Search

The complexities and heterogeneity of the ageing process have slowed the development of consensus on appropriate biomarkers of healthy ageing. The Medical Research Council-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA) is a collaboration between researchers and clinicians at the Universities of Liverpool, Sheffield and Newcastle. One of CIMA's objectives is to 'Identify and share optimal techniques and approaches to monitor age-related changes in all musculoskeletal tissues, and to provide an integrated assessment of musculoskeletal function'-in other words to develop a toolkit for assessing musculoskeletal ageing. This toolkit is envisaged as an instrument that can be used to characterise and quantify musculoskeletal function during 'normal' ageing, lend itself to use in large-scale, internationally important cohorts, and provide a set of biomarker outcome measures for epidemiological and intervention studies designed to enhance healthy musculoskeletal ageing. Such potential biomarkers include: biochemical measurements in biofluids or tissue samples, in vivo measurements of body composition, imaging of structural and physical properties, and functional tests. This review assesses candidate biomarkers of musculoskeletal ageing under these four headings, details their biological bases, strengths and limitations, and makes practical recommendations for their use. In addition, we identify gaps in the evidence base and priorities for further research on biomarkers of musculoskeletal ageing.

Context: The levels of bone formation and resorption can be assessed at the tissue level by bone histomorphometry on transiliac bone biopsies. Systemic biochemical markers of bone turnover reflect the overall bone formation and resorption at the level of the entire skeleton but cannot discriminate the different skeletal compartments., Objective: Our aim was to investigate the correlations between the serum biochemical markers of formation and resorption with histomorphometric parameters., Design: We performed post hoc analysis of a previous clinical study., Setting: Patients were selected from the general population., Patients: A total of 371 untreated postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged 50 to 84 years with a lumbar T-score ≤ -2.5 SD or ≤ -1 SD with at least one osteoporotic fracture., Interventions: Transiliac bone biopsies were obtained after a double tetracycline labeling, and blood samples were collected., Main Outcome Measures: The static and dynamic parameters of formation and bone resorption were measured by histomorphometry. Serum biochemical markers of formation (bone alkaline phosphatase [ALP]; procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide [PINP]) and resorption (C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of collagen type 1 [sCTX]) were assessed., Results: The mean values of biochemical markers were: bone ALP, 15.0 ± 5.2 ng/mL; PINP, 56.2 ± 21.9 μg/mL; and sCTX, 0.58 ± 0.26 ng/mL. Bone ALP and PINP were significantly correlated with both the static and dynamic parameters of formation (0.21 ≤ r' ≤ 0.36; 0.01 ≥ P ≥ .0001). sCTX was significantly correlated with all resorption parameters (0.18 ≤ r' ≤ 0.24; 0.02 ≥ P ≥ .0001)., Conclusion: Bone turnover markers were significantly but modestly associated with bone turnover parameters measured in iliac cancellous bone. The iliac crest bone may not represent perfectly the whole bone turnover.

Background: Calprotectin and S100A12 (calgranulin C) are markers of gut inflammation. The aim was to compare the usefulness of serum and fecal calprotectin (fCal) and S100A12 in assessing the response to anti-TNF and in predicting relapse under maintenance therapy in Crohn's diseases (CD)., Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with CD were treated with adalimumab or infliximab. All received an induction regimen followed by maintenance therapy with infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks or adalimumab 40 mg every other week and provided at week 0 and 14 fecal and blood samples for determination serum CRP, serum and fecal calprotectin and S100A12 levels., Results: Clinical remission at week 14 (responders) was achieved in 21 patients and among them, 12 were still in steroid-free clinical remission at week 52. Median serum S100A12 and fCal concentrations significantly drop only in responders from week 0 to week 14 after induction, whereas serum calprotectin and fecal S100A12 levels failed to differ significantly. Fecal calprotectin levels at week 14 had the highest discriminant validity to predict clinical remission within 1 year after induction (area under the curve = 0.87) followed by fecal, serum S100A12, and serum calprotectin (area under the ROC curve = 0.70, 0.70, and 0.68, respectively). A cutoff of 82 μg/g for fCal at week 14 had a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 75%, respectively, to predict clinical remission within 1 year of therapy., Conclusions: Serum S100A12 level and fCal are reliable markers associated with response to induction therapy with anti-TNF. Fecal calprotectin was the best for predicting clinical remission in CD under maintenance therapy.

Over the last 15 years several biological markers of bone turnover have been developed with increased specificity and sensitivity. In osteoporosis clinical studies, the IOF and IFCC organizations have recently recommended the measurements of serum type I collagen N-propeptide (PINP) and the crosslinked C-terminal telopeptide (serum CTX) as markers of bone formation and bone resorption, respectively. However these markers have some limitations including a lack of specificity for bone tissue, their inability to reflect osteocyte activity or periosteal apposition. In addition they do not allow the investigation of bone tissue quality an important determinant of skeletal fragility. To address these limitations, new developments in markers of bone metabolism have been recently achieved. These include assays for periostin, a matricellular protein preferentially localized in the periosteal tissue, sphingosine 1-phosphate, a lipid mediator which acts mainly on osteoclastogenesis and the osteocyte factors such as sclerostin and FGF-23. Recent studies have shown an association between the circulating levels of these biological markers and fracture risk in postmenopausal women or elderly men, although data require confirmation in additional prospective studies. Finally, recent studies suggest that the measurements of circulating microRNAs may represent a novel class of early biological markers in osteoporosis. It is foreseen that with the use of genomics and proteomics, new markers will be developed to ultimately improve the management of patients with osteoporosis., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Osteoarthritis (OA) is considered as a chronic disease with a long "silent" period. The diagnosis is generally based on clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. However X-ray has a poor sensitivity and a relatively large precision error that does not allow an early detection of OA or the monitoring of joint damage progression. The limitations of the tools that are currently available for OA assessment have been the impetus to identify specific biological markers that reflect quantitative and dynamic variations in joint remodeling. Research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix, especially type II collagen degradation markers. In spite of a significant increase of some markers in individuals with early stage of OA, the large overlap with control subjects indicates that the current biomarkers used alone have limited diagnostic potential. However, the combination of specific markers seems to improve the prediction of disease progression at the individual level. Several types of treatment have been investigated but the lack of medications with definitively demonstrated chondroprotective activity has limited the assessment of the potential role of biomarkers for monitoring patients' responses to the treatment of OA. In this review, we will use the BIPED classification that appeared in 2006 for OA markers to describe the potential usage of a given marker [5]. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Osteoarthritis"., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Robust validated reference intervals for bone turnover markers (BTMs) are required to assess fracture risk and effectiveness of therapy. However, there are currently limited reference intervals for BTMs in premenopausal women, especially comparing manual and automated assays. This study determined the BTM reference intervals using automated and manual assays, compared the results obtained from two different assays, and evaluated the factors that may affect BTM levels. This was a cross-sectional registry study in 194 healthy, premenopausal, European Caucasian women aged 35 to 39years from France (n=98) and Denmark (n=96). Two independent specialized laboratories, one in France (Synarc) and the other in Denmark (Nordic Bioscience), analyzed blood and urine samples from each woman for BTM levels. The type of assay used in this study significantly affected the reference intervals obtained for serum cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTX) and urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (uNTX/Cr; both P<0.001), but not for serum procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (PINP; P=0.28). The Serum Crosslaps® ELISA; Microtitre-plate based ELISA; Metra BAP EIA; and UniQ® PINP RIA assays yielded higher BTM reference values. The reference intervals for the BTMs, as measured with Serum β-Crosslaps, Elecsys® 2010 Systems; VITROS® ECI System; Ostase®, Access® Immunoassay System; and Total PINP, Elecsys® 2010 Systems assays, were 0.111-0.791ng/mL for sCTX, 12.3-59.7nmol BCE/mmol creatinine for uNTX/Cr, 5.8-17.5ng/mL for bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and 17.3-83.4ng/mL for PINP, respectively. When measured with Serum Crosslaps® ELISA, Microtitre-plate based ELISA, Metra BAP EIA, and UniQ® PINP RIA, the reference intervals were 0.177-0.862ng/mL for sCTX, 22.6-95.7nmol BCE/mmol creatinine for uNTX/Cr, 14.8-38.8U/L for bone ALP, and 19.5-75.2ng/mL for PINP, respectively. The clinical interpretation of the BTMs of a subject should be based on comparison with a BTM reference interval, measured with the same assay method., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surrogate markers of fracture risk--bone turnover markers (BTMs) and bone mineral density (BMD)--can be used to monitor treatment response. We assessed whether changes in these markers greater than the least significant change (LSC) were associated with fracture risk reduction and greater adherence. This secondary analysis of the Improving Measurements of Persistence on ACtonel Treatment (IMPACT) study--a multinational prospective, open-label, cluster-randomized study of postmenopausal women on oral risedronate 5 mg/d for 52 weeks-assessed adherence by electronic monitors. Urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (uNTX) and serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (sCTX) levels were assessed at baseline and weeks 10 and 22, and BMD at baseline and week 52. Fractures were recorded as adverse events. In 2302 women, responses beyond LSC in BTMs (uNTX and sCTX) and BMD (spine only) were associated with a reduced risk of nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) and all fractures. NVF incidence was about 50% lower in patients with 30% or more of uNTX reduction at week 22 (1.6%) than in those with less than 30% reduction (3.2%, p = .015). NVFs also were reduced in patients with more than 3% spine BMD increase at 52 weeks than those with 3% or less. Responses greater than LSC in BTMs and BMD were associated with greater adherence, but there was no association between adherence and fracture outcomes at 52 weeks. Changes greater than the LSC in BTMs and BMD reflect better treatment adherence, were associated with fracture risk reduction, and identify differences in individual responsiveness to risedronate., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic and slowly progressive disease for which biomarkers may be able to provide a more rapid indication of therapeutic responses to therapy than is currently available; this could accelerate and facilitate OA drug discovery and development programs. The goal of this document is to provide a summary and guide to the application of in vitro (biochemical and other soluble) biomarkers in the development of drugs for OA and to outline and stimulate a research agenda that will further this goal., Methods: The Biomarkers Working Group representing experts in the field of OA biomarker research from both academia and industry developed this consensus document between 2007 and 2009 at the behest of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Federal Drug Administration initiative (OARSI FDA initiative)., Results: This document summarizes definitions and classification systems for biomarkers, the current outcome measures used in OA clinical trials, applications and potential utility of biomarkers for development of OA therapeutics, the current state of qualification of OA-related biomarkers, pathways for biomarker qualification, critical needs to advance the use of biomarkers for drug development, recommendations regarding practices and clinical trials, and a research agenda to advance the science of OA-related biomarkers., Conclusions: Although many OA-related biomarkers are currently available they exist in various states of qualification and validation. The biomarkers that are likely to have the earliest beneficial impact on clinical trials fall into two general categories, those that will allow targeting of subjects most likely to either respond and/or progress (prognostic value) within a reasonable and manageable time frame for a clinical study (for instance within 1-2 years for an OA trial), and those that provide early feedback for preclinical decision-making and for trial organizers that a drug is having the desired biochemical effect. As in vitro biomarkers are increasingly investigated in the context of specific drug treatments, advances in the field can be expected that will lead to rapid expansion of the list of available biomarkers with increasing understanding of the molecular processes that they represent., (Copyright © 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recommend that a marker of bone formation (serum procollagen type I N propeptide, s-PINP) and a marker of bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, s-CTX) are used as reference analytes for bone turnover markers in clinical studies., Introduction: Bone turnover markers (BTM) predict fracture risk, and treatment-induced changes in specific markers account for a substantial proportion of fracture risk reduction. The aims of this report were to determine their clinical potential in the prediction of fracture risk and for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis and to set an appropriate research agenda., Methods: Evidence from prospective studies was gathered through literature review of the PUBMED database between the years 2000 and 2010 and the systematic review of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality up to 2001., Results: High levels of BTMs may predict fracture risk independently from bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. They have been used for this purpose in clinical practice for many years, but there is still a need for stronger evidence on which to base practice. BTMs provide pharmacodynamic information on the response to osteoporosis treatment, and as a result, they are widely used for monitoring treatment in the individual. However, their clinical value for monitoring is limited by inadequate appreciation of the sources of variability, by limited data for comparison of treatments using the same BTM and by inadequate quality control. IOF/IFCC recommend one bone formation marker (s-PINP) and one bone resorption marker (s-CTX) to be used as reference markers and measured by standardised assays in observational and intervention studies in order to compare the performance of alternatives and to enlarge the international experience of the application of markers to clinical medicine., Conclusion: BTM hold promise in fracture risk prediction and for monitoring treatment. Uncertainties over their clinical use can be in part resolved by adopting international reference standards.

We used data from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study to test the hypothesis that men with higher levels of bone turnover would have accelerated bone loss and an elevated risk of fracture. MrOS enrolled 5995 subjects >65 yr; hip BMD was measured at baseline and after a mean follow-up of 4.6 yr. Nonspine fractures were documented during a mean follow-up of 5.0 yr. Using fasting serum collected at baseline and stored at -190 degrees C, bone turnover measurements (type I collagen N-propeptide [PINP]; beta C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen [betaCTX]; and TRACP5b) were obtained on 384 men with nonspine fracture (including 72 hip fractures) and 947 men selected at random. Among randomly selected men, total hip bone loss was 0.5%/yr among those in the highest quartile of PINP (>44.3 ng/ml) and 0.3%/yr among those in the lower three quartiles (p = 0.01). Fracture risk was elevated among men in the highest quartile of PINP (hip fracture relative hazard = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.68; nonspine relative hazard = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.05) or betaCTX (hip fracture relative hazard = 1.76, 95 CI: 1.04, 2.98; nonspine relative hazard = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.69) but not TRACP5b. Further adjustment for baseline hip BMD eliminated all associations between bone turnover and fracture. We conclude that higher levels of bone turnover are associated with greater hip bone loss in older men, but increased turnover is not independently associated with the risk of hip or nonspine fracture.

Teriparatide, a parathyroid hormone analogue, is a potent anabolic treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Studies have shown that teriparatide induces large increases in biochemical markers of bone formation after 1 month of therapy followed by a delayed increase in bone resorption markers. The aims of this study were to (1) describe changes in bone turnover markers during 28 days of treatment with teriparatide; (2) identify the earliest time point by which most subjects showed a biochemical response to teriparatide; (3) identify potential biomarkers of positive bone response; (4) describe changes in bone turnover markers 4 weeks after stopping teriparatide. We recruited 15 osteopenic postmenopausal women, ages 55-69 (mean 62) years. All received 20 microg teriparatide subcutaneously for 28 days. Serum levels of the bone formation markers type I collagen N-terminal propeptide (PINP), type I collagen C-terminal propeptide (PICP), osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), and the bone resorption markers crosslinked C-telopeptide of type I collagen (Sbeta-CTX), crosslinked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (S-NTX) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRACP5b) were measured on 11 occasions: three times before dosing (baseline) and on days 3, 7, 10, 14, 19, 24 and 28 and at day 56 (i.e., 28 days after stopping teriparatide ). During the first 2 days of teriparatide treatment, PINP levels increased rapidly, by 8.2% (90% confidence interval (CI) 6.9%, 9.5%) and continued to increase until the end of treatment to 110.8%. PICP and OC showed a similar, but less pronounced, pattern. All three markers increased by at least 75% at day 28. A small, transient decrease in bone resorption markers occurred over the same period. Following cessation of treatment, concentrations of bone formation markers decreased to within 20% of baseline values by day 56. In conclusion, the bone formation markers PINP, PICP and OC show a rapid and robust increase in response to teriparatide, which is noticeable during the first week of therapy. PINP is the most responsive marker. These findings have important implications for monitoring patients treated with teriparatide and may also inform the design of studies of new anabolic agents for osteoporosis.

Current biological markers of bone turnover have proven useful in improving fracture risk assessment and monitoring treatment efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recent developments in the field of bone markers include 1) identification of new biochemical markers providing additional information on the complex pathways leading to bone fragility; 2) application of novel technologies such as proteomics for the discovery of novel markers; 3) automation and multiplexing for improving analytical performance and convenience; and 4) refinement of the clinical interpretation of markers. Currently, however, for the management of individual patients, their most established application is to monitor treatment efficacy and possibly to improve fracture risk assessment. The role of bone markers for improving adherence to therapy will need to be investigated in further studies. This brief review discusses these novel technological developments and the recent clinical data on the use of established and new markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Objective: To test the OMERACT 8 draft validation criteria for soluble biomarkers by assessing the strength of literature evidence in support of 5 candidate biomarkers., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on the 5 soluble biomarkers RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG), matrix metalloprotease (MMP-3), urine C-telopeptide of types I and II collagen (U-CTX-I and U CTX-II), focusing on the 14 OMERACT 8 criteria. Two electronic voting exercises were conducted to address: (1) strength of evidence for each biomarker as reflecting structural damage according to each individual criterion and the importance of each individual criterion; (2) overall strength of evidence in support of each of the 5 candidate biomarkers as reflecting structural damage endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and identification of omissions to the criteria set., Results: The search identified 111 articles. The strength of evidence in support of these biomarkers reflecting structural damage was low for all biomarkers and was rated highest for U-CTX-II [score of 6.5 (numerical rating scale 0-10)]. The lowest scores for retention of specific criteria in the draft set went to criteria that refer to the importance of animal studies, correlations with other biomarkers reflecting damage, and an understanding of the metabolism of the biomarker., Conclusion: Evidence in support of any of the 5 tested biomarkers (MMP-3, CTX-I, CTX-II, OPG, RANKL) was inadequate to allow their substitution for radiographic endpoints in RA. Three of the criteria in the draft criteria set might not be required, but few omissions were identified.

Objectives: A draft set of criteria for the validation of soluble biomarkers reflecting damage endpoints was proposed at OMERACT 8. At OMERACT 9 we aimed to scrutinize the necessity for each of these criteria according to the objectives of the working group., Methods: The OMERACT 8 draft criteria and the principle objectives of the validation process were clarified at a meeting of the working group in London, December 2007. A new framework was proposed after the following steps were conducted: (A) A systematic review of the literature focusing on the draft criteria and a preselected group of biomarkers (MMP3, CTX-II, RANKL, OPG, CTX-I) followed by a Delphi consensus exercise addressing the importance of individual criteria and identification of omissions in the draft set. (B) Formal debate as well as group discussion centered on the key arguments for inclusion/exclusion of specific criteria. (C) Onsite interactive electronic voting on the importance of specific criteria. The framework was presented and discussed at OMERACT 9 in both breakout and plenary sessions followed by a vote on its acceptance., Results: The objectives of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis biomarkers in relation to their predictive validity for damage endpoints was clarified and supported by OMERACT 9 participants. The OMERACT 8 draft validation criteria were reformulated into an essential category focused on criteria addressing the OMERACT Filter elements of discrimination (incorporating truth) and feasibility, and a desirable but nonessential category of other criteria addressing truth. This revised draft set was endorsed by participants at OMERACT 9., Conclusion: A revised set of validation criteria has been drafted by consensus at OMERACT 9 that focuses on the performance characteristics of biomarker assays, the importance of addressing potential confounders, and the essential requirement for clinical validation studies.

Objective: At OMERACT 8 a framework for levels of evidence was proposed for the validation of biomarkers as surrogate outcome measures. We aimed to adapt this scheme in order to apply it in the setting of soluble biomarkers proposed to replace the measurement of damage endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We also aimed to generate consensus on minimum standards for the design of longitudinal studies aimed at validating biomarkers., Methods: Before the meeting, the Soluble Biomarker Working Group prepared a preliminary framework and discussed various models for association and prediction related to the statistical strength domain. In addition, 3 Delphi exercises addressing longitudinal study design for RA, PsA, and AS were conducted within the working group and members of the Assessments in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA). This formed the basis for discussions among OMERACT 9 participants., Results: The proposed framework was accepted by consensus. In the study design domain a requirement for both prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) in different drug classes was noted. A template for determining the level of statistical strength was proposed. The addition of a new domain on biomarker assay performance was considered essential, and participants suggested that for any biomarker this domain should be addressed first, i.e., before starting clinical validation studies. Participants agreed on most elements of a longitudinal study design template. Where consensus was lacking the working group has drafted solutions that constitute a basis for prospective validation studies., Conclusion: The OMERACT 9 Soluble Biomarker Group has successfully formulated a levels of evidence scheme and a study design template that will provide guidance to conduct validation studies in the setting of soluble biomarkers proposed to replace the measurement of damage endpoints in RA, PsA, and AS.

Objective: To evaluate 10 biomarkers in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined, pre-radiographically defined osteoarthritis (pre-ROA) and radiographically defined OA (ROA) in a population-based cohort of subjects with symptomatic knee pain., Methods: Two hundred one white subjects with knee pain, ages 40-79 years, were classified into OA subgroups according to MRI-based cartilage (MRC) scores (range 0-4) and Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grades of radiographic severity (range 0-4): no OA (MRC score 0, K/L grade<2), pre-ROA (MRC score>or=1, K/L grade<2), or ROA (MRC score>or=1, K/L grade>or=2). Urine and serum samples were assessed for levels of the following biomarkers: urinary biomarkers C-telopeptide of type II collagen (uCTX-II), type II and types I and II collagen cleavage neoepitopes (uC2C and uC1,2C, respectively), and N-telopeptide of type I collagen, and serum biomarkers sC1,2C, sC2C, C-propeptide of type II procollagen (sCPII), chondroitin sulfate 846 epitope, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, and hyaluronic acid. Multicategory logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of OA subgroup with individual biomarker levels and biomarker ratios, adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index., Results: The risk of ROA versus no OA increased with increasing levels of uCTX-II (odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.35-7.21), uC2C (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.04-4.37), and uC1,2C (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.06-4.04), and was reduced in association with high levels of sCPII (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.94). The risk of pre-ROA versus no OA increased with increasing levels of uC2C (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.01) and uC1,2C (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.12-3.77). The ratios of type II collagen degradation markers to collagen synthesis markers were better than individual biomarkers at differentiating the OA subgroups, e.g., the ratio of [uCTX-II][uC1,2C] to sCPII was associated with a risk of ROA versus no OA of 3.47 (95% CI 1.34-9.03) and a risk of pre-ROA versus no OA of 2.56 (95% CI 1.03-6.40)., Conclusion: Different cartilage degradation markers are associated with pre-ROA than are associated with ROA, indicating that their use as diagnostic markers depends on the stage of OA. Biomarker ratios contrasting cartilage degradation with cartilage synthesis are better able to differentiate OA stages compared with levels of the individual markers.

Robust reference intervals are needed for the interpretation of bone turnover markers in large phase III fracture trials. The objectives of the study were to (1) estimate reference intervals for serum bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), serum procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), serum beta cross-linked C-telopeptides of type I collagen (S-betaCTX), and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (U-NTX) in healthy young premenopausal women; (2) examine geographical differences on bone turnover markers; and (3) assess factors known to influence bone turnover and test whether these explain any regional differences. We studied 637 eligible women from four countries that participated in the Horizon-PFT study (United Kingdom, France, Belgium, United States). The women were 30-39 yr of age (mean, 34.6 yr), with regular cyclic menses. Subjects completed a medical and lifestyle questionnaire. Two-sided 95% reference intervals were estimated on transformed values and transformed back to the original scale using the proposed methodology of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. S-betaCTX was significantly higher in France relative to the United Kingdom (p = 0.01), and PINP was higher in France (p < 0.001) and Belgium (p = 0.02) relative to the United Kingdom and significantly higher in France relative to the United States (p < 0.01) by ANOVA. Overall, one could associate low bone turnover markers with nonsmoking, use of a contraceptive pill, exercise, being close to the time of ovulation, and having high 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Countries differed by these characteristics, and once allowed for in the statistical model, any country differences were attenuated or removed.

Introduction: At present, no disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADS) are approved by the FDA (US Food and Drug Administration); possibly partly due to inadequate trial design since efficacy demonstration requires disease progression in the placebo group. We investigated whether combinations of biochemical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based markers provided effective diagnostic and prognostic tools for identifying subjects with high risk of progression. Specifically, we investigated aggregate cartilage longevity markers combining markers of breakdown, quantity, and quality., Methods: The study included healthy individuals and subjects with radiographic osteoarthritis. In total, 159 subjects (48% female, age 56.0 +/- 15.9 years, body mass index 26.1 +/- 4.2 kg/m2) were recruited. At baseline and after 21 months, biochemical (urinary collagen type II C-telopeptide fragment, CTX-II) and MRI-based markers were quantified. MRI markers included cartilage volume, thickness, area, roughness, homogeneity, and curvature in the medial tibio-femoral compartment. Joint space width was measured from radiographs and at 21 months to assess progression of joint damage., Results: Cartilage roughness had the highest diagnostic accuracy quantified as the area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.91) among the individual markers (higher than all others, P < 0.05) to distinguish subjects with radiographic osteoarthritis from healthy controls. Diagnostically, cartilage longevity scored AUC 0.84 (0.77 to 0.92, higher than roughness: P = 0.03). For prediction of longitudinal radiographic progression based on baseline marker values, the individual prognostic marker with highest AUC was homogeneity at 0.71 (0.56 to 0.81). Prognostically, cartilage longevity scored AUC 0.77 (0.62 to 0.90, borderline higher than homogeneity: P = 0.12). When comparing patients in the highest quartile for the longevity score to lowest quartile, the odds ratio of progression was 20.0 (95% confidence interval: 6.4 to 62.1)., Conclusions: Combination of biochemical and MRI-based biomarkers improved diagnosis and prognosis of knee osteoarthritis and may be useful to select high-risk patients for inclusion in DMOAD clinical trials.

Introduction: Biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTMs) are important in determining fracture risk in postmenopausal women; high levels being associated with increased risk. A proposed goal of anti-resorptive therapy is to reduce BTMs to the lower half of the reference range for healthy young pre-menopausal women. Our aims were a) to establish reference ranges for bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), crosslinked C- and N-telopeptides of type I collagen (betaCTX, NTX), osteocalcin (OC) and procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP) in pre-menopausal women and b) to investigate the determinants of these BTMs., Methods: BTMs were measured in peripheral blood and second morning void urine collected from 200 healthy pre-menopausal women ages 30 to 45 years. Each subject completed a short medical and lifestyle questionnaire., Results: BTMs were higher before the age of 35 years than after it. BTMs were higher in women with low BMI (betaCTX and OC), low alcohol consumption (PINP), current smoking habit (bone ALP and NTX), and around time of ovulation (NTX)., Conclusions: We recommend that the age range 35 to 45 years should be used when establishing BTM reference ranges in women.

The measurement of bone turnover markers in serum and urine can be used to determine bone turnover in bone. New developments in this field include the discovery and availability of newer markers, development of newer analytical assays, automation of established assays, the introduction of quality assurance programs, and improved interpretation of data by the application of sophisticated statistical modeling techniques. This review discusses some of these new aspects in a perspective that has utility for clinical studies and individual patient care.

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, resulting in an increased risk of fracture. While the level of bone mass can be estimated by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), its measurement does not capture all the risk factors for fracture. Quantitative changes in skeletal turnover can be assessed easily and non-invasively by the measurement of serum and urinary biochemical markers; the most sensitive markers include serum osteocalcin, bone specific alkaline phosphatase, the N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen for bone formation, and the crosslinked C- (CTX) and N- (NTX) telopeptides of type I collagen for bone resorption. Advances in our knowledge of bone matrix biochemistry, most notably of post-translational modifications in type I collagen, are likely to lead to the development of new biochemical markers that reflect changes in the material property of bone, an important determinant of bone strength. Among those, the measurement of the urinary ratio of native (alpha) to isomerized (beta) CTX - an index of bone matrix maturation - has been shown to be predictive of fracture risk independently of BMD and bone turnover. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, levels of bone resorption markers above the upper limit of the premenopausal range are associated with an increased risk of hip, vertebral, and nonvertebral fracture, independent of BMD. Therefore, the combined use of BMD measurement and biochemical markers is helpful in risk assessment, especially in those women who are not identified as at risk by BMD measurement alone. Levels of bone markers decrease rapidly with antiresorptive therapies, and the levels reached after 3-6 months of therapy have been shown to be more strongly associated with fracture outcome than changes in BMD. Preliminary studies indicate that monitoring changes of bone formation markers could also be useful to monitor anabolic therapies, including intermittent parathyroid hormone administration and, possibly, to improve adherence to treatment. Thus, repeated measurements of bone markers during therapy may help improve the management of osteoporosis in patients.

Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex heterogeneous joint disease affecting more than 35 million people worldwide. The current gold standard diagnostic investigation is the plain radiograph, which lacks sensitivity. Biochemical markers have the potential to act as adjunct markers for imaging in the assessment of knee OA. We undertook this study to determine the association between individual biochemical markers and radiographic features, and to establish whether the association is strengthened when selected biochemical markers are combined into a single factor (a theoretical marker)., Methods: Twenty serum and urinary biochemical markers were analyzed in 119 patients with predominantly tibiofemoral knee OA. Pearson's correlation was performed, and corresponding coefficients of determination (R(2)) were calculated to determine the association between biochemical markers and a range of imaging features from radiographs and dual x-ray absorptiometry of the knee. Biochemical markers demonstrating a significant association (P < 0.05) with a specific imaging feature were combined by principal components analysis (PCA). Pearson's correlation was repeated to establish whether the combined panel of biochemical markers showed a stronger association with imaging than the best single marker., Results: Fourteen biochemical markers showed significant associations with one or more imaging features. By combining specific panels of biochemical markers to form factors, the association of markers with imaging features (R(2)) increased from 11.9% to 22.7% for the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) score, from 5.9% to 9.2% for joint space width (JSW), from 6.6% to 10.8% for sclerosis, from 13.5% to 22.6% for osteophytes, and from 12.0% to 14.2% for bone mineral density (BMD). Biochemical markers identifying patients with osteophytes overlapped with those correlated with a high K/L score, while markers of subchondral BMD formed a completely separate group. Biochemical markers of JSW included markers associated with both osteophytes and BMD., Conclusion: The PCA results suggest that biochemical marker combinations may be more sensitive than individual biochemical markers for reflecting structural damage in patients with knee OA. The differences in biochemical marker profiles associated with osteophytes compared with those associated with subchondral BMD raise the possibility that these 2 processes, commonly seen in bone in knee OA, have underlying biologic differences.

Objective: To assess the relationship of biochemical markers and radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (ROA) in the subjects with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) at multiple sites of the Genetics osteoARthritis and Progression (GARP) study., Methods: We have measured eight biochemical markers, representing tissue turnover of cartilage, bone, synovium, and inflammation. ROA was assessed in the knees, hips, hands, vertebral facet joints and spinal disc degeneration (DD) by using the Kellgren score. A proportionate score was subsequently made for each joint location based on the number of joints with ROA. Principal component and linear mixed model analyses were applied to analyze the data., Results: Three different clusters of markers were identified that may reflect different pathophysiological processes of OA. The first component appeared to be reflected by structural markers of cartilage and bone turnover and associated especially in subjects with hip ROA. The second component was reflected by a marker of inflammation and was associated with knee ROA, high Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) scores and body mass index (BMI). The third component included markers of cartilage turnover and was associated with ROA at hands, spine as well as age. High familial aggregation was observed for serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (S-COMP) (70%) and serum N-propeptide of collagen type IIA (S-PIIANP) (62%)., Conclusion: Using a large well-characterized study and eight biochemical markers, we were able to observe three components that may reflect different molecular mechanisms (bone, cartilage, synovium turnover and inflammation). Our data suggested that these components contribute differently to ROA at different joint sites.

Objective: Recent work has shown that several soluble biomarkers, detectable in peripheral blood, synovial fluid, and/or urine, reflect remodeling of joint tissues and may therefore constitute outcome measures that reflect joint damage. Consequently, it is now desirable to begin the process of developing criteria for validation of a soluble biomarker as an outcome measure reflecting structural damage progression in trials of disease-modifying therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Our objective was to develop validation criteria for a soluble biomarker to be regarded as a valid biomarker reflecting radiological endpoints in RA and SpA clinical trials., Methods: A special interest group was established comprising investigators with expertise in soluble biomarker assay development as well as in outcomes research. This project was initiated by means of a Delphi consensus exercise. A list of draft criteria was first generated following a review of a US National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2000 white paper (available at: http://www.niams.nih.gov/ne/oi/ oabiomarwhipap.htm) that focused on biomarkers in OA, and these were organized under subject headings relevant to the OMERACT filter: truth, discrimination, and feasibility. Additional criteria were solicited from the working group. This was followed by 3 rounds of voting., Results: A list of 31 criteria was generated prior to voting. The first 2 rounds of voting resulted in cumulative agreement that 19 criteria be retained and 4 discarded, while discrepancies were recorded for 8 criteria. In the third round of voting, cumulative agreement was achieved to retain 5 of the 8 discrepant criteria, so that the final list included 24 criteria., Conclusion: A draft set of criteria for validation of a soluble biomarker to be regarded as reflecting radiological damage endpoints in clinical trials has been proposed on the basis of consensus.

Osteoarthritis is characterized by progressive destruction of articular cartilage and subchondral bone and synovial reaction. Radiologic findings that form the basis of the diagnosis of osteoarthritis are poorly sensitive to detect early disease and for monitoring progression of joint damage. Blood-based proteomic analyses suggest that biochemical alterations can be observed well before radiologic damage is evidenced. New cartilage-specific markers, including assays for type II collagen synthesis and degradation, have been developed. Recent prospective studies indicate that blood and urine levels of these new markers are associated with progression of joint damage. Biological markers respond rapidly to treatment and therefore will certainly play an important role in the development and the monitoring of disease-modifying therapies. Because osteoarthritis involves different tissues and complex biologic processes, a combination of different biochemical markers appears to be the most promising diagnostic strategy.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are used increasingly during the clinical development of drugs for the treatment of metabolic bone diseases such as Paget's disease, osteoporosis and cancer that has metastasised to the bone. However, assessing the optimal value of these markers is often complicated, and such an assessment is an obvious prerequisite for rational use of the markers and, consequently, potential improvement of clinical drug development. Biochemical markers of bone turnover are substances in the blood or urine that are produced or released during bone remodelling. They provide semiquantitative information on bone remodelling, and are often the most adequate tool to describe the pharmacodynamics of the drug. Their use has increased considerably because of dose-effect relationships that have been seen with certain drugs, but also because they have proven relationships with clinical outcomes in several metabolic bone diseases. However, there is a lack of information on the kinetics of these markers, and the immunoassays that are frequently used in their monitoring often measure a mixture of fragments rather than a single molecular entity. For drug development it should also be realised that different markers, but also different assays for the same marker, may provide different results, considerably limiting the ability to compare results. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, relationships have been shown between several biochemical markers of bone turnover, and either fracture risk and/or the antifracture efficacy of drugs. Such relationships can be used for the development of drugs with similar mechanisms of action, but also for the development of these drugs for closely related indications, such as corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. In both of these instances, data on effects on biochemical markers of bone turnover are usually employed in combination with information about effects on bone mineral density. However, the relationships of these parameters with clinical outcomes may be remarkably different for drugs with alternative mechanisms of action, challenging the use of the markers for the development of new drugs for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis. At present, the pharmacological treatment of cancer that has metastasised to the bone is limited to several bisphosphonates. Recent studies have shown relationships between the normalisation of levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover and clinical outcomes, and prospective studies investigating the application of such relationships are ongoing. The markers may play an important role in the optimisation of registered bisphosphonate treatments. However, their role in the development of new drugs is still limited to dose selection, and potential relationships with clinical outcomes remain to be investigated in instances of new mechanisms of action. Biochemical markers of bone turnover are a valuable asset for drug development, but their rational use is determined by a number of variables. Correctly manipulating these may improve clinical development of drugs for the treatment of patients with metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis and cancer metastatic to the bone.

Objective: To investigate the associations of molecular markers of joint tissue turnover with clinical and radiological variables in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA)., Methods: Patients of the ECHODIAH trial cohort (60% female; mean age 63 yrs, disease duration 5 yrs) fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria for hip OA were studied. Pain was assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale, and the presence of night pain and morning stiffness was observed as the index of joint inflammation. Joint space width (JSW) and subchondral bone sclerosis were assessed on hip radiographs. Ten markers were measured, 8 in serum: N-propeptides of collagen type I (PINP) and type III (PIIINP), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), YKL-40, hyaluronan (HA), matrix metalloproteases (MMP1 and MMP3), and ultrasensitive C-reactive protein (CRP); and 2 in urine: C-terminal crosslinking telopeptides of collagen type I (CTX-I) and type II (CTX-II). Analyses of 376 patients with measurements of all the markers included principal component analyses to identify independent clusters of markers; followed by stepwise multivariate regressions to determine associations between markers, clinical variables, and radiographic signs of joint damage., Results: Markers could be segregated into independent clusters: CTX-II, PINP, and CTX-I for cartilage degradation and bone turnover; COMP, PIIINP, and HA as potential markers of synovitis; and CRP and YKL-40, which are likely to indicate systemic inflammation; plus MMP1 and MMP3. After adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index, pain was significantly associated with CTX-II (p = 0.0095) and CRP (p = 0.046) and joint inflammation with COMP (p = 0.013). Radiographic signs of joint damage were associated with CTX-II (p = 0.001 for JSW; p = 0.007 for bone sclerosis)., Conclusion: This cross-sectional study of OA molecular markers in a large cohort may provide biological evidence of different pathophysiological processes involved in hip OA. Among the markers measured, CTX-II showed the most consistent association with the symptoms and joint damage of OA.

In the skeleton of elderly men, two opposite activities occur: bone loss at the endosteal envelope, which increases bone fragility, and periosteal apposition, which improves bending strength of bone. Both may contribute to serum bone formation markers although they have an opposite effect on bone fragility. The aim of this study was to determine if circulating bone formation markers reflect periosteal bone formation and endosteal bone remodelling in 640 men aged 55-85 years belonging to the MINOS cohort. We measured biochemical markers of bone formation (osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase, N-terminal extension propeptide of type I collagen) and bone resorption (urinary and serum beta-isomerised C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I, total and free deoxypyridinoline). Parameters of bone size (cross-sectional surface of third lumbar vertebral body measured by X-ray, projected areas of total hip, femoral neck, radius and ulna measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) increased with age (r = 0.20-0.32, P < 0.0001). In contrast, parameters related to bone loss (areal bone mineral density [aBMD], volumetric bone mineral density [vBMD] and cortical thickness) and determined mainly by bone resorption, decreased with ageing (r = -0.14 to -0.23, P < 0.005-0.0001). Men in the highest quartile of bone resorption markers had lower aBMD (3.8-10.2%, P < 0.05-0.0001), lower vBMD (3.9-13.0%, P < 0.05-0.0001), and lower cortical thickness (1.5-9.6%, P < 0.05-0.0001) than men in the lowest quartile. Markers of bone resorption were not significantly associated with estimates of bone size at any skeletal site. Markers of bone formation were not associated with estimates of periosteal formation after adjustment for covariates. In contrast, men in the highest quartile of the bone formation markers had significantly lower aBMD (4.0-11.7%, P < 0.05-0.0001), lower vBMD (4.2-16.3, P < 0.05-0.0001) and lower cortical thickness (4.0-7.4%, P < 0.05-0.0001) than men in the lowest quartile. In summary, serum levels of bone formation markers are negatively correlated with the estimates of endosteal bone loss. In contrast, they disclose no association with parameters reflecting periosteal apposition. Thus, in elderly men, bone formation markers reflect endosteal bone remodelling, probably because of the coupling between resorption and formation activities. In contrast, they do not reflect the periosteal bone formation, probably because the periosteal surface is smaller and has a slower remodelling rate than the endosteal surface.

Dietary strategies to prevent and treat osteoporosis focus on increased intake of calcium and vitamin D. Modification of whole dietary patterns and sodium reduction may also be effective. We examined the effects of two dietary patterns and three sodium levels on bone and calcium metabolism in a randomized feeding study. A total of 186 adults, aged 23-76 y, participated. After a 2-wk run-in period, participants were assigned randomly to diets containing three levels of sodium (50, 100 and 150 mmol/d) to be consumed for 30 d in random order. Serum osteocalcin (OC), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), fasting serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), urinary sodium, potassium, calcium and cAMP were measured at baseline and at the end of each sodium period. The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet reduced serum OC by 8-11% and CTX by 16-18% (both P < 0.001). Urinary calcium excretion did not differ between subjects that consumed the DASH and control diets. Reducing sodium from the high to the low level significantly decreased serum OC 0.6 microg/L in subjects that consumed the DASH diet, fasting serum PTH 2.66 ng/L in control subjects and urinary calcium 0.5 mmol/24 h in both groups. There were no consistent effects of the diets or sodium levels on urinary cAMP. In conclusion, the DASH diet significantly reduced bone turnover, which if sustained may improve bone mineral status. A reduced sodium intake reduced calcium excretion in both diet groups and serum OC in the DASH group. The DASH diet and reduced sodium intake may have complementary, beneficial effects on bone health.

Purpose of Review: Osteoarthritis is a chronic disease characterized by progressive destruction of articular cartilage and subchondral bone, and synovial reaction. Clinical and radiologic findings that form the basis of the diagnosis of osteoarthritis are poorly sensitive for monitoring the progression of the disease. Biologic markers reflecting quantitative and dynamic changes of joint tissue turnover represent promising adjunct tools., Recent Findings: New tissue-specific markers have been developed and include assays for type II collagen synthesis and degradation and synovitis. Prospective studies indicate that increased or decreased levels of some of these markers are associated with rapid progression of joint destruction in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Because progression of joint damage is likely to result primarily from an imbalance between degradation and reparative processes, a combination of markers reflecting these two components appears promising. For example, combining two new markers for type II collagen synthesis and degradation in an uncoupling index of cartilage turnover was more effective in predicting 1-year radiologic progression in knee osteoarthritis than the measurement of a single marker. Preliminary data in rheumatoid arthritis show a rapid response of a marker of type II collagen degradation under disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, with early changes of this marker being predictive of long-term radiologic progression., Summary: Recent evidence suggests that the combination of some biologic markers will be useful for identifying patients at risk for rapid joint destruction in osteoarthritis. Because of their rapid changes under treatment, biologic markers will play an important role in the development and monitoring of new structure-modifying therapies for osteoarthritis.

Objective: The known risk factors for radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not optimally discriminative in patients with early disease who do not have evidence of radiologic damage. We sought to determine whether urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I (CTX-I) and type II (CTX-II) collagen (markers of bone and cartilage destruction, respectively) are associated with long-term radiologic progression in patients with early RA., Methods: This was a prospective study of 110 patients with early RA who were participating in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) clinical trial and followup study, a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of oral pulse prednisolone, methotrexate, plus sulfasalazine with sulfasalazine alone. We investigated the relationship between baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II and the mean annual progression of joint destruction over a median of 4 years, as measured by changes in the modified Sharp score (average of 2 independent readers)., Results: In multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels in the highest tertile were the strongest predictors of radiologic progression (Sharp score increase >2 units/year; odds ratio 7.9 and 11.2, respectively), independently of treatment group, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, rheumatoid factor (RF), and baseline joint damage (Sharp score). The likelihood ratios for a positive test were 3.8 and 8.0 for CTX-I and CTX-II, respectively, which compared favorably with the likelihood ratios for the ESR (3.0), baseline joint damage (1.6), and RF (1.8). When patients were grouped according to the presence (Sharp score >/=4, n = 49) and absence (Sharp score <4, n = 61) of joint damage at baseline, CTX-I and CTX-II levels were predictive only in those without baseline joint damage (odds ratio 14.9 and 25.7, respectively)., Conclusion: High baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II independently predict an increased risk of radiologic progression over 4 years in patients with early RA, especially those without radiologic joint damage. Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II may be useful for identifying individual RA patients at high risk of progression very early in the disease, before erosions can be detected radiographically. Such patients may be in special need of treatments that inhibit bone and cartilage degradation.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover have for several years been considered as valuable parameters in research clinical studies, but their use in individual patients is still debated. Recently several position papers have proposed guidelines for their use in clinical practice in patients with post menopausal osteoporosis. In the present article, we report the results of a survey which aims at comparing the actual modalities of prescription of French physicians with the above-mentioned recommendations. We contacted by phone clinical chemists from 158 different hospitals and asked them to transmit to the concerned physicians of their hospital a detailed questionnaire for assessing which bone marker(s) is (are) prescribed and for which purpose (s), and if not prescribed, the reason of non prescription. We were able to analyze 309 questionnaires from 89 hospitals including 5 specialties, rheumatology (35.9%), endocrinology (18.1%), gynecology (11.0%), internal medicine (22.0%) and geriatry (12.9%). The results showed large discrepancies between the mode of prescription of a subset of physicians and the guidelines. The most often evoked reason for non prescription was a lack of information about bone markers suggesting a need for teaching courses. This survey has also shown that many physicians do not know exactly which parameters are effectively measured in their hospital and which are addressed to specialized laboratories underlining the importance of the dialogue between clinicians and clinical chemists. We propose that in a given hospital, the present article may serve as a basis for a discussion between clinicians and biologists about the development and/or the optimization of the measurements of these markers of bone turnover.

Objective: To analyse the relations between the urinary levels of type II collagen C-telopeptide (CTX-II) and glucosyl-galactosyl pyridinoline (Glc-Gal-PYD)-two newly developed biochemical markers of type II collagen and synovial tissue destruction respectively-disease activity and the severity of joint destruction in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The clinical performance of these two new markers was compared with that of a panel of other established biochemical markers of connective tissue metabolism., Methods: The following biochemical markers were measured in a group of 67 patients with knee OA (mean age 64 years, median disease duration eight years ) and in 67 healthy controls: for bone, serum osteocalcin, serum and urinary C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I); for cartilage, urinary CTX-II, serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), and serum human cartilage glycoprotein 39 (YKL-40); for synovium, urinary Glc-Gal-PYD, serum type III collagen N-propeptide (PIIINP), serum hyaluronic acid (HA); and for inflammation, serum C reactive protein. Biochemical markers were correlated with pain and physical function (WOMAC index) and with quantitative radiographic evaluation of the joint space using the posteroanterior view of the knees flexed at 30 degrees., Results: All bone turnover markers were decreased in patients with knee OA compared with controls (-36%, -38%, and -52%, p<0.0001 for serum osteocalcin, serum CTX-I and urinary CTX-I, respectively). Serum COMP (+16%, p=0.0004), urinary CTX-II (+25%, p=0.0009), urinary Glc-Gal-PYD (+18%, p=0.028), serum PIIINP (+33%, p<0.0001), and serum HA (+ 233%, p<0.0001) were increased. By univariate analyses, increased urinary Glc-Gal-PYD (r=0.41, p=0.002) and decreased serum osteocalcin (r=-0.30, p=0.025) were associated with a higher total WOMAC index. Increased urinary CTX-II (r=-0.40, p=0.0002) and Glc-Gal-PYD (r=-0.30, p=0.0046) and serum PIIINP (r=-0.29, p=0.0034) were the only markers which correlated with joint surface area. By multivariate analyses, urinary Glc-Gal-PYD and CTX-II were the most important predictors of the WOMAC index and joint damage, respectively., Conclusion: Knee OA appears to be characterised by a systemic decrease of bone turnover and increased cartilage and synovial tissue turnover. CTX-II, Glc-Gal-PYD, and PIIINP may be useful markers of disease severity in patients with knee OA.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover have been developed over the past 20 years that are more specific for bone tissue than conventional ones such as total alkaline phosphatase and urinary hydroxyproline. They have been widely used in clinical research and in clinical trials of new therapies as secondary end points of treatment efficacy. Most of the interest has been devoted to their use in postmenopausal osteoporosis, a condition characterized by subtle modifications of bone metabolism that cannot be detected readily by conventional markers of bone turnover. Although several recent studies have suggested that biochemical markers may be used for the management of the individual patient in routine clinical practice, this has not been clearly defined and is a matter of debate. Because of the crucial importance to clarify this issue, the Société Francaise de Biologie Clinique prompted an expert committee to summarize the available data and to make recommendations. The following paper includes a review on the biochemical and analytical aspects of the markers of bone formation and resorption and on the sources of variability such as sex, age, menstrual cycle, pregnancy and lactation, physical activity, seasonal variation and effects of diseases and treatments. We will also describe the effects of pre-analytical factors on the measurements of the different markers. Finally based on that review, we will make practical recommendations for the use of these markers in order to minimize the variability of the measurements and improve the clinical interpretation of the data.

The recent development of specific and sensitive biochemical markers reflecting the overall rate of bone formation and bone resorption, has markedly improved the non invasive assessment of bone turnover in various metabolic bone diseases, especially for osteoporosis. The immunoassay of human osteocalcin recognizing the intact molecule and its major proteolytic fragment, assays for bone alkaline phosphatase and the intact form of the N-terminal extension propeptide of type I collagen are currently the most sensitive markers to assess bone formation. The best indices of bone resorption are the new immunoassays for the pyridinoline crosslinks and type I collagen related peptides in urine, but also very recently available in serum. Using these new markers, several studies have shown that bone turnover increases markedly after the menopause and remains elevated in late postmenopausal and elderly women. An increased bone turnover rate is related to a fast rate of bone loss in postmenopausal women and to a decreased bone mass in elderly women. Recent data suggest that some of the new immunoassays for pyridinoline crosslinks and related peptides could predict the subsequent risk of hip fracture in elderly women. Thus, bone markers might be used in combination with bone mass measurement to improve the prognostic assessment of postmenopausal women, i.e. their risk of developing osteoporosis and ultimately fractures. Treatment of postmenopausal women with antiresorptive drugs such as estrogens, bisphosphonates and calcitonin is followed by rapid decrease of the levels of bone markers that is correlated with the long term increase of bone mass as assessed by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry measurement. Thus, bone markers should be useful in monitoring treatment efficacy in patients with osteoporosis. Appropriate combination of the most efficient markers of bone formation and resorption will probably provide a powerful tool in the clinical investigation of osteoporosis.

Increased bone turnover has been suggested as a potential risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. We investigated this hypothesis in a prospective cohort study performed on 7598 healthy women more than 75 years of age. One hundred and twenty-six women (mean years 82.5) who sustained a hip fracture during a mean 22-month follow-up were age-matched with three controls who did not fracture. Baseline samples were collected prior to fracture for the measurement of two markers of bone formation and three urinary markers of bone resorption: type I collagen cross-linked N- (NTX) or C-telopeptide (CTX) and free deoxypyridinoline (free D-Pyr). Elderly women had increased bone formation and resorption compared with healthy premenopausal women. Urinary excretion of CTX and free D-Pyr, but not other markers, was higher in patients with hip fracture than in age-matched controls (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). CTX and free D-Pyr excretion above the upper limit of the premenopausal range was associated with an increased hip fracture risk with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.2 (1.3-3.6) and 1.9 (1.1-3.2), respectively, while markers of formation were not. Increased bone resorption predicted hip fracture independently of bone mass, i.e., after adjustment for femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and independently of mobility status assessed by the gait speed. Women with both a femoral BMD value of 2.5 SD or more below the mean of young adults and either high CTX or high free D-Pyr levels were at greater risk of hip fracture, with an odds ratio of 4.8 and 4.1, respectively, than those with only low BMD or high bone resorption. Elderly women are characterized by increased bone turnover, and some markers of bone resorption predict the subsequent risk of hip fracture independently of hip BMD. Combining the measurement of BMD and bone resorption may be useful to improve the assessment of the risk of hip fracture in elderly women.

Changes of bone turnover with aging are responsible for bone loss and play a major role in osteoporosis. Although an increase of bone turnover has been documented at the time of menopause, the subsequent abnormalities of bone resorption and formation and their potential role in determining bone mass in the elderly have not been investigated. To address this issue, we have measured a battery of new sensitive and specific markers of bone turnover in a population-based study of 653 healthy women analyzed cross-sectionally, including 432 women postmenopausal from 1 to 40 years, and the data were correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at different skeletal sites. Bone formation was assessed by serum osteocalcin (OC), serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP), serum C-propeptide of type I collagen (PICP), and bone resorption by the urinary excretion of two pyridinoline cross-linked peptides (NTX and CTX). Bone turnover increased in perimenopausal women with both irregular menses and elevated serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Menopause induced a 37-52% and 79-97% increase in the bone formation and bone resorption marker levels, respectively (p < 0.0001 except for PICP). In postmenopausal women, bone formation markers did not decrease with age. When resorption markers were corrected by whole body bone mineral content (BMC), the fraction of bone resorbed per day was not correlated with age in postmenopausal women and remained elevated for up to 40 years after menopause. In premenopausal women, the bone turnover rate accounted for only 0-10% of the variation in whole body BMC, total hip, distal radius, and lumbar spine BMD. With increasing time after menopause, the importance of the bone turnover rate as a determinant of bone mass increased at all sites and accounted for up to 52% of the BMD variance in elderly women. Thus, in women 20 years or more postmenopause, bone turnover was higher in those in the lowest quartile than in those in the highest quartile of BMD. In elderly women, 20 years since menopause and over, but not in younger ones, serum PTH was negatively correlated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (r = -0.22, p < 0.05) and explained only 5-8% of the bone turnover variance (p < 0.01-0.001). These data indicate that the overall rates of both bone formation and bone resorption remain high in elderly women. The rate of bone turnover appears to play an increasing role as a determinant of bone mass with increasing time since menopause with a high bone turnover rate being associated with a low bone mass. Thus assessing bone marker levels may be useful in the evaluation of osteoporosis risk. In elderly women, secondary hyperparathyroidism caused in part by reduced serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D appears to be a marginal determinant of an increased bone turnover rate.

Summary: Sclerostin is a key regulator of bone formation. In a population of 572 postmenopausal women (mean age, 67 years) followed prospectively for a median of 6 years, there was no significant association between baseline levels of serum sclerostin and incidence of all fractures which occurred in 64 subjects. Introduction: Sclerostin, an osteocyte soluble factor, is a major negative regulator of osteoblastic activity. Circulating sclerostin levels were reported to increase with age and to be modestly associated with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover, but there are no data on the association with fracture risk. Methods: We investigated 572 postmenopausal women (mean age, 67 ± 8.5 years) from the OFELY population-based cohort. The associations of serum sclerostin measured with a new two-site ELISA and spine and hip BMD by DXA, serum β-isomerized C-terminal crosslinking of type I collagen (CTX), intact N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), intact PTH, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], estradiol, testosterone, and fracture risk were analyzed. At the time of sclerostin measurements, 98 postmenopausal women had prevalent fractures. After a median of 6 years (interquartile range, 5-7 years) follow-up, 64 postmenopausal sustained an incident fracture. Results: Serum sclerostin correlated positively with spine ( r = 0.35, p < 0.0001) and total hip ( r = 0.25, <0.0001) BMD. Conversely, serum sclerostin was weakly negatively associated with the bone markers PINP ( r = −0.10, p = 0.014) and CTX ( r = −0.13, p = 0.0026) and with intact PTH ( r = −0.13, p = 0.0064). There was no significant association of serum sclerostin with 25(OH)D, estradiol, free estradiol index, or testosterone. Serum sclerostin considered as a continuous variable or in quartiles was not significantly associated with the risk of prevalent or incident fracture. Conclusion: Serum sclerostin is weakly correlated with BMD, bone turnover, and PTH in postmenopausal women. It was not significantly associated with the risk of all fractures, although the number of incident fractures recorded may not allow detecting a modest association. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revue Francophone des Laboratoires is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Periostin is a matricellular glutamate-containing protein expressed during ontogenesis and in adult connective tissues submitted to mechanical strains including bone and, more specifically, the periosteum, periodontal ligaments, tendons, heart valves, or skin. It is also expressed in neoplastic tissues, cardiovascular and fibrotic diseases, and during wound repair. Its biological functions are extensively investigated in fields such as cardiovascular physiology or oncology. Despite its initial identification in bone, investigations of periostin functions in bone-related physiopathology are less abundant. Recently, several studies have analyzed the potential role of periostin in bone biology and suggest that periostin may be an important regulator of bone formation. The aim of this article is to provide an extensive review on the implications of periostin in bone biology and its potential use in benign and metabolic bone diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: This multicenter and randomized clinical trial showed that daily oral herbal formula Xian Ling Gu Bao (XLGB) was safe in postmenopausal women over a 1-year treatment. Those patients ( n ∼ 50) treated with XLGB at the conventional dose demonstrated a statistically significant increase in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine at 6 months and a numerically increased BMD at 12 months. Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of a herbal formula XLGB in postmenopausal women (ChiCTR-TRC-00000347). Methods: One hundred eighty healthy postmenopausal women (≥60 years old) with BMD T-score ≤ −2.0 (lumbar spine or femoral neck) were recruited from four clinical centers to receive low-dose (conventional dose) XLGB (L-XLGB group, 3 g/day, n = 61) or high-dose XLGB (H-XLGB group, 6 g/day, n = 58) or placebo (CON group, n = 61). Women received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (200 IU) supplementation. Primary endpoints were lumbar spine BMD and safety; secondary endpoints were femoral neck BMD and bone turnover markers measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Results: Of 180 women recruited, 148 completed the study. The compliance in each group was comparable. Prominent adverse events were not observed in either group. In the L-XLGB group at 6 months, lumbar spine BMD by DXA increased significantly from baseline (+2.11% versus CON +0.58%, p < 0.05), but femoral neck BMD did not; at 12 months, BMD in the L-XLGB group decreased from 6-month levels yet remained higher than baseline, but without difference from the CON group. There was no dose-dependent response. Bone turnover marker levels declined during the first 6 months after XLGB treatment. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of side effects among treatment and control groups. Conclusion: XLGB over 1-year treatment at the conventional dose demonstrated safe and only a statistically significant increase in BMD at lumbar spine at 6 months in postmenopausal women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objective: To ascertain the predictive role of longitudinally acquired biochemical measures of cartilage turnover in relation to X-ray defined knee osteoarthritis (OAK), knee pain and functioning. Methods: This is a feasibility study based on 72 enrollees of the Michigan site of Study of Women''s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a longitudinal, population-based cohort study with 11 annual visits to characterize health at the mid-life. At visits in 1996, 1998 and 2007, radiographs were evaluated for the presence of OAK [≥2 on the Kellgren and Lawrence (K–L) scale]. Knee pain and stiffness were assessed by interview. Functioning was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and Type II collagen telopeptides (CTX-II) were assayed in serum and urine samples collected on alternate years from 1997 to 2006. We related trajectories of the cartilage biochemical markers from these five time points to OAK severity (no OAK, K–L score<2; mild OAK, K–L score=2; moderate/severe OAK, K–L score=3 or 4), pain, stiffness, or functioning, using longitudinal non-linear mixed modeling. Results: The 2007 prevalence of X-ray defined OAK was 50% in these 72 women. Upward trajectories of COMP (P =0.02) and CTX-II (P =0.006) were associated with increased OAK severity and body size. COMP trajectories were associated with pain and stiffness, but not functioning. CTX-II trajectories were associated with stiffness scores, but not knee pain or functioning scores. Conclusion: Multiple, biennial measures of COMP or CTX-II taken over a 10-year period were predictive of subsequent OAK and knee stiffness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Objective: To test the hypothesis that early knee and hand osteoarthritis (OA) development is characterized by detectable changes in serum proteins relevant to inflammation, cell growth, activation, and metabolism several years before OA becomes radiographically evident. Methods: Using microarray platforms that simultaneously test 169 proteins relevant to inflammation, cell growth, activation and metabolism, we conducted a case–control study nested within the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Subjects included 22 incident cases of OA and 66 age-, sex- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. Serum samples tested were obtained at the time of radiographic classification as either case or control, and up to 10 years earlier at a time when all participants were free of radiographic OA. Proteins with mean signal intensities fourfold higher than background were compared between cases and controls using multivariate techniques. Results: Sixteen proteins were different between OA cases compared to controls. Four of these proteins [matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, interleukin (IL)-15, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 and soluble vascular adhesion protein (sVAP)-1] were already different in samples obtained 10 years before radiographic classification and remained different at the time of diagnosis. Six additional proteins were only associated with subsequent OA development and not with established OA. Conclusions: Changes in serum proteins implicated in matrix degradation, cell activation, inflammation and bone collagen degradation products accompany early OA development and can precede radiographic detection by several years. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Complex biological pathways including angiogenesis, invasion, osteoclastic activation and bone matrix degradation are involved in the formation of bone metastasis (BM). The aim of our study was to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of a panel of 12 serum biochemical markers reflecting biological pathways underlying BM development. In a cross-sectional study, we investigated 29 patients with primary breast carcinoma without BM (BC/BM-), 28 patients with breast carcinoma and BM (BC/BM+) and 15 healthy women. In longitudinal analyses, we investigated 34 patients for whom serum was obtained a two different time points: at the time of primary BC diagnosis and after a median time of 3 years. During this follow-up, 15 patients developed BM, whereas the other 19 remained free of BM. In patients who developed BM, the second samples were obtained before BM was documented by bone scan. The cross-sectional analyses have shown all biochemical markers to be significantly elevated in patients with BM, when compared to the patients without BM and healthy controls, except TGFβ1 that was significantly decreased. Multivariable analyses showed that only the bone resorption markers TRACP 5b, CTX and ICTP, and the marker of angiogenesis VEGF were independently associated with BM. Those markers correctly distinguished 85% of BC patients with or without BM from normal individuals. Longitudinal analyses showed that patients with primary BC who developed BM during follow-up had higher levels of TRACP5b (+95%, P=0.08) at the time of primary diagnosis, those patients had also a higher increases of ICTP (P=0.006), MMP-7 (P=0.004) and TIMP-1 (P=0.017) during follow-up than patients who did not progress toward bone metastasis. This study provides evidence of increase and interrelationship of circulating markers of angiogenesis, invasion and bone resorption in patients with BC with and without BM. Markers of bone resorption have the highest independent diagnostic value for detecting and potentially predicting BM in breast carcinoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]