Search

Background: Ovarian carcinoma (OC) is the fifth most common female cancer and mostly diagnosed at an advanced stage. Surgical debulking is usually followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Only few biomarkers are known to be related to chemosensitivity. OX40 is a TNF receptor member and expressed on activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. It is known that OX40 signaling promotes survival and responds to various immune cells of the innate and adaptive immune system. Therefore we investigated the indicative value of OX40 expression for recurrence and survival in OC., Methods: A tissue microarray of biopsies of mostly high-grade primary serous OC and matched recurrences of 47 patients was stained with OX40. Recurrence within 6 months of the completion of platinum-based chemotherapy was defined as chemoresistance., Results: Chemosensitivity correlated significantly with high OX40 positive immune cell density in primary cancer biopsies (p = 0.027). Furthermore patients with a higher OX40 expression in recurrent cancer biopsies showed a better outcome in recurrence free survival (RFS) (p = 0.017) and high OX40 expression was associated with chemosensitivity (p = 0.008). OX40 positive TICI in recurrent carcinomas significantly correlated with IL-17 positive tumor infiltrating immune cells in primary carcinomas (r s  = 0.34; p = 0.023). Univariate cox regression analysis revealed a significant longer RFS and higher numbers of chemotherapy cycles for high OX40 tumor cell expression in recurrent cancer biopsies (HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.16-0.94, p = 0.036 and 1.28, 95%CI 1.05-1.55; p = 0.013)., Conclusion: High OX40 expression in OC is correlated with chemosensitivity and improved RFS in OC. Patients might therefore benefit from a second line therapy.

Background: OX40 is a TNF receptor family member expressed by activated T cells. Its triggering by OX40 ligand promotes lymphocyte survival and memory generation. Anti-OX40 agonistic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are currently being tested in cancer immunotherapy. We explored the prognostic significance of tumor infiltration by OX40+ cells in a large colorectal cancer (CRC) collective., Methods: OX40 gene expression was analyzed in 50 freshly excised CRC and corresponding healthy mucosa by qRT-PCR. A tissue microarray including 657 clinically annotated CRC specimens was stained with anti-OX40, -CD8 and -FOXP3 mAbs by standard immunohistochemistry. The CRC cohort was randomly split into training and validation sets. Correlations between CRC infiltration by OX40+ cells alone, or in combination with CD8+ or FOXP3+ cells, and clinical-pathological data and overall survival were comparatively evaluated., Results: OX40 gene expression in CRC significantly correlated with FOXP3 and CD8 gene expression. High CRC infiltration by OX40+ cells was significantly associated with favorable prognosis in training and validation sets in univariate, but not multivariate, Cox regression analysis. CRC with OX40(high)/CD8(high) infiltration were characterized by significantly prolonged overall survival, as compared to tumors with OX40(low)/CD8(high), OX40(high)/CD8(low) or OX40(low)/CD8(low) infiltration in both uni- and multivariate analysis. In contrast, prognostic significance of OX40+ and FOXP3+ cell infiltration was not enhanced by a combined evaluation. Irrespective of TNM stage, CRC with OX40(high)/CD8(high) density infiltrates showed an overall survival similar to that of all stage I CRC included in the study., Conclusions: OX40(high)/CD8(high) density tumor infiltration represents an independent, favorable, prognostic marker in CRC with an overall survival similar to stage I cancers.

Background: Snail is a key regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition of tumor cells. Several studies have shown nuclear Snail expression to be a negative prognostic factor in human cancer, where it is generally associated with more aggressive tumor behavior and worse survival., Objectives and Methods: To further explore the role of Snail expression in breast cancer, we conducted a study on a tissue microarray, encompassing 1043 breast cancer cases., Results: A total of 265 (25.4%) breast cancers were positive for Snail. Snail expression was significantly associated with greater tumor size, higher tumor stage and grade, positive lymph node status, and hormone receptor negative status and was differently expressed in the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer, being the highest in the basal-like subtype and the lowest in the luminal A subtype. In multivariate analysis, Snail proved to be an independent negative prognostic factor for OS. In the intrinsic subtypes, Snail expression was a negative prognostic factor for OS in the luminal B HER2(-), the luminal B HER2(+), and the basal-like subtype., Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating that nuclear Snail expression is an independent negative predictor of prognosis in breast cancer, thus suggesting that it may represent a potential therapeutic target.

Increasing evidence that cancers originate from small populations of so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs), capable of surviving conventional chemotherapies and regenerating the original tumor, urges the development of novel CSC-targeted treatments. Screening of new anticancer compounds is conventionally conducted on established tumor cell lines, providing sufficient material for high-throughput studies. Whether tumor cell lines might comprise CSC populations resembling those of primary tumors, however, remains highly debated. We have analyzed the expression of defined phenotypic profiles, including CD133+, CD166+CD44+, and CD24+CD44+, reported as CSC-specific in human primary colorectal cancer (CRC), on a panel of 10 established CRC cell lines and evaluated their correlation with CSC properties. None of the putative CSC phenotypes consistently correlated with stem cell-like features, including spheroid formation ability, clonogenicity, aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 activity, and side population phenotype. Importantly, CRC cells expressing putative CSC markers did not exhibit increased survival when treated with chemotherapeutic drugs in vitro or display higher tumorigenicity in vivo. Thus, the expression of CD133 or the coexpression of CD166/CD44 or CD24/CD44 did not appear to reliably identify CSC populations in established CRC cell lines. Our findings question the suitability of cell lines for the screening of CSC-specific therapies and underline the urgency of developing novel platforms for anticancer drug discovery.