Search

A techno-economic assessment and environmental and social sustainability assessments of novel Fischer–Tropsch (FT) biodiesel production from the wet and dry gasification of biomass-based residue streams (bark and black liquor from pulp production) for transport applications are presented. A typical French kraft pulp mill serves as the reference case and large-scale biofuel-production-process integration is explored. Relatively low greenhouse gas emission levels can be obtained for the FT biodiesel (total span: 16–83 g CO2eq/MJ in the assessed EU countries). Actual process configuration and low-carbon electricity are critical for overall performance. The site-specific social assessment indicates an overall positive social effect for local community, value chain actors, and society. Important social aspects include (i) job creation potential, (ii) economic development through job creation and new business opportunities, and (iii) health and safety for workers. For social risks, the country of implementation is important. Heat and electricity use are the key contributors to social impacts. The estimated production cost for biobased crude oil is about 13 €/GJ, and it is 14 €/GJ (0.47 €/L or 50 €/MWh) for the FT biodiesel. However, there are uncertainties, i.e., due to the low technology readiness level of the gasification technologies, especially wet gasification. However, the studied concept may provide substantial GHG reduction compared to fossil diesel at a relatively low cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The required level of a sector specific CO 2e -cost in the transport sector to make the net annual profit (NAP) of three different gasification based biofuel production systems positive (systems profitable) is investigated. The analysis is made for two different energy market scenarios for 2030 and 2040. The results show that the additional required sector specific CO 2e -cost (additional to a sector wide general cost) is not higher than the current level of CO 2e -tax in Sweden. The required total level of CO 2e -cost for the transport sector is in the 450 ppm v scenario in general higher than the current CO 2 -tax level but not higher than the fuel tax level (including also energy tax). The study also compares the NAP and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction potential of the gasification-based systems to a system where the biomass is used in conventional bio-CHP to produce heat and power and where the power is used in the transport sector (in battery electric vehicles (BEV)). Under the investigated energy market scenarios the bio-CHP and BEV system has higher NAP and higher GHG emission reduction potential. However, the bio-CHP system has a stronger dependency on the availability of large heat sinks and profits from a high price of delivered heat. Highlights • CO 2 cost levels required for profitability in gasification based biofuel production. • Evaluating GHG emissions and NAP of bioenergy systems under future conditions. • Biomass use for gasification based fuels or for CHP and battery electric vehicles. • Bio-CHP route with BEV shows higher NAP then gasification based biofuel production. • Strong dependency of bio-CHP routes profitability on the price and demand for heat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]