Search

Background: The healing of a bone injury is a highly complex process involving a multitude of different tissue and cell types, including immune cells, which play a major role in the initiation and progression of bone regeneration. Methods: We histologically analyzed the spatio-temporal occurrence of cells of the innate immune system (macrophages), the adaptive immune system (B and T lymphocytes), and bone cells (osteoblasts and osteoclasts) in the fracture area of a femoral osteotomy over the healing time. This study was performed in a bone osteotomy gap mouse model. We also investigated two key challenges of successful bone regeneration: hypoxia and revascularization. Results: Macrophages were present in and around the fracture gap throughout the entire healing period. The switch from initially pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype coincided with the revascularization as well as the appearance of osteoblasts in the fracture area. This indicates that M2 macrophages are necessary for the restoration of vessels and that they also play an orchestrating role in osteoblastogenesis during bone healing. The presence of adaptive immune cells throughout the healing process emphasizes their essential role for regenerative processes that exceeds a mere pathogen defense. B and T cells co-localize consistently with bone cells throughout the healing process, consolidating their crucial role in guiding bone formation. These histological data provide, for the first time, comprehensive information about the complex interrelationships of the cellular network during the entire bone healing process in one standardized set up. With this, an overall picture of the spatio-temporal interplay of cellular key players in a bone healing scenario has been created. Conclusions: A spatio-temporal distribution of immune cells, bone cells, and factors driving bone healing at time points that are decisive for this process—especially during the initial steps of inflammation and revascularization, as well as the soft and hard callus phases—has been visualized. The results show that the bone healing cascade does not consist of five distinct, consecutive phases but is a rather complex interrelated and continuous process of events, especially at the onset of healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To present knowledge, macrophages are found in all tissues of the human body. They are a cell population with high plasticity which come with a multitude of functions which appear to be adapted to the respective tissue niche and micro-environment in which they reside. Bone harbors multiple macrophage subpopulations, with the osteoclasts as classical representative of a bone resorbing cells and osteomacs as a bone tissue resident macrophage first described by the expression of F4/80. Both subtypes are found throughout all phases in bone healing. In vivo data on bone regeneration have demonstrated their essential role in initiating the healing cascade (inflammatory phase) but also of the later phases of healing (e.g. endochondral and intramembranous bone formation). To participate in such diverse processes macrophages have to be highly plastic in their functionality. Thus, the widely used M1/M2 paradigm to distinguish macrophage subpopulations may not mirror the comprehensive role of the dynamics of macrophage plasticity. From a clinical perspective it is especially relevant to distinguish what drives macrophages in impaired healing scenarios, implant loosening or infections, where their specific role of a misbalanced inflammatory setting is so far only partially known. With this review we aim at illustrating current knowledge and gaps of knowledge on macrophage plasticity and function during the cascades of regeneration and reconstitution of bone tissue. We propose aspects of the known biological mechanisms of macrophages and their specific subsets that might serve as targets to control their function in impaired healing and eventually support a scar-free regeneration. Macrophages are essential for successful regeneration. In scar-free healing such as in bone, a complete failure of healing was shown if macrophages were depleted; the M1/M2 switch appears to be key to the progression from pro-inflammation to regeneration. However, experimental data illustrate that the classical M1/M2 paradigm does not completely mirror the complexity of observed macrophage functions during bone healing and thus demands a broader perspective. Within this review we discuss the high degree of plasticity of macrophages and the relevant contribution of the different and more specific M2 subtypes (M2a-M2f) during (bone) regeneration. It summarizes the versatile roles of macrophages in skeletal regeneration and thereby highlights potential target points for immunomodulatory approaches to enable or even foster bone repair. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite significant advances in surgical techniques, treatment options for impaired bone healing are still limited. Inadequate bone regeneration is not only associated with pain, prolonged immobilization and often multiple revision surgeries, but also with high socioeconomic costs, underlining the importance of a detailed understanding of the bone healing process. In this regard, we previously showed that mice lacking the calcitonin receptor (CTR) display increased bone formation mediated through the increased osteoclastic secretion of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), an osteoanabolic molecule promoting osteoblast function. Although strong evidence is now available for the crucial role of osteoclast-to-osteoblast coupling in normal bone hemostasis, the relevance of this paracrine crosstalk during bone regeneration is unknown. Therefore, our study was designed to test whether increased osteoclast-to-osteoblast coupling, as observed in CTR-deficient mice, may positively affect bone repair. In a standardized femoral osteotomy model, global CTR-deficient mice displayed no alteration in radiologic callus parameters. Likewise, static histomorphometry demonstrated moderate impairment of callus microstructure and normal osseous bridging of osteotomy ends. In conclusion, bone regeneration is not accelerated in CTR-deficient mice, and contrary to its osteoanabolic action in normal bone turnover, osteoclast-to-osteoblast coupling specifically involving the CTR-S1P axis, may only be of minor relevance during bone healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) is a known key mediator of physiological bone regeneration and is clinically approved for selected musculoskeletal interventions. Yet, broad usage of this growth factor is impeded due to side effects that are majorly evoked by high dosages and burst release kinetics. In this study, mesoporous bioactive glass microspheres (MBGs), produced by an aerosol-assisted spray-drying scalable process, were loaded with BMP-2 resulting in prolonged, low-dose BMP-2 release without affecting the material characteristics. In vitro, MBGs were found to be cytocompatible and to induce a pro-osteogenic response in primary human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). In a pre-clinical rodent model, BMP-2 loaded MBGs significantly enhanced bone formation and influenced the microarchitecture of newly formed bone. The MBG carriers alone performed equal to the untreated (empty) control in most parameters tested, while additionally exerting mild pro-angiogenic effects. Using MBGs as a biocompatible, pro-regenerative carrier for local and sustained low dose BMP-2 release could limit side effects, thus enabling a safer usage of BMP-2 as a potent pro-osteogenic growth factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]