Search

Replies to questions related sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Exlusion of the minimal lymph node involvement from the node-positive category in order to avoid overstaging; Percentage of patients with isolated tumor cell in their SLN had axillary metastases; Distinction between isolated tumor cell and true micrometastases; Detection of tumor cell emboli within lymphovascular channels.

The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery is based on the fact that the tumour drains in a logical way via the lymphatic system, from the first to upper levels. Since axillary node dissection does not improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy might replace complete axillary dissection for staging of the axilla in clinically N0 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a minimally invasive procedure, considering that about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. Subdermal or peritumoural injection of small aliquots (and very low activity) of radiotracer is preferred to intratumoural administration, and 99mTc-labelled colloids with most of the particles in the 100–200 nm size range would be ideal for radioguided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. The success rate of radioguidance in localising the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer surgery is about 97% in institutions where a high number of procedures are performed, and the success rate of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node detection is about 100%. The sentinel lymph node should be processed for intraoperative frozen section examination in its entirety, based on conventional histopathology and, when necessary, immune staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody. Nowadays, lymphoscintigraphy is a useful procedure in patients with different clinical evidence of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is emerging as an actionable biomarker for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with novel anti-HER2 drugs. However, the evolution of this biomarker during the course of disease is still poorly characterised, and controversial data exist on its prognostic implications. We reviewed data of patients with HER2-negative BC according to the latest ASCO/CAP guidelines referred between January 2014 and December 2020. We grouped patients based on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of HER2, HER2-zero (IHC 0) and HER2-low subgroup (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-negative) and evaluated the evolution of HER2 expression between the primary tumour and the first biopsy collected in the advanced setting. Disease-free survival, overall survival and progression-free survival were compared between patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low expression on the primary tumour. 232 patients were included in the analysis. Among the overall population, there was a relevant discordance in HER2 expression between the primary tumour and the matched biopsy (K = 0.33, 95%CI 0.21–0.44): 44% of the HER2-zero primary tumour showed an increased HER2 score on biopsy, and 22% of the HER2-low primary tumours turned into HER2-IHC 0. The findings in the sub-populations of hormone-receptors positive (K = 0.32, 95%CI 0.19–0.45) and triple-negative tumours (K = 0.18, 95%CI -0.09-0.46) were consistent with the primary analysis. No difference in survival outcomes was observed between HER2-low and HER2-zero primary tumours. HER2-low expression is dynamic in BC and may be enriched in the advanced-stage setting. No prognostic significance was demonstrated for HER2-low expression. • HER2-low expression is emerging as an actionable biomarker in breast cancer. • HER2 IHC score increased from primary to metastatic tumour in 44% of the patients. • HER2-low to HER2-zero evolution was observed in 22% of the patients. • HER2-low expression is dynamic and may be enriched in the advanced-stage setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Axillary lymph node dissection is an established component of the surgical treatment of breast cancer, and is an important procedure in cancer staging; however, it is associated with unpleasant side effects. We have investigated a radioactive tracer-guided procedure that facilitates identification, removal, and pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node (i.e., the lymph node first receiving lymphatic fluid from the area of the breast containing the tumor) to predict the status of the axilla and to assess the safety of foregoing axillary dissection if the sentinel lymph node shows no involvement.Methods: We injected 5-10 MBq of 99mTc-labeled colloidal particles of human albumin peritumorally in 376 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were enrolled at the European Institute of Oncology during the period from March 1996 through March 1998. The sentinel lymph node in each case was visualized by lymphoscintigraphy, and its general location was marked on the overlying skin. During breast surgery, the sentinel lymph node was identified for removal by monitoring the acoustic signal from a hand-held gamma ray-detecting probe. Total axillary dissection was then carried out. The pathologic status of the sentinel lymph node was compared with that of the whole axilla.Results: The sentinel lymph node was identified in 371 (98.7%) of the 376 patients and accurately predicted the state of the axilla in 359 (95.5%) of the patients, with 12 false-negative findings (6.7%; 95% confidence interval = 3.5%-11.4%) among a total of 180 patients with positive axillary lymph nodes.Conclusions: Sentinel lymph node biopsy using a gamma ray-detecting probe allows staging of the axilla with high accuracy in patients with primary breast cancer. A randomized trial is necessary to determine whether axillary dissection may be avoided in those patients with an uninvolved sentinel lymph node. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is currently not recommended in pregnant patients with breast cancer due to radiation concerns. Twelve pregnant patients with breast cancer received low-dose (10 MBq on average) lymphoscintigraphy using 99mTc human serum albumin nanocolloids. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified in all patients. Of the 12 patients, 10 had pathologically negative SLN. One patient had micrometastasis in one of four SLN. One patient had metastasis in the SLN and underwent axillary clearance. From the 12 pregnancies, 11 healthy babies were born with no malformations and normal weight. One baby, whose mother underwent lymphatic mapping during the 26th week of gestation, was operated on at the age of 3 months for a ventricular septal defect and at 43 months was in good health. This malformation was suspected at the morphological US examination during week 21, well before lymphoscintigraphy, and was confirmed a posteriori by a different observer based on videotaped material. No overt axillary recurrence appeared in the patients with negative SLNs after a median follow-up of 32 months. Our experience supports the safety of SLNB in pregnant patients with breast cancer, when performed with a low-dose lymphoscintigraphic technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Premises: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with breast carcinoma accurately predicts the axillary node status. However, in some 4–7% of patients with negative sentinel nodes, the remaining axillary nodes harbour cancer cells. Objective: Our purpose was the long-term observation of a large number of patients who did not receive axillary dissection after a negative sentinel node biopsy, in order to evaluate the incidence of overt axillary metastases. Methods: Patients (3548) treated from 1996 to 2004, with negative sentinel nodes not submitted to axillary dissection, were followed up to 11 years with a median follow-up of 48 months. Results: Three hundred and sixteen unfavourable events occurred among the 3548 patients, 196 of which (5.5%) related to primary breast carcinoma. Thirty one cases of overt axillary metastases were found (0.9%): they received total axillary dissection and 27 of them are at present alive and well. The 5-year overall survival rate of the whole series was 98%. Conclusions: Patients with negative sentinel node biopsy not submitted to axillary dissection show, at follow-up, a rate of overt axillary metastases lower than expected. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Although numerous studies have shown that the status of the sentinel node is an accurate predictor of the status of the axillary nodes in breast cancer, the efficacy and safety of sentinel-node biopsy require validation. Methods: From March 1998 to December 1999, we randomly assigned 516 patients with primary breast cancer in whom the tumor was less than or equal to 2 cm in diameter either to sentinel-node biopsy and total axillary dissection (the axillary-dissection group) or to sentinel-node biopsy followed by axillary dissection only if the sentinel node contained metastases (the sentinel-node group). Results: The number of sentinel nodes found was the same in the two groups. A sentinel node was positive in 83 of the 257 patients in the axillary-dissection group (32.3 percent), and in 92 of the 259 patients in the sentinel-node group (35.5 percent). In the axillary-dissection group, the overall accuracy of the sentinel-node status was 96.9 percent, the sensitivity 91.2 percent, and the specificity 100 percent. There was less pain and better arm mobility in the patients who underwent sentinel-node biopsy only than in those who also underwent axillary dissection. There were 15 events associated with breast cancer in the axillary-dissection group and 10 such events in the sentinel-node group. Among the 167 patients who did not undergo axillary dissection, there were no cases of overt axillary metastasis during follow-up. Conclusions: Sentinel-node biopsy is a safe and accurate method of screening the axillary nodes for metastasis in women with a small breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546-53. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]