Search

Objective: To evaluate the proximal effects of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) on a validated measure of brain abnormalities in infants born at ≤32 weeks' gestational age (GA) using magnetic resonance imaging at term-equivalent age., Study Design: In a multisite prospective cohort study, 395 infants born at ≤32 weeks' GA, underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging scan between 39 and 44 weeks' postmenstrual age. A single neuroradiologist, blinded to clinical history, evaluated the standardized Kidokoro global brain abnormality score as the primary outcome. We classified infants as HDP-exposed by maternal diagnosis of chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia. Linear regression analysis identified the independent effects of HDP on infant brain abnormalities, adjusting for histologic chorioamnionitis, maternal smoking, antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate, and infant sex. Mediation analyses quantified the indirect effect of HDP mediated via impaired intrauterine growth and prematurity and remaining direct effects on brain abnormalities., Results: A total of 170/395 infants (43%) were HDP-exposed. Adjusted multivariable analyses revealed HDP-exposed infants had 27% (95% CI 5%-53%) higher brain abnormality scores than those without HDP exposure (P = .02), primarily driven by increased white matter injury/abnormality scores (P = .01). Mediation analyses showed HDP-induced impaired intrauterine growth significantly (P = .02) contributed to brain abnormality scores (22% of the total effect)., Conclusions: Maternal hypertension independently increased the risk for early brain injury and/or maturational delays in infants born at ≤32 weeks' GA with an indirect effect of 22% resulting from impaired intrauterine growth. Enhanced prevention/treatment of maternal hypertension may mitigate the risk of infant brain abnormalities and potential neurodevelopmental impairments., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest N.P. is supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 EB029944-01 from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), R01-NS094200 and R01-NS096037 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) M.D. is supported by grant K23-NS117734 from NINDS. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and associations between structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) injury/abnormality at term-equivalent age and absent fidgety General Movements Assessment (GMA) and abnormal Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) scores among infants born very preterm at 3-4 months of corrected age., Study Design: This prospective cohort study enrolled 392 infants born ≤2 weeks of gestation from 5 neonatal intensive care units in the greater Cincinnati area between September 2016 and October 2019. Infants completed sMRI at term-equivalent age and GMA and HINE at 3-4 months of corrected age. All assessors were blinded., Results: Of 392 infants, 375 (96%) had complete data. Of these, 44 (12%) exhibited moderate or severe brain abnormalities, 17 (4.5%) had abnormal GMA, and 77 (20.3%) had abnormal HINE. Global and regional abnormality scores on sMRI were significantly correlated with GMA (R 2 range 0.05-0.17) and HINE at 3-4 months of corrected age (R 2 range 0.01-0.17). These associations remained significant in multivariable analyses after adjusting for gestational age and sex. There was a significant but low correlation (R 2 0.14) between GMA and HINE., Conclusions: We observed a low prevalence of moderate or severe brain abnormalities in survivors born very preterm in this geographically defined cohort. The much greater prevalence of abnormal motor examination on the HINE compared with GMA and their low correlation suggests that these tests evaluate different constructs and, thus, should be used in combination with sMRI rather than interchangeably., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous studies have not found structural injury or brain malformations in infants and children with prenatal opioid exposure. As part of an ongoing study evaluating neuroimaging in infants with prenatal opioid exposure, we reviewed structural brain MR imaging in 20 term infants with prenatal opioid exposure and 20 term controls at 4-8 weeks of age. We found that 8 of the 20 opioid-exposed infants had punctate white matter lesions or white matter signal abnormality on structural MR imaging, and 2 of the opioid-exposed infants had a septopreoptic fusion anomaly. No controls had white matter injury or structural malformations. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical neurodevelopmental follow-up and the need for more comprehensive imaging and long-term outcomes research following prenatal opioid exposure., (© 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in prenatal evaluations., Objective: Identify common brain malformations on fetal MRI and evaluate perinatal course., Methods: Fetal consultations from 10/2016 to 12/2017 reviewed., Results: Hundred consultations were requested; 94 were completed. Findings included: posterior fossa malformations (19%), agenesis/dysgenesis of corpus callosum (15%), congenital aqueductal stenosis (CAS) (14%), ventriculomegaly (11%), isolated cortical malformations (8.5%), and holoprosencephaly (6%). Posterior fossa malformations were more likely to be associated with genetic conditions and cardiac malformations. Patients with CAS all required intensive care unit admission. Overall, few patients with congenital brain malformations required feeding or respiratory support at discharge. None had seizures as neonates except two with early epileptic encephalopathy syndromes., Conclusions: Even though long term neurological prognosis is poor for many conditions including high lifetime risk of epilepsy, most are discharged with no feeding or respiratory support. Seizures are rarely seen in the neonatal period.

Background: Many neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and seizures do not respond to the first line antiepileptic drug, phenobarbital. Little is known about what factors are associated with its failure., Objective: To examine factors associated with failure of phenobarbital therapy in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and seizures., Design/methods: A single-center retrospective review of 50 term (>35 weeks) neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and seizures treated with phenobarbital as the first-line antiepileptic. Neonates were classified into either responders (n = 30) or nonresponders (n = 20). Nonresponse was defined as continued seizures after maximum dosing of phenobarbital or an additional antiepileptic. Subjects with acceptable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans obtained within 2 weeks of birth were included in the study and rated using an MRI injury scoring system. Charts were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Resuscitation and seizure scores were also calculated. Electroencephalographic (EEG) background activity was reviewed in 2 different time epochs (12-24 hours and 24-36 hours of life) and graded as per ACNS guidelines., Results: There were no significant group differences in demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables except nonresponders, who had higher mean seizure score ( P = .01) and significantly more injury on MRI scan for white matter ( P = .004), parenchymal cortex ( P = .027), and watershed ( P = .009) regions. Neonates with moderately abnormal or severely abnormal background EEG responded poorly to phenobarbital., Conclusion: In the presence of above factors, one can anticipate that additional antiepileptic medication may be needed. These data also support that larger studies should be done to look prospectively at using alternative agents first line in patients with severe injury.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of the developing brain has dramatically increased over the last decade. Faster acquisitions and the development of advanced MRI sequences, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion imaging, functional MR imaging (fMRI), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), as well as the use of higher magnetic field strengths has made MRI an invaluable tool for detailed evaluation of the developing brain. This article will provide an overview of the use and challenges associated with 1.5-T and 3-T static magnetic fields for evaluation of the developing brain. This review will also summarize the advantages, clinical challenges, and safety concerns specifically related to MRI in the fetus and newborn, including the implications of increased magnetic field strength, logistics related to transporting and monitoring of neonates during scanning, and sedation considerations, and a discussion of current technologies such as MRI conditional neonatal incubators and dedicated small-foot print neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) scanners., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)