Search

Background: 3D printers have gained prominence in rapid prototyping and viable in creating dimensionally accurate objects that are both safe within a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) environment and visible in MRI scans. A challenge when making MRI-visible objects using 3D printing is that hard plastics are invisible in standard MRI scans, while fluids are not. So typically, a hollow object will be printed and filled with a liquid that will be visible in MRI scans. This poses an engineering challenge however since objects created using traditional Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-printing techniques are prone to leakage. Digital Light Processing (DLP) is a relatively modern and affordable 3D-printing technique using UV-hardened resin, capable of creating objects that are inherently liquid-tight. When printing hollow parts using DLP printers, one typically requires adding drainage holes for uncured liquid resin to escape during the printing process. If this is not done liquid resin will remain inside the object, which in our application is the desired outcome. Purpose: We devised a method to produce an inherently MRI-visible accessory using DLP technology with low dimensional tolerance to facilitate MRI-guided breast biopsies. Methods: By hollowing out the object without adding drainage holes and tuning printing parameters such as z-lift distance to retain as much uncured liquid resin inside as possible through surface tension, objects that are inherently visible in MRI scans can be created without further post-processing treatment. Results: Objects created through our method are simple and inexpensive to recreate, have minimal manufacturing steps, and are shown to be dimensionally exact and inherently MRI visible to be directly used in various applications without further treatment. Conclusion: Our proposed method of manufacturing objects that are inherently both MRI safe, and MRI visible. The proposed process is simple and does not require additional materials and tools beyond a DLP 3D-printer. With only an inexpensive DLP 3D-printer kit and basic cleaning and sanitation materials found in the hospital, we have demonstrated the viability of our process by successfully creating an object containing fine structures with low spatial tolerances used for MRI-guided breast biopsies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: CEM-guided breast biopsy is an advanced diagnostic procedure that takes advantage of the ability of CEM to enhance suspicious breast lesions. The aim pf this paper is to describe a single-center retrospective experience on CEM-guided breast biopsy in terms of procedural features and histological outcomes. Methods: 69 patients underwent the procedure. Patient age, breast density, presentation, dimensions, and lesion target enhancement were recorded. All the biopsy procedures were performed using a 7- or 10-gauge (G) vacuum-assisted biopsy needle. The procedural approach (horizontal or vertical) and the decubitus of the patient (lateral or in a sitting position) were noted. Results: A total of 69 patients underwent a CEM-guided biopsy. Suspicious lesions presented as mass enhancement in 35% of cases and non-mass enhancement in 65% of cases. The median size of the target lesions was 20 mm. The median procedural time for each biopsy was 10 ± 4 min. The patients were placed in a lateral decubitus position in 52% of cases and seated in 48% of cases. The most common approach was horizontal (57%). The mean AGD was 14.8 mGy. At histology, cancer detection rate was 28% (20/71). Conclusions: CEM-guided biopsy was feasible, with high procedure success rates and high tolerance by the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast MRI is a highly sensitive imaging modality that often detects findings that are occult on mammography and US. Given the overlap in appearance of benign and malignant lesions, an accurate method of tissue sampling for MRI-detected findings is essential. Although MRI-directed US and correlation with mammography can be helpful for some lesions, a correlate is not always found. MRI-guided biopsy is a safe and effective method of tissue sampling for findings seen only on MRI. The unique limitations of this technique, however, contribute to false negatives, which can result in delays in diagnosis and adverse patient outcomes; this is of particular importance as most MRI examinations are performed in the high-risk or preoperative setting. Here, we review strategies to minimize false negatives in biopsy of suspicious MRI findings, including appropriate selection of biopsy modality, use of meticulous MRI-guided biopsy technique, management after target nonvisualization, assessment of adequate lesion sampling, and determination of radiologypathology concordance. A proposed management algorithm for MRI-guided biopsy results will also be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolled in a pre-marketing clinical validation and feasibility study (October 2019 to September 2021). CEM-guided biopsy is a stereotactic-based procedure that, by using intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition, provides localisation of enhancing lesions. All the biopsies were performed using a vacuum-assisted device. We collected procedural characteristics (patient position and type of approach), and histopathological results. Feasibility endpoints included success (visualisation of the enhancing lesion, post-procedural biopsy changes and clip placement), procedural time, number of scout acquisitions and complications. Results: A total of 66 suspicious enhancing lesions (18.0% foci, 44.0% mass, 38.0% non-mass enhancement; median size 8.5 mm) in 64 patients (median age 59 years, mostly minimal [48.4%] or mild [32.8%] background parenchymal enhancement) were referred for CEM-guided biopsy in the study period. The success rate was 63/66 (95.4%). Amongst successful procedures, patients were most frequently seated (52/63, 82.5%) and the preferred approach was horizontal (48/63, 76.2%). Median total time per procedure was 15 min. Median number of acquisitions needed before targeting was 2 (range 1–4). Complications consisted of hematoma (17/63, 27%) and vasovagal reaction (2/63, 3.2%). At histology, the malignancy rate was 25/63 (39.7%). Conclusion: In this first patient series, CEM-guided breast biopsy was feasible, with success and complication rates similar to those previously reported for magnetic resonance guidance. Key points: • CEM may be used to guide biopsy of enhancing lesions through a stereotactic-based procedure combined with intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition. • In this first patient series (n = 64), the success rate of CEM-guided biopsy was above 95%, the only complications were hematoma (22.2%) and vasovagal reaction (3.2%), and median total time per procedure was 15 min. • CEM-guided biopsy is feasible and could potentially be a widely available biopsy technique for enhancing-only lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine key performance metrics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided breast biopsies (MRGB) to help identify reference benchmarks. Materials and Methods: We identified studies reporting MRGB results up to 04.01.2021 in the Embase database, Ovid Medline (R) Process, Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid Medline (R) and completed a PRISMA checklist and sources of bias (QUADAS-2). The inclusion criteria were English language, available histopathological outcomes, or at least one imaging follow-up after biopsy. A random intercept logistic regression model was used to pool rates. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified by the I2 statistic. Results: A total of 11,215 lesions in 50 articles were analyzed. The technical success rate was 99.10% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97.89–99.62%]. The MRI indications were staging in 1,496 (28.05%, 95% CI: 26.85–29.28%), screening in 1,427 (26.76%, 95% CI: 25.57–27.97%), surveillance in 1,027 (19.26%, 95% CI: 18.21–20.34%), diagnostic in 1,038 (19.46%, 95% CI: 18.41–20.55%), unknown primary in 74 (1.39%, 95% CI: 1.09–1.74%), and other in 271 (5.08%, 95% CI: 4.51–5.71%). Histopathology was benign in 65.06% (95% CI: 59.15–70.54%), malignant in 29.64% (95% CI: 23.58–36.52%) and high risk in 16.69% (95% CI: 9.96–26.64%). Detection of malignancy was significantly lower in those patients who underwent MRI for screening purposes (odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.87; p = 0.02), while mass lesions were more likely to yield malignancy compared to non-mass and foci [27.39% vs 11.36% (non-mass),18.03% (foci); p<0.001]. Surgical upgrade to invasive cancer occurred in 12.24% of ductal carcinoma in situ (95% CI: 7.76–18.77%) and malignancy in 15.14% of high-risk lesions (95% CI: 10.69–21.17%). MRI follow-up was performed in 1,651 (20.92%) patients after benign results [median=25 months (range: 0.4–117)]. Radiology-pathology discordance (2.48%, 95% CI: 1.62–3.77%), false negative after a benignconcordant biopsy (0.75%, 95% CI: 0.34–1.62%) and biopsy complications (2.36%, 95% CI: 2.03–2.72%) were rare. Conclusion: MRGB is a highly accurate minimally-invasive diagnostic technique with low false-negative and complication rates. MRI indication and lesion type should be considered when evaluating the performance of institutional MRGB programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objective of this study is to report on the performance of the MRI-guided VABB in our center and to look at the long-term outcome of biopsies with benign histology over a period of 19 years.Methods: In a single-center retrospective review study, data of 600 VABB procedures performed between September 1999 and March 2017 were evaluated. We collected patient demographics, histopathological diagnosis at MRI-VABB, and basic lesion characteristics (size, location). Data from the Belgian Cancer Registry was cross-referenced with our database to find out which patients with benign MRI-VABB results developed a malignant lesion over time.Results: These 600 VABB procedures were performed in 558 women with a mean patient age of 51.8 years (range 18-82 years). Our technical success rate was 99.3%. We found 27.67% B5 lesions, 9.82% B3 lesions, and 0.17% B4 lesions. Of 362 benign MRI-guided VABBs, follow-up data was available for a mean follow-up period of 7.6 years (0.8-18.3). Only one (0.3%) biopsy was a false negative lesion after MRI-guided VABB during follow-up. Short-term FU-MRI provided no increase in detection rate.Conclusion: The accuracy of MRI-guided VABB is high with a very low false negative rate of 0.3% on long-term follow-up. The value of short-term FU-MRI for every case after MRI-guided VABB may be questioned.Key Points: • MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies yield a large portion of clinically relevant lesions (9.82% B3, 0.17% B4, and 27.67% B5 lesions). • The false negative biopsy rate of MRI-guided VABB in this study with a mean follow-up time of 7.6 years was only 0.3%. • Performing a short-term follow-up MRI after a benign MRI-guided VABB concordant to the MRI appearance may be questioned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study evaluated the feasibility of DWI for lesion targeting in MRI-guided breast biopsies. Furthermore, it assessed device positioning on DWI during biopsy procedures.Methods: A total of 87 biopsy procedures (5/87 bilateral) consecutively performed between March 2019 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed: in these procedures, a preliminary DWI sequence (b = 1300 s/mm2) was acquired to assess lesion detectability. We included 64/87 procedures on lesions detectable at DWI; DWI sequences were added to the standard protocol to localize lesion and biopsy device and to assess the site marker correct positioning.Results: Mass lesions ranged from 5 to 48 mm, with a mean size of 10.7 mm and a median size of 8 mm. Non-mass lesions ranged from 7 to 90 mm, with a mean size of 33.9 mm and a median size of 31 mm. Positioning of the coaxial system was confirmed on both T1-weighted and DWI sequences. At DWI, the biopsy needle was detectable in 62/64 (96.9%) cases; it was not visible in 2/64 (3.1%) cases. The site marker was always identified using T1-weighted imaging; a final DWI sequence was acquired in 44/64 cases (68.8%). In 42/44 cases (95.5%), the marker was recognizable at DWI.Conclusions: DWI can be used as a cost-effective, highly reliable technique for targeting both mass and non-mass lesions, with a minimum size of 5 mm, detectable at pre-procedural DWI. DWI is also a feasible technique to localize the biopsy device and to confirm the deployment of the site marker.Key Points: • MRI-guided breast biopsy is performed in referral centers by an expert dedicated staff, based on prior MR imaging; contrast agent administration is usually needed for lesion targeting. • DWI represents a feasible, highly reliable technique for lesion targeting, avoiding contrast agent administration. • DWI allows a precise localization of both biopsy needle device and site marker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The question of overtreatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was raised because a significant proportion of especially low-grade DCIS lesions never progress to invasive cancer. The rationale for the present study was to analyze the value of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) for complete removal of DCIS, focusing on the relationship between the absence of residual microcalcifications after stereotactic VAB and the histopathological diagnosis of the definitive surgical specimen. Patients and Methods: Data of 58 consecutive patients diagnosed with DCIS by stereotactic VAB in a single breast center between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed. Patient records from the hospital information system were retrieved, and mammogram reports and images as well as histopathology reports were evaluated. The extent of microcalcifications before and after biopsy as well as the occurrence of DCIS in biopsy and definitive surgical specimens were analyzed and correlated. Results: There was no correlation between the absence of residual microcalcifications in the post-biopsy mammogram and the absence of residual DCIS in the final surgical specimen (p = 0.085). Upstaging to invasive cancer was recorded in 4 cases (13%) but occurred only in the group that had high-grade DCIS on biopsy. Low-grade DCIS was never upgraded to high-grade DCIS in the definitive specimen. Conclusions: The radiological absence of microcalcifications after stereotactic biopsy does not rule out residual DCIS in the final surgical specimen. Since upstaging to invasive cancer is seen in a substantial proportion of high-grade DCIS, the surgical excision of high-grade DCIS should remain the treatment of choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Some breast lesions are not visible on mammography or ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) become the only way to monitor these lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of MRI-guided biopsy and MRI-guided wire localization of breast minimal lesions in Chinese population. Methods: We evaluated 95 patients (the most patients of known in China) from August 2013 to December 2017. All the patients were scanned with a 1.5-Tesla MRI system (GE Medical Systems, America) in the prone position using a bilateral 8-channel phased-array breast coil and underwent MRI-guided wire localization or MRI-guided biopsy. Results: MRI-guided wire localization and MRI-guided biopsy were successfully performed in 87 patients with 88 lesions (100%, 88/88). After biopsy or surgery, 36 of 88 lesions (40.91%) were malignant, and 52 of 88 lesions (59.09%) were benign. Thirty-nine of 88 lesions (44.32%) were masses, and 49 of 88 (55.68%) showed non-mass enhancement. Statistical analysis showed there was no significant correlation between the malignancy rate and the type of lesion on MRI (P = 0.27). In this study, the rate of malignancy for Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 5 lesions was 100% (2 of 2) compared with 44.44% for BI-RADS 4C lesions (4 of 9), 42.42% for BI-RADS 4B lesions (14 of 33), and 36.36% for BI-RADS 4A lesions (16 of 44). Conclusions: MRI-guided wire localization with subsequent surgical biopsy and MRI-guided biopsy are safe and effective tools for breast minimal lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative bleeding is the most frequent serious complications after vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy (VABB). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of using urinary balloon catheter to prevent postoperative bleeding after ultrasound‐guided VABB. From May 2016 to June 2018, 324 patients who underwent ultrasound‐guided VABB were randomized into the study group and control group. In the study group, an urinary balloon catheter was inserted into the excision cavity to prevent bleeding and hematoma. In the control group, compression with thorax pressure bandage was used for hemostasis. Postoperative subcutaneous ecchymosis and hematoma were recorded and compared between the two groups. The rates of postoperative ecchymosis and hematoma in the study group were significantly lower than that in the control group (5.6% vs 13.0%, P <.05; 8.0% vs 20.4%, P <.05). Among patients with lesions ≤1.5 cm, the rates of postoperative ecchymosis and hematoma were 2.9% and 4.3% in the study group, 6.5% and 11.7% in the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P >.05). Among patients with lesions >1.5 cm, the rates of postoperative ecchymosis and hematoma in the study group were significantly lower than that in the control group (7.6% vs 18.8%, P <.05; 10.9% vs 28.2%, P <.05). Hemostasis with balloon urinary catheter is a safe and effective method to prevent postoperative bleeding after VABB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In breast tissue, pre-malignant lesions are classified as BIRADS 3. The treatment of this heterogeneous group varies with expertise and tools available.Materials and Methods: With the example of two case reports, the literature is reviewed on current treatment options for BIRADS 3 breast lesions.Results: About 7% of all B-type breast biopsies fall into the B3 category. Approximately 35% of these B3 lesions are due to FEA, 20% to PLs and another 20% to ADH. Due to improvement in diagnostics, the incidence is increasing, while their value as a predictive factor for malignancy has steadily been fallen.Conclusion: Depending on the histology of the needle biopsy, a complete resection with vacuum-assisted biopsy may be a treatment alternative to open biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess whether using the Tree flowchart obviates unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsies in breast lesions only visible on MRI.Methods: This retrospective IRB-approved study evaluated consecutive suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions only visible on MRI that were referred to our institution for MRI-guided biopsy. All lesions were evaluated according to the Tree flowchart for breast MRI by experienced readers. The Tree flowchart is a decision rule that assigns levels of suspicion to specific combinations of diagnostic criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. To assess reproducibility by kappa statistics, a second reader rated a subset of 82 patients.Results: There were 454 patients with 469 histopathologically verified lesions included (98 malignant, 371 benign lesions). The area under the curve (AUC) of the Tree flowchart was 0.873 (95% CI: 0.839-0.901). The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect (kappa: 0.944; 95% CI 0.889-0.998). ROC analysis revealed exclusively benign lesions if the Tree node was ≤2, potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies in 103 cases (27.8%).Conclusions: Using the Tree flowchart in breast lesions only visible on MRI, more than 25% of biopsies could be avoided without missing any breast cancer.Key Points: • The Tree flowchart may obviate >25% of unnecessary MRI-guided breast biopsies. • This decrease in MRI-guided biopsies does not cause any false-negative cases. • The Tree flowchart predicts 30.6% of malignancies with >98% specificity. • The Tree's high specificity aids in decision-making after benign biopsy results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB), evaluate and compare the characteristics and histopathologic findings of lesions, and overview the follow-up results of benign lesions.Methods: MRI findings and histopathologic results of breast lesions biopsied by MRI-guided VABB between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. MRI findings closely related with malignancy were investigated in particular. Follow-up results of benign lesions were evaluated.Results: MRI-guided VABB was applied to 116 lesions of 112 women. Of the lesions, 75 (65%) were benign, while 41 (35%) were malignant. Segmental (94%), clustered (89%), and clustered ring (67%) non-mass-like enhancement patterns were found to be more related with malignancy. False-negative rate of MRI-guided VABB was 12%, underestimation rate was 21%. One of the 54 followed-up benign lesions had a malignant result.Conclusion: MRI-guided VABB is a reliable method for the diagnosis of breast lesions that are positive only on MRI. Follow-up results show that cancer detection rate is low for radio-pathologically concordant lesions. Further multicenter studies with larger patient population are needed to elucidate these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare three different biopsy devices on false-negative and underestimation rates in MR-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of MRI-only lesions.Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was IRB-approved. Informed consent was waived. 467 consecutive patients underwent 487 MR-guided VABB using three different 8-10-gauge-VABB devices (Atec-9-gauge,A; Mammotome-8-gauge,M; Vacora-10-gauge,V). VABB data (lesion-type, size, biopsy device, histopathology) were compared to final diagnosis (surgery, n = 210 and follow-up, n = 277). Chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.Results: Final diagnosis was malignant in 104 (21.4 %), high risk in 64 (13.1 %) and benign in 319 (65.5 %) cases. Eleven of 328 (3.4 %) benign-rated lesions were false-negative (1/95, 1.1 %, A; 2/73, 2.7 %, M; 8/160 5.0 % V; P = 0.095). Eleven high-risk (11/77, 14.3 %) lesions proved to be malignant (3/26, 11.5 % A; 4/12, 33.3 % M; 4/39, 10.3 % V; P = 0.228). Five of 34 (14.7 %) DCIS were upgraded to invasive cancer (2/15, 13.3 %, A; 1/6, 16.6 % M; 2/13, 15.3 %, V; P = 0.977). Lesion size (P = 0.05) and type (mass vs. non-mass, P = 0.107) did not differ significantly.Conclusion: MR-guided VABB is an accurate method for diagnosis of MRI-only lesions. No significant differences on false-negative and underestimation rates were observed between three different biopsy devices.Key Points: • MR-guided VABB is an accurate procedure for the diagnosis of MRI-only lesions. • Similar false-negative and underestimation rates allow all three different MR-guided VABB devices for clinical application. • High-risk lesions should undergo surgery due to a substantial underestimation rate. • Agreement between MR-guided VABB and final diagnosis (benign/malignant) was 95.5% (465/487). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Oncology is the property of Chinese Journal of Oncology / Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)