Search

Unlabelled: Bisphosphonates can increase bone mineral density (BMD) in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). In this study of adults with OI type I, risedronate increased BMD at lumbar spine (but not total hip) and decreased bone turnover. However, the fracture rate in these patients remained high., Introduction: Intravenous bisphosphonates given to children with OI can increase BMD and reduce fracture incidence. Oral and/or intravenous bisphosphonates may have similar effects in adults with OI. We completed an observational study of the effect of risedronate in adults with OI type I., Methods: Thirty-two adults (mean age, 39 years) with OI type I were treated with risedronate (total dose, 35 mg weekly) for 24 months. Primary outcome measures were BMD changes at lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH). Secondary outcome measures were fracture incidence, bone pain, and change in bone turnover markers (serum procollagen type I aminopropeptide (P1NP) and bone ALP). A meta-analysis of published studies of oral bisphosphonates in adults and children with OI was performed., Results: Twenty-seven participants (ten males and seventeen females) completed the study. BMD increased at LS by 3.9% (0.815 vs. 0.846 g/cm(2), p = 0.007; mean Z-score, -1.93 vs. -1.58, p = 0.002), with no significant change at TH. P1NP fell by 37% (p = 0.00041), with no significant change in bone ALP (p = 0.15). Bone pain did not change significantly (p = 0.6). Fracture incidence remained high, with 25 clinical fractures and 10 major fractures in fourteen participants (0.18 major fractures per person per year), with historical data of 0.12 fractures per person per year. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in fracture incidence in patients with OI treated with oral bisphosphonates., Conclusions: Risedronate in adults with OI type I results in modest but significant increases in BMD at LS, and decreased bone turnover. However, this may be insufficient to make a clinically significant difference to fracture incidence.

Context: Determining how quickly bisphosphonate treatment effects begin to regress is crucial when considering termination of treatment., Objective: Our objective was to assess the effects of 1 yr discontinuation of risedronate use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had previously received risedronate for 2 or 7 yr., Design and Setting: Before initiation of the current study, placebo/5-mg-risedronate patients had received placebo for 5 yr and risedronate for 2 yr, whereas 5-mg-risedronate patients had received risedronate for a total of 7 yr. Risedronate was then discontinued for 1 yr (yr 8)., Patients: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had previously completed the 3-yr Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy MultiNational (VERT-MN) pivotal trial, plus a 2-yr extension comparing risedronate or placebo for a total of 5 yr, followed by 2 yr of open-label risedronate treatment were enrolled in these trial extensions., Main Outcome Measures: Evaluations included changes in type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (NTX)/creatinine (Cr) and bone mineral density (BMD) values, fracture incidence, and adverse events., Results: After 1 yr of risedronate discontinuation, NTX/Cr levels increased toward baseline in both patient groups vs. the values at the end of yr 7. In both treatment groups, off-treatment total hip and femoral trochanter BMD values decreased, whereas lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD were maintained or slightly increased. The adverse event profiles were similar between the two treatment groups during yr 8., Conclusions: One year of discontinuation of risedronate treatment in patients who had received 2 or 7 yr of risedronate therapy led to increases in NTX/Cr levels toward baseline and decreases in femoral trochanter and total hip BMD.

Background: Tamoxifen has a protective effect on bone metabolism in breast cancer; aromatase inhibitors deleterious and that of fulvestrant is unknown., Methods: Fourteen locally advanced breast cancers with clinical benefit on fulvestrant (250 mg/month) as first-line primary endocrine therapy had sequential serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type 1 (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 18 months. Mean percentage changes (95% CI) were calculated., Results: Changes from baseline at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months with BAP (3.9-46.8 ng/ml) were +1.5 (-9.8 to +12.9), +2.2 (-22.1 to +26.6), +17.6 (-12.4 to +47.6), +10.8 (-29.9 to +51.7); with PINP (20.6-82.1 ng/ml) were +3.4 (-12.0 to 19.0), +18.8 (-36.7 to +74.2), +47.5 (-21.4 to 116.3), +33.3 (-49.5 to +116.1) and with CTX (0.14-1.35 ng/ml) were +30.8 (0.1 to +61.6), +13.9 (-22.3 to +50.2), +42.9 (-12.7 to +98.5), +45.2 (-28.3 to +118.8)., Conclusions: Long-term (18 months) stability of bone markers may be exploited by using fulvestrant earlier in sequence of endocrine therapies particularly in adjuvant setting in those with pre-existing decreased bone mass.

Purpose: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial (median follow-up, 68 months) has shown that adjuvant anastrozole has superior efficacy and better tolerability than tamoxifen. However, anastrozole reduces circulating estrogen, and low estradiol levels are associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. It is therefore important to understand the effects of long-term aromatase inhibitor therapy on BMD., Patients and Methods: This prospective substudy of the ATAC trial assessed BMD changes in postmenopausal women with invasive primary breast cancer receiving anastrozole (1 mg/d) or tamoxifen (20 mg/d) as adjuvant therapy for 5 years. Lumbar spine and total hip BMD were assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, and 5 years., Results: One hundred ninety-seven women from the monotherapy arms of the ATAC trial were recruited onto the bone substudy, and 108 were included in the primary analysis. Among anastrozole-treated patients, there was a decrease in median BMD from baseline to 5 years in lumbar spine (-6.08%) and total hip (-7.24%) compared with the tamoxifen group (lumbar spine, +2.77%; total hip, +0.74%). No patients with normal BMD at baseline became osteoporotic at 5 years., Conclusion: Anastrozole is associated with accelerated bone loss over the 5-year treatment period. However, although patients with pre-existing osteopenia are likely to require monitoring and bone-protection strategies, patients with normal BMD would not appear to require monitoring beyond the recommendation for healthy postmenopausal women. The effect of anastrozole on bone should be weighed against its superior efficacy and better tolerability profile versus tamoxifen in the main ATAC trial.

Unlabelled: Aromatase inhibitors reduce estrogen levels in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Residual estrogen is an important determinant of bone turnover. Adjuvant anastrozole was associated with significant BMD loss and increased bone remodeling, whereas tamoxifen reduced bone marker levels., Introduction: In the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial after a median follow-up of 68 months, a significant improvement in disease-free survival was observed with anastrozole treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97; p = 0.01). Anastrozole was also associated with tolerability benefits compared with tamoxifen, but with higher fracture rates. The HR of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen after 60 months of treatment was 1.49 (95% CI, 1.25-1.77)., Materials and Methods: This prospectively designed subprotocol (n = 308) of ATAC assessed changes in BMD and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with invasive primary breast cancer receiving anastrozole 1 mg/day, tamoxifen 20 mg/day, or combination treatment with both agents for 5 years. Patients with osteoporosis were excluded (osteopenia permitted at the investigators discretion). Lumbar spine and total hip BMD was assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years; bone turnover markers (serum C-telopeptide, urinary N-telopeptide [NTX], free deoxypyridinoline, serum procollagen type-1 N-propeptide, bone alkaline phosphatase [ALP]) were assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Results were expressed as median percentage change., Results: After 2 years of anastrozole treatment, BMD was lost at lumbar spine (median 4.1% loss) and total hip (median 3.9% loss) sites; increases of 2.2% and 1.2%, respectively, were observed with tamoxifen. After 1 year of anastrozole treatment, increased bone remodeling was observed (NTX, +15%; 95% CI, 3-25%; bone ALP, +20%; 95% CI, 14-25%); decreased bone remodeling was observed with tamoxifen (NTX, -52%; 95% CI, -62% to -33%; bone ALP, -16%; 95% CI, -24% to -11%)., Conclusions: Anastrozole is associated with significant BMD loss and a small increase in bone turnover, whereas tamoxifen (and the combination) is associated with increased BMD and decreased remodeling. These data may explain the increased fracture risk observed with anastrozole treatment in the ATAC trial. The impact of anastrozole on bone should be weighed against its overall superior efficacy and tolerability as observed in the main ATAC trial.

Osteoporosis is a serious complication of anorexia nervosa and in affected adolescents may result in a permanent deficit in bone mass. The pathophysiology of this bone disease has not been clearly defined. In this prospective study of 26 young women with anorexia nervosa aged 13-20 years (mean 16.5) we have measured changes in bone mineral density, total body composition and biochemical indices of bone turnover over 1 year. Over this period there was a mean weight gain of 10 kg and significant height gain with baseline and final values for body mass index of 14.2+/-1.7 and 17.6+/-2.3 kg/m2 (P<0.001). However, no significant changes were seen in bone mineral density in the spine or proximal femur during the study; total body bone mineral content was significantly higher than baseline at 3 months and 12 months (P=0.001 and P<0.0001), but total body bone mineral density at 3 months was significantly lower than baseline (P=0.003). Serum osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase values increased significantly and remained higher than baseline at all time points whereas urinary NTX/creatinine excretion showed a non-significant increase over the first 6 months of the study, but at 12 months, the mean value was significantly lower than baseline. Mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels showed a significant decrease at 6 months (P<0.05), but returned towards baseline thereafter. There was a significant increase in serum parathyroid hormone levels at all time points compared to baseline, these occurring within the normal range. These results indicate that although weight gain in young anorexics is associated with linear growth, bone mineral density does not increase. Whether this deficit can be corrected subsequently requires longer-term prospective studies.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a recently identified cytokine that acts as a decoy receptor for the receptor activator of NF kappa B ligand. OPG has been shown to be an important inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation and activation in rodent models. Estrogen is known to suppress bone resorption, and the action of estrogen on bone may be mediated by OPG. The relationship between endogenous estrogen and circulating OPG levels and bone status in human populations is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone density and circulating OPG and endogenous estradiol levels in a population-based cohort of postmenopausal women. Subjects were 180 women ages 55-91 yr (mean age, 67 yr). Serum estradiol was measured using an auto-analyzer. Serum concentrations of OPG were determined by ELISA. Markers of bone formation and resorption were measured by standard methods. Bone mineral density at total body, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. There was a significant inverse relationship between estradiol and all bone turnover markers (r-values from -0.46 to -0.23; P < 0.05). Serum estradiol was positively related to absolute bone density at all sites and to change in bone density at the hip and femoral neck by univariate analysis (r-values from 0.15-0.29; P < 0.05). We observed a weak inverse association between OPG and serum-based bone turnover markers (r-values -0.18 and -0.16; P < 0.05). There was a significant positive relationship between OPG and bone mineral density at total body, total hip, and femoral neck (r-values from 0.17-0.2; P < 0.05) by univariate analysis, which was lost after adjustment for age and body mass index. There was a significant weak positive relationship between circulating OPG and serum estradiol (r = 0.18; P < 0.02). We observed no significant relationships between OPG and bone turnover markers measured in urine. We conclude that the variation in circulating endogenous estradiol levels is an important factor contributing to levels of bone turnover and bone density at the menopause. Our observations also suggest that circulating levels of OPG may reflect OPG activity in bone and are related to circulating endogenous levels of estradiol. We have previously reported high levels of variability in urine markers of bone resorption, and we suggest that this could account for the absence of a significant association between these markers and circulating OPG.

Objective: To evaluate the anabolic effect of oestrogen on bone by comparing the response of markers of bone formation (and resorption) and bone mineral density (BMD) to subcutaneous oestradiol implants., Design: One year double-blind placebo controlled randomised study., Setting: Clinical research unit within a teaching hospital., Population: Twenty-one hysterectomised postmenopausal women were randomised to 25 mg oestradiol implants at baseline and at six months or to have a sham procedure at baseline and six months., Methods: BMD and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) were assessed at baseline and one year. Bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), osteocalcin (OC), free deoxypyridinoline (iFDPD), N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), serum oestradiol and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured at baseline, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks., Main Outcome Measures: Percentage change markers of bone turnover and PTH and change in oestradiol levels over first six months and percentage of changes in DXA and QUS over one year., Results: PINP, bone ALP and OC increased by 28%, 7% and 9%, respectively (P < 0.01) during the first four weeks of treatment and then decreased significantly. Lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) BMD increased by 5.4% and 6.0% (P < 0.001), respectively, and femoral neck (FN) BMD by 3.7% (P < 0.05) during the first year of treatment compared with control subjects. The peak serum oestradiol level was achieved four weeks after implant insertion. Mean PTH levels increased significantly in subjects receiving subcutaneous oestradiol., Conclusion: Subcutaneous oestrogen exerted an apparent anabolic effect on bone, which was initially reflected by an increase in bone formation markers and later by a large increase in BMD.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover may correlate with rates of bone loss in a group of postmenopausal women, but it is uncertain how useful they are in predicting rates of bone loss in the individual. The aim of this study was to determine the value of measurements of biochemical markers for the prediction of rates of bone loss in the individual. We studied 60 postmenopausal women (ages, 49-62 years), 43 of whom had gone through a natural menopause 1-20 years previously and 17 of whom had undergone hysterectomy 3-22 years ago. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) over 2-4 years. Bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [ibAP] and amino terminal of type I collagen [PINP] and osteocalcin [OC]) were measured in serum. Bone resorption markers (N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen [NTx] and immunoreactive free deoxypyridinoline [iFDpd]) were measured in urine and corrected for creatinine (Cr). Rates of bone loss were calculated as percent change per year. We found significant negative correlations (Spearman rank) between all measured biochemical markers and rate of change in bone density with r values ranging from -0.35 to -0.52. When markers and rates of bone loss were divided into tertiles, prediction of bone loss in an individual was poor (kappa < 0.2). There was an exponential relationship between rate of bone loss and years since menopause (YSM) in the 43 women having a natural menopause (r2 = 0.44; p = 0.008) indicating higher rates of loss in the early postmenopausal period. Levels of NTx, iFDpd, and PINP also showed a significant negative correlation with YSM. We conclude that there is a strong relationship between rates of spinal bone loss and levels of bone turnover markers. Although this is a small study, the results also suggest that using DXA measurements of the lumbar spine as the "gold standard," it is not possible to use biochemical markers to predict rate of bone loss in the individual.