Search

Background: Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are mainly enriched based on the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). Although it was shown that an EpCAM low-expressing CTC fraction is not captured by such approaches, knowledge about its prognostic and predictive relevance and its relation to EpCAM-positive CTCs is lacking., Methods: We developed an immunomagnetic assay to enrich CTCs from metastatic breast cancer patients EpCAM independently using antibodies against Trop-2 and CD-49f and characterised their EpCAM expression. DNA of single EpCAM high expressing and low expressing CTCs was analyzed regarding chromosomal aberrations and predictive mutations. Additionally, we compared CTC-enrichment on the CellSearch system using this antibody mix and the EpCAM based enrichment., Results: Both antibodies acted synergistically in capturing CTCs. Patients with EpCAM high-expressing CTCs had a worse overall and progression-free survival. EpCAM high- and low-expressing CTCs presented similar chromosomal aberrations and mutations indicating a close evolutionary relationship. A sequential enrichment of CTCs from the EpCAM-depleted fraction yielded a population of CTCs not captured EpCAM dependently but harbouring predictive information., Conclusions: Our data indicate that EpCAM low-expressing CTCs could be used as a valuable tumour surrogate material-although they may be prognostically less relevant than EpCAM high-expressing CTCs-and have particular benefit if no CTCs are detected using EpCAM-dependent technologies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow of endometrial carcinoma patients has been demonstrated previously. In contrast to breast cancer, no prognostic significance or association with clinicopathological features was revealed for endometrial carcinoma so far. The aim of this study was to investigate DTC in a large patient cohort with in-depth pathology review data available and to study DTC occurrence in the context of L1CAM and long-term disease specific follow-up., Methods: Patients treated for endometrial carcinoma at the Tuebingen University Women's hospital between 2003 and 2013 were identified. Cases with previous expert central pathology review including L1CAM immunohistochemistry and bone marrow aspirates available were selected. The presence of DTC and L1CAM expression was studied immunohistochemically., Results: In 395 cases with a confirmed diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma, bone marrow aspirates were available. DTC were detected in 17.2%. The presence of DTC was independent from tumor histology, grade, lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI), FIGO stage, myoinvasion, L1CAM immunoreactivity, and nodal metastasis. DTC occurred less frequently in cases with a microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern of invasion (2.2 vs. 21.8%, p = 0.0003). Disease progression was distributed equally among patients with and without DTC present., Conclusions: We were able to confirm previous findings of DTC presence in a large well-characterized cohort of endometrial carcinoma patients. DTC are detectable in almost one-fifth of endometrial carcinoma and occur less frequently with a MELF pattern of invasion. Further studies investigating the role of DTC in endometrial carcinoma are warranted.

Background: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), antigen profiles of metastatic tissue and primary tumor differ in up to 20 % of patients. Reassessment of predictive markers, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, might help to optimize MBC treatment. While tissue sampling is invasive and often difficult to repeat, circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis requires only a blood sample and might provide an easy-to-repeat, real-time "liquid biopsy" approach. The present retrospective study was conducted to compare HER2 expression in primary tumors, metastatic tissue, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from MBC patients and to analyze the potential impact of HER2 overexpression by CTCs on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MBC., Methods: CTC-positive (five or more CTCs/7.5 mL blood; CellSearch®, Janssen Diagnostics) MBC patients starting a new line of systemic treatment were eligible for the study. HER2 status of CTCs was determined by immunofluorescence (CellSearch®). HER2 status of primary (PRIM) and metastatic (MET) tumor tissue was determined by immunohistochemistry. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots., Results: One hundred seven patients (median age (range) 57 (33-81) years) were included. 100/107 (93%) patients were followed-up for a median [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 28.5 [25.1-40.1] months. Of 37/107 (35%) CTC-HER2-positive patients only 10 (27%) were PRIM-HER2-positive. 6/46 (13%) patients were MET-HER2-positive; only 2/10 (20%) CTC-HER2-positive patients were MET-HER2-positive. Overall accuracy between CTC-HER2 expression and PRIM-HER2 and MET-HER2 status was 69% and 74%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier plots of PFS and OS by CTC-HER2 status revealed significantly longer median [95% CI] PFS of CTC-HER2-positive versus CTC-HER2-negative patients (7.4 [4.7-13.7] versus 4.34 [3.5-5.9] months; p = 0.035). CTC-HER2-positive status showed no significant difference for OS (13.7 [7.7-30.0] versus 8.7 [5.9-15.3] months; p = 0.287)., Conclusions: HER2 status can change during the course of breast cancer. CTC phenotyping may serve as an easy-to-perform "liquid biopsy" to reevaluate HER2 status and potentially guide treatment decisions. Further, prospective studies are needed.

The progesterone receptor (PR) has been increasingly well described as an important mediator of the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the role of PR status as a prognostic factor in addition to other well-established prognostic factors. Data from five independent German breast cancer centers were pooled. A total of 7,965 breast cancer patients were included for whom information about their PR status was known, as well as other patient and tumor characteristics commonly used as prognostic factors. Cox proportional hazards models were built to compare the predictive value of PR status in addition to age at diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, grading, and estrogen receptor (ER) status. PR status significantly increased the accuracy of prognostic predictions with regard to overall survival, distant disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival. There were differences with regard to its prognostic value relative to subgroups such as nodal status, ER status, and grading. The prognostic value of PR status was greatest in patients with a positive nodal status, negative ER status, and low grading. The PR-status adds prognostic value in addition to ER status and should not be omitted from clinical routine testing. The significantly greater prognostic value in node-positive and high-grade tumors suggests a greater role in the progression of advanced and aggressive tumors.

Background: To prospectively assess circulating tumor cell (CTC) status at baseline (CTCBL) and after one cycle of a new line of systemic therapy (CTC1C), and changes from CTCBL to CTC1C (CTC kinetics, CTCKIN) for their utility in predicting response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Methods: CTCBL and CTC1C status was determined as negative (-) or positive (+) for < 5 or ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood using CellSearch™ (Veridex). CTCKIN was categorized as favorable (CTC1C-) or unfavorable (CTC1C+). Tumor response was to be assessed every 2-3 months using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Statistical analysis focused on the relation between CTC status and CTCKIN, and response, PFS, and OS., Results: 133/393 (34%) patients enrolled were CTCBL+. CTC1C status after one cycle and radiological tumor response were assessed after median (range) periods of 1.2 (0.5-3.2) and 2.9 (0.5-4.8) months, respectively. 57/201 (28%) were CTC1C+. Median [95% confidence interval] PFS and OS (months) were significantly reduced in CTCBL+ vs. CTCBL- patients (PFS 4.7 [3.7-6.1] vs. 7.8 [6.4-9.2]; OS 10.4 [7.9-15.0] vs. 27.2 [22.3-29.9]), and for CTC1C+ vs. CTC1C- patients (PFS 4.3 [3.6-6.0] vs. 8.5 [6.6-10.4]; OS 7.7 [6.4-13.9] vs. 30.6 [22.6-not available]). Unfavorable CTCKIN was significantly associated with progressive disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed prognostic factors for shorter PFS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status) and shorter OS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, bone-and-visceral/local metastases, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status)., Conclusions: CTCBL, CTC1C, and CTCKIN are predictive of outcome in MBC. Serial CTC enumeration is useful in tailoring systemic treatment of MBC., Trial Registration: Not applicable.

The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients is an independent marker of prognosis. This large prospective multicenter study aimed to assess the impact of CTCs on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with predefined molecular subgroups of MBC. To this end, 468 MBC patients were divided into three subgroups based on immunohistochemical staining of the primary tumor: (1) hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HorR+/HER2-), (2) HER2-positive (HER2+), and (3) HorR-negative/HER2-negative (HorR-/HER2-) patients. CTC status (<5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood (CTC-negative) vs. ≥5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood (CTC-positive)) was determined using the CellCearch(®) system before patients started a new line of therapy. At baseline, 205 (42 %) patients were CTC-positive. On multivariate analysis, CTC-positivity was an independent prognostic factor for shorter PFS and OS. In HorR+/HER2- patients, median PFS [95 % CI] of CTC-negative versus CTC-positive patients was 8.60 [5.93-11.27] versus 4.33 [3.29-5.38] months (p < 0.001), in HER2+ patients 7.60 [5.40-9.79] versus 6.60 [4.20-9.00] months (p = 0.477) and in HorR-/HER2- patients 5.83 [5.09-6.78] versus 3.05 [1.81-4.29] months (p < 0.001), respectively. Median OS [95 % CI] of CTC-negative versus CTC-positive patients was as follows: not reached by either in the HorR+/HER2- subgroup (p < 0.001), not reached versus 18.07 [11.10-25.05] months (p = 0.001) in the HER2+ subgroup, and not reached versus 8.57 [4.07-13.07] months in the HorR-/HER2- subgroup (p = 0.001). In conclusion, our results strongly confirm the independent prognostic value of CTC enumeration in MBC patients. In contrast to recent reports, there was no association between primary tumor-based molecular subgroups and the impact of CTC status on OS. Hence, CTC status may help to identify patients who require aggressive therapy, especially among those with triple-negative MBC.