1. Cost Analysis of a Multidisciplinary Vascular Anomaly Clinic.
- Author
-
Straughan, Alexander J., Mudd, Pamela A., Silva, Allison L., Callicott, Susan S., Krakovsky, Gina, and Bauman, Nancy M.
- Subjects
- *
CLINICS , *MEDICAL appointments , *BLOOD-vessel abnormalities , *VASCULAR surgery , *ENDOSCOPY , *HEALTH care teams , *HOSPITAL charges , *SCLEROTHERAPY , *MEDICAL lasers , *MEDICAL care costs , *NURSE practitioners , *PHYSICIANS , *QUALITY assurance , *RADIOLOGISTS , *INTERVENTIONAL radiology , *WAGES , *THERAPEUTIC embolization , *COST analysis , *HUMAN services programs , *GENERAL anesthesia , *TERTIARY care , *ECONOMICS , *BLOOD disease treatment - Abstract
Objective: Multidisciplinary vascular anomaly clinics (VACs) offer important value to pediatric patients with complex vascular anomalies whose care overlaps specialties. These clinics are labor intensive and costly to operate since providers see fewer patients compared to their individual specialty clinic. Our North American tertiary care institution's VAC specialists include a pediatric otolaryngologist, pediatric surgeon, pediatric plastic surgeon, pediatric dermatologist, and interventional radiologist. To assess financial feasibility, we conducted a cost analysis of our VACs comprised of 2 half-day multidisciplinary physician attended clinics (5 specialists at our main campus and 2 specialists at a satellite clinic) and a half-day nurse practitioner clinic. Method: Assessment of net revenue based on net collections for clinic, professional, operative, hospital setting, and facility charges generated during 12 consecutive monthly VACs beginning July 1, 2015. Expense calculations included provider and staff salaries, benefits, supply costs, and clinic leasing costs. Results: There were 469 clinic visits, of which 202 were new patient evaluations. Sixty-eight patients underwent 93 procedures under general anesthesia, including procedures performed by our interventional radiologist, most commonly sclerotherapy or embolization (n = 37), surgical interventions including endoscopy (n = 36), or laser procedures (n = 20). Three patients were admitted. Fifty-seven patients received a new diagnosis different from that for which they were referred. Gross revenue was $1 810 525, and net revenue was 42.5%, or $783 152. Expenses totaled $453 415 for a net positive revenue of $329 737. Conclusion: When including direct downstream revenue, particularly from operative procedures, our VAC program operates on a net positive margin, making the program financially feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF