Search

Background and Aims: The aim of our study is to evaluate the possible urodynamic effect of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing PUL placement were consecutively enrolled in two centers. Inclusion criteria: ≥50 years of age, benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) ≥ 13, prostate volume ≤ 60 mL, and no middle prostate lobe. All patients were evaluated using a detailed clinical history, a validated questionnaire, flexible cystoscopy, and pressure flow studies (PFS) at baseline. PFS were performed at 6 months to evaluate the urodynamic effect of PUL. Results: Overall, 20 patients with a median age of 63 were enrolled. At six months, statistically significant improvements in terms of median Qmax (11.5 vs. 8.5; p < 0.05) and median IPSS (16 vs. 10.5; p < 0.05) were recorded, and sexual function was maintained. All urodynamic parameters improved at 6 months, and significance was reached for all values except for PdetQmax. Finally, Schäfer's class improved from a median of III to a median of II. More specifically, 16/20 presented an improvement in the Schäfer class, and 12/20 patients presented a BOOI < 20 at 6 months. Conclusions: PUL represents an effective treatment in patients with LUTS due to BPH and improves bladder outlet obstruction without any effect on sexual function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To confirm the correlation between post-void residual urine ratio (PVR-R) and BOO diagnosed by pressure-flow studies (PFS) in males with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and to develop a clinical nomogram. Methods: A consecutive series of patients aged 45 years or older with non-neurogenic LUTS were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent standard diagnostic assessment for BOO including International Prostatic Symptoms Score, uroflowmetry, urodynamic studies, suprapubic ultrasound of the prostate, and ultrasound measurements of the bladder wall thickness (BTW). PVR-R was defined as follows: PVR-R = (PVR/total Bladder Volume [BV]) × 100). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate predictors of pathological bladder emptying (BOO) defined as Schafer > II. A nomogram to predict BOO based on the multivariable logistic regression model was then developed. Results: Overall 335 patients were enrolled. Overall, 131/335 (40%) presented BOO on PFS. In a multivariable logistic age-adjusted regression model BWT (odds ratio [OR]: 2.21 per mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–3.09; p = 0.001), PVR-R (OR: 1.02 per %; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; p = 0.034) and prostate volume (OR: 0.97 per mL; 95% CI, 0.95–0.98; p = 0.001) were significant predictors for BOO. The model presented an accuracy of 0.82 and a clinical net benefit in the range of 10–90%. Conclusions: The present study confirms the important role of PVR-ratio in the prediction of BOO. For the first time, we present a clinical nomogram including PVR-ratio for the prediction of BOO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]