Search

The neuronal intermediate filament alpha internexin (INA) is expressed in most gliomas with 1p19q codeletion and could represent a valuable prognostic marker in clinical routine. INA expression was analysed on 409 gliomas and correlated with histology, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), genomic profile assessed by CGH-array, IDH1/IDH2 mutation and p53 expression. INA was expressed in 59% of grade II oligodendrogliomas (n=73), 45% of grade III oligodendrogliomas (n=133), 15% of grade II oligoastrocytomas (n=61), 12% of grade III oligoastrocytomas (n=41), 23% of glioblastomas with oligodendroglial component (n=31), 0% of grade I astrocytomas (n=3), 0% of grade II astrocytomas (n=14), 6% of grade III astrocytomas (n=17) and 0% of glioblastomas (n=36). INA expression was detected in 85% of gliomas with complete 1p19q codeletion ('true 1p19q signature') (n=85) versus 15% of gliomas without 1p19q codeletion (n=245), including 14% of gliomas with variable/partial 1p19q deletion ('false 1p19q signature') (n=72) (p<0.0001). INA was expressed by 43% of gliomas with IDH1 mutation (n=197) versus 12% of gliomas without IDH1 mutation (n=156) (p<0.0001). In oligodendroglial gliomas (n=240), INA expression specificity for 1p19q codeletion was 80%, sensitivity 85%, positive predictive value 70%, and negative predictive value was 91%. Combining INA and p53 expressions improved INA predictive accuracy for 1p19q codeletion. In grade III gliomas, INA expression was associated with longer PFS (42.1 versus 10.2 months, p=0.0007) and longer OS (124.6 versus 20.6 months, p=0.0001). In conclusion, INA expression is a fast, cheap and reliable prognostic marker, and represents a surrogate marker for 1p19q complete codeletion., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

MGMT promoter methylation, which has been correlated with the response to alkylating agents, was investigated in a retrospective series of 219 glioblastomas (GBMs) treated with various modalities. MGMT methylation had no impact on survival for the whole group, but showed a significant advantage (17.1 months vs. 13.1) for patients treated with RT+ adjuvant chemotherapy (relative risk of death (RR) = 0.53; P = 0.041), particularly when patients received CT during the course of RT (MS = 19.9 months vs. 12.5 months; RR = 0.227, P = 0.001). This suggests that the prognostic impact of MGMT methylation is dependent on therapeutic modalities and schedules. MGMT methylation was not correlated with the main molecular alterations, such as 10q loss and p53 expression.

The methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase promoter (MGMTP) was evaluated in 68 low-grade gliomas treated by neoadjuvant temozolomide. Methylated MGMTP was detected in 63 of 68 (92.6 %) patients and was a favorable predictor of progression-free survival as compared with unmethylated MGMTP tumors (p < 0.0001). Assessment of MGMTP status could help identifying low-grade gliomas patients more likely to respond to chemotherapy or to benefit from MGMT depletion strategies.