Search

Although intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with recombinant tissue-plasminogen-activator represents a highly effective treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients, not every patient benefits. We hypothesized that pretreatment levels of mediators of hemostasis (VWF and ADAMTS13) and dimethylarginines (ADMA and SDMA) are associated with early neurological improvement and outcome after IVT in ischemic stroke. Moreover we aimed to investigate the link between ADAMTS13 and markers of inflammation (CRP, IL-6, MMP-9 and MCP-1). In 43 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT blood samples for determination of the different markers were strictly taken before treatment, as well as at 24 h, 3, 7 and 90 days after symptom onset. Early neurological improvement was assessed using the shift between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline and at 24 h. Outcome at 90 days was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale. The lowest quartile of ADAMTS13 activity was independently associated with less improvement in NIHSS (baseline-24 h) (OR 1.298, p = 0.050). No independent association of ADMA or SDMA levels at baseline with outcome could be shown. Furthermore, IL-6, MCP-1 and CRP levels at 90 days significantly differed between patients with low and high ADAMTS13 activity. Thus, ADAMTS13 might indicate or even influence efficacy of IVT.

Background: Endovascular treatment improves outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in general. But outcome in some of these patients is jeopardized by recanalization failure or bleeding., Objectives: This study aimed to determine a possible association of mediators of inflammation and haemostasis (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, matrix metalloproteinase-9, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, asymmetric dimethylarginine [ADMA], symmetric dimethylarginine, von Willebrand factor and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif 13 [ADAMTS-13]) with the post-intervention grade of reperfusion, complications and clinical outcome in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of ischaemic stroke., Patients/methods: Forty-one patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion were prospectively enrolled into the study. Peripheral venous blood was taken prior to treatment and 24 hours and 3, 7 and 90 days after symptom onset. The post-intervention grade of reperfusion was determined using the modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score. Clinical outcome on day 90 was assessed using the modified Rankin's scale (mRS)., Results: Low ADAMTS-13 activity ( p  = 0.009) and missing of statin therapy ( p  = 0.038) on admission were independently associated with unfavourable outcome (mRS: 5-6). Patients with unsuccessful reperfusion (mTICI: 0-1) showed higher ADMA levels on admission ( p  = 0.018). However, this association could not be confirmed in the binary logistic regression analysis., Conclusion: Low ADAMTS-13 activity is a predictor of unfavourable outcome in patients with ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical and potential therapeutic role of ADAMTS-13 in acute ischaemic stroke., Competing Interests: This study was funded by a scholarship of TUI Stiftung, Germany, to H. Worthmann.Heinrich Lanfermann reports industry-funded travel and honoraria for speaking engagements from Bender Imaging and Radiopharm., (Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.)

Background: Nonagenarians are under-represented in thrombolytic trials for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytics in nonagenarians in terms of safety and outcome is not well established., Materials and Methods: We used a multinational registry to identify patients aged 90 years or older with good baseline functional status who presented with AIS. Differences in outcomes-disability level at 90 days, frequency of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality-between patients who did and did not receive thrombolytics were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) was utilized before evaluating outcome by balancing both groups in the sensitivity analysis., Results: We identified 227 previously independent nonagenarians with AIS; 122 received intravenous thrombolytics and 105 did not. In the unmatched cohort, ordinal analysis showed a significant treatment effect (adjusted common odds ratio [OR]: .61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .39-.96). There was an absolute difference of 8.1% in the rate of excellent outcome in favor of thrombolysis (17.4% versus 9.3%; adjusted ratio: .30, 95% CI: .12-.77). Rates of sICH and in-hospital mortality were not different. Similarly, in the matched cohort, CEM analysis showed a shift in the primary outcome distribution in favor of thrombolysis (adjusted common OR: .45, 95% CI: .26-.76)., Conclusions: Nonagenarians treated with thrombolytics showed lower stroke-related disability at 90 days than those not treated, without significant difference in sICH and in-hospital mortality rates. These observations cannot exclude a residual confounding effect, but provide evidence that thrombolytics should not be withheld from nonagenarians because of age alone., (Copyright © 2018 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: A recent meta-analysis showed that women with acute ischemic stroke are less likely to receive treatment with intravenous alteplase than men. The aim of this study was to assess sex differences in treatment with intravenous alteplase and to explore the reasons for these differences., Methods: We analyzed data from the Promoting Acute Thrombolysis for Ischaemic Stroke (PRACTISE) study. We applied a multiple logistic regression model and expressed the association between sex and treatment with an age-adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval., Results: In total, 5515 patients were included in PRACTISE. Women were an average of 4 years older than men. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 in women and 5 in men. Fewer women were treated with intravenous alteplase (11% versus 14%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.0). However, fewer women arrived within 4 hours after onset (27% versus 33%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.9)., Conclusions: Fewer women present themselves within 4 hours from stroke onset than men and consequently less often receive thrombolytic treatment. This difference may be caused by the older age of women on average and consequently women more often living alone., Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN20405426.

Background: Thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase has been proven an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke in randomized clinical trials. In daily practice, the effect of thrombolysis may be less, and complications may occur more often., Aims: The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness and safety of thrombolysis in an unselected observational cohort of patients., Methods: During a two-year period, all patients over 18 years with acute stroke who were admitted within four-hours from onset of symptoms in 12 centers were registered. We compared outcomes in patients who were treated with alteplase with patients who were not treated with alteplase. The primary outcome was good functional outcome at three-months measured with the modified Rankin Scale ≤2). The safety end point was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to adjust for baseline imbalances and multilevel analysis to take into account within center correlations., Results: Overall, 1657 patients with ischemic stroke were admitted within four-hours from onset of symptoms and 696 (42%) were treated with alteplase. Treatment with alteplase was associated with a favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1·3; 95% confidence interval 1·0 to 1·7). After further adjustment for potential clustering effects, the adjusted odds ratio for good outcome was 1·4 (95% confidence interval 1·0 to 1·8). Thirty-six (5%) of the 696 patients treated with alteplase had a symptomatic intracranial bleeding complication., Conclusions: Thrombolysis for ischemic stroke with intravenous alteplase is an effective treatment also in an unselected observational cohort of patients., (© 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2011 World Stroke Organization.)

Background: The introduction of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) has greatly improved the effectiveness of acute ischaemic stroke care. However, in most hospitals only 2-10% of all admitted stroke patients are treated with thrombolysis., Aim: The purpose of this study is to identify if available protocols, training and infrastructure influence the thrombolysis rate., Design: Cohort study of 12 hospitals in the Netherlands., Methods: In a cohort of patients admitted with acute stroke within 24 h from onset of symptoms, data were obtained. Stroke service characteristics of 12 hospitals were acquired through structured interviews with intra- and extramural representatives, in order to asses (i) protocols, (ii) training and (iii) complexity of infrastructure. Data were analysed with multi-level logistic regression to relate the likelihood of treatment with thrombolysis to availability and completeness of protocols, training and infrastructure both outside (extramural) and inside (intramural) each centre., Results: Overall 5515 patients were included in the study. Thrombolysis rates varied from 5.7% to 21.7%. An association was observed between thrombolysis rates and extramural training [odds ratio (OR): 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.25] and availability of intramural protocols (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12-1.91). After adjustment for hospital size and teaching vs. nonteaching hospital, these associations became stronger; extramural training [adjusted OR (aOR): 1.14; 95% CI: 1.01-1.30] and availability of intramural protocols (aOR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.30-2.39)., Conclusions: Extramural training and intramural protocols are important tools to increase thrombolysis rates for acute ischaemic stroke in hospitals. Intramural protocols and extramural training should be aimed at all relevant professionals.

Objective: Several studies indicate that only a small proportion of patients with acute ischaemic stroke are treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Indications and contraindications for this treatment are usually based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of randomised clinical trials. The trial context of these criteria hampers implementation in real life settings. We therefore aimed to obtain specialist opinion in a Delphi consensus on these contraindications., Methods: We used the Delphi approach on an international group of specialists in the field of thrombolysis. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were reworded into 18 quantitatively phrased propositions. Feedback consisted of the median score, interquartile range and the panellist's own score in the previous round. For each item, we defined consensus as the achievement of an interdecile range within two prespecified clinically relevant units., Results: Thirty-one specialists participated in the first round and 30 completed all three rounds. Consensus was reached on 12 of the 18 propositions: previous ischaemic stroke, head trauma and gastrointestinal tract bleeding should not have taken place earlier than 1.5 months, 2 months and 14 days, respectively; the severity of the neurological deficit is defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 2-3 or more, and blood pressure level should not be >185/110 mmHg; platelet count should be >90x10(12)/l, glucose levels 2.7-22 mmol/l, international normalised ratio <1.5 and activated partial thromboplastin time <50 s. No consensus was reached on propositions concerning the stroke onset to treatment time, patient's age, recent medical procedures, spontaneous improvement rate and blood pressure treatment., Conclusions: We present specialists' opinion on contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis in ischaemic stroke. The results of this study may be relevant for routine clinical practice as they may help to increase the number of treated patients.