Search

Purpose of Review: To review the findings of trials evaluating pharmacological treatment approaches for hypertension in general, and resistant hypertension (RH) in particular, and propose future research and clinical directions., Recent Findings: RH is defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains above target levels despite adherence to at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Thus far, clinical trials of pharmacological approaches in RH have focused on older molecules, with spironolactone being demonstrated as the most efficacious fourth-line agent. However, the use of spironolactone in clinical practice is hampered by its side effect profile and the risk of hyperkalaemia in important RH subgroups, such as patients with moderate-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Clinical trials of new molecules targeting both well-established and more recently elucidated pathophysiologic mechanisms of hypertension offer a multitude of potential treatment avenues that warrant further evaluation in the context of RH. These include selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs), activators of the counterregulatory renin-angiotensin-system (RAS), vaccines, neprilysin inhibitors alone and in combined formulations, natriuretic peptide receptor agonists A (NPRA-A) agonists, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) agonists, centrally acting aminopeptidase A (APA|) inhibitors, antimicrobial suppression of central sympathetic outflow (minocycline), dopamine β-hydroxylase (DβH) inhibitors and Na+/H+ Exchanger 3 (NHE3) inhibitors. There is a paucity of data from trials evaluating newer molecules for the treatment of RH. Emergent novel molecules for non-resistant forms of hypertension heighten the prospects of identifying new, effective and well-tolerated pharmacological approaches to RH. There is a glaring need to undertake RH-focused trials evaluating their efficacy and clinical applicability.

Background: Recent sham-controlled randomized clinical trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN). Long-term safety and efficacy data beyond 3 years are scarce. Here, we report on outcomes after RDN in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension with an average of ≈9-year follow-up (FU). Methods: We recruited patients with resistant hypertension who were previously enrolled in various RDN trials applying radiofrequency energy for blood pressure (BP) lowering. All participants had baseline assessments before RDN and repeat assessment at long-term FU including medical history, automated office and ambulatory BP measurement, and routine blood and urine tests. We analyzed changes between baseline and long-term FU. Results: A total of 66 participants (mean±SD, 70.0±10.3 years; 76.3% men) completed long-term FU investigations with a mean of 8.8±1.2 years post-procedure. Compared with baseline, ambulatory systolic BP was reduced by −12.1±21.6 (from 145.2 to 133.1) mm Hg (P <0.0001) and diastolic BP by −8.8±12.8 (from 81.2 to 72.7) mm Hg (P <0.0001). Mean heart rate remained unchanged. At long-term FU, participants were on one less antihypertensive medication compared with baseline (P =0.0052). Renal function assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate fell within the expected age-associated rate of decline from 71.1 to 61.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Time above target was reduced significantly from 75.0±25.9% at baseline to 47.3±30.3% at long-term FU (P <0.0001). Conclusions: RDN results in a significant and robust reduction in both office and ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP at ≈9-year FU after catheter-based RDN on less medication and without evidence of adverse consequences on renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Disturbance of sympathetic and vagal nervous system participates in the pathogenesis of hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF). Renal denervation (RDN) can modulate autonomic nervous activity and reduce blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients. We aimed to evaluate the effect of RDN combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with AF and hypertension. Methods: Clinical trials including randomized data comparing PVI plus RDN vs PVI alone were enrolled. Primary outcome was incidence of AF recurrence after procedure. Results: A total of 387 patients, of them 252 were randomized and were enrolled. Mean age was 57 ± 10 years, 71% were male, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.4% ± 6.9%. Follow‐up for randomized data was 12 months. Overall comparison for primary outcome showed that PVI + RDN was associated with significantly lower AF recurrence as compared with PVI alone (35.8% vs 55.4%, P < 0.0001). This advantageous effect was consistently maintained among randomized patients (37.3% vs 61.9%, odds ratio = 0.37, P = 0.0001), and among patients with implanted devices for detection of AF recurrence (38.9% vs 61.6%, P = 0.007). Post‐hoc sensitivity and regression analysis demonstrated very good stability of this primary result. Pooled Kaplan‐Meier analysis further showed that PVI + RDN was associated with significantly higher freedom from AF recurrence as compared with PVI alone (log‐rank test, P = 0.001). Besides, RDN resulted in significant BP reduction without additionally increasing the risk of adverse events. Conclusions: RDN may provide synergetic effects with PVI to reduce the burden of AF and improve BP control in patients with AF and uncontrolled hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]