Search

Rapid growth in knowledge of cell and molecular biology led to the increased usage of molecular techniques in anatomical pathology. This is also due to the advances achieved in the techniques introduced in the last few years which are less laborious as compared to the techniques used at the beginning of the "molecular era". The initial assays were also very expensive and were not performed except for selected centers. Moreover, the clinicians were not sure how to make use of the accumulating molecular information. That situation has also changed and molecular techniques are being performed in a wide variety of medical settings which also has a reflection on the endocrine system pathology among other organ systems. This review will provide an update of genetic changes observed in different endocrine system pathologies and their diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In metastatic melanoma, the detection of somatic mutations in the BRAF gene is crucial regarding patient selection for targeted therapy. Several screening methods have been developed to identify BRAF gene mutations. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the detection of the BRAF V600 mutations using two molecular methods, real-time polymerase chain (real-time PCR) assay and pyrosequencing, and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and to compare the results of these different technical platforms. This study included 98 patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma at the Hacettepe University, Department of Pathology between 2002 and 2014. BRAF mutation analysis was tested with real-time PCR, pyrosequencing and IHC methods. The results of all three tests were compared with a reference test, and the sensitivity, specificity rates and kappa coefficient values were analysed for each test. We successfully analysed BRAF mutations using all three methods in 92 patients. According to our findings, the pyrosequencing method had the highest kappa value regarding the determination of BRAF V600 mutations. The kappa values were at almost perfect agreement levels in pyrosequencing and real-time PCR assay (kappa coefficient for pyrosequencing = 0.895 (95% CI: 0.795–0.995); kappa coefficient for real-time PCR = 0.871 (95% CI: 0.761–0.981). The kappa value was at a substantial agreement level in the IHC analysis (kappa coefficient = 0.776 (95% CI: 0.629–0.923). According to our results, we found that real-time PCR and pyrosequencing methods were equally excellent in determination of BRAF V600 mutations. The IHC method, which is commonly used in routine pathology practice, can also be safely used as a screening test for determination of BRAF V600 mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]