Search

Little is known about what happens to transmembrane proteins (TMP) in 2-DE. In order to obtain more insight into the whereabouts of these proteins we prepared membrane-enriched synaptosomes from rat frontal cortex and washed them with 7 M urea or Na(2)CO(3). From each preparation, 200 microg protein was loaded on 2-DE gels covering the 4-7 and 6-11 pH ranges, respectively. MALDI-MS/MS analysis detected only 3 TMP among 421 identified spots. However, when the samples had been washed with Na(2)CO(3), only few well-focused spots remained detectable on the gel covering the pH 6-11 range. Instead, a heavily ruthenium-stained smear became visible at the upper edge of the gel at the location where the samples had been applied by cup loading. LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that this smear contained 38 unfocused TMP with up to 12 transmembrane helices. After transfer to the second dimension, no major areas of protein staining were left on the IPG strips. This indicates that after extraction and denaturation the TMP may form high-molecular aggregates, due to their "hydrophobic interactions". These aggregates enter the IPG strips, but do not focus regularly. They are then transferred onto the 2-DE-gels, where they remain caught at the upper edge.

The purpose of this study was to test the extent to which differences in spot intensity can be reliably recognized between two groups of two-dimensional electrophoresis gels (pH 4-7, visualized with ruthenium fluorescent stain) each loaded with different amounts of protein from rat brain (power analysis). Initial experiments yielded only unsatisfactory results: 546 spots were matched from two groups of 6 gels each loaded with 200 microg and 250 microg protein, respectively. Only 72 spots were higher (p<0.05), while 58 spots were significantly lower in the 250-microg group. The construction of new apparatuses that allowed the simultaneous processing of 24 gels throughout all steps between rehydration and staining procedure considerably lowered the between-gel variation. This resulted in the detection of significant differences in spot intensities in 77-90% of all matched spots on gel groups with a 25% difference in protein load. This applied both when protein from 24 biological replicates was loaded onto two groups of 12 gels and when two pooled tissue samples were each loaded onto 6 gels. At a difference of 50% in protein load, more than 90% of all spots differed significantly between two experimental groups.