Search

Context.—: Mesothelioma is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose., Objective.—: To provide updated, practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of mesothelioma., Data Sources.—: Pathologists involved in the International Mesothelioma Interest Group and others with expertise in mesothelioma contributed to this update. Reference material includes peer-reviewed publications and textbooks., Conclusions.—: There was consensus opinion regarding guidelines for (1) histomorphologic diagnosis of mesothelial tumors, including distinction of epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid mesothelioma; recognition of morphologic variants and patterns; and recognition of common morphologic pitfalls; (2) molecular pathogenesis of mesothelioma; (3) application of immunohistochemical markers to establish mesothelial lineage and distinguish mesothelioma from common morphologic differentials; (4) application of ancillary studies to distinguish benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations, including BAP1 and MTAP immunostains; novel immunomarkers such as Merlin and p53; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for homozygous deletion of CDKN2A; and novel molecular assays; (5) practical recommendations for routine reporting of mesothelioma, including grading epithelioid mesothelioma and other prognostic parameters; (6) diagnosis of mesothelioma in situ; (7) cytologic diagnosis of mesothelioma, including use of immunostains and molecular assays; and (8) features of nonmalignant peritoneal mesothelial lesions., Competing Interests: The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (© 2024 College of American Pathologists.)

Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and ultrasonography are the most common modalities for the diagnosis and follow up of thyroid nodules. FNAB is able to distinguish benign from malignant nodules with high sensitivity and specificity; however, 20% to 30% of nodules are diagnosed as indeterminate with a risk of malignancy varying from 10% to 75% based on the 2017 revision of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Molecular tests are being increasingly used to triage this group of nodules. Several molecular tests are commercially available and newer upgrades are being developed to either "rule in" or "rule out" malignancy with greater accuracy. The Afirma gene expression classifier and its recent upgrade (the Afirma gene sequencing classifier), Thryoseq v2, a next generation sequencing test and its recent upgrade (the v3), RosettaGX Reveal based on microRNA alterations, and ThyGenX/ThyraMIR, a combination test, are currently on the market. Familiarity with these tests, their performance, and postvalidation publications will enable appropriate test selection and improve triage of patients for appropriate therapy. The underlying rate of malignancy at different institutions and the interobserver variability in cytologic and histologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions are important factors that impact the performance of the various molecular tests.

Background: Molecular tests are increasingly used to triage cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules for surgery and/or follow-up. We retrospectively compared the performance of the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (AGEC) with that of the more recently developed RosettaGX ® Reveal™ miRNA Classifier (Reveal) in a cohort of Bethesda III-V thyroid FNAs with surgical follow-up., Design: Eighty-one samples (54 Bethesda III, 26 Bethesda IV, 1 Bethesda V) with available AGEC (74 AGEC-SUSP and 7 AGEC-BENIGN) and surgical pathology results were studied from three academic centers. Reveal was performed in a blinded fashion., Results: The final diagnoses were benign/NIFTP (n = 63) and malignant (n = 18). The overall "correct" rate was 64.2% for Reveal and 28.4% for AGEC (P = 1.4e-6). The specificity of Reveal was 60.3%, compared with 9.5% for AGEC (P = 2.1e-9). Among the 18 malignant cases, 77.8% and 94.4% were correctly classified as suspicious by Reveal and AGEC, respectively (P = 0.2). In the FLUS and the FN group, the specificity of AGEC was lower than the specificity of Reveal. Whether the 7 NIFTP in our study were considered benign or malignant, specificity and PPV of Reveal were higher than those of AGEC. Reveal also outperformed AGEC in correctly classifying the 26 benign Hürthle lesions studied (P = 7.6e-5)., Conclusion: Reveal outperformed AGEC in this cohort, whether NIFTP is considered benign or malignant, and in Hürthle lesions. Reveal has the potential to reduce the number of unnecessary resections in patients with indeterminate thyroid cytology. Based on our findings and the practical advantages offered by Reveal methodology, large prospective studies are warranted. Diagn. Cytopathol., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The checkpoint protein programmed cell death ligand-1 protein (PD-L1) binds to its receptor (PD-1) activating the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway, an important therapeutic target. There is limited information regarding PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in thymic lesions. Sections from nonneoplastic thymi (n = 20), thymomas World Health Organization types A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 (n = 38) and thymic squamous cell carcinoma (n = 8) were stained for PD-L1 (clone SP142; Spring BioScience), PD-1 (MRQ22; Cell Marque), CD4 (clone SPO32; Cell Marque), and CD8 (JCB117; Ventana). Immunoreactivity for each antibody was classified as focal or diffuse and scored as follows: 0, negative; 1%-5%, 1+; 6%-20%, 2+; and >20%, 3+. The proportions of cases expressing PD-L1, PD-1, CD4, and C8 at score ≥1+ were compared by diagnosis, using χ 2 statistics. PD-L1 was expressed in 90% of nonneoplastic thymi, 92% of thymomas, and 50% of carcinomas, with significantly higher scores (P < .01) in B2 and B3 thymomas and carcinomas than in AB and B1 thymomas; PD-L1 was diffuse in most B2 and B3 thymomas and focal in carcinomas. PD-1 was focally expressed, and mostly with scores 1+, in 55% of nonneoplastic thymi, 63% of thymomas, and 37.5% of carcinomas. CD4+ and CD8+ cells were diffusely distributed with scores 3+ in all lesions other than B3 thymomas and carcinomas. The latter showed CD4+ cells mostly at the interface between neoplastic cells and stroma. PD-L1 and PD-1 are not expressed in similar locations and cellular proportions in thymic lesions, raising a question as to whether the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway is an actionable therapeutic target in these lesions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are viewed as a promising therapeutic target, the design of rational therapy has been hampered by two key obstacles. First, attempts to ablate CAFs have resulted in significant toxicity because currently used biomarkers cannot effectively distinguish activated CAFs from non-cancer associated fibroblasts and mesenchymal progenitor cells. Second, it is unclear whether CAFs in different organs have different molecular and functional properties that necessitate organ-specific therapeutic designs. Our analyses uncovered COL11A1 as a highly specific biomarker of activated CAFs. Using COL11A1 as a 'seed', we identified co-expressed genes in 13 types of primary carcinoma in The Cancer Genome Atlas. We demonstrated that a molecular signature of activated CAFs is conserved in epithelial cancers regardless of organ site and transforming events within cancer cells, suggesting that targeting fibroblast activation should be effective in multiple cancers. We prioritized several potential pan-cancer therapeutic targets that are likely to have high specificity for activated CAFs and minimal toxicity in normal tissues., (Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mesothelioma patients often present with serosal effusions, which are ideal for cytopathological diagnoses. However, the morphological overlap between malignant and benign mesothelial proliferation can make a conclusive cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma elusive because immunohistochemical staining does not discriminate definitively between the two in this setting. p16 is deleted in up to 80% of pleural mesotheliomas. The aim of this study was to establish the correlation between the p16 deletion status of the cell block with that of its corresponding tumor using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for individual patient tumors., Methods: Twenty-two biopsies and 24 corresponding cell blocks, containing serosal effusions with atypical mesothelial cells from 22 patients with histologically confirmed pleural mesotheliomas, were analyzed with p16 FISH. Seventeen cell blocks consisting of serosal effusions with reactive mesothelial cells from nonmesothelioma cases were also analyzed. Combined immunofluorescence and FISH were also performed., Results: Seventeen of the 22 mesothelioma patients (77.3%) showed homozygous deletions of p16 in the tumor tissue and in the atypical mesothelial cells from the cell blocks. p16 FISH followed by immunofluorescence with EMA was helpful towards identifying the mesothelioma cells in the cell blocks., Conclusion: We confirmed that the p16 FISH results obtained from the cell blocks are as reliable as those from the tissue sections. Cell block analysis is recommended for patients with serosal effusions of unknown origins with the following methods: immunohistochemistry should be performed to validate the mesothelial origin, and p16 FISH should be performed to confirm malignancy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:591-598. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a precursor to invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma. Histologic evaluation is hampered by intra- and interobserver variability. Various biomarkers have been investigated to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of diagnosis and grading, but interpretation can be challenging. ProEx™ C is an antibody cocktail for proteins upregulated in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This study investigated ProEx™ C's role alone and with p16 and Ki-67 in the diagnosis and grading of AIN. Sixty-seven anal tissue samples (22 AIN I, 25 AIN II/III, and 20 non-dysplastic) were stained for ProEx™ C, Ki-67, and p16. Staining patterns were recorded and correlated with morphologic diagnoses. Considering AIN II/III vs I, full-thickness ProEx™ C staining was more frequent in AIN II/III (p = 0.0373), and showed the highest sensitivity of the biomarkers. In combination with Ki-67, sensitivity was lower, but specificity for AIN II/III rose to 83%. For differentiating non-dysplasia from AIN I, negative ProEx™ C staining correlated with non-dysplasia (p < 0.0001) and had the highest sensitivity (90%). In combination with Ki-67, sensitivity dropped to 80%, but specificity was high (96%). ProEx™ C is useful for diagnosing and grading AIN, performing as well or better than other markers at identifying AIN II/III and non-dysplastic epithelium., (© 2015 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The potential usefulness of the squamous markers p40 and desmoglein 3 (DSG-3) for the diagnosis and staging of selected thymic lesions is uncertain. We investigated their expression and distribution pattern in 66 thymomas, 12 thymic squamous carcinomas, 6 undifferentiated thymic carcinomas, 5 hyperplastic thymi, and 5 normal thymi. p40 nuclear and DSG-3 cytoplasmic/membranous immunoreactivity in greater than or equal to 10% of thymic epithelial cells was interpreted as positive, and DSG-3 distribution pattern was classified as organotypic and nonorganotypic. All nonneoplastic thymic tissues, 100% of thymic squamous carcinomas, 97% of thymomas, and 50% of undifferentiated thymic carcinomas were positive for p40. Expression of p40 in almost all thymomas and in 50% of undifferentiated carcinomas that lacked squamous features suggests that p40 is not a good marker for the diagnosis of thymic squamous carcinoma. All normal and hyperplastic thymi, 51.5% of thymomas, and 0% of thymic squamous carcinomas expressed DSG-3 in an organotypic pattern, and 13.6% of thymomas and 83% of thymic squamous carcinomas were DSG-3 positive in a nonorganotypic pattern. Findings suggest that nonorganotypic DSG-3 expression favors the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma over thymoma. In 26 (60.5%) of the 43 cases where neoplastic and nonneoplastic thymus were present on the same slide, the presence/absence or distribution pattern of DSG-3 immunoreactivity was different in the 2 components, suggesting that this marker can be helpful in staging thymomas with incomplete encapsulation. The presence of DSG-3-positive and DSG-3-negative thymomas raises the possibility that these tumors may originate from 2 different types of thymic epithelial cells., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pulmonary carcinoid tumors are currently classified as typical or atypical based on the mitotic index (2 per 10 hpf) and/or the presence of necrosis. Following incorporation of the Ki-67 index into the classification of GI carcinoid tumors, our oncologists have also been requesting this test as part of the work-up of pulmonary carcinoid tumors although there are currently no established criteria for interpreting Ki-67 index in these neoplasms. We utilized the Ariol(®) SL50 Image Analyzer system to measure the Ki-67 index in 101 pulmonary carcinoid tumors (78 typical and 23 atypical) and then correlated the Ki-67 index and the histological diagnoses in univariate and multivariable analysis with overall survival. The mean Ki-67 indices for the typical carcinoids (3.7 s.d.± 4.0) and the atypical carcinoids (18.8 s.d.± 17.1) were significantly different (P<0.001) although the frequency distributions of Ki-67 indices in the two groups overlapped considerably. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a Ki-67 index cutoff value of 5% provided the best fit for specificity and sensitivity in predicting overall survival. Histological diagnosis and the Ki-67 index cutoff of 5% were each independently strong predictors of survival (P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). When considered together in multivariable analysis, histological diagnosis was the stronger predictor of overall survival and a Ki-67 index cutoff of 5% did not provide additional significant predictive survival information within either the typical carcinoid or the atypical carcinoid patient group. A few typical carcinoid patients with Ki-67 indices of 5% appeared to have worse survival after 5 years than those with Ki-67 indices <5%, but the data set was insufficiently powered to further analyze this. These findings do not provide best evidence for the routine use of Ki-67 index to prognosticate overall short-term survival in patients with pulmonary carcinoid tumors.

BD ProEx C (ProEx C) is a recently developed immunocytochemical assay that targets the expression of topoisomerase II-alpha and minichromosome maintenance protein-2, 2 genes shown to be overexpressed in cervical cancers. Recent studies validated this reagent in liquid-based cytology specimens and suggested its usefulness as an adjunct in the diagnosis of challenging cases. Limited information is available on its expression in tissue sections. This study aims to assess ProEx C expression patterns in benign, atypical, and dysplastic lesions of the cervix and to compare these patterns with p16 and Ki67 expression and with the presence of human papilloma virus DNA as determined by in situ hybridization. ProEx C positivity was limited to the basal layers of the epithelium in 75% of benign cervices. In the remaining 25%, staining extended into the lower half of the epithelium particularly in areas of squamous metaplasia and immature squamous metaplasia. In 92% of high-grade dysplasias [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and III] strong positive staining for ProEx C involved the lower and upper halves of the epithelium. Condylomas and CIN I showed greater variability in staining pattern with ProEx C positivity extending into the upper half of the epithelium in 48% of cases. Statistically significant correlations were noted with presence of human papilloma virus DNA and with p16/Ki67 expression. Atypical squamous metaplasia showed varied staining with 24% being positive. To summarize, ProEx C is a reliable marker for high-grade CIN that can be applied to tissue sections to confirm the diagnosis of high-grade CIN and to triage cases of atypical squamous metaplasia. ProEx C may also have a potential role in triaging patients with low-grade CIN. ProEx C expression patterns are similar to those for p16 and Ki67 with most discrepancies occurring in the CIN I category.