Search

Purpose: We investigated the ability of a 20-core prostate biopsy protocol to enhance the prostate cancer diagnosis rate., Materials and Methods: We compared the diagnosis rate of prostate biopsies in 2 groups of consecutive patients, including group 1-10 cores and group 2-20 cores. The prostate specific antigen range in the 2 groups was 3 to 30 ng/ml and biopsies were performed because of increased prostate specific antigen (more than 3 ng/ml) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. To analyze the results we divided each group into 3 subgroups according to prostate specific antigen, including group 1-3 to less than 6 ng/ml, group 2-6 or greater to less than 10 ng/ml and group 3-10 or greater to up to 30 ng/ml. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the difference in the diagnosis rate among the subgroups according to the number of cores taken., Results: The percent of positive biopsies was 39.7% in group 1 and 51.7% in group 2. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of biopsies taken was a factor that independently and significantly correlated with the prostate cancer diagnosis. The 20-core biopsy protocol was more efficient than the 10-core protocol in the 3 subgroups with 47.2% vs 28.1% of patients diagnosed in group 1 (OR 3.26, p = 0.001), 40.5% vs 36.1% in group 2 (OR 2.37, p = 0.009) and 69.8% vs 39.7% in group 3 (OR 2.01, p = 0.015)., Conclusions: The 20-core biopsy protocol was more efficient than the 10-core biopsy protocol, especially in patients with prostate specific antigen between 3 and 6 ng/ml. Nevertheless, it is mandatory to confirm whether detected tumors are clinically significant on pathological examination of the radical prostatectomy specimens.

Purpose: Some studies imply that increasing the number of prostate biopsy cores may improve the cancer detection rate. We performed a prospective study to evaluate pain and morbidity after an extensive transrectal ultrasound guided 10-core biopsy protocol., Materials and Methods: A total of 289 consecutive men with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and/or increased prostate specific antigen underwent extensive prostate biopsy involving 6 sextant and 4 peripheral biopsies. Each received an information leaflet a few days before the procedure. A single dose of fluoroquinolone and a rectal enema were administered before biopsy. In no case was the procedure performed using anesthesia. Immediately after biopsy patients were asked to complete a self-administered nonvalidated questionnaire evaluating the degree of pain and/or discomfort using a visual analog scale. In another questionnaire they listed the side effects noticed during month 1 after biopsy., Results: Although 48% of the 275 men who completed the initial questionnaire reported anxiety before the procedure, 78.8% of them were completely reassured by the information brochure. Of the 275 patients 47.6% described the procedure as painful, including only slightly painful (analog visual scale 3 or less) in 67.9%, while 33.8% described it as uncomfortable but not painful and 18.6% thought that it was neither painful nor uncomfortable. Of the 115 patients who engaged in sexual intercourse during month 1 after the procedure 78.3% noticed hematospermia an average of 10.9 days in duration. Of the 164 men who completed questionnaire 2, 74.4% noticed hematuria an average of 2.7 days in duration, 3.7% noticed pyrexia and 1.2% noticed acute prostatitis. In the 59 patients (36%) who reported delayed perineal pain it was slight in 64.4%, moderate in 30.5% and severe in 5.1%. No patient required hospitalization., Conclusions: Although minor complications are common, the extensive 10-core prostate biopsy protocol is associated with few major complications. The occurrence and intensity of pain and discomfort are in the range reported after the standard 6-core biopsy protocol.

Purpose: We evaluated improvement in the rate of prostate cancer detection when using an extensive biopsy protocol involving peripheral cores., Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 303 consecutive men who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy due to elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Ten biopsies were performed, including at least 5 at the base and middle of each lobe. In addition to standard biopsy at a 45-degree angle, a more peripheral 30-degree angle biopsy was obtained. At the apex only 1 standard biopsy was done. However, when prostate volume was greater than 50 cm.3, an additional peripheral biopsy was obtained at the apex., Results: The complication rate in this biopsy protocol was 1% (3 patients). Prostate cancer was detected in 118 of the 303 men (38. 9%). Overall this extensive protocol resulted in 6.6% improvement in the detection rate. Improvement was 6.5% in men with PSA 10 ng./ml. or less and 7% in those with PSA greater than 10 (not significant)., Conclusions: Increasing the number of biopsy cores and improving prostate peripheral zone sampling resulted in a significant improvement in the detection of prostate cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the improvement in the rate of detection of prostate cancer using an extensive protocol involving ten transrectal biopsies., Methods: A total of 162 patients submitted to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormality on digital rectal examination were studied consecutively and prospectively. Five biopsies were performed in each lobe: between the three standard biopsies on each side, two additional biopsy specimens were taken in the same plane and at the same 45 degrees angle., Results: The complication rate with the ten-biopsy protocol was 1.85%. Prostate cancer was detected in 40.1% of the patients. In the overall series, the percentage of diagnostic improvement brought about by this ten-biopsy protocol was +3.1%. The percentage improvement was greatest (+4.9%) in patients with PSA

Objective: To study the improvement of prostatic cancer detection provided by ten strictly systematized transrectal prostatic biopsies., Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in 162 patients submitted to a series of 10 ultrasound-guided transrectal prostatic biopsies due to the presence of elevated PSA and/or an abnormality on digital rectal examination. Five biopsies were taken from different sites in each lobe: 2 biopsies were inserted between the 3 biopsies usually performed in the standard protocol, while maintaining the angle of entry of the needle recommended in this protocol., Results: The complication rate was 1.85% with the 10-biopsy technique. Prostatic cancer was detected in 40.1% of the 162 patients. The percentage diagnostic improvement provided by the 10-biopsy protocol in the overall patient population was +3.1% compared to the standard protocol. The highest percentage diagnostic improvement was observed in the group of patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/ml (+4.9%) and in the group of patients with an ultrasound prostatic volume < or = 40 cc (+4%)., Conclusion: The most marked diagnostic improvement appears to be related more to sampling of prostatic zones presenting a statistically increased risk of cancer (peripheral zone) than to the increased number of prostatic biopsies performed.

Objectives: To evaluate whether the percentage of biopsy tissue invaded by tumour provides any supplementary information to laboratory and/or biopsy data (Gleason, number...) in the preoperative staging of patients with localized prostatic cancer (T1-T2)., Materials and Methods: 170 patients with a mean age of 65.05 +/- 6.12 years and a mean PSA of 22.5 +/- 21.4 ng/mL were submitted to radical prostatectomy (RP) for T1-T2 prostatic cancer. 110 patients were submitted to a series of 6 transrectal prostatic biopsies to establish the diagnosis. We evaluated the percentage of biopsy tissue invaded. This parameter, as well as the Gleason score and the preoperative PSA, were studied in comparison with pathological criteria of the operative specimen (capsule status, resection margins) and postoperative PSA., Results: The cut-off value of 10% of invaded biopsy tissue was calculated as being the most discriminant for the prediction of resection margins, capsule status and progression of laboratory parameters. When less than 10% of biopsy tissue was invaded, there were 31.2% positive margins (RM+). 28% of invaded capsules (pT3), and 21.7% of laboratory progression (P+) versus 44.1%, 71.4% and 47%, respectively, when more than 10% of tissue was invaded. The Gleason score of the biopsy did not improve this prognostic evaluation. The mean quantities of invaded biopsy tissue were statistically different between pT3 and pT2, RM+ and RM-and P+ and P-. When only one positive biopsy was invaded by less than 10%, 87.5% of these operated patients remained stable, RM- and pT2., Conclusions: On an individual level, the percentage of invaded tissue does not reflect the degree of extension or progression of localized prostatic cancer. Only a single positive biopsy invaded over less than 10% of its length is statistically correlated with a good prognosis.

Objective: To evaluate whether or not a single positive prostatic biopsy out of six systematic ultrasound-guided biopsies, is reliably correlated manner with favourable histopathological features of the tumour on the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen., Materials and Methods: In a series of 158 patients undergoing RP for clinically localized prostatic cancer, 15.2% had only one positive biopsy out of 6 systematic biopsies. We compared the rates of capsular effraction (C+) and positive resection margins (RM+), assessed on the operative specimen, in this group of patients with a single positive biopsy (group 1) and in the group (group 2) diagnosed by more than one positive biopsy. The postoperative biological progression rate (P+), defined as an immediate or secondary postoperative elevation of PSA beyond 0.1 ng/ml by polyclonal assay, was also evaluated in the two groups. The Gleason score was evaluated and compared on biopsies and on RP specimens., Results: 29.2 of cases were C+, 16.7% were RM+ and 26% were P+ in group 1, versus 70%, 46.5% and 49.5%, respectively, in group 2. All differences were statistically significant. All patients in group 1 with less than 10% of prostatic tissue invaded on the positive biopsy had stage P2, while all patients with 100% of the length of the biopsy invaded by tumour had stage P3. The Gleason score was accurately predicted by the positive biopsy in 39% of cases and was underestimated in 39% of cases., Conclusion: A single positive prostatic biopsy out of six systematic biopsies is a useful predictive factor of local extension, but, in the individual patient, does not guarantee favourable histopathological characteristics of the tumour, nor a favourable course of the disease.

Purpose: We evaluated the ability of an extended, 32-core repeat transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy protocol to improve the characterization of low volume, well differentiated disease in men with a diagnosis of potentially insignificant microfocal prostate cancer, as defined by 1 single focus positive core of 10 with less than 5 mm of Gleason score 6 or less tumor on primary biopsy. Materials and Methods: A total of 35 consecutive patients, who were 62 to 75 years old, had a median serum prostate specific antigen of 8 ng/ml (range 0.5 to 14) and a diagnosis of minimal prostate cancer, and were willing to consider observation with delayed treatment at progression, were offered repeat saturation prostate biopsy with a median of 32 cores (range 18 to 36) under local anesthesia. This biopsy was to determine whether more extensive prostate sampling would confirm or disprove the initial diagnosis of microfocal, well differentiated prostate cancer. Results: The procedure was aborted in 1 patient because of massive rectal hemorrhage. Another patient had acute prostatitis with gram-negative sepsis. Of 34 evaluable biopsy sets 11 (32%) were negative for cancer, suggesting that tumor detected at the primary biopsy was probably of low volume and amenable to observation with delayed treatment. Of the biopsies 23 (68%) were positive, 17 were at multiple sites and 7 were upgraded to Gleason score 7 or greater. These patients were then considered to have significant tumors and were offered active treatment. Conclusions: This study is to our knowledge the first to describe the clinical use of prostate saturation biopsies for reevaluating potentially insignificant prostate cancer. Of patients with minimal disease on standard 10-core biopsy, results show that this technique may be helpful for distinguishing the 30% who probably have minimal disease based on negative repeat saturation biopsy from the 70% who almost certainly have a significant tumor, as characterized by multiple positive cores, with or without an increased Gleason score. The latter patients should be offered active therapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective To evaluate whether a single positive prostate biopsy in six systematic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsies is predictive of a small tumour volume in a subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. Patients and methods Of 158 patients submitted to RP for T1-T2 prostate cancer, 15.2% had one positive biopsy. The rate of positive margins (M+) and extracapsular involvement (C+) were assessed on the RP specimen in those with one positive biopsy (group I) and in those diagnosed by more than one positive biopsy (group II). The percentage of those with post-operative biological progression (P+), having a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level>0.1 ng/mL, was evaluated in both groups. The Gleason scores in biopsies and specimens were also compared. Fifteen patients diagnosed by a single positive biopsy were management conservatively. Results The percentage of patients who were categorized C+, M+ and P+ was 29.2, 16.7 and 26% in group I and 70, 46.5 and 49.5%, respectively, in group II. All patients with <10% of the biopsy core length invaded by cancer had intracapsular (P2) disease, whereas if all the core length was invaded by tumour, all patients had extracapsular (P3) disease. The Gleason scores for biopsy cores and whole specimens were identical in 38.7% of the cases; the Gleason score was underestimated on biopsy in 48.4% of cases. In the group treated conservatively, nine of 15 patients were in biological progression, with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Conclusion A single positive needle-biopsy in six systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsies is not predictive of low-volume prostate cancer on an individual basis and does not guarantee a favourable outcome after RP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]