Search

Background and Purpose: To evaluate intraoperative brachytherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcomas involving neurovascular structures, its impact on local control and complications., Patients and Methods: Between 01/1989 and 12/2002, 98 patients received an intraoperative implant in conjunction with conservative surgery. Brachytherapy was part of the initial treatment (79 cases) or performed in recurrent disease (19 cases). We studied primary sarcomas involving neurovascular structures treated with conservative surgery and intraoperative brachytherapy (n = 6) or intraoperative brachytherapy and external irradiation (n = 73). Conservative surgery was performed as first treatment (51 cases), after chemotherapy (21 cases) and after primary external radiation (seven cases). Brachytherapy was performed according to Paris system rules. Patients were loaded with Iridium 192 (64 cases) or connected to a Microselectron PDR (15 cases). Mean dose given by brachytherapy was 20 Gy. Mean dose given of external radiotherapy was 46 Gy., Results: With a median follow-up of 58 months, 5-year actuarial survival was 69% and local free disease at 5 years was 90%. Acute side-effects occurred in 22/79 requiring surgical repair in 10 patients. Late side-effects occurred in 35/79. No patient required amputation for complications. Prognostic factors were studied for the occurrence of acute and late side-effects and local control., Conclusions: Intraoperative brachytherapy is efficient with excellent local control rates in soft tissue sarcomas presenting with neurovascular involvement and offers an acceptable conservative option.

Purpose: Conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcomas most often implies combination of surgical resection and irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate low-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy, delivered as a boost, in the local control of primary tumors, with special concern about treatment complications., Methods and Materials: Between 1986 and 1995, 112 patients underwent intraoperative implant. This report focuses on the group of 58 patients with primary sarcomas treated by combination of conservative surgery, intraoperative brachytherapy, and external irradiation. Most of the tumors were located in the lower limbs (46/58-79%). Median size of the tumor was 10 cm, most of the lesions being T2-T3 (51/58-88%), Grade 2 or 3 (48/58-83%). The mean brachytherapy dose was 20 Gy and external beam irradiation dose 45 Gy. In 36/58 cases, iridium wires had to be placed on contact with neurovascular structures., Results: With a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year actuarial survival was 64.9%, with a 5-year actuarial local control of 89%. Of the 6 patients with local relapse, 3 were salvaged. Acute side effects, essentially wound healing problems, occurred in 20/58 patients, late side effects in 16/58 patients (7 neuropathies G2 to G4). No amputation was required. The only significant factor correlated with early side effects was the location of the tumor in the lower limb (p = 0.003), and with late side effects the vicinity of the tumor with neurovascular structures (p = 0.009)., Conclusion: Brachytherapy allows early delivery of a boost dose in a reduced volume of tissue, precisely mapped by the intraoperative procedure. Combined with external beam irradiation, it is a safe and efficient treatment technique leading to high local control rates and limited functional impairment.

The authors present a retrospective analysis dealing with the cost of therapeutic procedures achieved in the department of radiotherapy of the Centre Claudius-Regaud. This analysis was performed according to the actual cost of the different components of each treatment including the human costs. For this last purpose, serial countings of time spent by each category of employees were performed and then translated into financial terms. Results show a large discrepancy between the costs of therapeutic procedures. These differences are mainly related to the purpose of therapeutic plan, dealing with the most expensive procedures dealing with the developmental treatments. This study provides a tool that can be used by medical and/or administrative managers of radiation oncology departments when changes or innovations in therapeutic procedures. This cost accounting analysis is compared to the French administrative procedures used to pay the health care services and to determine the level of hospital resources.

Between May 1986 and June 1992, 48 patients with soft tissue sarcomas underwent 50 intraoperative interstitial implants in conjunction with conservative tumoral resections. Brachytherapy was part of the initial treatment in 27 cases and was done in 21 other previously treated patients. For the last ones brachytherapy was, in most of the cases, the only treatment in addition to surgery. The implant dose was 40-65 Gy. When combined with external irradiation the mean prescribed dose was 20 Gy (12-25 Gy). With a median follow-up of 33 months, the 3-year actuarial survival rate was 81% and the local disease-free survival 91.7%. Five local failures were observed only in patients with recurrent sarcomas: two were inside the treated volume and three outside (local failure 5/48 = 10.4%). Acute side-effects occurred in 11 patients (11/48 = 23%), with skin breakdown (two cases) infection and hematoma (one case), infection, lymphocele, secondary skin breakdown and vascular rupture (one case), infection and limited skin breakdown (two cases) and delayed healing (five cases). As a consequence, six patients required reoperation but no amputation was necessary. The functional results were good. Only three patients had a moderate limitation of movement. Late complications occurred in five patients: bone fracture (one case), leg oedemas not interfering with normal activity (three cases), peripheral neuropathy fibrosis related requiring surgery (one case). Therefore, this preliminary report shows that adjuvant intraoperative brachytherapy is feasible and is safe in treating soft tissue sarcomas, even in previously irradiated patients. However, further evaluation is needed to determine the real place of intraoperative implant in the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

From 1977 to 1990, 94 evaluable patients were treated with iridium-192 implantation in the Centre Claudius Regaud for a Stage I (52 patients) or a Stage II (42 patients) squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue and/or the floor of the mouth. Interstitial brachytherapy was associated with external irradiation in 68 patients (group 1; mean dose, 48 Gy for external irradiation, 26 Gy for brachytherapy) or was exclusive in 26 patients (group 2; mean dose, 66 Gy). The mean follow-up was 44 months. Eleven acute complications were noted during or immediately after the implant (1 lethal myocardial infarction, 6 hematomas of the tongue which spontaneously resolved, 3 local sepsis). The mean duration of the mucositis was 9 weeks (from 4 to 20 weeks). Ten patients (17%) experienced a late complication (8 in group 1, 2 in group 2): 3 bone necroses requiring hemimandibulectomy (1 post-operative death), 1 tongue necrosis treated by a transoral mucosal excision, 6 bone expositions which recovered after medical treatment. Local control rates for T1 and T2 tumors were 75% (39/52) and 51% (21/41), respectively. Sixteen patients (17%) presented a nodal relapse which was associated in 6 cases with a concomitant local relapse. The local control rate of T1 tumors was 64% (23/36) in group 1 versus 100% (16/16) in group 2 (p < 0.01). For T2 tumors, these figures were 45% (14/31) and 70% (7/10), respectively (p > 0.3). The influence of 13 parameters on the local control was studied in analysis. In the one model analysis, a cox regression tumor size was significantly predictive of actuarial local recurrence (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)