1. Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia.
- Author
-
McIntyre HD, Gibbons KS, Ma RCW, Tam WH, Sacks DA, Lowe J, Madsen LR, and Catalano PM
- Subjects
- Adult, Australia, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, Canada, Diabetes, Gestational metabolism, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin metabolism, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, SARS-CoV-2, United Kingdom, Blood Glucose metabolism, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Diabetes, Gestational diagnosis, Glucose Tolerance Test methods, Missed Diagnosis statistics & numerical data, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control
- Abstract
Aims: We assessed how altered diagnostic processes and criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) recommended by the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and Australia for use during the COVID-19 pandemic would affect both GDM frequency and related adverse outcomes., Methods: Secondary analysis of 5974 HAPO study women with singleton pregnancies who underwent 75 g OGTTs and HbA1c assays between 24 and 32 weeks' gestation and who received no treatment for GDM., Results: All post COVID-19 modified pathways reduced GDM frequency - UK (81%), Canada (82%) and Australia (25%). Canadian women whose GDM would remain undetected post COVID-19 (missed GDMs) displayed similar rates of pregnancy complications to those with post COVID-19 GDM. Using UK modifications, the missed GDM group were at slightly lower risk whilst the women missed using the Australian modifications were at substantially lower risk., Conclusions: The modifications in GDM diagnosis proposed for the UK, Canada and Australia result in differing reductions of GDM frequency. Each has both potential benefits in terms of reduction in potential exposure to COVID-19 and costs in terms of missed opportunities to influence pregnancy and postpartum outcomes. These factors should be considered when deciding which protocol is most appropriate for a particular context., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF