Search

In this study, the effectiveness of an inoculant containing a nitrogen (N)-fixing microorganism (Methylobacterium symbioticum) was evaluated on maize (Zea mays L.) grown both in the field (silage maize) and in pots over two years (2021 and 2022). The field trial included the following two treatments: with (Yes) and without (No) the inoculant. The pot experiment was designed as a factorial arrangement with two factors: the application of the inoculant (Yes and No) and N applied to the soil (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 g pot−1). In the field, total dry matter yield (DMY) did not differ significantly between treatments, although the average DMY was higher in the inoculant treatment. In pots, the total DMY varied significantly across all N rates but was only significantly affected by the inoculant application in 2022. N fixation estimates in the field were 58.8 and 14.5 kg ha−1 for 2021 and 2022, respectively, representing 23.7% and 9.1% of the N recovered in the aboveground plant parts. In pots, the estimated fixed N values were −49.2 and 199.2 mg pot−1 in 2021 and 2022, respectively, which corresponded to −5.2% and 18.5% of the N found in the aboveground plant parts. Considering the average values obtained across the four cultivation conditions, there was a positive outcome for the treated plants. However, these values cannot be considered significant when compared to nitrogen removal in maize crops. A commercial product should provide an unequivocal and quantitatively relevant contribution to plant nutrition, which did not appear to be the case. Thus, for this inoculant to provide reliable guarantees of positive outcomes for farmers and become a useful tool in promoting more sustainable agriculture, further studies appear necessary. These studies should aim to determine in which crops and under what cultivation conditions the application of the inoculant is truly effective in enhancing N fixation and improving crop productivity.

In the northeast of Portugal, like in many parts of the world, most soils are acidic, which may hamper crop productivity. This study presents the findings of a factorial experiment on olive (Olea europaea L.) involving three factors: (i) soil type [schist (Sch) and granite (Gra)]; (ii) cultivars [Cobrançosa (Cob) and Arbequina (Arb)]; and (iii) fertilizer treatments [liming (CaCO3) plus magnesium (Mg) (LMg), phosphorus (P) application (+P), boron (B) application (+B), all fertilizing materials combined (Con+), and an untreated control (Con-)]. Dry matter yield (DMY) did not show significant differences between cultivars, but plants grown in schist soil exhibited significantly higher biomass compared to those in granite soil. Among the treatments, +B and Con+ resulted in the highest DMY (50.8 and 47.2 g pot−1, respectively), followed by +P (34.3 g pot−1) and Con- (28.6 g pot−1). Treatment LMg yielded significantly lower values (15.6 g pot−1) than Con-. LMg raised the pH above 7 (7.36), leading to a severe B deficiency. Although Con+ also raised the pH above 7 (7.48), it ranked among the most productive treatments for providing B. Therefore, when applying lime to B-poor sandy soils, moderate rates are advised to avoid inducing a B deficiency. Additionally, it seems prudent to apply B after lime application.