Search

The liquid biopsy has the potential to improve patient care in the diagnostic and therapeutic setting in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Consented patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive disease (n = 21) were stratified into two cohorts: those currently receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (n = 9) and newly diagnosed EGFR TKI treatment-naïve patients (n = 12). Plasma genotyping of cell-free DNA was carried out using the FDA-approved cobas® EGFR mutation test v2 and compared to next generation sequencing (NGS) cfDNA panels. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) numbers were correlated with treatment response and EGFR exon 20 p.T790M. The prognostic significance of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was also investigated. Patients in cohort 1 with an EGFR exon 20 p.T790M mutation progressed more rapidly than those with an EGFR sensitizing mutation, while patients in cohort 2 had a significantly longer progression-free survival (p = 0.04). EGFR exon 20 p.T790M was detected by liquid biopsy prior to disease progression indicated by computed tomography (CT) imaging. The cobas® EGFR mutation test detected a significantly greater number of exon 20 p.T790M mutations (p = 0.05). High NLR and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) were associated with shorter time to progression and worse survival outcomes (p < 0.05). High LDH levels were significantly associated with shorter time to disease progression (p = 0.03). These data support the use of liquid biopsy for monitoring EGFR mutations and inflammatory markers as prognostic indicators in NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular basis of cancer and the development of molecular diagnostics based on this knowledge have done much to progress the fields of oncology and pathology. Technological developments such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and multiplex assays have made feasible the widespread adoption of molecular diagnostics for clinical use. While these developments and advances carry much promise, there are pitfalls to implementing this testing. Choosing appropriate biomarkers is a vital first step for clinical use and being able to understand the complex relationship between predictive and prognostic biomarkers is a crucial component of this. Testing for standard of care biomarkers is not straightforward, one must choose carefully between clinical trial assays, assays that analyse the same biological phenomenon or surrogate biomarkers. Sample heterogeneity and population specific difference is assays may skew results and must be controlled for at the assay design stage. At a technical level, NGS has the potential to revolutionise laboratory practice and approaches to cancer treatment. However, use of this technology requires careful planning and implementation if one is to avoid technical and ethical quagmires. Finally, with FDA regulation of companion diagnostics one may be limited to therapy specific assays. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• ROS1 was assessed in a retrospective cohort of surgically resected NSCLC. • ROS1 was correlated to outcome variables/results from previous biomarker projects. • ROS1 IHC by SP384 clone is useful for exclusion of ROS1 gene fusion negative cases. ROS1 fusion is a relatively low prevalence (0.6–2.0%) but targetable driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Robust and low-cost tests, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), are desirable to screen for patients potentially harboring this fusion. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of ROS1 fusions in a clinically annotated European stage I-III LUAD cohort using IHC screening with the in vitro diagnostics (IVD)-marked clone SP384, followed by confirmatory molecular analysis in pre-defined subsets. Resected LUADs constructed in tissue microarrays, were immunostained for ROS1 expression using SP384 clone in a ready-to-use kit and Ventana immunostainers. After external quality control, analysis was performed by trained pathologists. Staining intensity of at least 2+ (any percentage of tumor cells) was considered IHC positive (ROS1 IHC +). Subsequently, ROS1 IHC + cases were 1:1:1 matched with IHC0 and IHC1 + cases and subjected to orthogonal ROS1 FISH and RNA-based testing. The prevalence of positive ROS1 expression (ROS1 IHC +), defined as IHC 2+/3+, was 4 % (35 of 866 LUADs). Twenty-eight ROS1 IHC + cases were analyzed by FISH/RNA-based testing, with only two harboring a confirmed ROS1 gene fusion, corresponding to a lower limit for the prevalence of ROS1 gene fusion of 0.23 %. They represent a 7 % probability of identifying a fusion among ROS1 IHC + cases. Both confirmed cases were among the only four with sufficient material and H-score ≥ 200, leading to a 50 % probability of identifying a ROS1 gene fusion in cases with an H-score considered strongly positive. All matched ROS1 IHC- (IHC0 and IHC1 +) cases were also found negative by FISH/RNA-based testing, leading to a 100 % probability of lack of ROS1 fusion for ROS1 IHC- cases. The prevalence of ROS1 fusion in an LUAD stage I-III European cohort was relatively low. ROS1 IHC using SP384 clone is useful for exclusion of ROS1 gene fusion negative cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]