Search

Obesity and weight gain represent a challenging issue in people suffering from schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses (SMI). Most of clinical guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in people with SMI share a stepwise approach starting with more conservative interventions, with diet, physical activity, lifestyle coaching and behavioral modifications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a group weight management program in a real-world outpatient Italian setting. Data from 100 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, undergone to a group metabolic management program, were analyzed through a 12 months follow-up. The main body weight (kgs) decreased from 98.01±18.30 at baseline to 93.29±17.36 (p>0.001) at 6 months to 90.35±17.90 at 12 months. Parallel statistically significant decreases were found for BMI, waist circumference, glycaemia and systolic blood pressure. After patients' segmentation into normal-weight, overweight and obese at baseline, the significant of the decrease emerged only between baseline and the 6-month endpoint, thus suggesting that the program was successful in the short-term. Notwithstanding the limitations of the study, the 12-month intervention evaluated demonstrated feasibility and a high retention rate. This allowed a relevant weight reduction during the first six months, followed by durable maintenance until the end of the study. Current NICE recommendation guidance indicates that people with SMI, particularly those on antipsychotic treatment, should be provided with integrated nutrition and exercise programmes by their healthcare professional. Future research should focus on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this kind of interventions and their reliability in the different real-world healthcare settings.

Background: Treatment-resistant bipolar depression is one of the leading problems in psychiatry with serious consequences on patients functioning, quality of life and resource utilization. Despite this, there is a lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria and treatment algorithms., Objective: The objective of the present study is to assess the acute effectiveness and tolerability of cariprazine in the management of treatment resistant bipolar depression., Methods: This is a four weeks retrospective multicentric observational study on patients with treatment resistant bipolar depression receiving cariprazine in augmentation to the current treatment. Cariprazine dosage changed during the follow-up period according to clinical judgment. Since data followed a non-normal distribution, non-parametric tests were used to pursue the analysis. The effectiveness of cariprazine was assessed through the mean change in Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) scores from baseline to endpoint. For missing values, a "Last Observation Carried Forward" approach was applied., Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. Four patients (7.8%) discontinued cariprazine mainly due to adverse events. Mean cariprazine dose was 1.7 mg/day. The mean HAM-D score decreased significantly from baseline (T0) to week 4 (T4) at each evaluation point. Fourty-five one percent of the patients benefited of cariprazine add-on strategy: 23.5% achieved a clinical response and 21.6% were remitters. Among the completers, 70.6% experienced at least one adverse event. All side effects were mild to moderate., Conclusion: Cariprazine seems to be an effective and well tolerated option in the management of patients with treatment resistant bipolar depression., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background and objectives : Aripiprazole is a first-line agent in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) and available data demonstrates its efficacy on clinical symptoms in serotonin reuptake inhibitors-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Therefore, aripiprazole augmentation to mood stabilizers could represent a promising treatment in BD patients with comorbid OCD. The study examined the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole added to lithium or valproate for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms in euthymic BD patients with comorbid OCD. Materials and methods : This is a 12-week prospective observational study. The efficacy of aripiprazole on OC symptoms was assessed through the mean change of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive (YBOCS) total score. Tolerability was assessed with the Utvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side effect scale and by reporting adverse events. Results : A total of 70 patients were included in the analyses. The withdrawal rate was 21.4%, mainly due to adverse events. Mean ± SD final aripiprazole dose was 15.2 ± 5.3 in the completer sample ( N = 55). The Y-BOCS mean score decreased from 24.0 ± 4.1 at baseline to 17.1 ± 4.3 at 12 weeks. Treatment response rate (Y-BOCS reduction ≥ 35%) was 41.8%, while partial response rate (Y-BOCS reduction greater than 25% but less than 35% from baseline) accounted for the other 18.2% of patients. Overall, 91.4% of completers had at least 1 adverse effect (tremor, tension/inner unrest, reduced duration of sleep, akathisia). No significant differences emerged comparing aripiprazole efficacy and tolerability between patients treated with lithium or valproate. Conclusion : Our findings show that aripiprazole addition to lithium or valproate can reduce OC symptoms in real-world BD euthymic patients.

This study evaluated the impact of comorbid OCD on suicide attempt risk and suicide methods in 990 patients with main diagnosis of BD. Two hundred and one patients (20.3%) had lifetime comorbid OCD. No significant differences were found comparing rates of lifetime suicide attempts between patients with or without comorbid OCD (30.3% vs 24.6%). In the subgroup of patients with concomitant OCD more subjects performed suicide attempts with violent methods (48.3% vs 28.7%). Therefore, our results suggest a correlation between comorbid OCD and violent suicide attempts. This finding is worthy of interest and deserves to be explored by further studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The paper is not under review elsewhere. All authors declare that there are not any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationship with other people., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Relatively few systematic data exist on the clinical impact of bipolar comorbidity in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and no studies have investigated the influence of such a comorbidity on the prevalence and pattern of Axis II comorbidity. The aim of the present study was to explore the comorbidity of personality disorders in a group of patients with OCD and comorbid bipolar disorder (BD)., Methods: The sample consisted of 204 subjects with a principal diagnosis of OCD (DSM-IV) and a Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score>or=16 recruited from all patients consecutively referred to the Anxiety and Mood Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin over a period of 5 years (January 1998-December 2002). Diagnostic evaluation and Axis I comorbidities were collected by means of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Personality status was assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders (SCID-II). Socio-demographic and clinical features (including Axis II comorbidities) were compared between OCD patients with and without a lifetime comorbidity of BD., Results: A total of 21 patients with OCD (10.3%) met DSM-IV criteria for a lifetime BD diagnosis: 4 (2.0%) with BD type I and 17 (8.3%) with BD type II. Those without a BD diagnosis showed significantly higher rates of male gender, sexual and hoarding obsessions, repeating compulsions and lifetime comorbid substance use disorders, when compared with patients with BD/OCD. With regard to personality disorders, those with BD/OCD showed higher prevalence rates of Cluster A (42.9% versus 21.3%; p=0.027) and Cluster B (57.1% versus 29.0%; p=0.009) personality disorders. Narcissistic and antisocial personality disorders were more frequent in BD/OCD., Conclusions: Our results point towards clinically relevant effects of comorbid BD on the personality profiles of OCD patients, with higher rates of narcissistic and antisocial personality disorders in BD/OCD patients.

Introduction: Persistent depressive episodes and subsyndromic depressive symptoms frequently characterize mood alterations in bipolar disorder (BD) and negatively influence quality of life and suicide risk. BD patients with predominant depressive episodes generally show significantly higher treatment resistance rates. Although not specifically approved in Italy for bipolar depression, recently published observational data suggest that the cariprazine add-on may be a potential effective short-term treatment for resistant bipolar depression. Nevertheless data on long-term cariprazine treatment are lacking. Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term cariprazine augmentation in patients suffering from treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Methods: 30 resistant bipolar depressed patients, whose resistance was defined according to The CINP Guidelines on the Definition and Evidence-Based Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Disorder, were treated with cariprazine 1,5 -3 mg flexible dose for 4 weeks, added to previous mood stabilizing and/or antidepressant treatment. Psychopathology at time 0 and at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks of treatment was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS); safety and tolerability was measured by the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale. The drop-out rate was assessed throughout the study duration. Results: Cariprazine add-on was effective in the study sample but only during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Improvement in depression scores started from the first week, reaching about 40% mean HDRS score reduction at T4; a moderate ulterior decrease (-15%) was reached at T24 but was accompanied by a significant drop-out rate; anxiety symptoms improved (mean HARS score reduction 37% at T4) mainly during the first 4 weeks. The treatment was generally well tolerated. From week 4 to 24 we observed a near 70% drop-out rate (18 total drop-outs) with maximum drop-outs between weeks 4-8 (n=7) and 18-24 (n=7). Discontinuation causes were inefficacy (5/18); clinical worsening (10/18); side effects (3/18); hypomanic shift (2/18). Conclusions: Despite the relatively small population examined and the observational design, our results suggest that cariprazine may represent an effective and safe short-term enhancement strategy in resistant bipolar depression. Long-term treatment, in this sample, did not lead to significant improvements and was burdened by a high drop-out rate, mainly due to inefficacy/clinical worsening. Further studies on larger samples are needed to confirm these preliminary findings, both in short-term and in longer observations. Disclosure of Interest: None Declared [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The concept of affective temperament has been extensively discussed throughout the history of psychopathology and represents a cornerstone in the study of mood disorders. This review aims to trace the evolution of the concept of affective temperaments (ATs) from Kraepelin's seminal work to the present day. In the 1980s, Akiskal redefined Kraepelin's concept of affective temperaments (ATs) by integrating the five recognized ATs into the broader framework of the soft bipolar spectrum. This conceptualization viewed ATs as non-pathological predispositions underlying psychiatric disorders, particularly mood disorders. Epidemiological and clinical studies have validated the existence of the five ATs. Furthermore, evidence suggests that ATs may serve as precursors to various psychiatric disorders and influence clinical dimensions such as disease course, psychopathology, and treatment adherence. Additionally, ATs appear to play a significant role in moderating phenomena such as suicide risk and stress coping. Incorporating an evaluation of temperamental bases of disorders into the multidimensional psychiatric diagnostic process could enhance treatment optimization and prognosis estimation. • Research confirms affective temperaments are genetic factors underlying mood, substance use, and risky behavior disorders. • These temperaments contribute to psychiatric syndromes, personality disorders, and complex conditions like suicidal behavior. • Affective temperaments appear to influence the clinical presentation, course, and response to therapies, particularly in bipolar disorder and major depression. • In bipolar disorder, temperamental diathesis affects insight and impacts social, occupational, and family functioning differently across disorder phases. • Understanding hyperthymic temperament is crucial as it can both precede psychiatric disorders and offer protection against psychiatric and medical conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]