Search

Objectives: To investigate calcium intake and its association with bone mineral density (BMD) and the type and extent of the disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Setting: University hospital clinic., Subjects: A total of 152 unselected IBD patients and 73 healthy controls., Measurements: Dietary calcium intake was assessed with a food frequency questionnaire and BMD of the lumbar spina and proximal femur was measured., Results: The IBD patients had lower dietary calcium intake (1034 [SD 493] mg) than the controls (1334 [514] mg, P < 0.001). The difference was significant in the males (1047 [552] mg and 1575 [586] mg, respectively, P < 0.001), but not in the females (1020 [422] mg and 1112 [303] mg). The dietary daily calcium intake was below 1000 mg in 53% of the patients and 27% of the controls (P = 0.0004) and below 400 mg in 9.2% of the patients and none of the controls (P = 0.007). The calcium intake was not associated with the severity or the type of IBD. Seventy-one (47%) patients and eight (11%) controls avoided lactose in their diet (P < 0.001). In the IBD patients, no association between the calcium intake and BMD was detected, whereas in the controls a positive correlation between the calcium intake and the BMD of the proximal femur was found., Conclusions: Calcium intakes below the recommendations are seen more often in the IBD patients than in the healthy controls, but in the IBD patients the calcium intake is not associated with BMD in a cross-sectional study. A low-lactose diet is common among IBD patients. To reduce the risk of inadequate calcium intake, unnecessary dietary restrictions concerning, e.g. milk products, should be avoided for these patients.

Objectives: To explore the relationships between vitamin D intake, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (250HD) concentrations, and bone mineral density (BMD) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Setting: A university hospital clinic in Finland., Subjects: One hundred and fifty randomly selected patients with IBD from the hospital register and 73 healthy controls., Measurements: BMD of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Vitamin D intake and serum levels of 250HD and PTH were determined., Results: The IBD patients had a lower serum 250HD concentration (28.4 [SD 12.0] nmol L-1) than the controls (36.1 [16.7] nmol L-1; P = 0.001), whereas no differences in the vitamin D intake or the serum PTH levels were found. The serum 250HD concentrations and the vitamin D intake of the patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 67) were similar to those of the Crohn's disease patients (n = 76). The patients with Crohn's disease of the small bowel had slightly, but not significantly, lower serum 250HD concentrations (25.6 [11.0] nmol L-1) than the other Crohn's disease patients (31.4 [14.3] nmol L-1; P = 0.061). In the IBD patients, the vitamin D intake and the serum 250HD and PTH concentrations were not associated with BMD., Conclusions: Patients with IBD have lower serum levels of 250HD than healthy controls, but similar serum PTH concentrations and vitamin D intake. Vitamin D intake, and the serum levels of 250HD and PTH are not associated with BMD, and malabsorption is unlikely to be a major factor in the aetiology of bone loss in unselected IBD patients.

To assess the mechanisms of osteopenia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the serum markers of bone formation (osteocalcin and carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP)) and bone degradation (carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP)), the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur and calcium intake of 150 unselected IBD patients and 73 healthy controls were investigated. The patients had higher ICTP values (3.69 (SD 1.40) microgram/l) than the healthy controls (3.25 (1.00) microgram/l, p = 0.035), but no differences in serum PICP and osteocalcin between these groups were detected. In the patients, the ICTP, PICP, and osteocalcin values did not have any significant correlation with BMD, but the patients with ICTP values above 3.6 microgram/l had significantly lower Z scores than those with lower ICTP. In the controls, however, a positive correlation between serum ICTP and BMD was found. The ulcerative colitis patients with total colitis had higher values of ICTP (3.96 (1.58) microgram/l) than those with a left sided disease (3.04 (0.86) micrograms/l, p = 0.009). The patients with a history of clinically active disease (n = 20) had higher ICTP (4.58 (1.55) microgram/l) and osteocalcin (12.56 (5.64) microgram/l) values than the patients (n = 130) with quiescent disease (ICTP 3.56 (1.33), p = 0.002, and osteocalcin 9.76 (3.62), p = 0.017). Increased serum osteocalcin, PICP, and ICTP concentrations and reduced BMD Z scores were found in a subgroup of Crohn's disease patients with a history of an active disease (n = 11). Raised serum ICTP and normal values of osteocalcin and PICP in IBD patients show increased breakdown of type I collagen without a compensatory increase in its synthesis suggesting an increased rate of bone degradation as a probable mechanism for osteopenia in IBD. Raised ICTP values are related to reduced bone mineral densities.

To assess the prevalence of and risk factors for low bone mineral density in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 152 IBD patients and 73 healthy controls were studied. Sixty seven patients had ulcerative colitis, 78 had Crohn's disease (52 of them (66.7%) had ileal disease), and seven had indeterminate colitis. Bone mineral density values (g/cm2) measured by dual energy x ray absorbtiometry at the spine (L2-L4), the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and the trochanter were 1.177, 0.948, 0.850, and 0.838 in the patients and 1.228 (p = 0.034), 1.001 (p = 0.009), 0.889 (NS), and 0.888 (p = 0.012) in the control group, respectively. The type or extent of the disease or previous small bowel resection did not have any significant effect on the bone mineral density values. There was a weak, but statistically significant negative correlation between bone mineral density and the total lifetime corticosteroid dose (in the lumbar spine r = -0.164, p = 0.04, the femoral neck r = -0.185, p = 0.02, Ward's triangle r = -0.167, p = 0.04, and the trochanter r = -0.237, p = 0.003). The patients whose lifetime corticosteroid dose (prednisone/prednisolone) was more than 10 g had especially low bone mineral density (p < 0.05 compared with the groups with no or less than 5 g of corticosteroid). The patients who had never taken peroral corticosteroids did not have decreased bone mineral density. In conclusion, IBD patients have significantly lower bone mineral density values than healthy controls, but the difference is not so great as has been reported previously. Low bone mineral density values in these patients are related to high lifetime corticosteroid doses.