Search

Although contralateral trunk tilt has been recognized, the phenomenon of excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt, often observed during earlier portions of the pitch, has not been explored as a potential correlate with throwing-arm kinetics among baseball pitchers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate kinetic and kinematic parameters among high school and professional pitchers related to excessive ipsilateral and contralateral trunk tilt.Professional and high school pitchers were assessed with a 3-dimensional motion capture system (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitchers were grouped as follows: excessive ipsilateral tilt at foot contact (FC), neutral, or excessive contralateral tilt at ball release (BR). Trunk and shoulder kinematics as well as throwing-arm kinetics were compared between subgroups via post hoc regression analysis.Professional pitchers (n = 287) had significantly higher ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC (P .001) than high school pitchers (n = 59). High school pitchers with excessive contralateral trunk tilt at BR experienced significantly higher shoulder superior force (27.0% ± 7.4% body weight [BW] vs. 17.6% ± 5.1% BW, P .001) and shoulder anterior force (39.6% ± 8.2% BW vs. 35.7% ± 5.4% BW, P .001) compared with the ipsilateral trunk tilt cohort but had comparable ball velocity (30.2 ± 3.2 m/s vs. 30.4 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .633). For professionals, for every 10° increase in ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC, ball velocity increased by 0.2 m/s (B = 0.02, β = 0.07, standard error [SE] = 0.005, P = .010) whereas elbow varus torque decreased by 0.1% BW × height (B = -0.01, β = -0.08, SE = 0.002, P .001) and shoulder internal rotation torque decreased by 0.1% BW × height (B = -0.01, β = -0.07, SE = 0.002, P = .005).High school and professional pitchers with excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC consistently demonstrated significantly decreased throwing-arm kinetics (shoulder anterior force and shoulder superior force for high school pitchers and shoulder internal rotation torque and elbow varus torque for professional pitchers) compared with pitchers with excessive contralateral trunk tilt at BR, with equivalent ball velocity. In addition, professional pitchers appeared to engage in significantly greater ipsilateral trunk tilt during early portions of the pitch when compared with high school pitchers, which may represent a kinetically favorable method adopted by pitchers at higher playing levels to maintain adequate ball velocity while concomitantly minimizing throwing-arm kinetics.

BACKGROUND Increased sagittal-plane trunk tilt is thought to increase drive in the anterior direction toward home plate, transferring energy from the trunk to the distal upper extremity, ultimately generating greater ball velocity. Increased sagittal trunk tilt has also been implicated in the risk of upper-extremity joint loading in baseball pitchers by way of elbow varus torque (EVT), a metric previously associated with elbow injury in professional pitchers. The purposes of this study were (1) to compare sagittal trunk tilt positioning between high school and professional pitchers throughout the pitch and (2) to identify the potential associations between sagittal-plane trunk tilt, ball velocity, and EVT for both cohorts. METHODS Professional and high school pitchers were instructed to throw fastballs while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Sagittal trunk tilt motion throughout the pitching motion was compared between cohorts from maximum knee height to maximum shoulder internal rotation. To assess the effects of sagittal-plane trunk tilt on ball velocity and EVT, linear mixed-effect models were created. RESULTS Professional pitchers (n = 100, 882 pitches) achieved greater sagittal trunk tilt than high school pitchers (n = 57, 519 pitches) during early portions of the pitching motion, including maximum positive sagittal trunk tilt (46.6° ± 8.3° vs. 43.6° ± 10.2°, P = .042). Professional pitchers also had greater sagittal trunk tilt excursion throughout the pitch motion (68.0° ± 11.4° vs. 62.5° ± 11.0°, P = .004). For every 10° increase in sagittal trunk tilt at ball release for professional pitchers, ball velocity increased by 0.36 m/s (B = 0.036 and β = 0.194, P < .001) or 0.9% average ball velocity whereas EVT increased by 0.14% body weight × body height (B = 0.014 and β = 0.159, P < .001) or 2.9% average normalized EVT. For every 10° increase in sagittal trunk tilt at ball release for high school pitchers, ball velocity increased by 0.34 m/s (B = 0.097 and β = 0.025, P = .025) or 1.1% average ball velocity whereas EVT increased by 0.07% body weight × body height (B = 0.007 and β = 0.086, P = .016) or 1.7% average normalized EVT. CONCLUSION Increased positive sagittal-plane trunk tilt was significantly associated with greater ball velocity and increased EVT for both professional and high school pitchers. Peak EVT estimates were consistently more pronounced than ball velocity benefits for both populations, suggesting that no specific time point may provide a ball velocity benefit while concomitantly minimizing EVT. Both professional and high school pitchers should consider this trade-off, which may influence injury risk, when engaging in higher degrees of positive sagittal-plane trunk tilt.

Background: Inefficient energy transfer from the pelvis and trunk has been shown to increase compensation at the level of the shoulder. Kinetic chain sequencing of the core segments is underexamined in professional baseball pitchers, especially as it relates to changes in upper extremity kinetics. Purpose: To evaluate elbow and shoulder kinetics in a cohort of professional pitchers differentiated by instances of discordant pelvic to upper torso sequencing during the pitch. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: 285 professional baseball pitchers were evaluated using 3D motion capture (480 Hz). Pitchers were divided into “chronological” and “discordant” groups based on whether maximum pelvic rotation velocity occurred before (chronological) or after (discordant) maximum upper torso rotation velocity during the pitch motion. Pelvic, upper torso, and shoulder kinematic parameters, shoulder distraction force, shoulder internal rotation torque, and pitch efficiency (PE) were compared between groups. Results: Pitchers with discordant torso sequencing (n = 30; 110 pitches) had greater shoulder horizontal adduction at maximum external rotation (mean difference, 3.6°; 95% CI, −5.2° to −2.0°; t = −4.5; P < .001) and greater maximum shoulder external rotation (mean difference, 3.7°; 95% CI, 5.7° to 1.5°; t = −3.5; P < .001) than chronological pitchers (n = 255; 2974 pitches). PE did not differ between groups ( P = .856), whereas ball velocity was significantly faster in the discordant group (mean difference, 0.6 m/s; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.3 m/s; t = −3.3; P = .0012). Chronological pitchers had significantly reduced shoulder distraction force (mean difference, −4.7% body weight (BW); 95% CI, −7.9% to −1.5% BW; t = −2.9; P = .004) with no difference in shoulder internal rotation torque ( P = .160). These kinematic and kinetic differences were not observed when accounting for interpitcher variability. Conclusion: Between pitchers, those who had a discordant pelvic to upper torso sequence experienced significantly greater shoulder distraction forces, potentially compensating by increasing maximum shoulder external rotation and horizontal abduction. Achieving maximal pelvic rotation velocity before maximal rotation velocity may be advantageous in preventing compensation at the upper extremity and excessive throwing arm loading. Clinical Relevance: Identifying risk factors for increased upper extremity forces has potential implications in injury prevention. Specifically, mitigating shoulder distraction forces may be beneficial in reducing risk of injury.

Background: Early pelvis rotation has been associated with decreased throwing arm kinetics and conventionally was considered a component of proper pitching form in baseball throwers. However, previous assessments of pelvis rotation style have not accounted for confounders such as playing level, anthropometric characteristics, or ball velocity and have not evaluated sufficient sample sizes. Purpose: To compare kinetic and kinematic parameters based on pelvis rotation style in high school and professional pitchers. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: High school and professional baseball pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while being evaluated using 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). These pitchers were 1:1 propensity score matched by age, height, weight, handedness, and ball velocity based on early (Results: Pelvis rotation at foot contact was not significantly associated with ball velocity for either high school ( P = .243) or professional pitchers ( P = .075). No difference was found in elbow varus torque between high school early rotators (57.5 ± 14.9 N·m) and late rotators (51.3 ± 14.7 N·m; P = .036) and between professional early rotators (80.1 ± 11.8 N·m) and late rotators (79.0 ± 11.2 N·m; P = .663). At foot contact in high school pitchers, stride length increased by 2.1% of body height (B = −0.205; β = −0.470; P < .001), trunk rotation increased by 4.2° (B = −0.417; β = −0.488; P < .001), and trunk flexion at foot contact decreased by 4.4° (B = 0.442; β = 0.476; P < .001) with every 10° increase in pelvis rotation. At foot contact in professional pitchers, stride length increased by 2.3% of body height (B = –0.229; β = –0.478; P < .001), trunk rotation increased by 4.3° (B = –0.431; β = –0.515; P < .001), and trunk flexion decreased by 4.0° (B = 0.404; β = 0.373; P < .001) with every 10° increase in pelvis rotation. Conclusion: Pelvis rotation at foot contact was associated with several kinematic parameters in both groups and may influence mechanics further along the kinetic chain. Landing open or closed was not significantly associated with throwing arm kinetics or ball velocity for both high school and professional baseball pitchers, contrary to previous thought. Clinical Relevance: Coaches and players may better focus their efforts on refining other kinematic parameters for enhanced performance outcomes and safe pitching mechanics.

Although ball velocity has often been associated with increased kinetics at the upper extremity and risk of injury in youth and adolescent pitchers, it is unclear if the performance metric pitch location consistency has any positive or negative associations with pitching kinetics.High school pitchers (n = 59) pitched 8-12 fastballs using 3D motion capture (480 Hz). Pitchers were divided into high-consistency (HiCon) and low-consistency (LoCon) groups based on the absolute center deviation of each pitcher's pitch to the center of the pitcher's mean pitch location. Ninety-five percent confidence ellipses with major and minor radii were constructed, and kinematics and kinetics were compared between groups.Compared with LoCon pitchers, HiCon pitchers had decreased lead hip flexion at elbow extension (40° ± 12° vs. 52° ± 13°, respectively, P = .008), and at foot contact, decreased back hip extension (-1° ± 10° vs. -10° ± 13°, respectively, P = .038) and increased back hip internal rotation (9° ± 15° vs. -2° ± 15°, respectively, P = .043). LoCon pitchers achieved maximum lead hip flexion earlier in the pitch (61.3% ± 23.2% vs. 75.8% ± 15.1%, respectively, P = .039). A multiregression model predicted 0.49 of variance in pitch location consistency using kinematic inputs.Pitchers who differ in pitch location consistency outcomes do not appear to demonstrate physiologically unsafe kinematics. High school pitchers who strive for improved pitch consistency can consider adjusting parameters of hip kinematics during early portions of the pitch.

Background: Elbow flexion at late portions of the pitch has been associated with increased elbow varus torque, a kinetic surrogate associated with injury risk. Direct examinations of injury incidence with elbow flexion angles have not been conducted in professional pitchers. Purpose: To compare elbow and shoulder injury incidence among professional baseball players stratified by degree of elbow flexion at ball release (BR). Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Professional pitchers (N = 314) were instructed to pitch between 8 and 12 fastballs while being evaluated using motion capture technology. Upper extremity injury incidence was recorded upon interview. Pitchers were subsequently subdivided into 3 groups based on increasing elbow flexion at BR. Analysis of variance was used to compare participant characteristics and kinematic and peak kinetic variables. An odds ratio (OR) was calculated to determine the risk of having a previous upper extremity injury based on the degree of elbow flexion at BR. Results: A total of 116 pitchers (132 documented injuries) had a previous upper extremity injury, with elbow injury (76 injuries; 57.6%) being the most common. Evaluation of kinetic values showed that pitchers with the smallest elbow flexion at BR had significantly less peak elbow flexion torque than did those with greatest elbow flexion at BR (3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.1 ± 0.6 %weight × height; P = .003). Pitchers who demonstrated a greater than average degree of elbow flexion at BR when pitching were more likely to have a history of elbow injury (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.14-3.40; P = .015) and olecranon spur formation or stress fracture (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.25-26.85; P = .025). Conclusion: Pitchers with greater elbow flexion at BR had significantly higher odds of previous injury of the elbow and olecranon. Increasing elbow flexion has been shown to place the medial elbow in a position to carry a greater amount of load, which may be exacerbated during the final moments of the pitching motion. Professional pitchers can consider decreasing elbow flexion at BR as a potential, modifiable risk factor for elbow injury, in particular for olecranon spur formation and fracture. Clinical Relevance: This study attempts to associate injury incidence with a modifiable, kinematic variable for an at-risk population.

Background: Biomechanical predictors of pitching accuracy are underevaluated in baseball research. It is unclear how pitchers with higher accuracy differ in terms of kinematics and upper extremity kinetics. Purpose: To differentiate high- and low-accuracy professional pitchers by full-body kinematic and upper extremity kinetic parameters. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: In total, 121 professional baseball pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastballs while assessed with motion-capture technology (480 Hz). Pitchers were divided into high-accuracy (n = 33), moderate-accuracy (n = 52), and low-accuracy (n = 36) groups based on the absolute center deviation of each pitcher’s average pitch to the center of the pitching chart by greater or less than 0.5 SD from the mean, respectively. The 95% confidence ellipses with comparisons of major and minor radii and pitching probability density grids were constructed. Analysis of variance was used to compare kinematic and kinetic values between groups. Results: The absolute center deviation (14.5% ± 6.7% vs 33.5% ± 3.7% grid width; P < .001) was significantly lower in the high-accuracy compared with the low-accuracy group, with no significant difference in ball velocity (38.0 ± 1.7 vs 38.5 ± 2.0 m/s; P = .222). Lead knee flexion at ball release (30.6°± 17.8° vs 40.1°± 16.3°; P = .023) was significantly less for the high-accuracy pitchers. Peak normalized shoulder internal rotation torque (5.5% ± 1.0% vs 4.9% ± 0.7% body weight [BW] × body height [BH]; P = .008), normalized elbow varus torque (5.4% ± 1.0% vs 4.8% ± 0.7% BW × BH; P = .008), and normalized elbow medial force (42.9% ± 7.3% vs 38.6% ± 6.2% BW; P = .024) were significantly greater for the low-accuracy group compared with the high-accuracy group. Conclusion: Professional pitchers with increased accuracy experienced decreased throwing arm kinetics. These pitchers had increased lead knee extension at later stages of the pitch, potentially providing more stable engagement with the ground and transference of kinetic energy to the upper extremities. Professional pitchers can consider increasing lead knee extension at the final stages of the pitch to improve the accuracy of their throws and mitigate elbow varus torque. Clinical Relevance: Increased elbow varus torque, shoulder internal rotation torque, and elbow medial force in less accurate pitchers may contribute to increased injury risk in this group.

To evaluate kinematic and kinetic parameters for high school (HS) and professional (PRO) pitchers differentiated by stride width.Descriptive laboratory study.HS (n = 36) and PRO (n = 172) baseball pitchers pitched 8-12 fastballs using 3D-motion capture (480-Hz). Pitchers were 1:1 propensity-scored matched by age, height, weight, and ball velocity based on 'narrow' versus 'wide' stride widths and kinematics and kinetics were compared using independent t-tests. Independent associations between variables and stride width were determined utilizing linear regressions.At foot contact, HS wide (n = 18) had significantly less lead knee flexion (41 ± 9° vs. 49 ± 6°, p = 0.007, d = -1.0) and less pelvis rotation (66 ± 9° vs. 57 ± 14°, p = 0.003 d = 0.8) compared to HS narrow (n = 18). PRO wide (n = 86) at ball release had significantly less pelvis rotation (-10 ± 10° vs. -15 ± 14°, p = 0.008, d = 0.4) and increased shoulder horizontal adduction (4±8° vs. -1±9°, p=0.003, d=0.5) compared to PRO narrow (n = 86). For every 10 cm increase in stride width, pelvis rotation at ball release decreased by 2° (B:0.10, β:0.20, p 0.001) in HS and 1.3° (B:0.08, β:0.13, p = 0.002) in PRO.HS and PRO pitchers differentiated by stride width demonstrated no significant difference in throwing arm kinetics. For both groups, wider stride width was associated with decreased pelvis rotation, which may contribute to inefficient utilization of kinetic energy. Ultimately, coaches and players may better focus their efforts on refining other kinematics for enhanced performance outcomes and safe pitching mechanics.

Background: Understanding the relationship between the temporal phases of the baseball pitch and subsequent joint loading may improve our understanding of optimal pitching mechanics and contribute to injury prevention in baseball pitchers. Purpose: To investigate the temporal phases of the pitching motion and their associations with ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school (HS) and professional (PRO) baseball pitchers. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: PRO (n = 317) and HS (n = 54) baseball pitchers were evaluated throwing 8 to 12 fastball pitches using 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Four distinct phases of the pitching motion were evaluated based on timing of angular velocities: (1) Foot-Pelvis, (2) Pelvis-Torso, (3) Torso-Elbow, and (4) Elbow-Ball. Peak elbow varus torque, shoulder internal rotation torque, and shoulder distraction force were also calculated and compared between playing levels using 2-sample t tests. Linear mixed-effect models with compound symmetry covariance structures were used to correlate pitch velocity and throwing arm kinetics with the distinct temporal phases of the pitching motion. Results: PRO pitchers had greater weight and height, and faster ball velocities than HS pitchers ( P < .001). There was no difference in total pitch time between groups ( P = .670). PRO pitchers spent less time in the Foot-Pelvis ( P = .010) and more time in the Pelvis-Torso ( P < .001) phase comparatively. Shorter time spent in the earlier phases of the pitching motion was significantly associated with greater ball velocity for both PRO and HS pitchers (Foot-Pelvis: B = −6.4 and B = −11.06, respectively; Pelvis-Torso: B = −6.4 and B = −11.4, respectively), while also associated with increased shoulder proximal force (Pelvis-Torso: B = −76.4 and B = −77.5, respectively). Decreased time in the Elbow-Ball phase correlated with greater shoulder proximal force for both cohorts (B = −1150 and B = −645, respectively) with no significant correlation found for ball velocity. Conclusion: Significant differences in temporal phases exist between PRO and HS pitchers. For all pitchers, increased time spent in the final phase of the pitching motion has the potential to decrease shoulder distraction force with no significant loss in ball velocity. Clinical Relevance: Identifying risk factors for increased shoulder and elbow kinetics, acting as a surrogate for loading at the respective joints, has potential implications in injury prevention.

Temporal variations during the pitch have demonstrated significant impacts on the kinetic chain, and as such, have implications in injury risk.To determine the effect of varying chronological orders of maximum joint and segment velocities on ball velocity and upper extremity kinetics.Professional baseball pitchers (n = 287) were assessed with 3D-motion capture (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitches were categorized into one of the following groups dependent on the first maximum joint or segment velocity achieved out of chronological order in an inferior to superior direction: knee extension (DscK), pelvis rotation (DscP), trunk rotation (DscT), shoulder rotation (DscS), forearm pronation (DscF), and Proper (for pitchers with the correct temporal sequence), and Total Population, for all pitchers. Ten normalized throwing arm kinetic variables were compared among groups. Regression analysis was conducted on the timing of maximum velocities with ball velocity.The majority of pitches were in the DscK group (64.5%). The DscK group had a significantly slower maximum lead knee extension velocity compared with the Proper group (253°/s vs. 316°/s, P = .017). The Proper group had a significantly faster ball velocity compared with the Total Population (39.0 ± 1.9 m/s vs. 38.3 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .013). The DscP group had a significantly slower maximum pelvis rotation velocity compared with the Proper group (596°/s vs. 698°/s, P .001). The Proper group had no significant difference in kinetics relative to the population. For every 1 standard deviation delay in attaining maximum lead knee extension velocity, ball velocity increased by 0.38 m/s (B = 3.5, β = 0.18, P .001). For every 1 standard deviation delay in timing to achieve maximum pelvis rotation velocity, maximum pelvis rotation velocity and ball velocity increased by 22.5°/s (B = 1107.0, β = 0.23, P .001) and 0.48 m/s (B = 23.4, β = 0.23, P .001), respectively.Pitchers with a discordant sequence of knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity timing had significantly slower corresponding segment/joint velocities. Conversely, pitchers with a proper sequence had the fastest ball velocity with minimal differences in throwing arm kinetics. To maximize ball velocity, professional pitchers should consider achieving maximal velocities in an inferior to superior chronological sequence, with a particular focus on the knee and pelvis.

Professional basebal pitchers (n =315) were divided into quartiles based on increasing stride length and random intercept linear mixed-effect models were used to correlate stride length with ball velocity, pelvis and trunk rotation at foot contact, and throwing arm kinetics. Average stride length among all pitchers was 78.3±5.3%body height (%BH). For every 10% increase in stride length, ball velocity increased by 0.9 m/s (B =0.089, β =0.25, p

Purpose To compare kinematic and kinetic parameters between a cohort of fully recovered professional pitchers with prior shoulder injury treated conservatively compared to a cohort with no prior shoulder injury. Methods Twenty-six fully recovered professional baseball pitchers with a history of shoulder injury treated conservatively pitched 8-10 fastball pitches using 3D-motion capture (480 Hz). All shoulder injuries occurred within a 1-4 year timespan from biomechanical evaluation and were severe enough to prevent pitchers from playing between 1-12 months. These pitchers were 4:1 propensity-scored matched by age, height, weight, handedness, and ball velocity to pitchers with no prior injury history (control). Twenty-two kinematic and eleven kinetic parameters were compared between groups using appropriate parametric testing. Sub-analysis comparisons of pitchers with prior superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) injury as well as rotator cuff tendinitis were also performed. Results SLAP tears (n=11, 42.3%) were the most frequently reported injury, followed by rotator cuff tendinitis/shoulder impingement (n=7, 26.9%). Compared to the control group, the twenty-six prior injured pitchers showed no significant differences across kinematic and kinetic factors. However, the SLAP tear subgroup did demonstrate significantly less trunk rotation at foot contact compared to control (34.1±4.9 vs. 39.2±10.2°, p=0.0075). Conclusion Fully recovered professional baseball pitchers with shoulder injuries treated conservatively showed no significant differences in kinetics or kinematics compared to their propensity-matched counterparts, suggesting shoulder injury alone may not greatly alter pitching mechanics. However, while prior groups have demonstrated a decrease in trunk rotation at foot contact after surgical repair for SLAP tear, our study suggests that this kinematic change may alternatively originate with the injury itself. Clinical Relevance Understanding the etiology of biomechanical adaptations by pitchers after injury can better aid clinicians and coaching staff in providing individualized and specific care to the throwing athlete.

Background The association between ball velocity and elbow varus torque has shown differences when evaluated within a single pitcher and within a cohort. The impact of increasing ball velocity on additional throwing-arm kinetics, in particular shoulder distraction forces, with intra- vs. inter-pitcher evaluations has not been evaluated, even though these kinetic measures have been implicated in injury risk. The purpose of this study was to compare intra- vs. inter-pitcher relationships between ball velocity and all major kinetics at the shoulder and elbow in professional pitchers. Methods A total of 323 professional baseball pitchers threw 8-12 fastball pitches while simultaneously being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion-capture technology (480 Hz). A linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate pitch velocity as a predictor of peak kinetic values at the shoulder and elbow among pitchers. A linear mixed model with random intercepts was then created to evaluate ball velocity as a predictor of peak kinetic values when comparing pitches within an individual pitcher. Results 91 pitchers were included in the analyses. Ball velocity among pitchers had weak correlations with shoulder distraction force (R2 = 0.228, P 0.85) were observed for (1) shoulder internal rotation torque (P Conclusion Faster pitch velocity is a weak predictor of shoulder and elbow distraction forces experienced among professional pitchers. However, when controlling for an individual pitcher, peak kinetics at the shoulder and elbow can be strongly predicted by ball velocity. Therefore, the assumption that higher peak throwing-arm kinetic values are experienced by pitchers with faster ball velocity is likely an inappropriate assumption among pitchers but may be correct for each player who increases pitch velocity.