Search

Objective: To investigate the in vivo applicability of non-contrast-enhanced hydroxyapatite (HA)-specific bone mineral density (BMD) measurements based on dual-layer CT (DLCT)., Methods: A spine phantom containing three artificial vertebral bodies with known HA densities was measured to obtain spectral data using DLCT and quantitative CT (QCT), simulating different patient positions and grades of obesity. BMD was calculated from virtual monoenergetic images at 50 and 200 keV. HA-specific BMD values of 174 vertebrae in 33 patients (66 ± 18 years; 33% women) were determined in non-contrast routine DLCT and compared with corresponding QCT-based BMD values., Results: Examining the phantom, HA-specific BMD measurements were on a par with QCT measurements. In vivo measurements revealed strong correlations between DLCT and QCT (r = 0.987 [95% confidence interval, 0.963-1.000]; p < 0.001) and substantial agreement in a Bland-Altman plot., Conclusion: DLCT-based HA-specific BMD measurements were comparable with QCT measurements in in vivo analyses. This suggests that opportunistic DLCT-based BMD measurements are an alternative to QCT, without requiring phantoms and specific protocols., Key Points: • DLCT-based hydroxyapatite-specific BMD measurements show a substantial agreement with QCT-based BMD measurements in vivo. • DLCT-based hydroxyapatite-specific measurements are on a par with QCT in spine phantom measurements. • Opportunistic DLCT-based BMD measurements may be a feasible alternative for QCT, without requiring dedicated examination protocols or a phantom.

Objectives: To develop and evaluate a method for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurement based on dual-layer spectral CT scout scans., Methods: A post-processing algorithm using a pair of 2D virtual mono-energetic scout images (VMSIs) was established in order to semi-automatically compute the aBMD at the spine similarly to DXA, using manual soft tissue segmentation, semi-automatic segmentation for the vertebrae, and automatic segmentation for the background. The method was assessed based on repetitive measurements of the standardized European Spine Phantom (ESP) using the standard scout scan tube current (30 mA) and other tube currents (10 to 200 mA), as well as using fat-equivalent extension rings simulating different patient habitus, and was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Moreover, the feasibility of the method was assessed in vivo in female patients., Results: Derived from standard scout scans, aBMD values measured with the proposed method significantly correlated with DXA measurements (r = 0.9925, p < 0.001), and mean accuracy (DXA, 4.12%; scout, 1.60%) and precision (DXA, 2.64%; scout, 2.03%) were comparable between the two methods. Moreover, aBMD values assessed at different tube currents did not differ significantly (p ≥ 0.20 for all), suggesting that the presented method could be applied to scout scans with different settings. Finally, data derived from sample patients were concordant with BMD values from a reference age-matched population., Conclusions: Based on dual-layer spectral scout scans, aBMD measurements were fast and reliable and significantly correlated with the according DXA measurements in phantoms. Considering the number of CT acquisitions performed worldwide, this method could allow truly opportunistic osteoporosis screening., Key Points: • 2D scout scans (localizer radiographs) from a dual-layer spectral CT scanner, which are mandatory parts of a CT examination, can be used to automatically determine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the spine. • The presented method allowed fast (< 25 s/patient), semi-automatic, and reliable DXA-equivalent aBMD measurements for state-of-the-art DXA phantoms at different tube settings and for various patient habitus, as well as for sample patients. • Considering the number of CT scout scan acquisitions performed worldwide on a daily basis, the presented technique could enable truly opportunistic osteoporosis screening with DXA-equivalent metrics, without involving higher radiation exposure since it only processes existing data that is acquired during each CT scan.

Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a promising alternative to standard filtered back projection (FBP), because of lower noise generation while maintaining image quality. Hence, we investigated the feasibility of SIR in predicting MDCT-based bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral bone strength from finite element (FE) analysis. The BMD and FE-predicted bone strength derived from MDCT images reconstructed using standard FBP (FFBP) and SIR with (FSIR) and without regularization (FSIRB0) were validated against experimental failure loads (Fexp). Statistical iterative reconstruction produced the best quality images with regard to noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Fexp significantly correlated with FFBP, FSIR, and FSIRB0. FFBP had a significant correlation with FSIRB0 and FSIR. The BMD derived from FBP, SIRB0, and SIR were significantly correlated. Effects of regularization should be further investigated with FE and BMD analysis to allow for an optimal iterative reconstruction algorithm to be implemented in an in vivo scenario.

To assess whether phantomless calcium-hydroxyapatite (HA) specific bone mineral density (BMD) measurements with dual-layer spectral computed tomography are accurate in phantoms and vertebral specimens. Ex-vivo human vertebrae (n = 13) and a phantom containing different known HA concentrations were placed in a semi-anthropomorphic abdomen phantom with different extension rings simulating different degrees of obesity. Phantomless dual-layer spectral CT was performed at different tube current settings (500, 250, 125 and 50 mAs). HA-specific BMD was derived from spectral-based virtual monoenergetic images at 50 keV and 200 keV. Values were compared to the HA concentrations of the phantoms and conventional qCT measurements using a reference phantom, respectively. Above 125 mAs, errors for phantom measurements ranged between -1.3% to 4.8%, based on spectral information. In vertebral specimens, high correlations were found between BMD values assessed with spectral CT and conventional qCT (r ranging between 0.96 and 0.99; p < 0.001 for all) with different extension rings, and a high agreement was found in Bland Altman plots. Different degrees of obesity did not have a significant influence on measurements (P > 0.05 for all). These results suggest a high validity of HA-specific BMD measurements based on dual-layer spectral CT examinations in setups simulating different degrees of obesity without the need for a reference phantom, thus demonstrating their feasibility in clinical routine.

Objective: Osteoporosis diagnosis using multidetector CT (MDCT) is limited to relatively high radiation exposure. We investigated the effect of simulated ultra-low-dose protocols on in-vivo bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative trabecular bone assessment., Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Twelve subjects with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and 12 age- and gender-matched controls undergoing routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT were included (average effective dose: 10 mSv). Ultra-low radiation examinations were achieved by simulating lower tube currents and sparse samplings at 50%, 25% and 10% of the original dose. BMD and trabecular bone parameters were extracted in T10-L5., Results: Except for BMD measurements in sparse sampling data, absolute values of all parameters derived from ultra-low-dose data were significantly different from those derived from original dose images (p<0.05). BMD, apparent bone fraction and trabecular thickness were still consistently lower in subjects with than in those without fractures (p<0.05)., Conclusion: In ultra-low-dose scans, BMD and microstructure parameters were able to differentiate subjects with and without vertebral fractures, suggesting osteoporosis diagnosis is feasible. However, absolute values differed from original values. BMD from sparse sampling appeared to be more robust. This dose-dependency of parameters should be considered for future clinical use., Key Points: • BMD and quantitative bone parameters are assessable in ultra-low-dose in vivo MDCT scans. • Bone mineral density does not change significantly when sparse sampling is applied. • Quantitative trabecular bone microstructure measurements are sensitive to dose reduction. • Osteoporosis subjects could be differentiated even at 10% of original dose. • Radiation exposure should be considered when comparing quantitative bone parameters.

Osteoporosis is characterized by bone loss and degradation of bone microstructure leading to fracture particularly in elderly people. Osteoporotic bone degeneration and fracture risk can be assessed by bone mineral density and trabecular bone score from 2D projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images. However, multidetector computed tomography image based quantification of trabecular bone microstructure showed significant improvement in prediction of fracture risk beyond that from bone mineral density and trabecular bone score; however, high radiation exposure limits its use in routine clinical in vivo examinations. Hence, this study investigated reduction of radiation dose and its effects on image quality of thoracic midvertebral specimens. Twenty-four texture features were extracted to quantify the image quality from multidetector computed tomography images of 11 thoracic midvertebral specimens, by means of statistical moments, the gray-level co-occurrence matrix, and the gray-level run-length matrix, and were analyzed by an independent sample t-test to observe differences in image texture with respect to radiation doses of 80, 150, 220, and 500 mAs. The results showed that three features-namely, global variance, energy, and run percentage, were not statistically significant ([Formula: see text]) for low doses with respect to 500 mAs. Hence, it is evident that these three dose-independent features can be used for disease monitoring with a low-dose imaging protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]