Search

Introduction: A virtual reality simulator developed for orthopaedic and trauma surgical training has been introduced. However, it is unclear whether the experiences of actual surgery are reflected in virtual reality simulation surgery (VRSS) using a simulator. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the results in VRSS differ between a trauma expert and a trauma novice. Methods: In Group A (expert), there are ten orthopaedic trauma surgeons and in Group B (novice) ten residents within 2 years after medical school graduation. VRSS for a femoral neck fracture using Hansson hook-pins (Test 1) and Hansson twin hook plate (Test 2) was performed. The parameters evaluated were total procedure time (s), fluoroscopy time (s), number of times X-ray was used (defined by the number of times the foot pedal was used), number of retries in guide placement, and final implant position. Results: In Test 1, the averages of four parameters (distance to posterior cortex (p = 0.009), distal pin distance above lesser trochanter (p = 0.015), distal pin hook angular error (p = 0.004), and distal pin tip distance to centre (lateral) (p = 0.015)) were significantly different between Groups A and B. In Test 2, no parameters in a mean were significantly different between groups, but seven parameters in a variance (guide wire distance to joint surface (p = 0.0191), twin hook length outside barrel (p = 0.011), twin hook tip distance to centre (lateral) (p = 0.042), twin hook distance to centre of lateral cortex (lateral) (p = 0.016), plate end alignment error (lateral) (p = 0.027), guide wire angle with lateral cortex (front) (p = 0.024), and 3.2-mm drill outside cortex (p = 0.000)) were significantly different between groups. In Test 1, Group B showed significantly longer fluoroscopy time than Group A (p = 0.044). In Test 2, Group B showed significantly fewer instances of X-ray use than Group A (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Our study showed that the experiences of actual surgery are reflected in the result of VRSS using the simulator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Spinopelvic fixation and triangular osteosynthesis give firm internal fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries (UPRI), but with sacrifice of mobility of the lumbar spine. Here, we describe the procedure and outcomes of a new approach, which we refer to as "within ring"-based sacroiliac rod fixation (SIRF).Methods: The patient was placed in a prone position and longitudinal skin incisions were made at the medial margins of the bilateral posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS). After reduction of fracture, a pedicle screw was inserted into the first sacral vertebra on the injured side and iliac screws inserted through the bilateral PSIS were bridged using rods.Results: SIRF was performed in 15 patients. The AO/OTA classification was 61-B2.3 in 1, C1.3 in 4, C2.3 in 7, C3.3 in 1, and H-type spinopelvic dissociation in two cases. The mean operative time was 179 (110-298) minutes, mean blood loss was 533 (100-2700) cc. One patient died during hospitalization and three patients stopped outpatient treatment. The other 11 patients achieved bone union without major loss of reduction in a mean post-operative follow-up period of 23.8 (4-50) months. The mean Majeed score at final follow-up was 86.7 (73-96) out of 96, excluding scoring sexual intercourse.Conclusions: "Within ring"-based SIRF not including the lumbar spine in the fixation range is a simple, safe, and low-invasive internal fixation method for UPRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the fixation power of sacroiliac rod fixation (SIRF), which was developed based on our original "within ring" concept to exclude the lumbar vertebra from the fixation range, and spinopelvic fixation (SPF) in a biomechanical experiment.Methods: SPF and SIRF were applied to the posterior element in four bones each with the pelvic ring fracture model (AO/OTA classification 61-C1.3). A 300-N axial force was loaded on the fifth lumbar vertebra of the simulated pelvis. Then the stiffness (N/m) and deformation (mm) of SPF and SIRF were determined, and the final displacement (mm) of the fracture region and angular deformity (degrees) were measured. Displacements were measured using the markers at two sites of the sacral fracture [upper margin of the sacral ala (Ala) and second sacral vertebra level (S2)] and one site of the pubic symphysis (PS), and angular deformity was measured at Ala and PS.Results: In SPF and SIRF, the mean stiffnesses and deformations showed no statistically significant difference. Only the vertical displacement at Ala differed significantly between SPF and SIRF (p = 0. 045), and the fixing force of SPF was higher. There was no other significant difference in vertical and horizontal displacement. The mean angular deformities also showed no significant difference between the two methods.Conclusions: In biomechanics experiments, vertical resistance was stronger in SPF-treated than SIRF-treated bone, but stiffness and deformation, horizontal resistance, and angular deformity did not differ significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of femoral fracture with implants on the proximal and distal sides to verify whether actual fracture morphologies follow the fracture types of Baba classification focusing on implant designs useful for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Methods: Prosthesis was present in 85 with periprosthetic femoral fractures. Excluding 73 patients with fracture around the femoral stem or fracture of the TKA femoral component alone, 12 patients with 14 legs with both implants were investigated. All patients were radiographically assessed for implant stability according to the Baba classification. For clinical evaluation, intra- and postoperative complications, the operation time, and intra-operative blood loss were investigated. Results: The Baba classification fracture type showed the implant as unstable and stable types in 3 and 11 legs, respectively. The consistency rate between the Baba classification-based judgment of plain radiograms acquired at the time of injury and actual surgical findings was 100%. As a result of treatment according to the Baba classification, bone union was achieved in all patients. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. Conclusions: Applying the Baba classification, implant stability could be sufficiently evaluated in not only periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty, but also interprosthetic femoral fractures, thereby verifying its usefulness in setting the treatment strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) using a dual-mobility cup (DMC) in patients with femoral neck fracture to those in patients undergoing elective THA for osteoarthritis.Patients and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 40 hips with femoral neck fracture (group A), and 81 hips with osteoarthritis (group B). THA via the DAA using the DMC was performed in both groups. A primary/secondary outcome variable were the presence of dislocation/operative time, intra- and/or peri-operative complication, and mortality.Results: Dislocation did not occur in either group. The complication rate was slightly higher in group A than in group B, but not statistically significant.Conclusion: THA with the DMC using the DAA was as effective for femoral neck facture as it was for elective THA in patients with osteoarthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There are various types of intertrochanteric fractures that are unstable pertrochanteric fractures of the hip. The aim of this study was to develop a systematic and comprehensive classification of intertrochanteric fractures.Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 74 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated by us between 2012 and 2015. The fractures were classified using 3D-CT images taken immediately after the fractures occurred based on the course of the lateral fracture line (LFL) that extends through the lateral femoral cortex distal to the vastus ridge of the greater trochanter in the intertrochanteric area. Furthermore, the presence or absence of additional typical fractures was also studied. Then, 4 orthopedic specialists examined the 3D-CT images of 20 patients randomly selected from the 74 patients to evaluate both the inter-rater and intra-rater agreement levels.Results: Intertrochanteric fractures were classified into three types according to the LFL patterns. Type I (41.9%), the Lateral Wall Pattern, has a LFL that extends towards the lateral fiber bundle attachment area of the iliofemoral ligament. Type II (24.3%), the Transverse Pattern, has a LFL that extends towards the medial bundle attachment area. Type III (33.8%), the Reverse Oblique Pattern, has a LFL that extends between the lateral and medial fiber bundle area of the iliofemoral ligament. Each type showed characteristic displacement and was associated with various combinations of typical fractures (fracture across the intertrochanteric line, posteromedial fragment, including the lesser trochanter, posterolateral fragment posterior to the femoral greater trochanter, and banana-shaped big fragment, including both the greater trochanter and the lesser trochanter). The mean κ values for the interobserver and intraobserver agreement levels were 0.77 (0.70-0.85) and 0.76 (0.70-0.85), respectively, which were considered substantial agreement levels.Conclusion: We believe our new classification is a useful communication tool for medical professionals in the diagnosis of fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Locking plate is considered biomechanically advantageous for porotic bone, compared with conventional plate. However, clinical evaluations of locking and conventional plates for periprosthetic femoral fracture are still controversial. Thus, we investigated the usefulness of a locking plate compared with the conventional plate for treatment for this fracture. Materials and methods: We reviewed 40 patients (40 fractures) who had undergone internal fixation for Vancouver type B1 or C periprosthetic fracture. Locking and conventional plates were applied for 21 and 19 patients, respectively. Results: No significant difference was found between locking and conventional plate groups in Merle d' Aubigné hip score, walking ability, operation time, and blood loss. Regarding postoperative complications, delayed union was noted in one patient in the locking plate group and subsidence of the stem in one in the conventional plate group. On the final follow-up, bone union was achieved in all patients. Conclusion: We cannot suggest the usefulness of locking plate for periprosthetic femoral fracture. However, functional training was performed in the same rehabilitation schedule in our comparative study. Considering the angle stability of the locking plate, weight may be loaded on the locking plate, earlier than that on the conventional plate, which may be an advantage of the locking plate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Displacement fracture of the acetabulum is treated with open reduction and rigid fixation in many cases. We have recently applied internal fixation using the Dall–Miles cable system (Stryker). We investigated ten patients undergoing cable fixation between 2003 and 2008. Reduction and fixation were simultaneously performed by simply hanging and tightening a cable on the quadrilateral surface, showing the usefulness of this cable fixation. Based on our experience of cable detachment in a case fixed with a cable alone, an anchor screw was inserted in the distal bone fragment of the posterior column, and the cable was hung on the screw to prevent detachment, which not only prevented cable detachment but also ensured the pulling and fixing of the posterior column element. To our knowledge, the reduction and fixation of an acetabular fracture by hanging a cable on an anchor screw has not previously been reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present three cases of cervical spinal fracture, involving two columns without an obvious neurological deficit. Usually if two of three columns are fractured, the injury is considered unstable structurally and clinically. Fortunately our cases did not involve sensory or motor impairment because of an enlargement of the spinal canal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are stress-related fractures that are speculated to associate with long-term treatment with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. A history of AFF is a high risk factor for the development of a subsequent AFF in the same location of the contralateral femur, suggesting that a patient's individual anatomical factor(s) are related to the fracture site of AFFs. In this study, we investigated the radiographs of fourteen AFFs (four bilateral fractures among ten patients) treated at six hospitals associated with our university between 2005 and 2010. The fracture site and standing femorotibial angle (FTA), which reflects the mechanical axis of the lower limb, were measured on weight-bearing lower limb radiographs. The fracture site and FTA of patients with typical femoral fractures (TFF) were compared to those of patients with AFFs. The correlations were examined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. The fracture locations in the femora were almost the same in the patients with bilateral AFFs. There was a positive correlation between the fracture site and the standing FTA in the patients with AFFs (r = 0.82, 95% confidence interval; 0.49 to 0.94), indicating that the larger the standing FTA (varus alignment), the more distal the site of the fracture in the femur. The FTA of the patients with atypical diaphyseal femoral fracture were significantly larger compared to that of those with not only atypical subtrochanteric fractures but also TFFs. In conclusion, the fracture sites of AFFs are associated with the standing lower limb alignment, while those of TFFs are not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]