Search

Purpose: To investigate long-term results of patients with hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and consecutive endocrine therapy (ET) with or without whole breast irradiation (WBI)., Methods and Materials: Within the 8 A trial of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, a total of 869 patients received ET after BCS which was randomly followed by WBI (n = 439, group 1) or observation (n = 430, group 2). WBI was applied up to a mean total dosage of 50 Gy (+/- 10 Gy boost) in conventional fractionation., Results: After a median follow-up of 9.89 years, 10 in-breast recurrences (IBRs) were observed in group 1 and 31 in group 2, resulting in a 10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of 97.5% and 92.4%, respectively (p = 0.004). This translated into significantly higher rates for disease-free survival (DFS): 94.5% group 1 vs 88.4% group 2, p = 0.0156. For distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), respective 10-year rates amounted 96.7% and 86.6% for group 1 versus 96.4% and 87.6%, for group 2 (ns). WBI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.27, p < 0.01) and tumour grading (HR: 3.76, p = 0.03) were found as significant predictors for IBR in multiple cox regression analysis., Conclusions: After a median follow-up of 10 years, WBI resulted in a better local control and DFS compared with ET alone. The omission of WBI and tumour grading, respectively, were the only negative predictors for LRFS., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement F.S. reports a research collaboration with Elekta, during the conduct of the study. R.G. has received honoraria, has been a consultant or has served an advisory role, has received research funding and has received travel and accommodations expenses from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Sandoz, Abbvie, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Janssen. G.M. has received institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer and has received lecture fees, honoraria for participation on advisory boards, and travel support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, EliLilly, Invectys, Pfizer, Nanostring, Novartis, Roche, and Medison. He has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca and EliLilly and an immediate family member is employed by Sandoz. The other authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The effect of the treatment of anal cancer by performing a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost during a short split between the external beam radiotherapy series (EBR) +/- chemotherapy was investigated., Methods and Materials: Thirty-nine patients with anal canal cancers, stages T1-T4 N0-2 M0, were treated with split-course EBR (50-50.4 Gy) and a Iridium 192 ((192)Ir-) HDR boost (6 Gy) performed during the 1-2-week split. Patients who failed to achieve a complete tumor response received additional brachytherapy. Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C was offered to patients with tumors > 3 cm and employed concomitantly on days 1-5 and day 1, respectively, of each EBR series., Results: Follow-up ranged from 3 to 140 months (median 31). Median treatment duration was 56 days. The 3-year (5-year) actuarial rates of locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 81% (76%) and 80% (76%), respectively. The crude rate of anal preservation was 77% overall, and 97% in patients in whom LRC was achieved. Uncompromised anal function was recorded in 93% of these patients. The actuarial 3-year (5-year) rate of colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 78% (73%). There was a statistically significant difference in LRC and DSS according to stage, tumor size, and nodal status. Complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 7.6% of patients., Conclusion: The integration of the HDR boost in a split-course EBR regimen +/- chemotherapy resulted in excellent sphincter function without an increase of severe complications and with rates of LRC, DSS, and CFS, which compare favorably with those reported in the literature.

Background and Purpose: There is still a concern that the use of HDR brachytherapy might result in an increase of late tissue damage. This restrospective study evaluates the incidence and severity of late complications in patients with carcinoma of the cervix who underwent combined external beam radiation (EBR) and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy and attempts to identify pretreatment and treatment parameters correlating with late complications., Material and Methods: Between 1985 and 1992, 161 patients with carcinoma of the cervix (FIGO stages IB-IVB) received EBR to the pelvis (ave, max. dose 48.8 Gy) followed by 1-6 Ir-192 HDR placements (median 2). Doses to point A ranged from 8.5 to 38.7 Gy (median 17 Gy). Parameters examined included age, diabetes, obesity, history of inflammatory bowel disease or diverticulitis, prior surgery, hemoglobin level, FIGO stage, EBR dose, technique and daily dose fraction, number of HDR treatments and total dose to point A, maximum doses to bladder and rectum delivered by brachytherapy and cumulative dose to point A. Median follow-up for all patients was 37 months. Complications were rated using an in-house scoring system and according to the French-Italian Glossary (FIG)., Results: Actuarial 5-year survival was 93%, 57%, 46%, and 0% for stages IB, II, IIIB, and IV, respectively. Of 161 patients, 11% developed moderate and 3.7% severe sequelae (FIG: 2.5%, 3.7%). Since some patients experienced more than one complication, the overall incidence was 13.6% and 4.9% (FIG: 3.1%, 4.9%) with respective 5-year actuarial rates of 14% and 5% for moderate, and 2% and 8% for severe bowel and genitourinary tract complications (FIG: 3.5%, 0, and 2%, 8%). All severe bowel complications occurred within 1.5 years whereas urinary tract sequelae continued to develop throughout the follow-up period. FIGO stage was associated with a significant increase in late sequelae (P = 0.015). Analysis of the remaining pretreatment and treatment parameters failed to reveal any statistically significant correlation with moderate or severe sequelae., Conclusion: In our series using HDR brachytherapy, complication and survival rates were comparable with other series employing either LDR or HDR procedures. Of all parameters analysed, stage of disease was the only parameter significantly correlated with complications in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Purpose: The rate of local failure is sufficiently high following sphincter conserving surgery and radiation therapy for advanced anal cancers to warrant investigation of improved local treatment techniques. This Phase I/II study was undertaken to investigate the site-specific toxicities and response of Stage II and III anal cancers to interstitial thermoradiotherapy using a hot water interstitial system., Methods and Materials: Between September 1988 and March 1991, 14 patients with primary carcinomas of the anal canal, UICC Stage T2-3, N0-1, M0, were treated with split-course external beam irradiation to the pelvis (30 Gy + 20 Gy) and 1 or 2 interstitial Iridium-192 high dose rate (Ir-192 HDR) implants (6-8 Gy each) immediately followed by interstitial hyperthermia (HT). Patients with tumor diameters > 3 cm were scheduled to receive chemotherapy consisting of 2 courses of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C given concomitantly with external beam radiation. Interstitial hyperthermia was induced by circulating warm water through the needles that were implanted to hold the Ir-192 source. The treatment goal was to achieve and maintain a temperature of 42.5 degrees C over a time period of 40 min. A 3-point thermocouple probe inserted into one or two additional needles was used for thermometry. The temperatures were recorded by manual mapping along these needles at steps of 0.5 or 1 cm., Results: A total of 20 Ir-192 HDR-HT implants were performed in 14 patients. All but two patients completed the external beam irradiation; five patients received concomitant chemotherapy. Analysis of thermal parameters showed that minimum intratumoral temperatures (Tmin) of 42 degrees C, 42.5 degrees C, 43 degrees C, and 44 degrees C were achieved in 64%, 37.5%, 14%, and 7% of patients, respectively. Intratumoral mean Tmin, mean average, and mean maximum temperatures for these patients were 41.7 degrees C, 42.4 degrees C, and 43.4 degrees C, respectively. Brachytherapy and HT were well tolerated. Clinical complete responses (cCR) were obtained in 11/14 (78.5%) patients, complete histopathological responses (pCR) in 10/14 (71%). Only one patient with pCR recurred and succumbed to her disease. Patients with persistent disease (1 minimal and 3 partial responders, including 1 cCR) underwent abdominal-perineal resection but subsequently died from local-regional recurrence. One patient with pCR died from unrelated causes. Median survival for all patients from onset of radiation to death or last follow-up is 26 months. Eight patients are alive disease-free after a follow-up ranging from 16-44 months (median: 30, mean: 30 months). Treatment complications were limited to two patients who developed persistent ulcers. Sphincter function was maintained in 50% of patients., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that interstitial warm water hyperthermia in combination with brachytherapy for anal carcinomas is feasible and did not add to complications when compared to studies employing external beam irradiation and brachytherapy alone. The thermal parameters obtained by the warm water system compare favorably to those reported by others using radiofrequency and microwave systems.

A total of 720 192Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) applications in 331 patients with gynecological tumors were analyzed to evaluate the dose to normal tissues from brachytherapy. Based on the calculations of bladder base, bladder neck, and rectal doses derived from orthogonal films the planned tumor dose or fractionation was altered in 20.4% of intracavitary placements (ICP) for cervix carcinoma and 9.2% of ICP for treatment of the vaginal vault. In 13.8% of intracervical and 8.1% of intravaginal treatments calculated doses to both the bladder and rectum were greater than or equal to 140% of the initially planned dose fraction. Doses at the bladder base were significantly higher than at the bladder neck (p less than 0.001). In 17.5% of ICP the dose to the bladder base was at least twice as high as to the bladder neck. The ratio of bladder base dose to the bladder neck was 1.5 (+/- 1.19 SD) for intracervical and 1.46 (+/- 1.14 SD) for intravaginal applications. The comparison of calculated doses from orthogonal films with in-vivo readings showed a good correlation of rectal doses with a correlation coefficient factor of 0.9556. CT-assisted dosimetry, however, revealed that the maximum doses to bladder and rectum were generally higher than those obtained from films with ratios of 1-1.7 (average: 1.44) for the bladder neck, 1-5.4 (average: 2.42) for the bladder base, and 1.1-2.7 (average: 1.37) for the rectum. When doses to the specified reference points of bladder neck and rectum from orthogonal film dosimetry were compared with the corresponding points on CT scans, similar values were obtained for both methods with a maximum deviation of +/- 10%. Despite the determination of multiple reference points our study revealed that this information was inadequate to predict doses to the entire rectum and bladder. If conventional methods are used for dosimetry it is recommended that doses to the bladder base should be routinely calculated, since single point measurements at the bladder neck seriously underestimate the dose to the bladder. Also the rectal dose should be determined at several points over the length of the implant due to the wide range of anatomic variations possible.