1. A comparison of the usage of an open-source automated insulin delivery system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in real-world settings: the AWeSoMe study group.
- Author
-
Landau Z, Lebenthal Y, Mazor-Aronovitch K, Brener A, Levek N, Jacobi-Polishook T, Ben Ari T, Abiri S, Haim A, Nir J, Rachmiel M, and Pinhas-Hamiel O
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Child, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin analysis, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring methods, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood, Insulin Infusion Systems, Insulin administration & dosage, Insulin therapeutic use, Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage, Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use, Blood Glucose analysis
- Abstract
Purpose: In recent years there has been a noticeable increase in the use of advanced hybrid closed-loop systems (AHCLs) for managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) among youth. However, there is a lack of comparison between the open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system (780 G)., Methods: In this multi-center study, we retrospectively compared selected glycemic ranges of 26 individuals who used open-source AID and 20 individuals who used 780 G (age 11.3 years [IQR 9.3, 12.9] and 13.4 years [IQR 10.9, 16.5], respectively, p = 0.069) from system initiation to the most recent visit., Results: At baseline, the median HbA1c was significantly lower and the time below range (TBR)
<54mg/dL was significantly higher in the open-source AID group compared to the 780 G group (6.8% [IQR 6.4, 7.1] vs. 7.4% [IQR 6.9, 8.6], p = 0.006 and (1.0% [IQR 0.5, 2.8] vs. 0.0% [0.0, 1.0], p = 0.014), respectively; the median time in range (TIR70-180mg/dL ) was similar (p = 0.068). After a median duration of 10.9 months on AHCLs the reduction of HbA1c was similar ( ~ 0.3%). The time spent in the hypoglycemic ranges was longer among users of the open-source AID compared to 780 G (TBR54-70mg/dL 4.2% [IQR 2.6, 7.3] vs. 2.0% [1.0, 4.0], p = 0.005) and TBR<54mg/dL 1.1% [IQR 0.4, 2.3] vs. 0.0 [0.0, 1.0], p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Both AHCLs similarly improved HbA1c and TIR70-180mg/dL . The open-source AID youth had better glycemic control but spent longer time in the hypoglycemic range. These findings must be considered when choosing the use of AHCL technologies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF