Search

Background: DREAM-GLOBAL (Diagnosing hypertension-Engaging Action and Management in Getting Lower Blood Pressure in Indigenous and low- and middle-income countries) studied a SMS text messaging-based system for blood pressure measurement and hypertension management in Canadian Aboriginal and Tanzanian communities. The use of SMS text messages is an emerging point of interest in global health care initiatives because of their scalability, customizability, transferability, and cost-effectiveness., Objective: The study aim was to assess the effect on the difference in blood pressure reduction of active hypertension management messages or passive health behavior messages. The system was designed to be implemented in remote areas with wireless availability. This study described the implementation and evaluation of technical components, including quantitative data from the transmission of blood pressure measurements and qualitative data collected on the operational aspects of the system from participants, health care providers, and community leadership., Methods: The study was implemented in six remote Indigenous Canadian and two rural Tanzanian communities. Blood pressure readings were taken by a community health worker and transmitted to a mobile phone via Bluetooth, then by wireless to a programmed central server. From the server, the readings were sent to the participant's own phone as well. Participants also received biweekly tailored SMS text messages on their phones. Quantitative data on blood pressure reading transmissions were collected from the study central server. Qualitative data were collected by surveys, focus groups, and key informant interviews of participants, health care providers, and health leadership., Results: In Canada, between February 2014 and February 2017, 2818 blood pressure readings from 243 patients were transmitted to the central server. In Tanzania, between October 2014 and August 2015, 1165 readings from 130 patients were transmitted to the central server. The use of Bluetooth technology enabled the secure, reliable transmission of information from participants to their health care provider. The timing and frequency were satisfactory to 137 of 187 (73.2%) of participants, supporting the process of sending weekly messages twice on Mondays and Thursdays at 11 am. A total of 97.0% (164/169) of the participants surveyed said they would recommend participation in the DREAM-GLOBAL program to a friend or relative with hypertension., Conclusions: In remote communities, the DREAM-GLOBAL study helped local health care providers deliver a blood pressure management program that enabled patients and community workers to feel connected. The technical components of the study were implemented as planned, and patients felt supported in their management through the SMS text messaging and mobile health program. Technological issues were solved with troubleshooting. Overall, the technical aspects of this research program enhanced clinical care and study evaluation and were well received by participants, health care workers, and community leadership., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02111226; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02111226., (©Jordan Andrea Barsky, Rebekah Hunter, Colin McAllister, Karen Yeates, Norm Campbell, Peter Liu, Nancy Perkins, Diane Hua-Stewart, Marion A Maar, Sheldon W Tobe. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 09.12.2019.)

The ability to reliably evaluate the impact of interventions and changes in hypertension prevalence and control is critical if the burden of hypertension-related disease is to be reduced. Previously, a World Hypertension League Expert Committee made recommendations to standardize the reporting of population blood pressure surveys. We have added to those recommendations and also provide modified recommendations from a Pan American Health Organization expert meeting for "performance indicators" to be used to evaluate clinical practices. Core indicators for population surveys are recommended to include: (1) mean systolic blood pressure and (2) mean diastolic blood pressure, and the prevalences of: (3) hypertension, (4) awareness of hypertension, (5) drug-treated hypertension, and (6) drug-treated and controlled hypertension. Core indicators for clinical registries are recommended to include: (1) the prevalence of diagnosed hypertension and (2) the ratio of diagnosed hypertension to that expected by population surveys, and the prevalences of: (3) controlled hypertension, (4) lack of blood pressure measurement within a year in people diagnosed with hypertension, and (5) missed visits by people with hypertension. Definitions and additional indicators are provided. Widespread adoption of standardized population and clinical hypertension performance indicators could represent a major step forward in the effort to control hypertension., (©2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Accurate blood pressure measurement is critical to properly identify and treat individuals with hypertension. In 2005, the Canadian Hypertension Education Program produced a revised algorithm to be used for the diagnosis of hypertension. Subsequent annual reviews of the literature have identified 2 major deficiencies in the current diagnostic process. First, auscultatory measurements performed in routine clinical settings have serious accuracy limitations that have not been overcome despite great efforts to educate health care professionals over several years. Thus, alternatives to auscultatory measurements should be used. Second, recent data indicate that patients with white coat hypertension must be identified earlier in the process and in a systematic manner rather than on an ad hoc or voluntary basis so they are not unnecessarily treated with antihypertensive medications. The economic and health consequences of white coat hypertension are reviewed. In this article evidence for a revised algorithm to diagnose hypertension is presented. Protocols for home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are reviewed. The role of automated office blood pressure measurement is updated. The revised algorithm strongly encourages the use of validated electronic digital oscillometric devices and recommends that out-of-office blood pressure measurements, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (preferred), or home blood pressure measurement, should be performed to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Directly measured blood pressure (BP) data have not been collected in Canada since the Canadian Heart Health Surveys, conducted between 1985 and 1992. Because hypertension is often asymptomatic, a large proportion of those with the condition are unaware of it., Data and Methods: These analyses use BP and heart rate (HR) data from cycle 1 of the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) for respondents aged 6 to 79 years. Methods and quality assurance and control procedures are explained. Logistical and feasibility issues that arose during data collection are discussed. The reasons for repeating a series of measures are given. Between- and within- series variations and inter-tester variability are assessed., Results: The BP and HR of almost all respondents who attended the examination centre were measured. Only one series of measurements was taken for 88% of respondents. The series was repeated for around 5% with variability in their BP or HR measurements. About 3% had HR or BP values above the screening cut-offs for the fitness tests. Almost 35% of respondents with HR or BP values above the screening cut-offs after their first series had values below the cut-points after the second series; a further 3% had values below after the third series. Within a series of six measurements, BP decreased until about the fourth measure, after which it remained stable. Mean BP and HR values indicated no inter-tester variability., Interpretation: The protocol for measuring BP and HR by oscillometry in the CHMS appears to have produced reliable estimates. No benefit to repeating the series of six measurements a third time for screening purposes is evident. Four measurements may be sufficient to provide reliable BP and HR data. Oscillometry appears to eliminate inter-tester variability.

In 1995, the Calgary Fire Department developed a program to assess blood pressure in community fire stations, selected businesses and public venues. The program has gradually expanded. Currently, all 30 fire stations across Calgary, Alberta assess blood pressures for the public seven days per week throughout the year. Since 1995, there have been 10,883 measurements in 3477 people. Most people (2106) assessed had hypertensive readings, and 72 had readings greater than 220 mmHg systolic or greater than 120 mmHg diastolic, and were referred for immediate medical assessment. The program has been recently integrated into a more global vision for the prevention and control of cardiovascular disease in Calgary. Future plans include offering lipid assessments, assisting other communities to adopt the program and using the program to provide physical measures (of blood pressure, glucose, total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, height and weight) to an ongoing questionnaire that surveys the health of Calgarians. The history of the program, its training methods, quality control, preliminary results and future plans are presented in detail to provide an example of a community-based program that could aid in the detection, monitoring and awareness of hypertension.

Objective: To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of high blood pressure in adults., Options: For people with high blood pressure, the assignment of a diagnosis of hypertension depends on the appropriate measurement of blood pressure, the level of the blood pressure elevation, the duration of follow-up and the presence of concomitant vascular risk factors, target organ damage and established atherosclerotic diseases. For people diagnosed with hypertension, defining the overall risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes requires laboratory testing, a search for target organ damage and an assessment of the modifiable causes of hypertension. Out-of-clinic blood pressure assessment and echocardiography are options for selected patients., Outcomes: People at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and were identified and quantified., Evidence: Medline searches were conducted from the period of the last revision of the Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension (May 1998 to October 2000). Reference lists were scanned, experts were polled, and the personal files of the subgroup members and authors were used to identify other studies. All relevant articles were reviewed and appraised, using prespecified levels of evidence, by content experts and methodological experts., Values: A high value was placed on the identification of people at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality., Benefits, Harms and Costs: The identification of people at higher risk of cardiovascular disease will permit counselling for lifestyle manoeuvres and the introduction of antihypertensive drugs to reduce blood pressure for patients with sustained hypertension. In certain settings, and for specific classes of drugs, blood pressure lowering has been associated with reduced cardiovascular morbidity and/or mortality., Recommendations: The present document contains detailed recommendations pertaining to aspects of the diagnosis and assessment of patients with hypertension, including the accurate measurement of blood pressure, criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension and recommendations for follow-up, routine and optional laboratory testing, assessment for renovascular hypertension, home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and the role of echocardiography in hypertension., Validation: All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the Canadian Hypertension Recommendations Working Group. Only the recommendations achieving high levels of consensus are reported here. These guidelines will be updated annually., Endorsement: These recommendations are endorsed by the Canadian Hypertension Society, The Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control, The College of Family Physicians of Canada, The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, The Adult Disease Division and Bureau of Cardio-Respiratory Diseases and Diabetes at the Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control of Health Canada.

Objective: Self-measurement of blood pressure is commonly performed by those persons with hypertension and is advocated in many national hypertension guidelines. We examined accuracy of readings, patient knowledge, and preparation for readings, technique and equipment., Design: The study was a prospective observational design. Sixty-nine hypertensive patients were recruited from a tertiary referral center and by newspaper advertisement. All patients had previously self-measured their blood pressure. The patients initially measured their blood pressure under direct supervision in a clinic using their usual preparation, technique and their own equipment. Then after a five-min rest, blood pressures were measured twice both by research nurse and the patient in an alternating sequence. The nurse used a standardized blood pressure measurement technique., Results: Inadequate patient knowledge and performance of measurement technique and inaccurate equipment was common. The average initial patient systolic reading prior to the five-minute rest was higher than that of the trained nurse (9.1 +/- 13 mmHg systolic, p < 0.001 and 1.5 +/- 8.0 mmHg diastolic, p = 0.12). Almost half (42%) of the initial patient blood pressure readings differed in classification of hypertension/normotension from the nurse. The difference between the patient and nurse readings after the five-min rest was 3.8 +/- 11.8 / 1.1 +/- 6.8 mmHg., Conclusions: Care must be taken in interpreting patient self-measured blood pressure unless there has been adequate training and assessment of patient and equipment accuracy. Studies of health care professionals reveal similar problems therefore widespread efforts to standardize blood pressure measurement are necessary.

Background: Standardized measurement of blood pressure is widely recommended but rarely applied in usual clinical practice., Objective: To determine the differences resulting from physicians using standardized and usual (casual) techniques for measurement of blood pressure., Methods: Blood pressures measured by a research nurse, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular mass index were used as standards for comparison., Results: Use of casual technique resulted in blood pressure readings higher than those obtained by standardized technique, namely 6.2 (3.1-9.3) systolic and 3.9 (2.4-5.4) diastolic mmHg [means (95% confidence intervals)], and readings that were more variable. Sixty-two patients (42%) were classified normotensive by standardized techniques but hypertensive by physicians casual technique. When standardized technique was used 22 patients (15%) were classified hypertensive but blood pressure readings in normal range were obtained by usual technique. Measurements obtained using standardized technique were less variable and were significantly correlated to left ventricular mass index., Conclusion: Using standardized technique is important if one is to classify the blood pressures of patients correctly. Use of usual or casual technique results in higher, more variable readings that are not related to left ventricular mass index. Results of this study strongly support recommendations that standardized technique should be used for assessing the cardiovascular risk of all adult patients.

Background: Although there is a theoretical basis for crossing legs to increase blood pressure, there are no published data addressing this question. As a result guidelines for measurement of blood pressure are not consistent in recommending that patients legs should not be crossed during measurement., Objective: To determine the effect of crossing legs on blood pressure., Methods: Fifty healthy volunteers and 53 patients with hypertension were randomly allocated in a study with a cross-over design to having seated blood pressure measured with their legs in three different positions: feet flat on the floor and legs crossed using two common methods. The blood pressures were assessed by an investigator who was blinded to the leg positions and used a fully automated sphygmomanometer., Results: Crossing legs during blood pressure measurement increased systolic (by average 8.1 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 5.1-11.1 mmHg for method 1; 10.5 mmHg, 6.5-14.6 mmHg for method 2) and diastolic (by 4.5 mmHg, 1.5-7.5 mmHg for method 1; 4.0 mmHg, 2.0-6.0 mmHg for method 2) blood pressures in patients who have hypertension. Crossing legs increased systolic blood pressure (by 2.5 mmHg, 1.3)3.8 mmHg for method 1; 2.3 mmHg, 0.9-3.7 mmHg for method 2) in the healthy volunteers but had little effect on diastolic blood pressure. The cardiovascular-risk class increased for a large number of the hypertensive patients but for fewer of the normotensive subjects., Conclusions: Blood pressure increases when legs are crossed and this increases the estimation of cardiovascular risk for many patients. Care should be taken to ensure that the patients feet are flat on the floor when measuring their blood pressure.

For effective self-measurement of blood pressure, patients need to be able to obtain accurate and reproducible measurements. Criteria for measuring blood pressure have been well developed in research studies, and through the use of standardized training programs it has been established that nonmedically trained individuals can obtain valid measurements. These recommendations for blood pressure measurement were adapted to the self-measurement situation. Either manual sphygmomanometers or automated electronic devices can be used effectively. Although automated devices may be easier to use, the health care practitioner should ensure that any such device has been demonstrated to be accurate and reliable before its adoption. There are no reported programs available for training individuals in the use of self-measurement. A check-list has been developed for use by health care practitioners. It is estimated that proper training will usually take more than 20 mins. Since many health care practitioners do not use the recommended blood pressure measurement technique, there is also a need to develop programs to 'train the trainers'. Finally, individuals undertaking regular self-measurement should have their technique and the calibration of their instruments checked at regular intervals (six to 12 months).

Equipment for the self-measurement of blood pressure is readily available to consumers. These devices use one or more surrogate (indirect) measures of pressure to estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Manual auscultatory devices using stethoscope and sphygmomanometer have been adapted for home use, but a variety of automated devices based on auscultation, oscillometry, and other techniques are available and may be more suitable for individuals who have limited vision, hearing or dexterity. Despite the existence of voluntary evaluation protocols and mandatory manufacturing standards, blood pressure readings from some automatic devices may not be accurate. Some devices are packaged with insufficient information to ensure proper use, and most individuals need some form of guidance in their use and calibration testing. If self-measurement of blood pressure is to be of benefit, the health care professional must recommend only those devices that are accurate and suitable to the patient or client. The Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control will endeavour to develop a regular means by which health care professionals can keep informed of available devices for blood pressure self-measurement.

The literature on the benefits and risks of self-measurement of blood pressure and interpretation of the readings was reviewed. Self-measurement of blood pressure is useful in selected patients with high blood pressure, can be used to monitor blood pressure closely outside health care facilities, and can determine whether patients have white coat hypertension. The involvement of patients in their own blood pressure management is increased and self measurement may result in more rapid achievement of target blood pressure readings, improvement in adherence to antihypertensive therapy and decreased health care utilization. However, some patients may not be suited to monitor their own blood pressure and some may experience an increase in anxiety regarding their health. With careful training and selection of patients, most can accurately assess their blood pressure. Self-measured readings are generally lower than readings in a physician's clinic (or office) and this must be accounted for in assessing response to therapy and usual levels of blood pressure. Self-measured readings are a valuable supplement to clinic readings in many patients.

Objective: To provide health care professionals with guidelines on the use of blood pressure self-measurement., Methods: Recommendations were devised after consideration of expert reviews and guidelines, personal files, international standards documents, personal communication with investigators and the results of a MEDLINE search (1966-94) using the term 'blood pressure determination'., Benefits, Harms, Costs: Self-measurement of blood pressure can be used to detect white coat hypertension, monitor changes in blood pressure closely, more rapidly achieve desired blood pressure goals, increase adherence to antihypertensive therapy and improve patient self-reliance. However, self-measured blood pressure readings may be misleading because there is insufficient normative, prognostic and outcome data and because some patients may not take accurate measurements. The use of self-measurement of blood pressure has a relatively small direct cost and may result in an overall reduction in treatment costs., Recommendations: Self-measured blood pressure readings can be a valuable supplement to clinic (or office) blood pressure readings. However, self-measurement is appropriate neither for patients who are physically or mentally incapable of accurate assessment and interpretation of readings nor for those who do not want to participate. Patients who self-monitor blood pressure require careful training in blood pressure measurement and instruction on the recording and interpretation of blood pressure readings. Advice to patients using monitoring equipment must take into account the needs and abilities of the patient. Although only a few electronic devices for the self-measurement of blood pressure have met recommended performance standards, their use may be more appropriate for some patients and the training requirements fewer than if manual devices are used., Validation: The guidelines of several expert groups were examined in the preparation of these recommendations. The recommendations were presented at the World Conference on Hypertension Control in 1995 and were reviewed by the parent societies of the Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control.

As part of the Coalition's mandate to promote the prevention and control of high blood pressure in Canada, an interdisciplinary Workgroup was established to review and update the existing standards (1987) for blood pressure measurement and referral guidelines. The intent was to prepare a scientifically based document which contained practical guidelines for the measurement of blood pressure and criteria for follow-up, and one which promoted the concept of cardiovascular health in the assessment and interpretation of blood pressure readings. These guidelines were primarily developed to assist primary health care providers and/or clinicians to assess, monitor, counsel, refer, and develop treatment plans for adults-at-risk for high blood pressure or those with the confirmed diagnosis of hypertension. Readers are referred to The Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference series (Canadian Medical Association Journal 1993) for specific guidelines on the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of hypertension. The document is divided into three sections: 1. Measurement of blood pressure 2. Criteria for follow-up 3. Guidelines for lifestyle counselling Each section cites the references used in developing the guidelines and where relevant, identifies other resources which can be used in clinical practice.

This article reviews the recommended techniques for accurate and reproducible blood pressure measurements. The scientific basis underlying current recommendations for blood pressure measurement is presented. Many of the current recommendations are not followed in ambulatory care clinics and this paper will show how measurement errors in excess of 15 mm Hg or more can occur. Many patients will be misclassified and treated inappropriately when errors in blood pressure measurement of this magnitude are made. Rigorous adherence to proper blood pressure measurement is necessary to evaluate a patient's risk of cardiovascular disease, and to assess the need or efficacy of antihypertensive therapy.

This article reviews the current recommendations on equipment when blood pressure is measured by sphygmomanometer. The scientific rationale underlying the current recommendations for selection and maintenance of blood pressure measuring equipment is presented. The errors that can occur when the recommendations are not followed are quantified whenever the data are available. Inadequate assessment and maintenance of equipment often lead to the use of faulty equipment, and as a result errors in the assessment of patients' blood pressure are likely to be common. If followed, the current guidelines for use and maintenance of equipment would remove most of the problems noted. Physicians must ensure that properly maintained and appropriate equipment is used to measure blood pressure.

Accurate, reproducible blood pressure readings are more difficult to obtain in the elderly. Elderly patients have more variable blood pressure, show a reduction in blood pressure following meals, and can have postural hypotension, discrepancies in blood pressure between arms, auscultatory gaps and 'pseudohypertension', all of which can mislead clinicians regarding these patients' usual blood pressure. Arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, make accurate blood pressure determination difficult and are more common in the elderly. Prostatic hypertrophy causing high pressure urinary retention is suggested as a common and reversible cause of hypertension in older men. Proper measurement of blood pressure in elderly patients demands additional thought and action, all of which are necessary for accurate cardiovascular risk assessment and proper therapeutic decisions. Increasing the number of visits and the number of carefully taken blood pressure readings per visit will result in a more accurate assessment of blood pressure in older patients.

This article reviews patient-related factors affecting blood pressure measurement and provides the scientific rationale underlying current recommendations for the measurement of blood pressure in the evaluation of hypertension. Information is included on the magnitude of errors that can occur when the recommendations are not followed. A variety of factors relating to the patient's emotions, activity, bodily function and environment cause blood pressure to fluctuate throughout the day such that peak systolic and diastolic blood pressures are often twice as high as trough levels. Many physicians fail to account for these factors when assessing a patient's blood pressure. Errors in the classification and treatment of a patient's blood pressure and the finding of labile blood pressure can occur often when patients are not adequately prepared in advance of the blood pressure measurement.

The recommended techniques to measure blood pressure for assessment of hypertension are seldom followed in the ambulatory care setting. This study has found that interns and first-year family practice residents have significant deficits in their knowledge and use of the recommended techniques to measure blood pressure. The results suggest that inadequacies exist in the teaching of blood pressure measuring techniques in our medical schools, the consequences of which are misdiagnosis and improper treatment of high blood pressure.

This study was performed to determine the blood pressure measuring techniques and accuracy of sphygmomanometers used by physicians in ambulatory care clinics on the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland. Of the 114 participating physicians, no physician completely followed all the recommended BP measuring techniques of the American Heart Association. Almost all physicians supported the patient's arm at heart level to measure BP. Fewer physicians used the following recommended techniques; palpation to initially assess systolic BP (38%), measurement of BP in both arms (23%), an appropriate rate of cuff deflation (18%), measurement of BP in recommended patient positions (10%), the appropriate length of rest (4%) or use of a cuff of appropriate size (3%). Approximately 8% of mercury sphygmomanometers were out of calibration by at least 4 mmHg but none were out by more than 6 mmHg. Forty percent of aneroid sphygmomanometers were out of calibration by at least 4 mmHg and of these 30% were out by 10 mmHg or more. Mercury and aneroid sphygmomanometers were used by 60% of physicians. Aneroid sphygmomanometers were used exclusively by 34% of physicians, while 5% of physicians relied solely on mercury devices. Standardized techniques for BP measurement are not used and inaccurate sphygmomanometers are common; these factors may lead to misclassification of blood pressure and inappropriate treatment of patients.

The diagnosis of mild hypertension and the treatment of hypertension require accurate measurement of blood pressure. Blood pressure readings are altered by various factors that influence the patient, the techniques used and the accuracy of the sphygmomanometer. The variability of readings can be reduced if informed patients prepare in advance by emptying their bladder and bowel, by avoiding over-the-counter vasoactive drugs the day of measurement and by avoiding exposure to cold, caffeine consumption, smoking and physical exertion within half an hour before measurement. The use of standardized techniques to measure blood pressure will help to avoid large systematic errors. Poor technique can account for differences in readings of more than 15 mm Hg and ultimately misdiagnosis. Most of the recommended procedures are simple and, when routinely incorporated into clinical practice, require little additional time. The equipment must be appropriate and in good condition. Physicians should have a suitable selection of cuff sizes readily available; the use of the correct cuff size is essential to minimize systematic errors in blood pressure measurement. Semiannual calibration of aneroid sphygmomanometers and annual inspection of mercury sphygmomanometers and blood pressure cuffs are recommended. We review the methods recommended for measuring blood pressure and discuss the factors known to produce large differences in blood pressure readings.