Search

Purpose: A specific biomarker of post-ARDS fibroproliferation could be useful in the identification of patients who could benefit from therapies aiming to modulate fibroproliferation such as corticosteroids.The aim of this prospective study was to determine the best threshold of the N-terminal-peptidetype III procollagen (NT-PCP-III) in non-resolving ARDS to validate this threshold according to the outcome. Methods: Concerning the best threshold of NT-PCP-III, all consecutive patients with a non-resolving ARDS were included if all the following criteria were fulfilled: moderate to severe ARDS lasting for at least 5 days, lung biopsy performed, serum and alveolar NT-PCP-III obtained within 1 week prior to biopsy, and no documented infection contra-indicating the corticosteroids. In the validation cohort part of the study, patients were included at day 7 if they presented a persistent moderate to severe ARDS. Results: Nineteen of 32 patients had fibroproliferatio nonbiopsy. Serum and alveolar NT-PCP-III were higher in patients with fibroproliferation. Using a threshold of 9 µg/L, alveolar NT-PCP-III had the highest accuracy for diagnosing fibroproliferation (sensitivity = 89.5 % and specificity = 92.3 %). Regarding the 51 patients included in the validation cohort, the mortality rate at day 60 was increased in patients presenting an alveolar NT-PCP-III level higher than 9 µg/L (69 vs. 17 %, p < 0.001). The mean alveolar level of NT-PCP-III on day 7 was 8.1-fold higher in nonsurvivors ( p = 0.03). Conclusions: The determination of NT-PCP-III on BAL done at day 7 in persistent ARDS is able to identify patients with fibroproliferation who could be included in a trial of corticosteroids or any other treatment that might help resolve lung fibroproliferation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Glucose-transporter-1 (Glut-1) may be a useful marker for differentiating B3 thymomas and thymic carcinomas. Since the literature is limited, we undertook a study to evaluate its diagnostic value in a series of thymic epithelial tumors. Materials and methods Glut-1 expression was studied by the group of pathologists linked to the French national oncological network RYTHMIC. Immunostaining was performed on a whole section of one paraffin block in a series of 92 successive surgical specimens. Patterns (focal, zonal, diffuse) and intensity of Glut-1 expression were assessed and compared with WHO histological subtypes. Results Expression was mainly restricted to epithelial cells. Immature T-lymphocytes were negative. A diffuse, moderate or strong staining was observed in most thymic carcinomas (15/16). In B3 thymomas (10/11) and in B3 thymomas borderline to thymic carcinomas (5/6), a moderate to strong zonal staining was observed at distance from vessels and fibrous septa. This pattern sometimes created the aspect of an anastomosing network in large cellular lobules. In B1 thymomas, immunostaining highlighted foci of medullary differentiation (7/8). B2 thymomas ( n = 25) were heterogeneous, with a spectrum of patterns ranging between those of B1 and B3 thymomas. Type A thymomas ( n = 5) mostly presented a weak positivity but one aggressive case showed zonal moderate/strong positivity. Most AB thymomas (15/17) showed weak to moderate immunostaining in spindle cell areas. In micronodular thymomas ( n = 3), epithelial cells and B-lymphocytes were weakly positive while follicular dendritic cells were strongly highlighted. One metaplastic thymoma displayed diffuse and moderate positivity. Conclusion Glut-1 expression globally depended on histological subtypes and the staining patterns (diffuse or zonal) were different between thymic carcinomas and type B3 thymomas. A comparative study of Glut-1 expression in atypical versus conventional type A thymomas appears warranted. Otherwise, restriction to epithelial cells makes likely a correlation with clinical assessment of glucose uptake in lymphocyte-poor tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: CK2α is a signalling molecule that participates in major events in solid tumour progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the immunohistochemical expression of CK2α in breast carcinomas. Methods: Quantitative measurements of immunohistochemical expression of 33 biomarkers using high-throughput densitometry, assessed on digitised microscopic tissue micro-array images were correlated with clinical outcome in 1000 breast carcinomas using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: In univariate analysis, CK2α was a significant prognostic indicator (p <0.001). Moreover, a multivariable model allowed the selection of the best combination of the 33 biomarkers to predict patients’ outcome through logistic regression. A nine-marker signature highly predictive of metastatic risk, associating SHARP-2, STAT1, eIF4E, pmapKAPk-2, pAKT, caveolin, VEGF, FGF-1 and CK2α permitted to classify well 82.32% of patients (specificity 81.59%, sensitivity 92.55%, area under ROC curve 0.939). Importantly, in a node negative subset of patients an even more (86%) clinically relevant association of eleven markers was found predictive of poor outcome. Conclusion: A strong quantitative CK2α immunohistochemical expression in breast carcinomas is individually a significant indicator of poor prognosis. Moreover, an immunohistochemical signature of 11 markers including CK2α accurately (86%) well classifies node negative patients in good and poor outcome subsets. Our results suggest that CK2α evaluation together with key downstream CK2 targets might be a useful tool to identify patients at high risk of distant metastases and that CK2 can be considered as a relevant target for potential specific therapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]