Search

Objectives: The aim of this multicentre study was to demonstrate the safety and clinical performance of E-vita OPEN NEO Stent Graft System (Artivion, Inc.) in the treatment of aneurysm or dissection, both acute and chronic, in the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta., Methods: In this observational study of 12 centres performed in Europe and in Asia patients were enrolled between December 2020 and March 2022. All patients underwent frozen elephant trunk using E-vita OPEN NEO Stent Graft System. Primary end point was the rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days and secondary end points included further clinical and safety data are reported up to 3-6 months postoperatively., Results: A total of 100 patients (66.7% male; mean age, 57.7 years) were enrolled at 12 sites. A total of 99 patients underwent surgery using the E-vita OPEN NEO for acute or subacute type A aortic dissection (n = 37), chronic type A aortic dissection (n = 33) or thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 29), while 1 patient did not undergo surgery. Device technical success at 24 h was achieved in 97.0%. At discharge, new disabling stroke occurred in 4.4%, while new paraplegia and new paraparesis was reported in 2.2% and 2.2%, respectively. Renal failure requiring permanent (>90 days) dialysis or hemofiltration at discharge was observed in 3.3% of patients. Between discharge and the 3-6 months visit, no patients experienced new disabling stroke, new paraplegia or new paraparesis. The 30-day mortality was 5.1% and the estimated 6-month survival rate was 91.6% (standard deviation: 2.9)., Conclusions: Total arch replacement with the E-vita OPEN NEO can be performed with excellent results in both the acute and chronic setting. This indicates that E-vita OPEN NEO can be used safely, including in the setting of acute type A aortic dissection., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: The indications for use, evidence base and experience with the novel noncovered open hybrid surgical stents for acute type A aortic dissection repair for concurrent stabilization of the 'downstream' aorta remains limited. We review the evidence base and the development of these stents., Methods: Data were collected from Pubmed/Medline literature search to develop and review the evidence base for safety and efficacy of non-covered surgical stents. Existing guidelines for use and developments were reviewed., Results: A single randomized control trial and 4 single-centre studies were included in the review with a total worldwide experience of 241 patients. The deployment was easy and did not add significantly to the primary operation. The mortality and new stroke ranged from 6.3-18.7%. Safe and complete deployment was accomplished in 92-100%. There was no device-related reintervention. There was a significant improvement in malperfusion in over 90% of the cases with varying degrees of remodelling (60-90%) of the downstream aorta., Conclusions: Open noncovered stent grafts represent a major technical advancement as an adjunct procedure for acute dissection repairs, e.g. hemiarch repair. It has potential for wider use by non-aortic surgeons due to simplicity of technique. Limited safety and efficacy data confirm the device to be safe, feasible and reproducible with potential for wider adoption. However, long-term trial and registry data are required before recommendations for standard use outside of high-volume experienced aortic centres., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Age-related atherosclerosis has been shown to cause aortic stiffness and wall rigidification. This analysis aimed to correlate age and dissection extension length in a large contemporary multicentre study. We hypothesize that younger patients suffer more extensive DeBakey type I dissection due to aortic wall integrity, allowing unhindered extension within the layers., Methods: The perioperative data of 3385 patients from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A were retrospectively analyzed with regard to postoperative outcomes and dissection extension. Patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection (n = 2510) were retrospectively identified and divided into 2 age groups for comparison: ≤69 years (n = 1741) and ≥70 years (n = 769). Patients with DeBakey type II dissection or connective tissue disease were excluded from the analysis., Results: In younger patients (≤69 years), aortic dissection involved the supra-aortic vessels significantly more often (52.0% vs 40.1%; P < 0.001) and extended significantly further downstream the aorta: descending aorta (68.4% vs 57.1%; P < 0.001), abdominal aorta (54.6% vs 42.1%; P < 0.001) and iliac bifurcation (36.6% vs 26.0%; P < 0.001). Consequently, younger patients also presented with significantly higher incidences of preoperative cerebral (P < 0.001), spinal (P < 0.001), visceral (P < 0.001), renal (P = 0.013) and peripheral (P < 0.001) malperfusion. In older patients (≥70 years), dissection extent was significantly more often limited to the level of the aortic arch (40.9% vs 29.2%; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found with regard to 30-day mortality (20.7% vs 23.6%; P = 0.114)., Conclusions: Extensive DeBakey type I aortic dissection is less frequent in older patients ≥70 years than in younger patients. In contrast, younger patients suffer more often from preoperative organ malperfusion and associated complications. Postoperative mortality remains high irrespective of age groups., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The prevalence and aetiology of acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) in patients ≤30 years is unknown. The aims of this clinical study were to determine the prevalence and potential aetiology of AADA in surgically treated patients ≤30 years and to evaluate the respective postoperative outcomes in this selective group of patients in a large multicentre study., Methods: Retrospective data collection was performed at 16 participating international aortic institutions. All patients ≤30 years at the time of dissection onset were included. The postoperative results were analysed with regard to connective tissue disease (CTD)., Results: The overall prevalence of AADA ≤30 years was 1.8% (139 out of 7914 patients), including 51 (36.7%) patients who were retrospectively diagnosed with CTD. Cumulative postoperative mortality was 8.6%, 2.2% and 1.4%. Actuarial survival was 80% at 10 years postoperatively. Non-CTD patients (n = 88) had a significantly higher incidence of arterial hypertension (46.6% vs 9.8%; P < 0.001) while AADA affected the aortic root (P < 0.001) and arch (P = 0.029) significantly more often in the CTD group. A positive family history of aortic disease was present in 9.4% of the study cohort (n = 13)., Conclusions: The prevalence of AADA in surgically treated patients ≤30 years is <2% with CTD and arterial hypertension as the 2 most prevalent triggers of AADA. Open surgery may be performed with good early results and excellent mid- to long-term outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS) has been recently introduced as an alternative for total arch replacement in acute aortic dissection type A (AADA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes after AMDS treatment in a large contemporary cohort of AADA patients., Methods: Data acquisition was performed retrospectively at 2 German aortic centres between 2020 and 2022 and comprised the perioperative parameters and postoperative results of all AADA patients. All patients treated with the AMDS for AADA were included in the study. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were defined as early postoperative and AMDS-related complications., Results: Fifty-seven AADA patients treated by AMDS were included in the study group. The mean age was 64.6 ± 10.8 years and 59.7% (n = 34) were males. The actual in-hospital mortality was considerably lower than the predicted mortality risk by the German registry for acute aortic dissection type A score (16% vs 22%). The median ICU and in-hospital stay were 5 (interquartile range: 3-13) and 12 (interquartile range: 10-22) days, respectively. Postoperative complications comprised acute renal insufficiency (37%) with need for temporary (16%) or permanent dialysis (5%), delirium (26%), re-exploration for bleeding (14%), tracheostomy (14%) and new stroke (4%). A new AMDS-related complication (central stent collapse) was observed in 9% (n = 5) by postoperative computed tomography and chest X-ray. The incidence of complete central AMDS collapse did not impact 30-day mortality., Conclusions: The AMDS may be successfully used in AADA with acceptable 30-day mortality in accordance with the German registry for acute aortic dissection type A score. However, careful preoperative evaluation of the patient's individual aortic anatomy regarding potential contraindications and proper device implantation are strongly recommended to avoid complete central AMDS collapse., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Acute aortic dissection type A can occur in both genders at any age. Our aim was to report differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome in female and male patients with acute aortic dissection type A., Methods: Between July 2006 and June 2015, 56 centers participating in the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A reported on a total of 3380 patients. As many as 1234 (37%) were women and 2146 (63%) were men. We compared their clinical features and events occurring within 30 days after surgery., Results: Women were significantly older than male patients (65.5 ± 12.7 years vs 59.2 ± 13.3 years; P < .001). Aortic dissection extended down to the abdominal aorta in 43% men and 39% women (P = .01). Visceral (4.9% vs 7.3%; P = .006) and renal malperfusion (7.7% vs 10.6%; P = .006) were more frequently diagnosed in men. Aortic roots were replaced more frequently in men (22% vs 18%; P < .001). Different aortic arch repair strategies were distributed similarly in both genders. The incidence of new hemiplegia or hemiparesis was also similar in men and women (P = .24). Thirty-day mortality did not differ between women and men (16.3% vs 16.6%; P = .18). In a logistically mixed-effect model, gender revealed no influence on 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.44; P = .21)., Conclusions: Aortic dissection type A occurs almost twice as frequently in men. Women develop aortic dissection later in life. Despite women and men presenting at different ages and exhibiting varying dissection and malperfusion patterns, and the fact that men undergo complex proximal aortic repair more frequently, outcomes are similar in both genders., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Our study aim was to evaluate the impact of left subclavian artery (LSA) flow preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on outcome., Methods: Between August 2001 and October 2016, 176 patients (mean age, 61.3 ± 15.8 years) underwent TEVAR with complete LSA coverage. Fifty-five of those patients (31.3%) also underwent LSA revascularization, whereas 121 patients (68.7%) did not. Perioperative data were acquired retrospectively for statistical analysis at the three study institutions., Results: Overall in-hospital and follow-up mortality was 8.5% (n = 15) and 9.1% (n = 16), respectively, including 88 urgent and emergent cases (50%). Stroke (independent of location) and permanent paraplegia rates were 6.8% and 6.3%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Isolated upper-left extremity malperfusion exclusively occurred in 12 (9.9%) of the 121 patients without LSA revascularization. Left-hemispheric stroke was observed four times more often in patients without LSA revascularization and left arm malperfusion (16.7% versus 3.7%, p = 0.095). Multivariate analysis identified no LSA revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 3.779, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.096 to 13.029, p = 0.035), two or more endografts (OR 3.814, 95% CI: 1.557 to 9.343, p = 0.003), and coronary artery disease (OR 3.276, 95% CI: 1.262 to 8.507, p = 0.015) as independent risk factors for procedure-related adverse events (left-hemispheric stroke, left arm malperfusion, and permanent paraplegia) after TEVAR with complete LSA overstenting., Conclusions: Every 10th patient with LSA overstenting and no revascularization experienced left arm malperfusion. No LSA revascularization, extensive aortic coverage with two or more endografts, and coronary artery disease increased the risk of permanent paraplegia, left-hemispheric stroke, and left arm malperfusion. Patients should undergo LSA revascularization to prevent left vertebral artery-associated central neurologic complications and to maintain upper-left extremity perfusion., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The reattachment of the supra-aortic vessels during hybrid arch repair using a branched prosthesis is time consuming and sometimes technically challenging. Here, we describe the surgical technique of bridging the end-to-end anastomoses between the graft branches and the supra-aortic vessels by self-expanding covered stents to reduce suturing time, avoid anastomotic bleeding, enhance true lumen remodeling, and improve vessel alignment to the hybrid graft., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with acute aortic dissections involving the arch and descending aorta can effectively be treated using the frozen elephant trunk technique. We describe here the novel technique of temporary banding of the descending aorta onto the stent of the hybrid graft in 3 patients who developed unmanageable bleeding from the distal suture line due to retrograde false lumen perfusion and disintegration of the adventitia. Retrograde false lumen perfusion was stopped and therefore bleeding controlled in all patients. Temporal aortic banding represents a novel, feasible, and effective bailout technique for otherwise unmanageable bleeding with fatal outcome in hybrid arch surgery., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Surgical therapy for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) in octogenarians carries high morbidity and mortality. The role of isolated medical treatment in this setting is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine whether risk of surgery for AADA outweighs risk of death from medical treatment only., Methods: From 2002 to 2015, 90 consecutive octogenarians (mean age, 83.5 ± 3 years) were treated for AADA at three institutions: 67 patients underwent surgery, 23 patients received medical treatment. Analysis of early and late outcome was performed., Results: Patients in the medical treatment group were significantly older than in the surgical group (84.9 ± 3.7 vs 83 ± 2.5 years, P  = 0.008) and in a more critical state. In patients undergoing surgical repair, perioperative mortality was 14.9% ( n  = 10). Rate of prolonged ventilation (63.2% vs 5.9%; P  < 0.001) and renal failure (35.1% vs 5.9%, P  = 0.029) was significantly higher in the surgical group. Thirty-day survival was impaired in the medical treatment group (34.8% vs 61.2% in the surgical group; P  = 0.032). Coronary artery disease (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.16-13.49; P  = 0.029) and complicated dissections (OR 5.28, 95% CI 1.48-18.88; P  = 0.010)-composite variable of preoperative resuscitation, neurological injury and malperfusion-emerged as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in the surgical group. There was no difference in long-term survival., Conclusions: Emergency surgery for AADA in octogenarians is associated with relatively high intraoperative mortality and may reasonably be avoided in patient with complicated presentation. Despite better immediate survival after surgery, long-term survival does not differ between medical and surgical patients, reflecting the extremely advanced point in life cycle octogenarians., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The study was conducted to evaluate, on the basis of a multicentre analysis, current results of elective open aortic arch surgery performed during the last decade., Methods: Data of 1232 consecutive patients who underwent aortic arch repair with reimplantation of at least one supra-aortic artery between 2004 and 2013 were collected from 11 European cardiovascular centres, and retrospective statistical examination was performed using uni- and multi-variable analyses to identify predictors for 30-day mortality. Acute aortic dissections and arch surgeries not involving the supra-aortic arteries were not included., Results: Arch repair involving all 3 arch arteries (total), 2 arch arteries (subtotal) or 1 arch artery (partial) was performed in 956 (77.6%), 155 (12.6%) and 121 (9.8%) patients, respectively. The patients' characteristics as well as the surgical techniques, including the method of cannulation, perfusion and protection, varied considerably between the clinics participating in the study. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 11.4 and 8.8% for the entire cohort, respectively, ranging between 1.7 and 19.0% in the surgical centres. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified surgical centre, patient's age, number of previous surgeries with sternotomy and concomitant surgeries as independent risk factors of 30-day mortality. The follow-up of the study group was 96.5% complete with an overall follow-up duration of 3.3 ± 2.9 years, resulting in 4020 patient-years. After hospital discharge, 176 (14.3%) patients died, yielding an overall mortality rate of 25.6%. The actuarial survival after 5 and 8 years was 72.0 ± 1.5% and 64.0 ± 2.0, respectively., Conclusions: The surgical risk in elective aortic arch surgery has remained high during the last decade despite the advance in surgical techniques. However, the patients' characteristics, numbers of surgeries, the techniques and the results varied considerably among the centres. The incompleteness of data gathered retrospectively was not effective enough to determine advantages of particular cannulation, perfusion, protection or surgical techniques; and therefore, we strongly recommend further prospective multicentre studies, preferably registries, in which all relevant data have to be clearly defined and collected., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate, with an 'all-comers' approach, the survival and outcome of patients following secondary surgical or interventional procedures after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)., Methods: Between October 2002 and December 2013, 371 patients with different aortic pathologies underwent primary TEVAR at our institution. Fifty-six out of the 371 patients (15.1%, 18 females, mean age 62.3 ± 13.7 years) required secondary procedures, either interventionally (N = 31; 55.4%) or surgically (N = 25; 44.6%), due to stent graft-related complications. After TEVAR complications comprised endoleaks (N = 28; 7.5%), organ malperfusion (N = 9; 2.4%), aorto-oesophageal/-bronchial fistulae (N = 9; 2.4%), stent graft infections (N = 4; 1.1%), aneurysm progression (N = 3; 0.8%), retrograde type A aortic dissection (N = 2; 0.5%) and aortic regurgitation (N = 1; 0.3%)., Results: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10.7% (N = 5): open surgery (N = 1; 4%) versus reintervention (N = 5; 16%; P = 0.14). The cumulative survival rates after secondary procedures at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years were 80.4, 73.5 and 69.3%, respectively. Postoperative complications either for open surgery or reintervention comprised stroke (8 vs 9.6%; P = 0.82), paraplegia (4 vs 6.4%; P = 0.68), renal failure (16 vs 3.2%; P = 0.09), respiratory failure (12 vs 0%; P = 0.04), sepsis (16 vs 3.2%; P = 0.87), organ malperfusion (4 vs 3.2%; P = 0.87) and need for a tertiary procedure (8 vs 6.4%; P = 0.82)., Conclusions: Stent graft complications after primary TEVAR were not infrequent and often required secondary procedures for definite treatment. Endoleaks (type Ia), organ malperfusion, stent graft infections, fistula formation and expanding aneurysm occurred predominantly during early and mid-term follow-up. Despite the high-risk nature of the complications, secondary open surgical or interventional procedures may be successfully performed with an acceptable outcome., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Unresolved for over half a century now since the beginning of aortic surgery spinal cord injury (SCI) remains the most devastating complication after extensive open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA/A) repair. Over the past decade extensive research on spinal cord perfusion lead to a better understanding of previously unknown physiologic mechanisms involved in the suspension of the cord's arterial supply and the consecutive development of SCI underscoring the need for new concepts in treatment strategy and monitoring methods during and after TAA/A repair. Based on this knowledge, new treatment strategies in particular the staged-repair were developed. The first-in-man translation of this idea has just been published introducing the new concept: minimally invasive selective segmental artery coil-embolization. Another approach to overcome the most critical initial period after segmental artery occlusion due to stent graft deployment in the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta is temporary aneurysm sac perfusion, which also has recently been clinically trialed. Furthermore, the new non-invasive real-time monitoring method to record spinal cord viability by means of near-infrared spectroscopy of the paraspinal collateral network by means of near-infrared spectroscopy has also been suggested and successfully introduced in a pilot series to a clinical setting. This review addresses problems, unsolved questions and future perspectives regarding these three new concepts.

Objectives: To learn upon incidence, underlying mechanisms and effectiveness of treatment strategies in patients with central airway and pulmonary parenchymal aorto-bronchial fistulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)., Methods: Analysis of an international multicentre registry (European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications) between 2001 and 2012 with a total caseload of 4680 TEVAR procedures (14 centres)., Results: Twenty-six patients with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range: 60-77) (35% female) were identified. The incidence of either central airway (aorto-bronchial) or pulmonary parenchymal (aorto-pulmonary) fistulation (ABPF) in the entire cohort after TEVAR in the study period was 0.56% (central airway 58%, peripheral parenchymal 42%). Atherosclerotic aneurysm formation was the leading indication for TEVAR in 15 patients (58%). The incidence of primary endoleaks after initial TEVAR was n = 10 (38%), of these 80% were either type I or type III endoleaks. Fourteen patients (54%) developed central left bronchial tree lesions, 11 patients (42%) pulmonary parenchymal lesions and 1 patient (4%) developed a tracheal lesion. The recognized mechanism of ABPF was external compression of the bronchial tree in 13 patients (50%), the majority being due to endoleak formation, further ischaemia due to extensive coverage of bronchial feeding arteries in 3 patients (12%). Inflammation and graft erosion accounted for 4 patients (30%) each. Cumulative survival during the entire study period was 39%. Among deaths, 71% were attributed to ABPF. There was no difference in survival in patients having either central airway or pulmonary parenchymal ABPF (33 vs 45%, log-rank P = 0.55). Survival with a radical surgical approach was significantly better when compared with any other treatment strategy in terms of overall survival (63 vs 32% and 63 vs 21% at 1 and 2 years, respectively), as well as in terms of fistula-related survival (63 vs 43% and 63 vs 43% at 1 and 2 years, respectively)., Conclusions: ABPF is a rare but highly lethal complication after TEVAR. The leading mechanism behind ABPF seems to be a continuing external compression of either the bronchial tree or left upper lobe parenchyma. In this setting, persisting or newly developing endoleak formation seems to play a crucial role. Prognosis does not differ in patients with central airway or pulmonary parenchymal fistulation. Radical bronchial or pulmonary parenchymal repair in combination with stent graft removal and aortic reconstruction seems to be the most durable treatment strategy., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate whether longevity after mechanical aortic root replacement is influenced by the patient's gender., Methods: From February 1998 to June 2011, 476 patients (376 men, 100 women, mean age, 53±12 years; range, 18-88) underwent composite aortic root replacement. Of these patients, 398 (312 men) were included in the present analysis. The indications for root replacement were aortic valve dysfunction (mostly stenosis) and concomitant aneurysmal disease in 334 (83.9%), acute type A aortic dissection in 51 (12.8%), and infective endocarditis in 10 (2.5%). Other indications were technical or anatomic considerations (0.8%)., Results: The women who presented for surgery were significantly older (men, 52±12 years vs women, 56±12 years; P=.01). However, no significant differences were found with regard to previous cardiac surgery (5.3%, 20 men [6.4%] vs 1 woman [1.2%]; P=.06), concomitant procedures (38%; 117 men [37.5%] vs 35 women [40.7%]; P=.62), or additive EuroSCORE (men, 5.1±2.2; women, 5.2±2.2; P=.55). The mean diameter of the ascending aorta was not significantly different between the 2 groups (men, 54±9 mm; women, 56±14 mm; P=.97). The median follow-up period was 7.4 years (range, 0-13; 2366 cumulative patient-years), with no significant difference in hospital mortality (men, 6.7% vs women, 10.5%; P=.25). Overall, men enjoyed significantly better longevity than did women. After 10 years, 73%±3% of the men and only 60%±6% of the women were alive (P=.03). Although no long-term survival benefit for either gender was found in an age-matched subgroup among young patients (P=.66), men experienced much more favorable longevity after 55 years of age (P=.04). Consequently, the longevity in men-but not in women-was equal to an age-matched normal population., Conclusions: Overall, long-term survival after mechanical aortic root replacement was significantly better among men. However, comparing age-matched subgroups≤55 years old, no significantly different life expectancy was found after mechanical root replacement., (Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For more than half a century ischemic spinal cord injury (SCI) and consecutively permanent paraplegia remained the most devastating complication after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Various neuroprotective strategies (e.g., motor-/somatosensory evoked potential monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid drainage) used as adjuncts have lowered the SCI; maybe most importantly, the modern collateral network (CN) has begun to replace the classic understanding of spinal cord blood supply implying several consequences. Reliable non-invasive tools to monitor cord perfusion to detect imminent spinal cord malperfusion, ischemia and forthcoming neurologic injury (particularly early postoperatively) is not available, neither is a reliable strategy to prevent ischemic injury during distal circulatory arrest and after segmental artery occlusion. Currently, two promising new concepts--potentially advancing spinal protection in open and endovascular TAAA repair--address these issues: 1) non-invasive real-time monitoring of the paraspinous CN-oxygenation via near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as an alternative to the demanding direct neuromonitoring; and 2) preconditioning of the CN as minimally invasive, endovascular "first stage" to increase the resilience of spinal cord perfusion prior to definite aortic repair. This article illustrates both concepts discussing: 1) the clinical application of thoracic and lumbar collateral NIRS monitoring to indirectly detect spinal cord hypoperfusion; and 2) minimally invasive selective segmental artery coil-embolization (MISACE) for (arteriogenic) preconditioning of the CN prior to extensive open or endovascular staged TAAA repair.

Background: The impact of antegrade versus retrograde perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass on short- and long-term outcome after repair for acute type A aortic dissection is controversial., Methods: We reviewed 401 consecutive patients (age, 59.2 ± 14 years) with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent aggressive resection of the intimal tear and aortic replacement (March 1995 through July 2011). Arterial perfusion was antegrade in 78% (n = 311), either by means of the right axillary artery (n = 297) or through direct aortic cannulation (n = 15). Retrograde perfusion through the femoral artery was used in 22% (n = 90)., Results: Of the 401 patients with acute type A aortic dissection, 16% (n = 64) presented in critical condition and 10% (n = 39) entered the operating room under cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In 14% (n = 54) the dissection did not extend beyond the ascending aorta (DeBakey II); 82% of dissections did involve at least the aortic arch (n = 326, DeBakey I+III). Mean age was not significantly different between patients undergoing antegrade (59.4 ± 14 years) versus retrograde (59.2 ± 13 years; p = 0.489) perfusion. Operative mortality was 20% and did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.766); postoperative stroke occurred also with a similar prevalence (antegrade, 15% versus retrograde, 18%; p = 0.623). Patients undergoing antegrade perfusion had a better long-term survival. Survival at 10 years after discharge was 71% versus 51% (p = 0.025) in favor of antegrade perfusion. Retrograde perfusion was identified to be an independent risk factor for late mortality in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 2; p = 0.009)., Conclusions: Survival during the initial perioperative period was equivalent comparing antegrade and retrograde perfusion. Antegrade perfusion to the true lumen, however, appears to be associated with superior long-term survival after hospital discharge., (Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Hybrid endovascular procedures are rapidly evolving and have recently been adopted for high-risk patients deemed unsuitable for conventional aortic arch surgery. We describe here our initial experience with this technique, including the management of 2 patients who developed a retrograde type A aortic dissection post-de-branching., Methods: Between May 2010 and October 2012, 109 patients underwent conventional aortic arch repair at our institution. A further 9 high-risk patients with complex aortic arch pathology (median logistic EuroSCORE: 26, range: 11-41) were deemed unsuitable for conventional total aortic arch replacement and therefore underwent hybrid aortic arch repair. Complete supra-aortic de-branching, followed by endovascular stent-grafting (TEVAR) of the transverse arch and descending aorta, was performed in these high-risk patients., Results: In-hospital mortality was zero and no patient developed paraplegia/paraparesis due to spinal cord ischaemia. However, 2 patients (22%) developed retrograde type A aortic dissection on Days 10 and 12 post-TEVAR. Both patients had a dilated ascending aorta and received a stent graft containing bare metal springs at the proximal end. Emergency ascending aortic replacement was performed during moderate-to-mild hypothermia (28-34°C) and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion via cannulation of the de-branching prosthesis. A Hemashield prosthetic graft was anastomosed to the proximal stent graft in an elephant trunk technique. Both patients suffered from minor non-debilitating stroke, with 1 being discharged home and 1 transferred to a neurological rehabilitation centre 2 and 3 weeks after reoperation, respectively., Conclusions: Retrograde type A aortic dissection after hybrid endovascular treatment of the aortic arch represents a new-most likely under-reported-pathology that may be successfully treated with open surgical repair. The use of stent grafts with protruding proximal bare springs and the implementation of oversizing and post-deployment ballooning should be avoided in patients undergoing hybrid arch procedures, particularly if the ascending aorta is dilated.

We describe the case of an 11-year-old girl with an abdominal neuroblastoma which was operated and intraoperatively irradiated nine years ago. After six years, she developed stenoses of the infrarenal abdominal aorta and both renal arteries. Initial treatment of the stenosed vessels comprised endovascular balloon dilatations and repeated stent-graft implantations, including drug eluting stents. However, severe in-stent stenoses occurred during follow-up and the girl developed acute renal failure. Open surgery was performed with two extra-anatomic bypasses, a thoracic-to-abdominal aortic bypass and a left iliac-to-renal bypass, on an urgent basis. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged home two weeks after the operation with full recovery of renal function. We conclude that endovascular stent-graft placement in children can only be a palliative treatment due to outgrowing of the stent-graft and the potential risk of re-stenosis, especially after a history of irradiation. Vascular surgery with placement of extra-anatomic bypasses will provide a definite treatment.

Objectives: Repair of thoracic aneurysms (TA) involving the ascending, arch, and descending aorta results in substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates outcomes with a two-stage elephant trunk (ET) technique., Methods: Two hundred and fifteen consecutive patients (pts) underwent total arch replacement using an ET (02/90-09/06). One hundred and thirty-nine pts (65%), group PC (planned completion; median age 68; 28-86 years), had extensive descending TA (Ø>/=5 cm) or dissections requiring complete repair. Seventy-six pts (35%), group CS (close surveillance; median age: 68; 20-87 years), had less severe distal dilatation (Ø

Background: The tendency of Dacron vascular grafts to expand after placement in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta has been noted, but never described in detail., Methods: From 1986 to 2005, two or more computed tomography studies were obtained as part of routine postoperative surveillance in patients with Dacron grafts implanted to replace diseased aortic segments. Scans were digitized to evaluate the entire thoracic aorta. The median diameters of 547 grafts (18 to 34 mm) in the ascending (349) and descending (198) aorta were calculated from more than 2,000 postoperative computed tomography scans., Results: In scans obtained 7 or fewer days after implantation, the median graft diameters increased from the manufacturer's measurement by 17% in the ascending aorta (n = 169; interquartile range, 11% to 21%; p < 0.0001) and 21% in the descending aorta (n = 63; interquartile range, 12% to 25%; p < 0.0001). From an initial scan within 30 days to at least one other within 18 months after implantation, ascending aorta grafts dilated further, at a median rate of 2.8% per year (n = 143; interquartile range, -2.2% to +6.9%; p = 0.0001). Descending grafts dilated less markedly: 1.1% per year (n = 80; interquartile range, -4.0% to +6.1%; p = 0.14). After 18 months, median graft expansion gradually diminished to less than 1% per year., Conclusions: Significant initial expansion and early growth of woven vascular Dacron grafts occurs; it is slightly different in the ascending and descending aorta. Graft expansion should be anticipated when selecting grafts for aortic valve-sparing procedures to prevent development of regurgitation, and, for endoluminal repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, to prevent development of type III endoleaks in the projected landing zone.

Objective: Aortic endovascular stent-graft implantation is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. Overstenting of the left subclavian artery may be necessary to create a satisfactory proximal 'landing zone' for the stent-graft. Few cases have been published reporting adverse neurological events after overstenting of the left subclavian artery. We thus evaluated whether this procedure is associated with a higher rate of neurological complications by focusing on the management of the supra-aortic vessels., Methods: Twenty patients suffering from aortic arch aneurysms (n=3), descending aortic aneurysms (n=7), acute (n=6) and chronic (n=4) type-B aortic dissections underwent stent-graft repair with complete (n=14) or partial (n=6) overstenting of the left subclavian artery. Three patients underwent overstenting of the entire aortic arch with ascending aortic-bi-carotid bypass grafting. One patient with right carotid and vertebral artery occlusion underwent initial carotid-to-subclavian bypass. All patients subsequently underwent neurological examination and Doppler ultrasound for detection of neurological and peripheral vascular complications., Results: Aortic stent-graft repair was successful in all patients without acute neurologic complications. Two patients developed late central adverse neurological events: right-sided vertebral artery occlusion with brainstem infarction (n=1) and impaired binocular vision combined with dizziness (n=1), necessitating secondary subclavian transposition in one patient. Peripheral symptoms related to occlusion of the left subclavian artery were observed in five patients as sensory and motoric deficits of the left hand and arm., Conclusions: Overstenting of the left subclavian artery as treatment of aortic pathologies in high-risk patients is feasible but associated with the risk of neurological complications and peripheral symptoms. Side effects were mild or transient in most of our patients. Detailed preoperative exploration of vascular anatomy and pathology via Doppler ultrasound, CT- or MRI scan is mandatory to avoid adverse neurological events. Prior surgical revascularization of the left subclavian artery is essential in patients with high-grade stenoses, occlusions, or anatomic variants of the supra-aortic branches. Delayed surgical revascularization is necessary only in patients with relevant subclavian steal syndrome or severe peripheral vascular symptoms.

Background: Thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic stent-graft repair has shown a reduction in morbidity and mortality rates due to the procedure's advantages (no aortic cross-clamping, continuous distal aortic perfusion, no reperfusion injury). However, 3% to 12% of the patients are at risk of spinal cord ischemia. We investigated spinal cord protective measures with evoked potentials, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and prevention of hypotension to minimize postoperative neurologic deficit., Methods: Between November 2000 and July 2005, vital parameters and spinal cord function were monitored, including cerebrospinal fluid pressure and transcranial motor-evoked and somatosensory-evoked potentials in 36 stent-graft procedures (31 patients) on the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta., Results: Stent-graft placement was technically successful in all patients. We achieved a survival rate of 100% without neurologic deficit after fast-track extubation. Eleven of 31 patients exhibited changes in evoked potentials during stent-graft deployment. In 12 of 31 patients (including the 11 with evoked potential alterations), cerebrospinal fluid pressure exceeded 15 mm Hg. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and vital parameter adjustment were executed in those instances. We observed intraoperative evoked potential total recovery in 10 of 11 patients after these interventions., Conclusions: Interventions to improve spinal cord perfusion led to total recovery of spinal function in most patients (10/11). Therefore, spinal cord protective measures with motor- and somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and prevention of hypotension can reduce the incidence of spinal cord ischemia and improve the neurologic outcome of patients undergoing endovascular thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of neurophysiological monitoring during thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular stent graft implantation., Methods: The spinal cords of 21 patients undergoing endovascular stent graft implantation on the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored with transcranial motor-evoked potentials (tcMEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP). All patients underwent mild systemic hypothermia (34-35 degrees C), constant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and vital parameter monitoring. If CSF pressure exceeded 15 mmHg, CSF-drainage was carried out., Results: Three of the 21 patients (14%) exhibited short-term loss of tcMEP and SSEP after the deployment of the self-expanding endoprosthesis. We observed an intraoperative recovery of the evoked potentials in all cases. CSF-drainage was necessary in three of them. One patient, whose potentials were stable intraoperatively, developed paraparesis 3 weeks after the intervention., Conclusions: Neurophysiological monitoring has proved to be an ideal monitoring method to detect spinal cord ischemia during thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular stent graft implantation. Due to the advantages of endovascular therapy (no aortic cross-clamping, continuous distal perfusion, and no reperfusion injury), changes in potentials were seldom observed.

Objective: To prevent clamp injury that may occur during aortic surgery, we aimed to develop a special balloon occlusion (BO) device to lower the thromboembolic risk in patients with severe atherosclerosis during aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: The study comprised two test phases: a laboratory-testing series focussing on flexible artificial aortas, and an experimental series conducted on 10 pigs., Results: The device proved to be effective during the laboratory tests and the experiments on pigs. No complications such as intraoperative balloon rupture, dislocation, or occlusion leaks occurred. No damage to the aortic vessels was observed in further histological examinations., Conclusions: This BO device has the potential to become an alternative to cross-clamping for vascular surgeons in patients with severely atherosclerotic vessels., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)