Search

Depth recordings in patients with Parkinson’s disease on dopaminergic therapy have revealed a tendency for oscillatory activity in the basal ganglia that is sharply tuned to frequencies of ∼70 Hz and increases with voluntary movement. It is unclear whether this activity is essentially physiological and whether it might be involved in arousal processes. Here we demonstrate an oscillatory activity with similar spectral characteristics and motor reactivity in the human thalamus. Depth signals were recorded in 29 patients in whom the ventral intermediate or centromedian nucleus were surgically targeted for deep brain stimulation. Thirteen patients with four different pathologies showed sharply tuned activity centred at ∼70 Hz in spectra of thalamic local field potential (LFP) recordings. This activity was modulated by movement and, critically, varied over the sleep–wake cycle, being suppressed during slow wave sleep and re-emergent during rapid eye movement sleep, which physiologically bears strong similarities with the waking state. It was enhanced by startle-eliciting stimuli, also consistent with modulation by arousal state. The link between this pattern of thalamic activity and that of similar frequency in the basal ganglia was strengthened by the finding that fast thalamic oscillations were lost in untreated parkinsonian patients, paralleling the behaviour of this activity in the basal ganglia. Furthermore, there was sharply tuned coherence between thalamic and pallidal LFP activity at ∼70 Hz in eight out of the 11 patients in whom globus pallidus and thalamus were simultaneously implanted. Subcortical oscillatory activity at ∼70 Hz may be involved in movement and arousal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the last few years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has emerged as a promising therapy, alleviating major motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, in times of growing budgetary limitations, medical decisions are no longer merely based on clinical efficacy, but also on cost-effectiveness. Here we assess treatment costs (i. e. costs for conservative pharmacological treatment and all in-patient admissions) of 46 PD patients for one year before and two years after STN-DBS. The present data show that total treatment costs were increased by 32 % for the first year and decreased by 54 % for the second year of STN-DBS in comparison with preoperative values while the Unified Parkinon’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) was significantly improved. The increase for the first year after surgery was mainly due to the implantation of the STN electrodes and the stimulation device. Taken together, STNDBS pays off from the second year of stimulation while motor symptoms are significantly improved. The present study provides first data of an important number of patients on clinical effectiveness and expenses in relation to STNDBS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The influence of the brainstem motor system on cerebral motor areas may play an important role in motor control in health and disease. A new approach to investigate this interaction in man is combining acoustic stimulation activating the startle system with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex. However, it is unclear whether the inhibition of TMS responses following acoustic stimulation occurs at the level of the motor cortex through reticulo-cortical projections or subcortically, perhaps through reticulo-spinal projections. We compared the influence of acoustic stimulation on motor effects elicited by TMS over motor cortical areas to those evoked with subcortical electrical stimulation (SES) through depth electrodes in five patients treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. SES bypasses the motor cortex, demonstrating any interaction with acoustic stimuli at the subcortical level. EMG was recorded from the contralateral biceps brachii muscle. Acoustic stimulation was delivered binaurally through headphones and used as a conditioning stimulus at an interstimulus interval of 50 ms. When TMS was used as the test stimulus, the area and amplitude of the conditioned motor response was significantly inhibited (area: 57.5±12.9%, amplitude: 47.9±7.4%, as percentage of unconditioned response) whereas facilitation occurred with SES (area: 110.1±4.3%, amplitude: 116.9±6.9%). We conclude that a startle-evoked activation of reticulo-cortical projections transiently inhibits the motor cortex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]