Search

Objective: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of Marshall, Rotterdam, and Neuroimaging Radiological Interpretation Systems (NIRIS) in predicting the in-hospital outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury., Methods: We identified 250 patients with traumatic brain injury in a retrospective single-center cohort from 2019 to 2020. Computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed by two radiologists and scored according to three CT scoring systems. One-month outcomes were evaluated, including hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, neurosurgical procedure, and mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify scoring systems and outcome relationships. The best cutoff value was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve model., Results: Eighteen patients (7.2%) died in the 1-month follow-up. The mean age and Glasgow Coma Scale of survivors differed significantly from nonsurvivors. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and compressed/absent cisterns were dead patients' most frequent CT findings. All three scoring systems had good discrimination power in mortality prediction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the Marshall, Rotterdam, and NIRIS was 0.78, 0.86, and 0.84, respectively). Regarding outcome, three systems directly correlated with unfavorable outcome prediction., Conclusions: The Marshall, Rotterdam, and NIRIS are good predictive models for mortality and outcome prediction, with slight superiority of the Rotterdam in mortality prediction and the Marshall in intensive care unit admission and neurosurgical procedures., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prediction of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among children is of great importance for accurate clinical decision making., Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the Rotterdam scoring system in predicting early outcome among children with TBI., Methods: This study was conducted in 2017 on 506 children with brain injury in Kashan, Iran. A checklist was used to collect demographic and clinical characteristics of patients such as age, sex, mechanism of trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, need for surgery, and brain injury outcome. Moreover, each participant's computed tomography scan was evaluated and scored using the Rotterdam system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the best cut-off score were calculated for the Rotterdam system. The relationships of the Rotterdam score with participants' characteristics were examined using the χ 2 test, whereas the predictors of brain injury outcome were identified using the logistic regression analysis., Results: Pediatric death rate was 4.3%. Most deaths were among children who were male, aged <4, had developed brain injury owing to traffic accidents, had a GCS score of 3-8, suffered from compressed skull fracture and frontal lobe injury, had cerebral edema, and had a Rotterdam score of 5. The sensitivity and specificity of a Rotterdam score 3 were 86.4% and 97.9%, respectively. The logistic regression analysis indicated that only GCS and Rotterdam scores were significant predictors of brain injury outcome., Conclusions: At a cut-off score of 3, the Rotterdam system can be used to predict TBI outcome among children with acceptable sensitivity and specificity., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intracranial hemorrhage is a common complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study is evaluation of the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on hemorrhagic mass growth in TBI patients., Patients and Methods: In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 149 patients with TBI and any kind of blood on their computed tomography scan enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated to receive TXA or placebo. After 24 hours, computed tomography scan was repeated for assessing the changes in hemorrhage, new bleeding, and mass effects of blood on brain tissue. The primary outcome was growth of the hemorrhagic lesion. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using Fisher exact, chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U tests, as well as linear and logistic regression models., Findings: The incidence of hemorrhagic lesion growth was 20.5% in the TXA group and 22.7% in the placebo group. The difference was not significant (P = 0.87, RR = 0.89). The mean (standard deviation) of hemorrhagic lesion growth was 9.4 (15.3) in the TXA group and 10.2 (10.1) in the placebo group without significant difference (P = 0.27). The frequency of deaths (2.7% vs. 4%), adverse outcome at discharge (10.8% vs. 17.3%), and 3 months later (6.8% vs. 14.7%) in the TXA group were lower than the placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant. No side effect was observed with the administration of TXA., Conclusion: Administration of a short dose of TXA does not lead to significant prevention of growth of posttraumatic hemorrhagic lesion or improvement of clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)