing, a small percentage of patients (ranging from 1.5% in those with IHC score of 0, to 6.9% with IHC score of 1 +) had discordant results, with negative HER2 IHC and positive HER2 FISH results. These patients could be reported as HER2-negative breast carcinomas if only HER2 IHC testing has been performed according to a current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. 57 patients had HER2 amplification status determined by NGS, and all patients had concordant results between HER2 NGS and FISH tests. A HER2-amplified breast carcinoma by NGS had a negative IHC and a positive HER2 FISH result. This case was classified as a HER2-positive breast carcinoma, had anti-HER2-targeted therapy, and achieved a complete clinical response. Conclusions: A small percentage of HER2-positive breast carcinomas are unidentified because of a negative HER2 IHC based on our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. It is not feasible and affordable in routine clinical practice to perform HER2 FISH for the cases with negative HER2 IHC (IHC score 0 and 1 +). Therefore, NGS assays capable of simultaneously detecting both somatic mutations and HER2 amplification could provide a more comprehensive genetic profiling for breast carcinomas in a clinical setting. Identification of HER2 amplification by NGS in HER2-positive breast carcinomas with negative HER2 IHC results is important since these cases are concealed by our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy with IHC first (for all cases) and FISH reflex (only for cases with IHC score of 2 +), and would offer the opportunity for potentially beneficial anti-HER2-targeted therapies for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intratumour heterogeneity fuels carcinogenesis and allows circumventing specific targeted therapies. HER2 gene amplification is associated with poor outcome in invasive breast cancer. Heterogeneous HER2 amplification has been described in 5–41% of breast cancers. Here, we investigated the genetic differences between HER2‐positive and HER2‐negative admixed breast cancer components. We performed an in‐depth analysis to explore the potential heterogeneity in the somatic mutational landscape of each individual tumour component. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded breast cancer tissue of ten patients with at least one HER2‐negative and at least one HER2‐positive component was microdissected. Targeted next‐generation sequencing was performed using a customized 53‐gene panel. Somatic mutations and copy number variations were analysed. Overall, the tumours showed a heterogeneous distribution of 12 deletions, 9 insertions, 32 missense variants and 7 nonsense variants in 26 different genes, which are (likely) pathogenic. Three splice site alterations were identified. One patient had an EGFR copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative in situ component, resulting in EGFR protein overexpression. Two patients had FGFR1 copy number gains in at least one tumour component. Two patients had an 8q24 gain in at least one tumour component, resulting in a copy number increase in MYC and PVT1. One patient had a CCND1 copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative tumour component. No common alternative drivers were identified in the HER2‐negative tumour components. This series of 10 breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification illustrates that HER2 positivity is not an unconditional prerequisite for the maintenance of tumour growth. Many other molecular aberrations are likely to act as alternative or collaborative drivers. This study demonstrates that breast carcinogenesis is a dynamically evolving process characterized by a versatile somatic mutational profile, of which some genetic aberrations will be crucial for cancer progression, and others will be mere ‘passenger’ molecular anomalies.

Abstracts: Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) status is a crucial predictive factor for prognostic assessment and targeted therapy selection, which may be influenced by intratumor heterogeneity and molecular divergence between the primary site and different metastases. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to confirm the concordance of HER2 amplification in circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA) with primary tumor tissue and verified its clinical implications. Methods: A total of 105 breast cancer patients were enrolled, and dynamic monitoring of HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA was conducted in 31 participants during the treatment. Totally 186 plasma samples were prospectively obtained and blinded to test HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA based on low-coverage whole genome sequencing(WGS) by next-generation sequencing(NGS). Results: Comparing HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA collected before the initiation of next line of anticancer treatment with primary tumor tissue, the concordant rate of HER2 amplification was 86.5%(χ2 = 52.901, p

There are contradictory data regarding the correlation between HER2 amplification level determined by in situ hybridization and evolution after treatment with anti-HER2 therapies. The aim of this study was to correlate quantitative results of FISH (ratio HER2/CEP17 and number of HER2 signals/nucleus) with pathological response achieved after neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. For this purpose, we analysed 100 consecutive HER2-positive cases of breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy. HER2 amplification determined by FISH was found in 92 of the 100 cases studied. pCR was obtained in 58% of the patients whose tumours presented amplification. In contrast, no pCR was obtained in the 8 patients with non-amplified tumours. A significant direct correlation between HER2 high amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio > 5 or HER2 signals/nucleus > 10) and pCR was found. In conclusion, HER2 amplification levels are clinically relevant because they provide oncologists with valuable information on the possibilities of achieving pCR after neoadjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification/overexpression is an effective therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancer. Although HER2 positivity has been reported in other malignancies, previous studies generally focused on one cancer type, making it challenging to compare HER2 positivity across studies/malignancies. Herein, we examined 37,992 patient samples for HER2 expression (+/- amplification) in a single laboratory. All 37,992 patients were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC); 21,642 of them were also examined for HER2 amplification with either fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (11,670 patients) or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) (9,972 patients); 18,262 patients had tumors other than breast or gastric cancer. All tissues were analyzed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory (Caris Life Sciences) at the request of referring physicians. HER2 protein overexpression was found in 2.7 % of samples. Over-expressed HER2 was detected predominantly in malignancies of epithelial origin; for cancers derived from mesenchyme, neuroendocrine tissue, central nervous system, and kidney, HER2 expression and amplification were remarkably rare or non-existent. Bladder carcinomas, gallbladder, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, cervical, uterine, and testicular cancers showed HER2 positivity rates of 12.4, 9.8, 6.3, 3.9, 3.0, and 2.4 %, respectively. HER2 overexpression and/or amplification is frequently found across tumor types. These observations may have significant therapeutic implications in cancers not traditionally thought to benefit from anti-HER2 therapies.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification occurs in approximately 13-23% of all GC cases and patients with HER2 overexpression exhibit a poor prognosis. Lapatinib, a dual EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is an effective agent to treat HER2-amplified breast cancer but it failed in gastric cancer (GC) clinical trials. However, the molecular mechanism of lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC is not well studied.Methods: We employed an unbiased, genome-scale screening with pooled CRISPR library on HER2-amplified GC cell lines to identify genes that are associated with resistance to lapatinib. To validate the candidate genes, we applied in vitro and in vivo pharmacological tests to confirm the function of the target genes.Results: We found that loss of function of CSK or PTEN conferred lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC cell lines NCI-N87 and OE19, respectively. Moreover, PI3K and MAPK signaling was significantly increased in CSK or PTEN null cells. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological study has shown that lapatinib resistance by the loss of function of CSK or PTEN, could be overcome by lapatinib combined with the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and MEK inhibitor trametinib.Conclusions: Our study suggests that loss-of-function mutations of CSK and PTEN cause lapatinib resistance by re-activating MAPK and PI3K pathways, and further proved these two pathways are druggable targets. Inhibiting the two pathways synergistically are effective to overcome lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC. This study provides insights for understanding the resistant mechanism of HER2 targeted therapy and novel strategies that may ultimately overcome resistance or limited efficacy of lapatinib treatment for subset of HER2 amplified GC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HER2 amplification is seen in 20–25% of primary breast cancer cases, and HER2 detection is performed routinely in primary operable, as well as metastatic breast cancer patients. Currently, HER2 is the only gene of which amplification is routinely assayed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, histochemical assay (FISH/IHC) of multiple target genes is laborious and time-consuming, and simultaneous amplification by microarray is preferred. OncoScan™ is a microarray-based assay capable of whole-genome copy number analysis using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the impact of tumor cellularity on the accuracy of OncoScan™ in the determination of HER2 amplification. Our results demonstrated that HER2 amplification by OncoScan™ is accurate, and has a high concordance rate of 93.3% with FISH. However, the concordance rate is poor (66.7%) in cases with a tumor cellularity < 20%. Nevertheless, the addition of FISH to breast tumors with a tumor cellularity < 20% and a HER2 copy number of 4 appears to be useful to minimize false-negative results by OncoScan™. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The recent advancement in massively parallel sequencing technologies has empowered liquid biopsies, in particular circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, to be the new paradigm in personalized cancer management. Plasma ctDNA detection overcomes the current limitations in tumor tissue procurement and serves as a convenient and non-invasive method to capture tumor heterogeneity and genetic evolution along patients' cancer journey. Summary of findings: In breast cancer, the current clinical application of ctDNA includes real-time monitoring of tumor response, detection of drug-resistant clones, assessing dynamic variations in tumor mutational landscape, identifying actionable mutations, detecting minimal residual disease and screening of early tumor. Purpose: This review aims to summarize the current clinical evidence of ctDNA application in the management of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: HER2 overexpression and gene amplification are routinely tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. In addition, HER2 mRNA expression is also tested by the Oncotype DX assay. Discordance between laboratories among the different assays remains a problem. To improve the routine HER2 reporting, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated their guidelines in 2018. Our study will compare concordance of HER2 status by IHC and FISH using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines with Oncotype DX. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 657 estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancer cases with available Oncotype DX tests between 2011 and 2018. Medical records were reviewed for HER2 results by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. The HER2 results by different assays and between 2013 and 2018 guidelines were compared. Results: Of the 657 cases, 280 were tested by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by IHC 2013 guidelines were all negative (67/67, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines and by Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by FISH 2013 guidelines were all negative (16/16, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines, while 15/16 (93.8%) negative and 1/16 (6.2%) equivocal by Oncotype DX. The HER2-equivocal and HER2-negative groups were similar in age, gender, histology, grade, and Ki67 score. Conclusions: HER2 concordance was highest between Oncotype DX (99.6%) and FISH per 2018 guidelines. This suggests that the ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines improved the accurate stratification of HER2-equivocal cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2) overexpression/amplification is associated with high malignancy, rapid disease progression and poor overall survival in breast cancer. The application of anti-HER2 drugs has greatly improved the survival of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, but drug resistance issues affect the long-term efficacy. The HER2 mutation is considered to be one of the reasons for resistance to anti-HER2 therapy, and there is currently no standard treatment. We report for the first time the detection of HER2 amplification with R157W mutation by second-generation sequencing (NGS) in a 57-year-old hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive woman with advanced breast cancer who was resistant to multi-line anti-HER2 therapies. She subsequently received pyrotinib combined with capecitabine treatment and achieved partial response. The small-molecule pan-HER family irreversible inhibitor pyrotinib combined with capecitabine has shown a promising effect in the treatment of HER2 mutation-induced resistance, but the molecular mechanism and efficacy need to be further verified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present the case of a patient with breast neoplasm which presented a particular evolution with pronounced molecular intratumoral heterogeneity proven at multiple biopsies. If in the first instance, at the primary tumor it was discovered a negative molecular HER2 luminal B pattern, in the end stage, after treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the residual tumor from the mastectomy tissue presented a luminal B profile with HER2 amplification. Under targeted anti-HER2 treatment, there was cutaneous and pleural progression, lesions that were subjected to biopsy and which revealed the presence of secondary masses with triple negative molecular pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intratumour heterogeneity fuels carcinogenesis and allows circumventing specific targeted therapies. HER2 gene amplification is associated with poor outcome in invasive breast cancer. Heterogeneous HER2 amplification has been described in 5–41% of breast cancers. Here, we investigated the genetic differences between HER2‐positive and HER2‐negative admixed breast cancer components. We performed an in‐depth analysis to explore the potential heterogeneity in the somatic mutational landscape of each individual tumour component. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded breast cancer tissue of ten patients with at least one HER2‐negative and at least one HER2‐positive component was microdissected. Targeted next‐generation sequencing was performed using a customized 53‐gene panel. Somatic mutations and copy number variations were analysed. Overall, the tumours showed a heterogeneous distribution of 12 deletions, 9 insertions, 32 missense variants and 7 nonsense variants in 26 different genes, which are (likely) pathogenic. Three splice site alterations were identified. One patient had an EGFR copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative in situ component, resulting in EGFR protein overexpression. Two patients had FGFR1 copy number gains in at least one tumour component. Two patients had an 8q24 gain in at least one tumour component, resulting in a copy number increase in MYC and PVT1. One patient had a CCND1 copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative tumour component. No common alternative drivers were identified in the HER2‐negative tumour components. This series of 10 breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification illustrates that HER2 positivity is not an unconditional prerequisite for the maintenance of tumour growth. Many other molecular aberrations are likely to act as alternative or collaborative drivers. This study demonstrates that breast carcinogenesis is a dynamically evolving process characterized by a versatile somatic mutational profile, of which some genetic aberrations will be crucial for cancer progression, and others will be mere 'passenger' molecular anomalies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) status is a crucial predictive factor for prognostic assessment and targeted therapy selection, which may be influenced by intratumor heterogeneity and molecular divergence between the primary site and different metastases. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to confirm the concordance of HER2 amplification in circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA) with primary tumor tissue and verified its clinical implications. A total of 105 breast cancer patients were enrolled, and dynamic monitoring of HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA was conducted in 31 participants during the treatment. Totally 186 plasma samples were prospectively obtained and blinded to test HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA based on low-coverage whole genome sequencing(WGS) by next-generation sequencing(NGS). Comparing HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA collected before the initiation of next line of anticancer treatment with primary tumor tissue, the concordant rate of HER2 amplification was 86.5%(χ2 = 52.901, p < 0.001), with a positive and negative predictive value of 94.9% and 80.7%, respectively. Histopathologically positive, high-level amplification of HER2 copy numbers in the baseline was significantly correlated with best objective response during the anticancer therapy(p = 0.010). Moreover, HER2 copy numbers fluctuated with HER2-targeted therapeutic response, and the patients with a constantly positive level after 6 weeks of treatment appeared to suffer from significantly reduced progression free survival(p < 0.001). HER2 amplification in ctDNA, with a concordance rate of over 80% with primary tumors, may be a predictive index for prognostic evaluation and therapeutic response monitoring in a noninvasive, repeatable and practical method for breast cancer patients. • The concordance between HER2 amplification in ctDNA and tumor tissues was 86.5%. • The positive and negative predictive value surpassed previous studies. • HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA may predict the prognosis of anti-HER2 therapy. • HER2 copy numbers in ctDNA may predict response in HER2 positive breast cancer. • The study of various-stage patients may be closer to real-world clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To review breast cancer with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) genetic heterogeneity (GH), with a focus on clinician interpretation of the results and subsequent management.Methods: We retrospectively searched all consecutive invasive breast cancers that underwent HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization testing and identified cases with HER2 GH.Results: Eleven (0.4%) cases of primary breast tumors with reported HER2 GH were identified over 76 months. HER2-positive tumor cells comprised a mean ± SD of 20% ± 15% of the overall tumor population (range, 5%-50%) and exhibited high levels of amplification (HER2/CEP17 = 5.4 ± 2.9). Three cases had morphologic heterogeneity. Of the four patients who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, two had trastuzumab; all showed a partial pathologic response. We identified two cases in which there appeared to be clinical misinterpretation of the HER2 results.Conclusions: HER2 GH is an infrequent event, may contain morphologic heterogeneity, could infer incomplete response to neoadjuvant therapy, and requires adequate communication with treating clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Cardiotoxicity is the most important side effect of trastuzumab treatment. Heart function monitoring is recommended during the treatment which has led to growing use of resources. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the frequency and timing of trastuzumab cardiotoxicity and its risk factors in real-world setting.Methods: Single institute, retrospective collection of data on HER2+ breast cancer patients (n = 246) was carried out through a pharmacy search for patients who had received trastuzumab in 2006-2014. Clinical and pathological factors, treatment history, EF measurements, cardiac medications, cardiovascular disease history, cardiac symptoms, and survival data were collected from patient records.Results: 32 patients (13%) had EF decline ≥ 10%, eleven (4.5%) had EF decline ≥ 20% within 1 year after trastuzumab initiation, and trastuzumab was discontinued due to suspected cardiotoxicity in six patients (2.4%). 49 patients (19.9%) experienced symptoms related to cardiotoxicity during therapy, which accumulated among those with EF drop. Underlying cardiovascular diseases and multiple (≥ 2) cardiac medications were related to EF drop (≥ 20%) and trastuzumab discontinuation. Majority of EF drops (≥ 10%) and trastuzumab discontinuations were seen within 6months of trastuzumab initiation and recovery of EF drop to < 10% of the baseline was seen in most cases (62.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of patients according to EF drop.Conclusions: Trastuzumab cardiotoxicity seems to accumulate among patients with underlying cardiac conditions. EF monitoring could be targeted to risk groups without compromising of the cardiac health or survival of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a highly accurate method to determine DNA concentration and detect copy number variations. We developed an approach to assess HER2 gene amplification status using ddPCR with two sequences of TFF3 as reference probes. Experimental design. 76 templates of carcinoma DNA were prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Digital PCR assay of the copy number of HER2 and TFF3 DNA was performed on the samples. The results were compared to prior fluorescent in-situ hybridation (FISH) assays performed on the same samples. Results The ddPCR assay had high concordance with the conventionally used immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH methods. The ddPCR method returned fewer indeterminate results than IHC. Concordance between a ddPCR plus FISH method and IHC plus FISH can rise to 98.7% (75/76) after validation is carried out. Conclusion It's potentially possible to improve the sensitivity and specifity of HER2 ddPCR assays using reference sequences not co-localized with HER2 on chromosome 17, and combining results from multiple sequences. Adopting an approach based on ddPCR HER2 assays plus FISH could lead to reduced costs, labour, and time consumption compared to current IHC plus FISH standard, while not losing precision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Amplification of HER2 is seen in 20-30% of breast cancer cases. Measurement of HER2 gene amplification appears to be of vital importance in planning the treatment schedule for patients with breast carcinoma. The aim of our study was to evaluate HER2 amplification status in malignant and benign breast tumors by differential PCR (dPCR). Materials and Methods: The genomic DNA was extracted using the phenol/chloroform extraction procedure from 76 different breast tissues. Differential PCR was performed using the DNA samples isolated from fresh and paraffin- embedded breast cancer tissues. The relative copy number ratio of target gene (HER2) to control gene ( INF-γ ) was measured. dPCR products were then separated by electrophoresis using 2% agarose gel. The intensity of HER2 and INFγ bands were determined for each sample by ImageJ software. Results: According to the ratio between the band intensity of HER2 to INFγ in tumour and also normal samples, 7% and 26% rates of HER2 amplification were observed in benign and malignant samples respectively. The ratio showed a 2-5 fold increase in HER2 gene copy number for tissues with HER2 amplification whereas, a one-fold increase was found in other samples. Conclusion: Differential PCR provides a relatively rapid and inexpensive technique to assess the HER2 gene amplification, especially alongside immunohistochemistry as a routine assessing method .

Rationale Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a key driver of tumorigenesis, and over-expression as a result of HER2 gene amplification has been observed in a number of solid tumors. Recently HER2 has become an important biomarker for the monoclonal antibody treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast and advanced gastric cancer. The HER2 targeting antibody trastuzumab treatment requires accurate measurement of HER2 levels for proper diagnosis. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with highly direct, precise and absolute nucleic acid quantification could be used to detect HER2 amplification levels. Objectives Our objective was to evaluate a robust, accurate and less subjective application of ddPCR for HER2 amplification levels and test the assay performance in clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast and gastric carcinoma samples. Methods Genomic DNA from HER2 amplified cell line SK-BR-3 was used to set up the ddPCR assays. The copy number of HER2 was compared to the chromosome 17 centromere reference gene (CEP17), expressed as HER2:CEP17 ratio. Genomic DNAs of FFPE specimens from 145 Asian patients with breast and gastric carcinomas were assayed using both standard methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and ddPCR. Results Based on 145 clinical breast and gastric carcinoma cases, our study demonstrated a high concordance of ddPCR results to FISH and IHC. In breast cancer specimens, the ddPCR results had high concordance with FISH and IHC defined HER2 status with a sensitivity of 90.9% (30/33) and a specificity of 100% (77/77). In gastric cancer specimens that were concordant in both FISH and IHC, our assay was 95.5% concordant with FISH and IHC (21/22). Conclusions ddPCR has the advantage of automation and also allows levels of HER2 amplification to be easily evaluated in large numbers of samples, and presents a potential option to define HER2 status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression and gene amplification are currently established by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. This study investigates whether high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays can provide additional diagnostic power to assess HER2 gene status. Methods: DNA from 65 breast tumor samples previously diagnosed by HER2 IHC and FISH analysis were blinded and examined for HER2 copy number variation employing SNP array analysis. Results: SNP array analysis identified 24 (37%) samples with selective amplification or imbalance of the HER2 region in the q-arm of chromosome 17. In contrast, only 15 (23%) tumors were found to have HER2 amplification by IHC and FISH analysis. In total, there was a discrepancy in 19 (29%) samples between SNP array and IHC/FISH analysis. In 12 of these cases, the discrepancy towards FISH could be attributed to concomitant amplification or deletion of the centromeric region, which harbors the FISH reference probe sequence. In 3 tumors, repeated IHC/FISH analysis revealed that the original IHC/FISH analysis had failed to indicate the correct HER2 expression level. Finally, the SNP array analysis revealed that more than two thirds of the samples exhibited polyploidy that was unrecognized by conventional FISH. Conclusions: Collectively, the data show that determination of HER2 copy number variations by SNP array-based genomic segmentation analysis is an effective supplement to IHC/FISH HER2 analysis that, by providing additional diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, may elect more women for targeted treatment with HER2 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The primary objectives of this study on carcinomas with equivocal HER2 expression were to assess the impact of distinct recommendations with regard to identifying patients eligible for anti-HER2 agents by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and to elucidate whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) may be of support in assessing HER2 gene status. METHODS: A cohort of 957 immunohistochemistry-evaluated HER2-equivocal cases was analyzed by dual-color FISH. The results were assessed according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2007 and 2013 guidelines for dual- and single-signal in situ hybridization (ISH) assays. A subgroup of 112 cases was subjected to MLPA. RESULTS: HER2 amplification varied from 15% (ASCO/CAP 2007 HER2/CEP17 ratio) to 29.5% (FDA/EMA HER2 copy number). According to the ASCO/CAP 2013 interpretation of the dual-signal HER2 assay, ISH-positive carcinomas accounted for 19.7%. In contrast with the ASCO/CAP 2007 ratio, this approach labeled as positive all 32 cases (3.34%) with a HER2/CEP17 ratio <2 and an average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 signals per cell. In contrast, only one case showing a HER2 copy number <4 but a ratio ≥2 was diagnosed as positive. MLPA data correlated poorly with FISH results because of the presence of heterogeneous HER2 amplification in 33.9% of all amplified carcinomas; however, MLPA ruled out HER2 amplification in 75% of ISH-evaluated HER2-equivocal carcinomas. CONCLUSION: The ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines seem to improve the identification of HER2-positive carcinomas. Polymerase chain reaction-based methods such as MLPA can be of help, provided that heterogeneous amplification has been ruled out by ISH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Measurement of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an evolving technique in breast cancer, enabling liquid biopsies and treatment monitoring. The present study investigated the dynamics of plasma HER2 gene copy number and amplification in cfDNA during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods: The study included 50 patients from a prospective cohort analyzed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty healthy women with no history of cancer served as control group and 15 patients with metastatic breast cancer were used to validate the assay. Total cfDNA and HER2 gene amplification were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: Plasma HER2 gene copy number ( p = 0.794), HER2 gene amplification ( p = 0.127) and total cfDNA ( p = 0.440) did not differ significantly from the levels in the control group. Eighteen patients (36 %) obtained pathological complete response (pCR). HER2 gene copy number before the operation was significantly higher than the baseline level ( p < 0.0001), but there was no difference between patients with and without pCR ( p = 0.569). Likewise, there was no difference in plasma HER2 gene amplification between tissue HER2-positive and -negative patients ( p = 0.754). Conclusions: The results indicate that neither total cfDNA nor HER2 gene copy number is elevated in primary breast cancer patients compared to healthy controls. The level of both parameters increased during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but without any relation to treatment effect. There was no indication of plasma HER2 gene amplification in the HER2-positive patients in the neoadjuvant setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is amplified and overexpressed in 20-25% of breast cancers. This study investigated circulating free DNA (cfDNA) for detection of HER2 gene amplification in patients with breast cancer.Methods: Circulating free DNA was extracted from plasma of unselected patients with primary breast cancer (22 before surgery and 68 following treatment), 30 metastatic patients and 98 female controls using the QIAamp Blood DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). The ratio of HER2 to an unamplified reference gene (contactin-associated protein 1 (CNTNAP1)) was measured in cfDNA samples by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using SK-BR-3 cell line DNA as a positive control.Results: We validated the qPCR assay with DNA extracted from 23 HER2 3+ and 40 HER2-negative tumour tissue samples; the results agreed for 60 of 63 (95.2%) tumours. Amplification was detected in cfDNA for 8 of 68 patients following primary breast cancer treatment and 5 of 30 metastatic patients, but was undetected in 22 patients with primary breast cancer and 98 healthy female controls. Of the patients with amplification in cfDNA, 10 had HER2 3+ tumour status by immunohistochemistry.Conclusions: The results demonstrate for the first time the existence of amplified HER2 in cfDNA in the follow-up of breast cancer patients who are otherwise disease free. This approach could potentially provide a marker in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

García-Caballero T, Grabau D, Green A R, Gregory J, Schad A, Kohlwes E, Ellis I O, Watts S & Mollerup J (2010) Histopathology 56, 472–480 Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens Aims: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to reveal several genomic imbalances relevant to proper cancer diagnosis and to the correct treatment regime. However, FISH requires expensive and advanced fluorescence microscopes in addition to expertise in fluorescence microscopy. To determine whether a newly developed dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) method is a suitable alternative to FISH, we analysed the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) amplification level of 168 breast cancer specimens using dual-colour CISH and FISH and compared the results. Methods and results: We found 100% agreement between HER2 status determined by FISH and dual-colour CISH. Furthermore, we observed that the time used to score slides was significantly reduced by 28% in dual-colour CISH compared with the FISH protocol. Concordance between HER2 protein status and dual-colour CISH or FISH was equally good with an overall agreement of 96.8%. Correlation between the HER2/centromere 17 gene ratios obtained with dual-colour CISH and FISH was highly significant with an overall correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.96. Conclusions: We conclude that dual-colour CISH and bright field microscopy are excellent alternatives to FISH when analysing the HER2 status of primary breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background HER2 gene amplification and/or protein overexpression in breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and predicts response to anti-HER2 therapy. We examine the natural history of breast cancers in relationship to increased HER2 copy numbers in a large population-based study. Patients and Methods HER2 status was measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in approximately 1,400 breast cancer cases with greater than 15 years of follow-up. Protein expression was evaluated with two different commercially-available antibodies. Results We looked for subgroups of breast cancer with different clinical outcomes, based on HER2 FISH amplification ratio. The current HER2 ratio cut point for classifying HER2 positive and negative cases is 2.2. However, we found an increased risk of disease-specific death associated with FISH ratios of >1.5. An ‘intermediate’ group of cases with HER2 ratios between 1.5 and 2.2 was found to have a significantly better outcome than the conventional ‘amplified’ group (HER2 ratio >2.2) but a significantly worse outcome than groups with FISH ratios less than 1.5. Conclusion Breast cancers with increased HER2 copy numbers (low level HER2 amplification), below the currently accepted positive threshold ratio of 2.2, showed a distinct, intermediate outcome when compared to HER2 unamplified tumors and tumors with HER2 ratios greater than 2.2. These findings suggest that a new cut point to determine HER2 positivity, at a ratio of 1.5 (well below the current recommended cut point of 2.2), should be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of an invasive ductal breast carcinoma with significant heterogeneity: a HER-2+ tumor component was densely infiltrated by T-cells, whereas the HER2− tumor component, including two axillary lymph node metastases, showed much fewer tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Array comparative genomic hybridization of dissected tumor cells from both components revealed many shared chromosomal aberrations but also unique alterations of the HER2+ tumor cell population besides HER2 amplification. We found a clonally dominated T-cell receptor rearrangement of the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the HER2+, but not in the HER2− tumor component. Thus, in this case HER2 overexpression is associated with a marked infiltration by T-cells suggesting a specific T-cell response against the HER2+ tumor cell population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The prevalence of HER2 amplification according to the percentage of positively stained cells, of polysomy 17 and their correlation with clinical and pathologic characteristics were retrospectively evaluated in a population of 415 breast cancers where fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was performed to clarify HER2 status previously determined by immunohistochemistry. Forty-two tumours with intense and complete staining in >50% of cells were selected from the same database as internal controls. Among the 415 cases, 233 tumours were IHC 1+, 168 tumours were 2+ and 14 tumours showed an intense and complete immunostaining in ⩽50% of neoplastic cells. HER2 was amplified in 3/14 (21.4%) tumours with ⩽50% and in 36/42 (85.7%) tumours with >50% of intense stained cells, (p <0.001). Polysomy 17 was detected in 77 tumours (16.85%). It was inversely correlated with the percentage of positively stained cells, but not with amplification. Patients with polysomy 17 and no amplification were significantly more likely to have tumours with favourable biological features when compared with patients with HER2 amplification. Our results suggest that FISH testing should be considered for tumours with ⩽50% positive stained cells and that polysomy 17 without amplification is not associated with poor prognostic features. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]