Search

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) negatively affect the function and structure of emotion brain circuits, increasing the risk of various psychiatric disorders. It is unclear if ACEs show disorder specificity with respect to their effects on brain structure. We aimed to investigate whether the structural brain effects of ACEs differ between patients with major depression (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). These disorders share many symptoms but likely have different etiologies. To achieve our goal, we obtained structural 3T-MRI images from 20 healthy controls (HC), 19 MDD patients, and 18 BPD patients, and measured cortical thickness and subcortical gray matter volumes. We utilized the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) questionnaire to quantify self-reported exposure to childhood trauma. Our findings suggest that individuals with MDD exhibit a smaller cortical thickness when compared to those with BPD. However, ACEs showed a significantly affected relationship with cortical thickness in BPD but not in MDD. ACEs were found to be associated with thinning in cortical regions involved in emotional behavior in BPD, whereas HC showed an opposite association. Our results suggest a potential mechanism of ACE effects on psychopathology involving changes in brain structure. These findings highlight the importance of early detection and intervention strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have lifelong effects on emotional behavior and are frequent in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The Central Autonomic Network (CAN), which modulates heart rate variability (HRV), comprises brain regions that mediate emotion regulation processes. However, it remains unclear the effect of ACEs on CAN dynamics and its relationship with HRV in these disorders. We studied the effects of ACEs on the brain and HRV simultaneously, during regulation of psychological stress in 19 BPD, 20 MDD and 20 healthy controls (HC). Participants underwent a cognitive reappraisal task during fMRI with simultaneous ECG acquisition. ACEs exposure was associated with increased activity of CAN and salience network components in patients with MDD compared to BPD during cognitive reappraisal. A brain-autonomic coupling was found in BPD relative to HC during emotion regulation, whereby greater activity of left anterior cingulate and medial superior frontal gyrus areas was coupled with increased HRV. Results suggest that ACEs exposure is associated with a distinct activation of the CAN and salience network regions governing responses to psychological stress in MDD compared to BPD. These alterations may constitute a distinctive neurobiological mechanism for abnormal emotion processing and regulation related to ACEs in MDD., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: One common denominator to the clinical phenotypes of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) is emotion regulation impairment. Although these two conditions have been extensively studied separately, it remains unclear whether their emotion regulation impairments are underpinned by shared or distinct neurobiological alterations., Methods: We contrasted the neural correlates of negative emotion regulation across an adult sample of BPD patients (n = 19), MDD patients (n = 20), and healthy controls (HCs; n = 19). Emotion regulation was assessed using an established functional magnetic resonance imaging cognitive reappraisal paradigm. We assessed both task-related activations and modulations of interregional connectivity., Results: When compared to HCs, patients with BPD and MDD displayed homologous decreased activation in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) during cognitive reappraisal. In addition, the MDD group presented decreased activations in other prefrontal areas (i.e., left dorsolateral and bilateral orbitofrontal cortices), while the BPD group was characterized by a more extended pattern of alteration in the connectivity between the vlPFC and cortices of the visual ventral stream during reappraisal., Conclusions: This study identified, for the first time, a shared neurobiological contributor to emotion regulation deficits in MDD and BPD characterized by decreased vlPFC activity, although we also observed disorder-specific alterations. In MDD, results suggest a primary deficit in the strength of prefrontal activations, while BPD is better defined by connectivity disruptions between the vlPFC and temporal emotion processing regions. These findings substantiate, in neurobiological terms, the different profiles of emotion regulation alterations observed in these disorders.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are highly prevalent and often comorbid psychiatric conditions, with abnormal processing of negative affect resulting from psychological stress. Characteristics of central processing of autonomic response to stress in each disorder are not clearly settled., Methods: We obtained whole brain 3T fMRI with concurrent skin conductance, respiration rate, and heart rate variability measures in a cohort of MDD (N=19), BPD (N=19) patients, and healthy (N=20) individuals. Experiments were conducted in resting conditions, during a control mental arithmetic task, during highly stressful mental arithmetic, and in the period immediately following psychological stress., Results: Widespread activation of central autonomic network (CAN) structures was observed during stress compared to a control task in the group of healthy participants, whereas CAN activation during stress was less intense in both BPD and MDD. Both patient groups displayed increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activation compared to healthy subjects, as previously reported. The relationship between peripheral sympathetic or parasympathetic activity and simultaneous regional brain BOLD activity was similar in BPD patients and healthy subjects, and markedly different from that seen in MDD patients., Limitations: The sample size, the fact it belonged to a single study site, and low grade affective symptomatology in both patient groups limit the generalizability of the present findings., Conclusions: The diverging neurobiological signature in the homeostatic response to stress in MDD and BPD possibly represents a heuristically valuable candidate biomarker to help discern MDD and BPD patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)