Search

Nausea is associated with significant morbidity, and there is a wide range in the propensity of individuals to experience nausea. The neural basis of the heterogeneity in nausea susceptibility is poorly understood. Our previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in healthy adults showed that a visual motion stimulus caused activation in the right MT+/V5 area, and that increased sensation of nausea due to this stimulus was associated with increased activation in the right anterior insula. For the current study, we hypothesized that individual differences in visual motion-induced nausea are due to microstructural differences in the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), the white matter tract connecting the right visual motion processing area (MT+/V5) and right anterior insula. To test this hypothesis, we acquired diffusion tensor imaging data from 30 healthy adults who were subsequently dichotomized into high and low nausea susceptibility groups based on the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Scale. We quantified diffusion along the IFOF for each subject based on axial diffusivity (AD); radial diffusivity (RD), mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA), and evaluated between-group differences in these diffusion metrics. Subjects with high susceptibility to nausea rated significantly (P < 0.001) higher nausea intensity to visual motion stimuli and had significantly (P < 0.05) lower AD and MD along the right IFOF compared to subjects with low susceptibility to nausea. This result suggests that differences in white matter microstructure within tracts connecting visual motion and nausea-processing brain areas may contribute to nausea susceptibility or may have resulted from an increased history of nausea episodes., (© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Functional brain imaging studies have provided insights into the processes related to motor recovery after stroke. The comparative value of different motor activation tasks for probing these processes has received limited study. We hypothesized that different hand motor tasks would activate the brain differently in controls, and that this would affect control-patient comparisons. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate nine control subjects and seven patients with good recovery after a left hemisphere hemiparetic stroke. The volume of activated brain in bilateral sensorimotor cortex and four other motor regions was compared during each of three tasks performed by the right hand: index-finger tapping, four-finger tapping, and squeezing. In control subjects, activation in left sensorimotor cortex was found to be significantly larger during squeezing as compared with index-finger tapping. When comparing control subjects with stroke patients, patients showed a larger volume of activation in right sensorimotor cortex during index-finger tapping but not with four-finger tapping or squeezing. In addition, patients also showed a trend toward larger activation volume than controls within left supplementary motor area during index-finger tapping but not during the other tasks. Motion artifact was more common with squeezing than with the tapping tasks. The choice of hand motor tasks used during brain mapping can influence findings in control subjects as well as the differences identified between controls and stroke patients. The results may be useful for future studies of motor recovery after stroke.