Search

Background: Some childhood cancer survivors experience employment difficulties. This study aimed to describe pediatric brain-tumor survivors' employment status., Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted, with questionnaires distributed to 101 pediatric brain-tumor survivors (aged 15 years or older) and their attending physicians from nine institutions in Japan. We compared category and time-series histories for participants' first-time employment using national census information. Factors related to delayed employment or early employment termination were examined using survival-time analyses., Results: Excluding students and homemakers, 38 brain-tumor survivors (median age 27 years, with 15 years since diagnosis) were of working age. Of these, 12 (32%) were unemployed and 9 (24%) had never been employed. First-time employment occurred later for brain-tumor survivors than the general population, particularly in those with lower educational levels. The number of brain-tumor survivors whose first job was terminated within the first year was higher than that for the general population, particularly in male survivors and germ cell-tumor survivors. Brain-tumor survivors described their working patterns (irregular), job types (specialist or professional), reasons for early termination (unsuitable job), and thoughts about working (they wished to serve their communities but lacked confidence)., Conclusion: Brain-tumor survivors are associated with high unemployment rates and multiple unemployment-related factors. Education and welfare systems should identify individual methods of social participation for this group.

Background: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are often affected by late effects, such as motility disturbance of limb(s), seizure, ocular/visual impairment, endocrine abnormality, and higher brain dysfunction, resulting from the disease and its treatment. Appropriate provision of supportive care will require understanding the effects of these experiences on survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQOL)., Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the relationships between late effects and specific aspects of the HRQOL of pediatric brain tumor survivors., Methods: We distributed questionnaires for measuring HRQOL to 138 survivors and their parents at 8 hospitals and 1 clinic in Japan and simultaneously surveyed late effects using information provided by the survivors' attending physicians. We compared the HRQOL of survivors with and survivors without specific late effects., Results: A total of 106 survivors and their parents returned the questionnaires to the researchers. The HRQOL of survivors 18 years or older was negatively affected by all 5 late effects, indicating that their higher impairment was associated with diminished HRQOL. The HRQOL of survivors aged 12 to 17 years was negatively affected by 2 late effects (ocular/visual impairment and motility disturbance of the limbs). A part of the HRQOL subdomain (motor and cognitive functioning) of survivors aged 12 to 17 years was positively related to ocular/visual impairment., Conclusions: Five late effects influenced the HRQOL of pediatric brain tumor survivors., Implications for Practice: Nurses and other health professionals should provide specific care designed to support aspects of HRQOL affected by late effects. For example, survivors with ocular/visual impairment may be expected to require additional emotional support, and those with seizures or endocrine abnormalities may be expected to require additional support for sleep disorders.

Purpose: To understand the influence of disease and treatment on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of children with brain tumors, compared to the HRQOL of children with other cancers, from the viewpoints of children and parents., Methods: A total of 133 children aged 5-18 years and 165 parents of children aged 2-18 completed questionnaires of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Cancer Module (Pain and Hurt, Nausea, Procedural Anxiety, Treatment Anxiety, Worry, Cognitive Problems, Perceived Physical Appearance, and Communication scales); higher scores indicate a better HRQOL. The Cancer Module scores, weighted by age and treatment status, were compared to those obtained in a previous study of children with other cancers (mostly leukemia)., Results: The weighted mean scores for Pain and Hurt (effect size d = 0.26) and Nausea (d = 0.23) from child reports and the scores for Nausea (d = 0.28) from parent reports were higher for children with brain tumors than scores for children with other cancers. The scores for Procedural Anxiety (d = -0.22) and Treatment Anxiety (d = -0.32) from parent reports were lower for parents of children with brain tumors than the scores for parents of children with other cancers. The child-reported Pain and Hurt score of the Cancer Module was higher (d = 0.29) and in less agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.43) with scores from the Brain Tumor Module, indicating that assessments completed with the Cancer Module misesteem pain and hurt problems in children with brain tumors., Conclusions: The profiles of cancer-specific HRQOL in children with brain tumors differ from those of children with other cancers; we therefore suggest that these children receive specific psychological support.

Purpose: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is not only a degree of health but also reflects patient perceptions and expectations of health. For children with brain tumors, better understanding of HRQOL requires the use of complementary reports from parents and interviewer-administered reports for children. Here, we aimed to test whether or not the trait anxiety of children and the psychological distress of their parents influence children's and parents' responses to HRQOL questionnaires, and whether or not the report-administration method for children influences children's responses to HRQOL questionnaires., Methods: One hundred and thirty-four children aged 5-18 with brain tumors and one of their parents completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory(™) (PedsQL(™)) Brain Tumor Module questionnaires. In addition, the children also completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC), and the parents also completed the Kessler-10 (K10) and health and sociodemographic characteristics questionnaires. The child questionnaires were administered either by the child (self-administered) or an interviewer. Rater-dependent perceptions about HRQOL were derived from the subscales scores of the PedsQL(™) Brain Tumor Module using structural equation modeling based on a multitrait-multimethod model. The STAIC trait-anxiety score, K10 score, report-administration method, and other health and sociodemographic factors related to each child's or parent's perceptions were identified through multiple linear regression analyses of the questionnaire responses. We used a path analysis to estimate the change in a PedsQL(™) child-reported score that occurs when interviewer-administration changes the child's perception about HRQOL., Results: Surveys for 89 children were self-administered while those for 45 were interviewer-administered. The perceptions of the children and parents were calculated by fitting data to the model (chi-squared P = 0.087, normed fit index = 0.932, comparative fit index = 0.978, standardized root mean squared residual = 0.053, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.054). The children's perception of HRQOL was affected by their STAIC trait-anxiety score (b = -0.43, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.25]). The parent's perception was affected by their child's treatment status (b = 0.26, 95% CI [0.09, 0.43]), the parent's K10 score (b = -0.21, 95% CI [-0.37, -0.04]), and by education level (b = 0.17, 95% CI [0.00, 0.34]). The change in the child-reported PedsQL(™) score in relation to the method of administration ranged from -1.1 (95% CI: -3.5, 1.3) on the procedural anxiety subscale to -2.5 (95% CI: -7.6, 2.6) on the movement and balance subscale., Conclusion: Child-reporting of HRQOL is little influenced by the method of administration. Children's perception about HRQOL tended to be influenced by their trait anxiety, while parents' perception was influenced by their psychological distress, academic background, and their child's treatment status.

Background: The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a widely-used modular instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in children aged 2 to 18 years. The PedsQL Brain Tumor Module is comprised of six scales: Cognitive Problems, Pain and Hurt, Movement and Balance, Procedural Anxiety, Nausea, and Worry. In the present study, we developed the Japanese version of the PedsQL Brain Tumor Module and investigated its feasibility, reliability, and validity among Japanese children and their parents., Methods: Translation equivalence and content validity were verified using the standard back-translation method and cognitive debriefing tests. Participants were recruited from 6 hospitals in Japan and the Children's Cancer Association of Japan, and questionnaires were completed by 137 children with brain tumors and 166 parents. Feasibility of the questionnaire was determined based on the amount of time required to complete the form and the percentage of missing values. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by retesting 22 children and 27 parents. Factorial validity was verified by exploratory factor analyses. Known-groups validity was described with regard to whole brain irradiation, developmental impairment, infratentorial tumors, paresis, and concurrent chemotherapy. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined using Generic Core Scales and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children., Results: Internal consistency was relatively high for all scales (Cronbach's coefficient alpha > 0.70) except the Pain and Hurt scale for the child-report, and sufficient test-retest reliability was demonstrated for all scales (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.45-0.95). Factorial validity was supported through exploratory factor analysis (factor-item correlation = 0.33-0.96 for children, 0.55-1.00 for parents). Evaluation of known-groups validity confirmed that the Cognitive Problems scale was sensitive for developmental impairment, the Movement and Balance scale for infratentorial tumors or paresis, and the Nausea scale for a patient currently undergoing chemotherapy. Convergent and discriminant validity with the PedsQL Generic Core Scales and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children were acceptable., Conclusions: The Japanese version of the PedsQL Brain Tumor Module is suitable for assessing health-related quality of life in children with brain tumors in clinical trials and research studies.