Search

Objectives. To evaluate the clinicopathological differences between Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 (v2) category 1 and 2 groups. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our two institutional clinical databases: (1) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion biopsy cohort (n = 706) and (2) radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort (n = 1403). Subsequently, we performed comparative analyses between PI-RADSv2 category 1 and 2 groups. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as the presence of Gleason score GS ≥ 3 + 4 in a single biopsy core, and adverse pathology (AP) was defined as high-grade (primary Gleason pattern 4 or any pattern 5) and/or non-organ-confined disease (pT3/N1). We also performed multivariate logistic regression analyses for AP. Results. In the TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy cohort, no significant differences in detection rates of all cancer (18.2% vs. 29.0%, respectively, P = 0.730) or csPCa (9.1% vs. 9.9%, respectively, P = 0.692) were observed between PI-RADSv2 category 1 and 2 groups. There were no significant differences in pathologic outcomes including Gleason score (≥ 4 + 3 , 21.2% vs. 29.9%, respectively, P = 0.420) or detection rate of AP (27.3% vs. 33.8%, respectively, P = 0.561) between the two groups in the RP cohort either. PI-RADSv2 category 1 or 2 had no significant association with AP, even in univariate analysis (P = 0.299). Conclusions. PI-RADSv2 categories 1 and 2 had similar performance to predict clinicopathological outcomes. Consequently, these two categories may be unified into a single category. Negative mpMRI does not guarantee the absence of AP, as with csPCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this research, we exploit an image-based deep learning framework to distinguish three major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe) using images acquired with computed tomography (CT). A biopsy-proven benchmarking dataset was built from 169 renal cancer cases. In each case, images were acquired at three phases(phase 1, before injection of the contrast agent; phase 2, 1 min after the injection; phase 3, 5 min after the injection). After image acquisition, rectangular ROI (region of interest) in each phase image was marked by radiologists. After cropping the ROIs, a combination weight was multiplied to the three-phase ROI images and the linearly combined images were fed into a deep learning neural network after concatenation. A deep learning neural network was trained to classify the subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, using the drawn ROIs as inputs and the biopsy results as labels. The network showed about 0.85 accuracy, 0.64–0.98 sensitivity, 0.83–0.93 specificity, and 0.9 AUC. The proposed framework which is based on deep learning method and ROIs provided by radiologists showed promising results in renal cell subtype classification. We hope it will help future research on this subject and it can cooperate with radiologists in classifying the subtype of lesion in real clinical situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been shown to be an important component of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We compared performance of DWI for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) of prostate. Materials and methods: We reviewed data of 460 subjects who underwent preoperative 3.0-Tesla mpMRI and subsequently radical prostatectomy. Level of suspicion for PCa was graded using 5-grade Likert-scale from DWI. Topographic analyses were performed for location of tumor foci at each surgical specimen. Among those with DWI grade ≥ III, we analyzed concordance rate on the location of radiologic and pathologic index lesions between DWI and surgical specimens. Results: Among 460 patients, 351 (76.3%) patients showed suspicious DWI lesions (57.5% in PZ, 42.5% in TZ). Multivariates regression analyses revealed significant associations between high DWI grade and adverse pathologic outcomes including pathologic stage, Gleason score, tumor volume and extracapsular extension (all p < 0.05). Overall concordance rates between DWI and surgical specimen were 75.8%, significantly higher in PZ than TZ (82.2% vs. 67.1% p = 0.002). Such concordance rate showed a positive linear association with increase in DWI grading (p < 0.001). Among 109 patients with DWI grade I-II, 28 (25.7%) harbored high grade disease (pathologic Gleason score ≥ 4 + 3). Conclusions: DWI detects tumors in PZ of prostate more accurately than those in TZ. Such accuracy of DWI was shown to be more evident with higher DWI grade. Meanwhile, a negative DWI did not guarantee absence of high grade PCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: There is little data about the clinical value of core length for prostate biopsy (PBx). We investigated the clinical values of various clinicopathological biopsy-related parameters, including core length, in the contemporary multi-core PBx. Patients and Methods: Medical records of 5,243 consecutive patients who received PBx at our institution were reviewed. Among them, 3,479 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10ng/ml level who received transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided multi (≥12)-core PBx at our institution were analyzed for prostate cancer (PCa). Gleason score upgrading (GSU) was analyzed in 339 patients who were diagnosed with low-risk PCa and received radical prostatectomy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for PCa detection and prediction of GSU were performed. Results: The mean age and PSA of the entire cohort were 63.5 years and 5.4ng/ml, respectively. The overall cancer detection rate was 28.5%. There was no statistical difference in core length between patients diagnosed with PCa and those without PCa (16.1 ± 1.8 vs 16.1 ± 1.9mm, P = 0.945). The core length was also not significantly different (16.4 ± 1.7 vs 16.4 ± 1.6mm, P = 0.889) between the GSU group and non-GSU group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the core length of PBx did not affect PCa detection in TRUS-guided multi-core PBx (P = 0.923) and was not prognostic for GSU in patients with low-risk PCa (P = 0.356). Conclusions: In patients undergoing contemporary multi-core PBx, core length may not have significant impact on PCa detection and also GSU following radical prostatectomy among low-risk PCa group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Type - Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? It has been reported that patients with Gleason 6 prostate cancer detected in a single microfocal positive core may actually harbour more aggressive disease. Meanwhile, several studies analyzing cases of single microfocal prostate cancer included a significant number of patients with serum PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL. Also, significant proportions of currently available published data on actual pathological characteristics of prostate cancer with favourable biopsy features were obtained from patients who underwent prostate biopsies performed in non-systematic fashion at different institutions and/or via non-contemporary scheme, such as sextant biopsy. Although PSA density can be considered an independent predictor of pathologically insignificant tumour among the patients with PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL and only a single microfocal tumour detected via multi (≥12)-core biopsy, clinical and biopsy-related parameters currently available have limited value in predicting pathologically insignificant or unfavourable prostate cancer in such patients. OBJECTIVE • To examine potential predictors of pathological outcomes for a single microfocal (≤3 mm) positive prostate cancer detected via contemporary biopsy scheme in patients presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS • We reviewed the data of 119 patients who had prebiopsy PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL and a single microfocal (≤3 mm) Gleason ≤6 prostate cancer identified via multicore (≥12) biopsy and who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). • We assessed the rates of insignificant prostate cancer (organ-confined and pathological Gleason ≤6 with tumour volume <0.5 mL) and unfavourable prostate cancer (upstaging and/or upgrading) by analysing pathological findings. • Potential preoperative predictors of insignificant or unfavourable prostate cancer were analysed. Multivariable models for predicting insignificant and unfavourable tumours were devised and evaluated. RESULTS • Overall rates of insignificant and unfavourable prostate cancer were 44.5% and 24.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only PSA density was an independent predictor of insignificant prostate cancer. • Predictive accuracies of multivariable models for predicting insignificant prostate cancer did not exceed 68.2%. No significant predictor for pathologically unfavourable tumour was found in multivariate analysis. • All versions of the multivariable model devised for prediction of unfavourable tumour showed predictive accuracies ≤66.9%. CONCLUSION • Although PSA density can be considered an independent predictor of pathologically insignificant tumour among patients with PSA ≤10 ng/mL and only a single microfocal tumour detected via multicore (≥12) biopsy, the clinical and biopsy-related parameters that are currently available have limited value in predicting pathologically insignificant or unfavourable prostate cancer in such patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluated the effect of intracapsular anesthesia and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study 152 consecutive patients were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 of 41 patients was administered intraprostatic local anesthesia into the right and left sides with a total of 2 ml 1% lidocaine and a periprostatic injection of 2 ml saline later. Group 2 of 49 patients was administered intraprostatic injection of 2 ml saline, followed by periprostatic local anesthesia with 2 ml 1% lidocaine. Group 3 of 62 patients received intraprostatic and periprostatic local anesthesia with 2 ml 1% lidocaine. Patients were asked to grade the pain level using a 10-point linear visual analog pain scale 1) when the transrectal ultrasound probe was inserted, 2) during anesthesia, 3) during biopsy and 4) 20 minutes after biopsy. One-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Tukey post hoc test were used to compare patient characteristics and pain scale responses among the 3 groups. Results: No major complications, including sepsis and severe rectal bleeding, were noted in any patient. There were statistically significant differences in pain scores among groups 1 to 3 during anesthesia (mean ± SD 5.6 ± 2.5, 6.7 ± 2.3 and 4.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.003) and during biopsy (4.3 ± 2.7, 4.5 ± 2.6 and 2.7 ± 2.1, respectively, p = 0.032). There were no differences in pain scores among the 3 groups during probe insertion (p = 0.39). Conclusions: A combination of intracapsular anesthesia and periprostatic nerve block is an effective and useful technique that is well tolerated by the patient. It decreases the level of pain and discomfort associated with the prostatic biopsy procedure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: We assessed the analgesic effect of additional intrarectal lidocaine gel instillation during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and identified the procedural steps that benefit from lidocaine gel instillation. Materials and Methods: A total of 250 consecutive patients scheduled for prostate biopsy were randomized into 2 groups. In the 125 group 1 patients lidocaine gel was instilled intrarectally before periprostatic neurovascular bundle block. The 125 patients in group 2 underwent only periprostatic neurovascular bundle block without lidocaine gel instillation. Of the 250 patients 90 in group 1 and 113 in group 2, in whom 12 systematic cores were obtained, were enrolled for data analysis. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale during periprostatic neurovascular bundle block (visual analog scale 1), during biopsy (visual analog scale 2) and 20 minutes after biopsy (visual analog scale 3). Differences between the visual analog scale scores of the 2 groups at each procedural step were evaluated using the unpaired t test with p <0.05 considered significant. Results: In terms of pain experienced during the 3 procedural steps scores were significantly different during biopsy (p <0.01). Visual analog scale scores of patients in group 1 showed a tendency to be lower than the scores of patients in group 2 during periprostatic neurovascular bundle block and 20 minutes after biopsy (p = 0.11 and 0.20, respectively). Conclusions: Intrarectal lidocaine gel instillation before periprostatic neurovascular bundle block produces a significant additional analgesic effect during biopsy. The procedure is simple, safe and rapid, and it should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of an antibiotic regimen for prostate biopsy by analyzing patients who were hospitalized because of complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of 10,339 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at our institution from May 2003 to April 2017. We excluded patients with low quality data. All patients underwent urine culture before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and received intravenous antibiotic agents 30-60 minutes before biopsy. Patients were either given prophylactic quinolone or cephalosporin (second or third generation). Clinicopathologic factors including patient age, antibiotic regimen, number of biopsy cores, body mass index, prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, and infection-related complications that required hospitalization were subsequently analyzed.Results: A total of 9,487 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 33 patients (0.35%) were hospitalized because of infection-related complications. Infection-related hospitalization rates were lower in patients who received cephalosporin (0.2%) than in patients who received quinolone (1.59%). At our institution, cephalosporin has been used predominantly to prevent post-biopsy infections since February 2013. Only five patients (0.12%) developed infection-related complications of the 3,863 patient who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy since February 2013. Multivariable analysis revealed that use of second- or third-generation cephalosporin was the only independent predictor of infection-related complications.Conclusion: Implementing an effective antibiotic prophylaxis regimen at our institution by using second- or third-generation cephalosporin could reduce infection-related complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume in a histologically defined subset of Korean men confirmed to have benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) only from multicore biopsy of prostate. Methods: A total of 707 Korean men with a PSA level of 10 ng/mL or lower who were shown to have stromoglandular hyperplasia only from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided multicore biopsy of prostate were included in the study. We analyzed PSA and total prostate volume (TV) measured through TRUS by stratified age cohorts. We used Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and linear regression model to describe the relationship between variables. Results: Serum PSA level significantly correlated with TV in all stratified age cohorts, with r ranging from 0.29 to 0.47 (all P <0.001). Meanwhile, the degree of correlation appeared to increase with age. The slope of linear regression showing an association of PSA and TV was 3.68. The PSA increase per unit prostate volume decreased with the advancing cohort of age when we excluded subjects 70 years or older. Conclusions: Although PSA was significantly correlated with TV, the exact nature of the relationship between PSA and TV in Korean men with biopsy-proven BPH may be different from that in other races. Further basic research on the pathophysiology of BPH is needed to explain such a racial difference. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]