Search

Objective: To determine whether preoperative staging of high-risk prostate cancer with 18 F-sodium-fluoride ( 18 F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) reduces the risk of skeletal metastases., Design: Nationwide, population-based cohort study using real-world data., Setting: The study used national health registries, including all sites in Denmark from 2011 to 2018., Participants: Newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011 to 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the preoperative imaging modality of either 18 F-NaF PET or bone scintigraphy., Main Outcome Measures: The risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) as a proxy for skeletal metastases following radical prostatectomy. The secondary endpoint was overall survival., Results: Between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018, 4183 high-risk patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Of these patients, 807 (19.3%) underwent 18 F-NaF PET and 2161 (51.7%) underwent bone scintigraphy. The remaining 30% were examined by a different imaging method or did not undergo imaging. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting to control potential confounding, the HR of experiencing an SRE for patients in the 18 F-NaF PET group versus the bone scintigraphy group was 1.15 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.54). The 3-year survival rates were 97.4% (95% CI 96.1 to 98.7) and 97.1% (95% CI 96.4 to 97.9) for patients receiving 18 F-NaF PET and bone scintigraphy, respectively., Conclusion: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing preoperative staging with 18 F-NaF PET did not display a lower risk of developing SREs after prostatectomy compared with patients undergoing bone scintigraphy. The survival rates were similar between the two groups., Competing Interests: Competing interests: One author received grants from Bayer and Novo Nordisk for the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of observers with different levels of experience in reading 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT images for the diagnosis of bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients., Methods: Nine observers with varying NaF PET/CT experience, ranging from no experience to 2000+ examinations, evaluated 211 NaF PET/CT scans from PCa patients participating in one of four prospective trials. Each observer evaluated each NaF PET/CT on a patient level using a trichotomous scale: M0 (no bone metastases), Me (equivocal for bone metastases) and M1 (bone metastases). Subsequently, a dichotomous evaluation was conducted (M0/M1). The final diagnosis was retrieved from the original study. For each observer, ROC curves and the diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on dichotomous and trichotomous scales; in the latter case, Me was first regarded as M1 and then M0., Results: Across all experience levels, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy using the dichotomous scale ranged from 0.81 to 0.89, 0.93 to 1.00 and 0.91 to 0.94, respectively. Employing the trichotomous scale, novice and experienced observers chose Me in up to 20 vs. 10% of cases, respectively. Considering Me as M0, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy ranged from 0.78 to 0.89, 0.95 to 1.00 and 0.91 to 0.95, respectively. Considering Me as M1, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy ranged from 0.86 to 0.92, 0.71 to 0.96 and 0.77 to 0.94, respectively., Conclusion: Novice observers used the equivocal option more frequently than observers with NaF PET/CT experience. However, on the dichotomous scale, all observers exhibited high and satisfactory accuracy for the detection of bone metastases, making NaF PET/CT an effective imaging modality even in unexperienced hands., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate inter- and intraobserver agreement using standard (std)-single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) or ultra-fast acquisition (UF)-SPECT/CT as an add-on to planar whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the detection of bone metastases in patients with known cancer., Methods: Images from patients (n = 104) participating in a prospective trial comparing SPECT/CT as an add-on to WB-BS with two different acquisition methods (std-SPECT/CT; 20 s per view, 32 views and UF-SPECT/CT; 16 views of 10 s per view) were included. The combinations of WB-BS with the two different SPECT/CT acquisition methods were independently evaluated by two experienced observers using a three-point scale (M0: no metastases, Me: equivocal for bone metastases and M1: bone metastases). The observers re-evaluated the scans 6 months later. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated using linear weighted kappa., Results: The linear weighted kappa for the interobserver agreement was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.94] for WB-BS with std-SPECT/CT and 0.84 (95% CI 0.67-1.00) for WB-BS with UF-SPECT/CT. Similar values were observed for the intraobserver agreement, in which the linear weighted kappa was 0.76 (95% CI 0.60-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.57-0.90) for std-SPECT/CT and UF-SPECT/CT, respectively., Conclusion: Satisfactory inter- and intraobserver agreement was seen for both acquisition methods, emphasizing that the use of SPECT/CT as an add-on to WB-BS is a robust method for the detection of bone metastases even when conducted with a very short acquisition time.

Background: Equivocal scanning results occur. It remains unclear how these results are presented and their management influence diagnostic characteristics., Purpose: To investigate the reporting and handling of equivocal imaging findings in diagnostic studies of bone metastases, and to assess the impact on diagnostic performance of the methods used to analyze equivocal findings. The conceptual issue was reified based on two actual observations., Material and Methods: A recent meta-analysis of bone metastases in prostate cancer was conducted and data were obtained from a large clinical trial with a true reference of bone metastasis, where diagnostic characteristics were calculated with equivocal scans handled by: removal; considered malignant; considered benign; and intention-to-diagnose., Results: The meta-analysis included 18 trials where the median proportion of reported equivocal results was 27%. Eleven (61%) studies reported an equivocal option for the index test, 42% reported equivocal results and described how these were analyzed. The clinical trial included 583 prostate cancer patients with 20% equivocal results. The different methods of managing equivocal findings resulted in highly variable outcomes: sensitivity = 85%-100%; specificity = 78%-99%; and positive and negative predictive values = 44%-94% and 97%-100%, respectively. The diagnostic performances obtained using the four methods were differentially susceptible to the proportion of equivocal imaging findings and the prevalence of bone metastases., Conclusion: Reporting of equivocal results was inadequate in bone imaging trials. The handling of equivocal findings strongly influenced diagnostic accuracy.

Our aim was to evaluate the interobserver agreement in 18 F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: 18 F-NaF PET/CT scans were retrieved from all patients who participated in 4 recent prospective trials. Two experienced observers independently evaluated the 18 F-NaF PET/CT scans on a patient level using a 3-category scale (no bone metastases [M0], equivocal for bone metastases, and bone metastases present [M1]) and on a dichotomous scale (M0/M1). In patients with no more than 10 lesions, the location and number of lesions were recorded. On a patient level, the diagnostic performance was calculated using a sensitivity analysis, in which equivocal lesions were handled as M0 as well as M1. Results: 18 F-NaF PET/CT scans from 219 patients with PCa were included, of whom 129 patients were scanned for primary staging, 67 for biochemical recurrence, and 23 for metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Agreement between the observers was almost perfect on a patient level (3-category unweighted κ = 0.83 ± 0.05, linear weighted κ = 0.90 ± 0.06, and dichotomous κ = 0.91 ± 0.07). On a lesion level (dichotomous scale), the observers agreed on the number and location of bone metastases in 205 (93.6%) patients. In the remaining 14 patients, the readers disagreed on the number of lesions in 13 patients and the location of bone metastases in 1 patient. A final diagnosis of bone metastases was made for 211 of 219 patients. The sensitivity ranged from 0.86 to 0.92, specificity from 0.83 to 0.97, positive predictive value from 0.70 to 0.93, and negative predictive value from 0.94 to 0.96. Conclusion: The interobserver agreement on 18 F-NaF PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa was very high among trained observers, both on a patient level and on a lesion level. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of 18 F-NaF PET/CT was satisfactory, rendering 18 F-NaF PET/CT a robust tool in the diagnostic armamentarium., (© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

The aim of this study was to determine if additional 18 F-sodium fluoride PET/CT (NaF PET/CT) improves the prognostic accuracy in the initial staging of prostate cancer patients with normal bone scintigraphy undergoing prostatectomy. Methods: A prospective cohort study examined NaF PET/CT in intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer with negative bone scintigraphy who were scheduled for prostatectomy. Biochemical response: PSA levels < 0.2 ng/mL at 6 wk and 6 mo postoperatively, PSA level ≥ 0.2 ng/mL was biochemical failure. Results: Eighty-one patients were included in the study; 75 patients (93%) achieved biochemical responses, 6 patients had biochemical failure. NaF PET/CT indicated bone metastasis in 1 patient (1.2%), was equivocal in 7 patients (8.6%), without bone metastases in 73 patients (90.1%). Eight patients with bone metastases or equivocal results on NaF PET/CT exhibited biochemical responses. All patients with biochemical failure had negative NaF PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for bone metastases. Conclusion: NaF PET/CT has no added value for bone staging in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients with normal bone scintigraphy results undergoing prostatectomy., (© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

A 69-year-old man with newly diagnosed prostate cancer PSA 274 ng/mL, Gleason 4+3, T-stage 3b) underwent Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging with follow-up scans 6 and 13 weeks after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiation. Six weeks after ADT initiation, lymph node metastases observed at staging showed metabolic and radiological regression, whereas the skeleton showed increased PSMA uptake in existing bone metastases and several new PSMA-avid lesions. Skeletal PSMA uptake decreased after 13 weeks of ADT, and prostate-specific antigen decreased to 16 ng/mL. These findings suggest the presence of the flare phenomenon to ADT in bone metastases seen on PSMA PET/CT.

Purpose: To prospectively compare diagnostic accuracies for detection of bone metastases by 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18 F-NaF PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW 600 -MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR)., Methods: Sixty-eight PCa patients with BCR participated in this prospective study. The patients underwent 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a 18 F-NaF PET/CT and a DW 600 -MRI (performed in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines, with b values of 0 and 600 s/mm 2 ). Bone lesions were categorized using a three-point scale (benign, malignant or equivocal for metastases) and a dichotomous scale (benign or metastatic) for each imaging modality by at least two experienced observers. A best valuable comparator was defined for each patient based on study-specific imaging, at least 12 months of clinical follow-up and any imaging prior to the study and during follow-up. Diagnostic performance was assessed using a sensitivity analysis where equivocal lesions were handled as non-metastatic and then as metastatic., Results: Ten of the 68 patients were diagnosed with bone metastases. On a patient level, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis were, respectively, 0.80, 0.98-1.00 and 0.89-0.90 for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT (n = 68 patients); 0.90, 0.90-0.98 and 0.90-0.94 for 18 NaF PET/CT (n = 67 patients); and 0.25-0.38, 0.87-0.92 and 0.59-0.62 for DW 600 -MRI (n = 60 patients). The diagnostic performance of DW 600 -MRI was significantly lower than that of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 NaF PET/CT for diagnosing bone metastases (p < 0.01), and no significant difference in the AUC was seen between 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 NaF PET/CT (p = 0.65)., Conclusion: 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 F-NaF PET/CT showed comparable and high diagnostic accuracies for detecting bone metastases in PCa patients with BCR. Both methods performed significantly better than DW 600 -MRI, which was inadequate for diagnosing bone metastases when conducted in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines.

Objective: To prospectively determine the prognostic value of the bone scan index (BSI) for time to development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in consecutive, hormone-naïve patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients participated in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the value of bone scintigraphy (BS) at staging. BSI was determined using the EXINI Bone BSI software in 208 consecutive patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. The presence or absence of bone metastases at staging was classified by BS with or without supplementary imaging. Follow-up was performed >5 years after including the last patient., Results: During follow-up, 149 of the 208 patients (72%) were diagnosed with CRPC. Median time to CRPC was 20 months. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years in patients without CRPC. In univariate analyses, presence of bone metastases (M1) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-4.30), Gleason grade (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.79), and BSI (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.23) but not PSA significantly predicted time to CRPC (all, P < .001). The predictive values of M1 (HR 2.06), Gleason grade (HR 1.47), and BSI (HR 1.10) were confirmed in multivariate analyses. Log-rank test for equality of time to CRPC showed the significant predictive value of BSI (BSI = 0 vs 0 < BSI ≤ 1 vs BSI > 1, P < .001). In addition to routine assessment of M1 vs M0 status, BSI contributed to the predictive power., Conclusions: BSI is an independent risk factor for the time from initiation of androgen deprivation therapy to CRPC in hormone-naïve patients. The significant prognostic factors, in rank order, were M1 status, Gleason grade, and BSI., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treatment with bone-seeking radionuclides may provide palliation from pain originating from bone metastases. However, most studies have been conducted in patients with prostate cancer and patients with breast cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the use of radionuclide treatment in lung cancer in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. In the eligible trials, pain relief was reported in 75% of the patients included in the studies. The onset of pain relief was seen within 1-5 weeks after treatment, lasting up to 6 months. However, the methodology in the included trials was poor-only two randomised trials were eligible, and none of them compared radionuclide treatments with placebo or best standard of care. The remaining trials were case series with inherent problems of methodology reporting. Particularly challenging was the lack of reporting of baseline disease status and use of prior/concomitant analgaesics. Large randomised controlled trials are needed to clarify the efficacy of radionuclide treatment in lung cancer., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the agreement of the bone scan index (BSI) using EXINI Bone BSI versus experts' readings in the initial staging for bone metastasis in prostate cancer. In addition, the diagnostic outcome was assessed in a large subset of patients where a true reference for metastases could be determined based on clinical and biochemical follow-up and/or supplementary imaging., Methods: A total of 342 patients had a bone scintigraphy as part of routine staging for prostate cancer. Supplementary imaging was obtained at the discretion of the referring urologist. After full recruitment, the BSI and the number of malignant lesions were calculated using EXINI Bone BSI , and three imaging experts independently classified bone status by a dichotomous outcome (M1 for bone metastasis, M0 for no bone metastasis). A true reference was available in a subset of the patients based on post-operative prostate-specific antigen responses after radical prostatectomy and/or supplementary imaging., Results: Software analysis with a BSI > 0 as the cut-off for metastasis showed excellent agreement with expert classification for M1 disease (96% of the patients) but modest agreement for M0 disease (38%). With a BSI > 1, the agreement was 58% for M1 and 98% for M0. Software analyses based on individual European Association of Urology risk classification did not improve the diagnostic performance. Among patients with a true reference, the software showed metastasis in 64% of the M0 patients but correctly classified metastases in all M1 patients. The sensitivity was 100%, the specificity was 36%, the positive predictive value was 12.6% and the negative predictive value was 100% with a BSI >0 compared with 66.7%, 97.8%, 72.7%, and 97.0% with a BSI > 1., Conclusion: The diagnostic value of using EXINI Bone for the BSI in the staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer is limited.

Objective: To determine the relationship between bone pain and bone metastases in newly diagnosed prostate cancer., Patients and Methods: This prospective study of bone scintigraphy enrolled 567 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The presence of all-cause bone pain, known benign bone disease, and unexplained bone pain (ie, not related to known benign bone disease) was derived from a patient questionnaire. Univariate logistic regression models (LRMs) were used to assess the relationship between individual clinical variables (all-cause bone pain, unexplained bone pain, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade, T stage, and age) and bone metastases. A multivariate LRM was used to assess the relationship between bone metastases and all factors in combination. Agreement between the LRMs and bone metastases was estimated by accuracy and by Cohen's κ., Results: All-cause bone pain predicted bone metastasis in univariate but not multivariate analysis. Unexplained bone pain remained an independent predictor of bone metastases in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 4.5; P < .001). Prostate-specific antigen was the single most important predictor of bone metastases (P < .001)., Conclusion: Unexplained bone pain was a strong independent risk factor for bone metastasis. Guidelines should recommend staging bone scintigraphy in patients with unexplained bone pain, regardless of other risk factors., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The objective was to describe regional variations in M-staging in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer within a Danish county and to compare clinical practice with guideline recommendations., Methods: Data were as captured from 1) a prospective, non-interventional study counting 635 consecutive patients referred for M-staging in the 2008-2009 period at three regional hospitals within one county, and 2) a questionnaire on M-staging practice completed by the five sites performing M-staging in the same county in 2015., Results: All three sites referred patients for M-staging in 2008, irrespective of their risk factors. Two of the three sites maintained this practice in 2015. Furthermore, in 2015, three of five sites performed M-staging in intermediate and high-risk patients only. Planar whole-body bone scans were standard in all sites in 2008 with single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) being performed if required and if available. In 2015, two sites used choline positron emission tomography/CT for primary staging of high-risk patients against guideline recommendations. The use of SPECT/CT showed wide variations from "if required" to "mandatory" head-to-thigh imaging. There were notable variations between clinical practice and guidelines in 2008, and this was even more evident in 2015., Conclusion: Considerable variations existed with respect to the M-staging imaging practices in prostate cancer within a single Danish county. The variation was more pronounced in 2015 than in 2008. Clinical practice conflicted in part with European and national Danish guidelines., Funding: none., Trial Registration: not relevant.

Background: For decades, planar bone scintigraphy has been the standard practice for detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer and has been endorsed by recent oncology/urology guidelines. It is a sensitive method with modest specificity. (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography has shown improved sensitivity and specificity over bone scintigraphy, but because of methodological issues such as retrospective design and verification bias, the existing level of evidence with (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography is limited. The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic properties of (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scintigraphy on an individual patient basis., Methods/design: One hundred forty consecutive, high-risk prostate cancer patients will be recruited from several hospitals in Denmark. Sample size was calculated using Hayen's method for diagnostic comparative studies. This study will be conducted in accordance with recommendations of standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Eligibility criteria comprise the following: 1) biopsy-proven prostate cancer, 2) PSA ≥ 50 ng/ml (equals a prevalence of bone metastasis of ≈ 50% in the study population on bone scintigraphy), 3) patients must be eligible for androgen deprivation therapy, 4) no current or prior cancer (within the past 5 years), 5) ability to comply with imaging procedures, and 6) patients must not receive any investigational drugs. Planar bone scintigraphy and (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography will be performed within a window of 14 days at baseline. All scans will be repeated after 26 weeks of androgen deprivation therapy, and response of individual lesions will be used for diagnostic classification of the lesions on baseline imaging among responding patients. A response is defined as PSA normalisation or ≥ 80% reduction compared with baseline levels, testosterone below castration levels, no skeletal related events, and no clinical signs of progression. Images are read by blinded nuclear medicine physicians. The protocol is currently recruiting., Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest prospective studies comparing (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. It is conducted in full accordance with recommendations for diagnostic accuracy trials. It is intended to provide valid documentation for the use of (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography for examination of bone metastasis in the staging of prostate cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate, using international urology and oncology guidelines, the criteria for performing bone scintigraphy (BS) in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in a prospective setting with 2 years of follow-up after prostatectomy., Materials and Methods: In a prospective setting, criteria from European and US urology and oncology guidelines were evaluated in 220 unselected patients with BS performed as a routine investigation before radical prostatectomy. A prostate-specific antigen level of 0.1 ng/ml or lower after surgery was considered successful and was used as a measure of true-negative BS., Results: Overall, 200 out of 220 patients (91%) experienced successful radical prostatectomy at 6 months, with a 2 year success rate of 83%. The proportion of redundant BS ranged from 56% to 89% among the guidelines, whereas the outcome after radical prostatectomy was 93% within 6 months after surgery and 86-89% after 2 years of follow-up, without significant differences among guideline recommendations., Conclusion: The guidelines from the American Urological Association and the criteria recently published by the present group proposed the largest proportion of redundant BS without compromising patient-related outcome.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic properties of EXINI Bone(BSI) in newly diagnosed prostate cancer in comparison with expert reading., Materials and Methods: Bone scintigraphy was performed in consecutive patients referred for staging at three clinics (342 patients with DICOM file format, 272 with Interfile format). Images were reported by three independent readers on a four-point scale (class 1-4) and by using a dichotomous outcome (M1 or M0). The software analyzed data in balanced mode, as well as using 'patient-specific' settings (based on tumor characteristics), and classified outcome as normal (N), probably normal (pN), probably abnormal (pA), and abnormal (A)., Results: Classification of bone metastasis using the software (pA+A) versus experts (class 3+4) showed a sensitivity of 93.3%, specificity of 89.3%, positive predictive value of 57.5%, and negative predictive value of 98.9% with DICOM files. The diagnostic properties of the software were notably different with Interfile format. For example, expert M1 versus software A showed a sensitivity of 90.0%, specificity of 98.9%, positive predictive value of 88.2%, and negative predictive value of 98.3% with DICOM files, versus 69.2, 88.2, 38.3, and 96.4% with Interfile format, respectively. Generally, patient-specific settings did not influence the diagnostic characteristics of the software versus balanced setting with expert reading as reference., Conclusion: EXINI Bone(BSI) showed high sensitivity and specificity for bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The software ruled out metastasis with confidence, whereas the positive predictive value was modest. The diagnostic properties were different for DICOM and Interfile file formats.

Bone-seeking radionuclides, such as Sr-89, Sm-153, and Re-186, have been shown to have an effect on pain from bone metastasis in prostate cancer. The effect on bone pain in other cancer types, including breast cancer, remains unclear. The purpose of the study was to perform a systematic review of the use of radioisotopes for pain relief in metastatic breast cancer. A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (1970 to September 2009) for clinical studies with a primary outcome of pain, performance status, or quality of life. Eligibility criteria were the following: (1) the trial must include at least 10 breast cancer patients with painful bone metastasis, (2) the radionuclide has been approved by regulatory authorities in Europe or the United States and is commercially available (Sr-89, Sm-153, and Re-186), (3) the dose of radionuclides must be clinically effective, (4) the primary endpoint must be pain, performance status or quality of life, and (5) separate reporting of efficacy should be available for breast cancer patients provided the trial included patients with various types of cancer. The literature search identified 189 individual studies of which 19 trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. There were three randomized controlled trials of which two trials compared two different radionuclides, and one trial compared two doses of Sm-153. In addition, there were 16 uncontrolled trials. Reporting of trial research methodology in the randomized as well as the uncontrolled trials was low (median Jadad score of 1, range 1-2). Key trial details, such as patient recruitment, description of prior palliative therapies, baseline characteristics, follow up, and reporting of outcome was insufficient in a large proportion of the trials. According to Center of Evidence-based Medicine criteria, there is level 4 documentation for the effect of radionuclides in painful bone metastasis in breast cancer. It has been concluded that there is limited clinical evidence supporting the clinical effect of radionuclides in relieving pain from bone metastasis in breast cancer. Large, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the utility of bone-seeking radionuclides in the palliative care of breast cancer patients., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Painful bone metastases are common in advanced prostate cancer. We report the clinical outcome after administration of Samarium-153 ((153)Sm), an emitter of beta-particles that concentrates in the areas of enhanced osteoblastic activity., Methods: Twenty-two patients (median age 73 years) with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer received a single bolus infusion of (153)Sm (37 MBq/kg). All patients had painful bone metastases to more than one anatomical region, and most had inadequate pain relief to narcotic analgesics. Bone specific pain, analgesic score according to WHO, ECOG performance status, and blood count were evaluated before and up to 28 weeks after treatment., Results: Median follow-up was six weeks (mean 14 weeks). Eleven patients died within the 28 week observation period (ten from terminal disease), and four patients had their observation period truncated. Median pain score was 56.3%, 50.0%, and 50.0% of baseline values at week 4 (n = 20), 16 (n = 10), and 28 (n = 7), respectively. A reduction of baseline pain score by 50% or more was observed in 50%, 70% and 71% of patients at week 4, 16, and 28, respectively. Hematological toxicity was mild and reversible in most cases., Conclusion: Administration of (153)Sm to prostate cancer patients with painful bone metastases offered clinical relevant pain relief with tolerable hematological toxicity.

Bone scintigraphy is key in imaging skeletal metastases in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Unfortunately, a notable proportion of scans are not readily classified as positive or negative but deemed indeterminate. The extent of reporting of indeterminate bone scans and how such scans are handled in clinical trials are not known. A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases up to October 2016. The main outcome of interest was the reporting of indeterminate bone scans, analyses of how such scans were managed, and exploratory analyses of the association of study characteristics and the reporting of indeterminate bone scan results. Seventy-four eligible clinical trials were identified. The trials were mostly retrospective (85%), observational (95%), large trials (median 195 patients) from five continents published over four decades. The majority of studies had university affiliation (72%), and an author with imaging background (685). Forty-five studies (61%) reported an indeterminate option for the bone scan and 23 studies reported the proportion of indeterminate scans (median 11.4%). Most trials (44/45, 98%) reported how to handle indeterminate scans. Most trials (n = 39) used add-on supplementary imaging, follow-up bone scans, or both. Exploratory analyses showed a significant association of reporting of indeterminate results and number of patients in the study (p = 0.024) but failed to reach statistical significance with other variables tested. Indeterminate bone scan for staging of prostate cancer was insufficiently reported in clinical trials. In the case of indeterminate scans, most studies provided adequate measures to obtain the final status of the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]