Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine clinical and outcome differences between older bipolar patients with early onset (EO) and late onset (LO) of the illness and between younger and EO older patients with a bipolar disorder under long-term treatment in an outpatient clinical setting., Methods: Three hundred ninety-five bipolar I and II outpatients were followed up for up to 7.7 years. Of these, 213 younger (<50 years) and 88 older (>60 years) patients were included. In the older subsample, 50 EO patients (onset <50 years) versus 38 LO patients (≥50 years) were analyzed. Likewise, younger versus EO older patients were compared., Results: The likelihood of LO older patients of being bipolar II was higher than for EO older patients. They were also diagnosed earlier than EO older patients. No other clinical differences at baseline and at the prospective follow-up were found. Compared with younger patients, EO older patients had more frequent depressive symptoms at baseline, suffered more major depressive episodes in the previous year and in the prospective follow-up, received more antidepressants at baseline, had higher rates of medical comorbid conditions and were less likely to be tobacco smokers., Conclusions: Older patients constitute a meaningful proportion of bipolar patients under treatment. EO older patients suffered significantly from more frequent depressive symptoms than younger ones. LO older patients were predominantly bipolar II. So as bipolar illness progressed, depressive symptomatology became more frequent and manic episodes were less severe. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Bipolar disorder is a highly recurrent disease which requires long-term treatment. Dropout is a major problem, poorly understood. The objectives of this study were to know the risk of dropout of a cohort of bipolar patients under ambulatory treatment and to identify the clinical profile of patients more likely to abandon the follow-up. A sample of 285 BD I and II patients was followed up for a mean of 2.87 years. A significant proportion of patients failed regular follow-up. The dropout rates were 6.3 % at three months, 12.7 % at 6 months, and 17.6, 27.2, 37.3, 44.0, 47.2 and 49.0 % at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 years respectively. Very few variables at baseline predicted dropout. Patients under 35 years of age were more likely to dropout than older cases. Seasonality, smoking and specially history of poor treatment compliance were strong predictors of dropout. Given the magnitude of dropout, additional early clinical interventions should be considered for high-risk patients.

The aim of this study was to examine the demographic, clinical, and treatment correlates of bipolar disorder (BD) in outpatients 65 years or older and to compare patients with BD subtype I (BD-I) versus BD subtype II (BD-II) and patients with early onset (EO; <=50 years old) versus late onset (LO; >50 years old) of the illness. Sixty-nine consecutive outpatients with BD were included. Diagnosis was delayed for a mean of 14.1 years, significantly longer in patients with EO (18.6 years) than with LO (3.3 years). Mild to moderate depressive symptoms were detected in 29% of the patients. The patients were receiving a mean of 3 different psychotropic medications. Antidepressantswere more frequently prescribed to patients with BD-II than to patients with BD-I (75.80% vs. 48.60%) and to patients with EO (71.7%) than to LO (35.3%). Geriatric BD has similar clinical characteristics with those of younger ages, and these do not seem to greatly differ with subtype or age of onset.

Background: Researchers have previously found that persistent subthreshold symptoms increase the risk and shorten the time until an affective relapse in bipolar disorder (BD) patients. Research has mainly focused on patients from tertiary Care Centers in USA. We tested the hypothesis that even in a different setting, BD outpatients with subsyndromal affective symptoms would re.turn to a subsequent major affective episode significantly faster than completely asymptomatic at baseline. Secondarily, we analysed other variables related to time and risk to relapse., Methods: A community cohort of BD outpatients from Madrid (Spain) followed-up in a systematic prospective follow-up protocol for up to five years were evaluated. Patients in clinical euthymia at baseline were included and evaluated quarterly., Results: Initially, 225 patients were included in the survival analysis. Of them, according to predefined psychometric criteria, 163 were in euthymia (72.4%) and 62 (27.6%) suffered subsyndromal symptoms. Median follow-up was 157.6 weeks (95% CI, 78.14 to 111); 57.3% of patients experienced at least one affective episode during their follow-up. Median survival time to first affective episode was 109 weeks for patients in euthymia at baseline, versus 35 weeks for those with subsyndromal symptoms (p<0.0001). Psychosocial stress (p=0.003; HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.31-3.68) and the affective mood baseline state, subsyndromal vs. euthymic (p=0.046; HR 1.74; 95%CI 1.009-3.020), were related to time to first affective episode., Limitations: Naturalistic study, some of the data collected were necessarily retrospective., Conclusions: In Spanish non-tertiary psychiatric outpatients, subsyndromal BD symptoms and psychosocial stress at baseline predict earlier episode relapse/recurrence., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Studies on adult bipolar patients have demonstrated a disability associated with the bipolar disorder, even in euthymic patients, but there is a lack of data in the elderly population., Material and Method: A cross-sectional, multicentre study on a consecutive sample of ambulatory bipolar patients (DSM-IV-TR criteria), aged 65 years or over. Retrospective and cross-sectional sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, as well as the Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Modified scale (CGI-BP-M) and the level of disability using the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO/DAS). The disability was assessed globally and by areas. The presence of a moderate to maximum disability compared to a mild to no disability was considered a dependent variable., Results: A moderate to maximum global disability was present in 43.6% of the sample. By areas, occupational functioning was the area most frequently affected, and personal care the least affected. The only variables which were associated with disability were the presence of medical comorbidity (P = .01), increased age (P = .005) global clinical severity (P = .0001) and in the depressive pole (P = .03). There was no relationship between clinical subtype, duration of the disease, number of previous episodes, number of hospitalisations, or other clinical variables and the degree of disability., Conclusions: These data underline the need to establish specific therapeutic strategies in the approach to depressive symptoms and medical comorbidity, with the aim of minimising the disability in elderly bipolar patients. Given the lack of current data, new studies are needed with larger samples and control groups., (Copyright © 2010 SEP y SEPB. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subsyndromal symptoms have been recognized as relevant in the course and outcome of bipolar disorder (BD) patients. Nevertheless, their definition and cutoff points on current depression and mania scales are uncertain. The recently defined International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) operational criteria for the assessment of the course and outcome of bipolar illness have never been tested until now., Methods: A naturalistic longitudinal follow-up study of up to 5 years included a cohort of 317 DSM-IV-TR BD outpatients. For the first time, we assessed the proportion of visits in different affective states using the ISBD criteria. Secondarily, we compared the results with those obtained applying other cutoff points., Results: Patients were symptomatic in 39.1% (95% CI 35.3-42.9) of the visits. Subsyndromal symptoms, primarily subsyndromal depression, were present in 15.9% of patients (95% CI 13.4-18.4). No significant differences were found between bipolar I patients and bipolar II patients. There were differences in the total percentage of visits in euthymia depending on the cutoff points (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Applying ISBD criteria, bipolar patients have significant clinical morbidity and are often symptomatic, both with threshold symptoms and with subthreshold symptoms, especially with depression. The chosen cutoff points modify the apparent results., Limitations: The cutoff points used have not been validated. Psychopharmacologic treatments were naturalistic., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: Most research on the symptomatic burden in bipolar disorder has included patients enrolled exclusively from tertiary centers, and only a few studies have analyzed factors related to it. We investigated the proportion of time and the proportion of visits with symptoms in a cohort of bipolar outpatients followed-up for 18 months, as well as the associated variables., Methods: 296 DSM-IV-TR bipolar outpatients were included in a naturalistic longitudinal follow-up study, with quarterly assessment. Euthymia was defined by a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score <7 and Young Mania Rating Scale score <5. Depressive episode, by a HDRS score of >17, hypomanic episode by a YMRS score of 10-20, and manic episode by a YMRS score >20. Sub-syndromal symptoms required scores of 7-17 in HDRS and 5-10 in YMRS. Based on a detailed recall of affective symptoms in the time between interviews, time in episode was also determined., Results: Patients were symptomatic for one third of the follow-up, and also one third of the visits. They spent three times more days depressed than manic or hypomanic. More prior affective episodes were related both to more time symptomatic and more visits with symptoms., Limitations: Some of the data were collected retrospectively. Treatment was naturalistic., Conclusions: In a bipolar outpatient cohort from Spain, time with symptoms was shorter than previously found in tertiary care settings. In accordance with other longitudinal studies, those patients spent much more time depressed than manic., (2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to obtain a sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial functioning and therapeutic profile of bipolar outpatients in the Madrid Community., Methods: A total of 115 outpatients were consecutively recruited by 10 psychiatrists., Results: Mean time between initial symptoms and an accurate bipolar diagnosis was of 7.6 years. A depressive episode was the onset of the illness in most patients independently of clinical subtype. Syndromal or subsyndromal symptoms were present in 47% of the patient population, dominating the depressive polarity (33.1%). A subjectively reduced perception of quality of life was associated to the presence of depressive symptoms and a worse clinical outcome last year. More than half of the patients (58.2%) were overweight or obese. Lithium was the most frequently used mood stabilizer (71.3%), whereas 41% of the patients were taking at least three psychotropic drugs., Conclusions: Results of this study widely confirm previous data on bipolar disorder. Reduction in quality of life of bipolar patients associated to depressive symptoms must be highlighted. It is necessary to optimize treatments in bipolar disorder in order to improve prognosis.

Introduction: In spite of the frequent prophylactic use of lithium salts in affective disorders, few papers have been published about clinical outcome predictors in long-term follow-up., Objective: To identify clinical predictors of long-term outcome in a sample of bipolar outpatients on lithium treatment., Methods: An intervention study was conducted in a case series of all patients treated, at least for two years, at two Affective Disorders ambulatory Units. It was examined the association between two dependent outcome variables (presence vs absence of relapses and number of relapses/person/year) and the rest of clinical variables., Results: 139 outpatients diagnosed of bipolar disorder were included in the sample. In each case, therapeutic lithium dosages were administered. Delay time to start treatment since the disorder has begun was the only variable useful to predict weakly outcome. The time spent without treatment and the association with other mood stabilizers or neuroleptics correlates with bad outcome., Conclusion: Whichever clinical characteristics of the sample may be, patients should be treated as soon as possible with lithium to get better outcome.

Unlabelled: Lithium effectiveness in manic depressive illness is still controversial. Recent naturalistic trials on lithium effectiveness as a mood stabilizer offer poorer results than previous controlled studies. These previous studies have methodological deficiencies., Objective: To determine the effectiveness of lithium treatment as a mood stabilizer under real clinical conditions., Methodology: An intervention study in a case series of all patients treated at least for two years at two Affective Disorders ambulatory Units was conducted to evaluate the incidence of episodes by year, before and during lithium therapy., Results: 152 patients were included. (91% were bipolar patients). Most of them were in monotherapy. The average time of illness before lithium treatment was 13 years, and cases were followed up a media of 8 years. Only 33% of the sample had no relapses during lithium therapy. An average of 1.38 (+/- 2.89) episodes/person year was estimated previous to lithium therapy and was decreased to 0.35 (+/- 0.47) phases/person year during lithium therapy., Conclusions: Although the total absence of relapses is not attained in most of the patients, our results support the lithium effectiveness to reduce the relapses in bipolar patients.