Search

Despite aggressive therapy, existing treatments offer poor prognosis for glioblastoma multiforme patients, in part due to poor penetration of most drugs across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). We propose a minimal-invasive combined treatment approach consisting of local BBB disruption in the tumor in parallel to systemic drug administration. Local BBB disruption is obtained by convection-enhanced delivery of a novel BBB disruption agent, enabling efficient/targeted delivery of the systemically administered drug by the tumors own vasculature. Various human serum albumin (HSA) analogs were synthesized and screened for BBB disruption efficacy in custom in vitro systems. The candidate analogs were then delivered into naïve rat brains by convection-enhanced delivery and screened for maximal BBB disruption and minimal brain toxicity. These studies found a noncationized/neutralized analog, ethylamine (EA)–HSA, to be the optimal BBB-opening agent. Immunocytochemical studies suggested that BBB disruption by EA–HSA may be explained by alterations in occludin expression. Finally, an efficacy study in rats bearing intracranial gliomas was performed. The rats were treated by convection-enhanced delivery of EA–HSA in parallel to systemic administration of Methotrexate, showing significant antineoplastic effects of the combined approached reflected in suppressed tumor growth and significantly (~x3) prolonged survival.

Even though some progress in diagnosis and treatment has been made over the years, there is still no definitive treatment available for Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a continuous infusion-mediated pressure gradient via intracranial catheters, studied in clinical trials, enables in situ drug concentrations several orders of magnitude greater than those achieved by systemic administration. We hypothesized that the currently limited efficacy of CED could be enhanced by a liposomal formulation, thus achieving enhanced drug localization to the tumor site with minimal toxicity. We hereby describe a novel approach for treating GBM by CED of liposomes containing the known chemotherapeutic agent, temozolomide (TMZ). A new technique for encapsulating TMZ in hydrophilic (PEGylated) liposomes, characterized by nano-size (121nm), low polydispersity index (

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unable to differentiate tumor/nontumor enhancing tissues. We have applied delayed-contrast MRI for calculating high resolution treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs) clearly differentiating tumor/nontumor tissues in brain tumor patients.One hundred and fifty patients with primary/metastatic tumors were recruited and scanned by delayed-contrast MRI and perfusion MRI. Of those, 47 patients underwent resection during their participation in the study. Region of interest/threshold analysis was performed on the TRAMs and on relative cerebral blood volume maps, and correlation with histology was studied. Relative cerebral blood volume was also assessed by the study neuroradiologist.Histological validation confirmed that regions of contrast agent clearance in the TRAMs1 h post contrast injection represent active tumor, while regions of contrast accumulation represent nontumor tissues with 100% sensitivity and 92% positive predictive value to active tumor. Significant correlation was found between tumor burden in the TRAMs and histology in a subgroup of lesions resected en bloc (r(2) = 0.90, P.0001). Relative cerebral blood volume yielded sensitivity/positive predictive values of 51%/96% and there was no correlation with tumor burden. The feasibility of applying the TRAMs for differentiating progression from treatment effects, depicting tumor within hemorrhages, and detecting residual tumor postsurgery is demonstrated.The TRAMs present a novel model-independent approach providing efficient separation between tumor/nontumor tissues by adding a short MRI scan1 h post contrast injection. The methodology uses robust acquisition sequences, providing high resolution and easy to interpret maps with minimal sensitivity to susceptibility artifacts. The presented results provide histological validation of the TRAMs and demonstrate their potential contribution to the management of brain tumor patients.

In spite of aggressive therapy, existing treatments offer poor prognosis for glioblastoma multiforme due to tumor infiltration into the surrounding brain as well as poor blood–brain barrier penetration of most therapeutic agents. In this paper we present a novel approach for a minimally invasive treatment and a non-invasive response assessment methodology consisting of applying intracranial point-source electroporation and assessing treatment effect volumes using magnetic resonance imaging. Using a unique setup of a single intracranial electrode and an external surface electrode we treated rats' brains with various electroporation protocols and applied magnetic resonance imaging to study the dependence of the physiological effects on electroporation treatment parameters. The extent of blood–brain barrier disruption and later volumes of permanent brain tissue damage were found to correlate significantly with the treatment voltages (r2 = 0.99, p < 0.001) and the number of treatment pulses (r2 = 0.94, p < 0.002). Blood–brain barrier disruption depicted 3.2 ± 0.3 times larger volumes than the final permanent damage volumes (p < 0.0001). These results indicate that it may be beneficial to use more than one modality of electroporation when planning a treatment for brain tumors.