Search

Purpose: Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESSDN) is a feasible and effective procedure because of its non-invasiveness and better cosmetic outcomes. However, there have been few multi-institutional studies conducted by multiple surgeons on LESSDN. We retrospectively compared the clinical data and outcomes between LESSDN and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) at multiple institutes in Japan.Materials and Methods: From 2009 to 2015, the clinical data of 223 donors who underwent LESSDN and 151 donors who underwent LDN were collected from 10 institutes. All LESSDNs were performed transperitoneally, whereas LDNs were performed transperitoneally (P-LDN) in 75 patients and retroperitoneally (R-LDN) in 76 patients.Results: In the LESSDN group, the single-incision site was pararectal in 155 (69.5%) patients and umbilical in 65 (29.1%) patients. Multiple surgeons (one to eight per institute) performed the LESSDN. No significant differences were observed between the three groups regarding estimated blood loss and warm ischemic time. The operative time was significantly shorter in the LESSDN group than in the R-LDN group (p = 0.018). No significant differences were observed regarding the rates of blood transfusion, open conversion, visceral injuries, and postoperative complications. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed regarding the dose of analgesic and the rate of delayed graft function. One patient required open conversion due to injury to the renal artery. Selection of LESS procedure was not an independent risk factor for the median serum creatinine level of above 1.27 mg/dL in recipients at 1 year after kidney transplantation.Conclusion: The results showed the technical feasibility of LESSDN compared with the standard LDNs in a multi-institutional and multi-surgeon setting. A few observed non-negligible complications and the significantly higher levels of serum creatinine in patients who underwent LESSDN indicate that this procedure should be employed cautiously when performed by surgeons without ample experience in performing LESS procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Urachal remnants are relatively rare. Generally, urachal remnants are detected in young people, and the removed specimen is small, comprising a good indication for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for urachal remnants is considered to be safe and result in an excellent cosmetic outcome. Therefore, we report our single-center experience with LESS for urachal remnants. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with urachal remnants who underwent LESS from January 2011 to December 2017. The patients' characteristics, surgical data, postoperative pain, and cosmetic assessment results were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: Mean total operative time was 151 min, mean pneumoperitoneal surgery time was 83 min, and mean estimated blood loss was 5.0 mL. All patients were started on an oral diet and began ambulating on postoperative day 1. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days. LESS was completed successfully in all patients, with no conversion to conventional or open surgery. Conclusions: LESS is a viable option for the surgical treatment of urachal remnants. This technique may result in less pain than conventional techniques. Further accumulation of surgical outcomes (especially regarding safety and cosmesis) is required for LESS to become an established treatment for urachal remnants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The host-related risk factors for surgical difficulty of partial nephrectomy include the presence of thick and adherent adipose tissue surrounding the kidney (adherent perinephric fat [APF]). The kidney and perirenal fat must be isolated in donor nephrectomy. Thus, APF is an important surgery-related factor. We analyzed whether the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score is related to APF and surgical outcomes in laparoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN). Forty-six donors who underwent LESS-DN were selected. Determination of APF was based on a retrospective review of video-recorded surgical procedures during anterior perinephric fat dissection. The MAP score was evaluated from computed tomography images. Data regarding patient characteristics and operative outcomes were collected. We then examined the MAP score, APF, and related factors. Eleven patients (23.9%) had APF. The patients were divided into 2 groups (MAP score of 0 points and ≥ 1 point). The 2 groups showed significant differences in sex, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, and history of dyslipidemia. The operation time was significantly longer and the estimated blood loss volume was higher in patients with a MAP score of ≥ 1. Eight of 9 patients with a MAP score of ≥ 1 had APF. The only significant differences between patients with and without APF were in the body mass index, history of hypertension, and history of dyslipidemia. The operation time was significantly longer and the estimated blood loss volume was larger in patients with APF. The MAP score could be useful when predicting surgical difficulty in patients undergoing LESS-DN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To compare diameter-axial-polar nephrometry score with RENAL nephrometry score for surgical outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 134 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, using diameter-axial-polar and RENAL scores. We analyzed data for warm ischemic time and estimated blood loss intraoperatively, and percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Both scores were classified as low-, middle- and high-risk, and were used to compare the three analyzed parameters. Results The median tumor size was 2.3 cm (range 1.0-5.4 cm); warm ischemic time was 25.4 min (range 6.5-57 min); and at 6 months and 1 year, percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was 93% (range 51.7-133.3%) and 91% (range 49.4-137.6%), respectively. There were no significant differences in warm ischemic time and estimated blood loss for RENAL between risk groups ( P = 0.38 and 0.09, respectively), but significant differences between groups for diameter-axial-polar score ( P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences in either score between groups for percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 6 months and 1 year. A total of 27 high-risk cases with a diameter-axial-polar score of seven points underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy safely; all three cases with a diameter-axial-polar score of eight points were converted to open partial nephrectomy. Conclusions Diameter-axial-polar score seems to estimate the complexity of tumor characteristics in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy better than RENAL score. It has a better correlation with warm ischemic time and estimated blood loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]