Search

Objective: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by surgery is now the standard care for patients with advanced rectal cancer. Because a certain proportion of these patients have poor response to CCRT, the risk stratification of survival outcomes needs to be investigated. DNA repair responses in tumor cells can regulate malignant potential and therapy resistance. In this study, we analyzed the clinical significance of principal DNA repair effectors in patients with rectal cancer., Methods: We applied data mining for DNA repair pathways in a published transcriptome for rectal cancer cases, and identified that tumors with BRCA2 downregulation correlated with poor response to CCRT. We next examined BRCA2 expression by using immunohistochemistry staining in tumor tissues of 172 patients with rectal cancer. The correlation between BRCA2 expression levels and clinical variables was further analyzed in this rectal cancer cohort., Results: Among clinical and pathological factors, low BRCA2-expression was significantly correlated with higher pre-treatment (Tx) tumor status (P = .013), post-Tx tumor (P < .001) and nodal status (P = .044), vascular invasion (P = .008), and poor tumor regression grades (P < .001). In analyses of survival outcomes, patients with low BRCA2-expression were associated with shorter local recurrence-free survival (LRFS; P = .0005) and disease-specific survival (P = .0269). Multivariate analyses confirmed the independent prognostic value of low BRCA2-expression for shorter LRFS (P = .045, hazard ratio = 4.695)., Conclusion: Low BRCA2-expression is a significant predictor for tumors in advanced stages, poor response to CCRT, and shorter survivals in patients with rectal cancer. Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors targeting DNA repair response in cells have demonstrated clinical efficacy in BRCA2-mutated patients with cancer. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of CCRT combined with these inhibitors in low BRCA2-expressing rectal cancers are encouraged., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors indicate that they have no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

The role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is mainly to maintain genome integrity in response to DNA damage through different mechanisms. Deregulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is associated with the development of tumor and altered sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, we determined protein expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 4 digestive system cancers (gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer) by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. A total of 1546 samples of 4 types of cancer tissues, their matched adjacent nontumor tissues, and corresponding benign tissues were studied, respectively. Immunohistochemistry expression patterns of the 2 proteins and their correlation with patients' clinical parameters and overall survival were analyzed. The results showed that low expression of cytoplasmic BRCA1 and BRCA2 was commonly associated with advanced tumor-lymph node-metastasis stage, whereas high expression of nuclear BRCA1 was generally correlated with advanced tumor stages in these cancers. High expression of cytoplasmic BRCA1 and BRCA2 had significantly favorable overall survival in digestive system cancers; in contrast, BRCA1 nuclear expression usually predicted poor outcomes. We conclude that BRCA1 and BRCA2 could be used as clinicopathological biomarkers to evaluate the prognosis of digestive system cancers., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Prostate cancer patients with inherited BRCA2 mutations have a survival disadvantage. However, it is unknown whether progression is associated with BRCA2 protein expression in diagnostic prostate cancer tissue, among men without inherited mutations. We conducted a nested case-control study within the Swedish Watchful Waiting cohort. The case group included all 71 patients who died from prostate cancer within 5 years from diagnosis and controls were all patients (n = 165) who lived at least 7 years after diagnosis. Tissue microarrays were stained using antibodies for C- and N-terminal domains of the BRCA2 protein. Location (nuclear, cytoplasmic and membranous) and magnitude (intensity and percentage) of expression were assessed. Logistic regression models produced odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, year of diagnosis and Gleason score. Positive BRCA2 staining at the cell membrane was associated with reduced risk of death within 5 years (N-terminal: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.21-1.04, P = 0.06; C-terminal: OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.18-0.91, P = 0.03) and low Gleason scores (P = 0.006). Positive cytoplasmic C-terminal staining was associated with higher Gleason scores and increased lethality (OR = 3.61, 95% CI = 1.61-8.07, P = 0.002). BRCA2 protein expression at the cell membrane and lack of C-terminal expression in the cytoplasm were associated with a reduced risk of rapidly fatal prostate cancer. BRCA2 protein expression in prostate cancer tissue may have independent prognostic value. The potential biological significance of BRCA2 expression at the cell membrane warrants further investigation., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: To determine the role of autoantibodies to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 which were involved in the synthetic lethal interaction in cancer., Methods: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) was used to detect autoantibodies to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 in 618 serum samples including 131 from breast cancer, 94 from lung cancer, 34 from ovarian cancer, 107 from prostate cancer, 76 from liver cancer, 41 from pancreatic cancer and 135 from normal individuals. The positive sera with ELISA were confirmed by Western blot. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the expression of PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 in breast cancer., Results: Autoantibody frequency to PARP1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 in cancer varied from 0% to 50%. When the sera from cancer patients were tested for the presence of autoantibodies to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2, the autoantibody responses slightly decreased and the positive autoantibody reactions varied from 0% to 50.0%. This was significantly higher autoantibody responses to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 (especially to PARP1 and BRCA1) in ovarian cancer and breast cancer compared to normal control sera (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01). Immunohistochemistry indicated that Pathology Grade at diagnosis to PARP1 expression in breast cancer was different (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Different cancers have different profiles of autoantibodies. The autoantibodies to proteins involving the synthetic lethal interactions would be novel serological biomarker in some selective cancers.

Serous carcinomas develop at various sites of the Mullerian system, in particular, the ovaries, the peritoneum, the uterus and the fallopian tubes. Currently, two distinctive molecular genetic pathways are distinguished for serous tumorigenesis: type I tumors are typically well differentiated and gradually develop from cystadenoma through borderline tumor to low grade carcinoma and are characterized by B-raf and K-ras mutations, whereas the poorly differentiated type II tumors develop from intraepithelial carcinoma and show p53 mutations. Infrequently, p53 mutations occur as a late event in the type I pathway and lead to a high grade tumor phenotype. A histologically inconspicuous possible precursor lesion of the intraepithelial carcinoma is the p53 signature that shows p53 overexpression without cell cycle deregulation. Whereas in the ovaries both pathways may occur and develop from inclusions of the surface epithelium, the fallopian tube has recently been described as an important site for the type II pathway. High grade serous carcinomas and intraepithelial carcinomas of the tubal fimbria are particularly found in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 germ line mutations. Since an advanced tumor stage is frequent and often makes the determination of the origin impossible, the term pelvic serous carcinoma was recently proposed for high grade serous (adeno)carcinomas involving multiple sites.

Purpose: To review the frequency and location of malignancies detected after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA mutations., Methods: Medical records and pathology findings were reviewed from BRCA-positive women undergoing prophylactic surgery for ovarian cancer risk reduction who underwent complete examination of the adnexa. Patients undergoing this procedure between January 1999 and January 2007 were identified., Results: From January 1999 to January 2007, 122 BRCA-positive patients underwent prophylactic surgery in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology at Brigham and Women's Hospital. The median age was 46.5 years (range, 33 to 76 years). Seven (5.7%) were found to have an early malignancy in the upper genital tract and all patients were age > or = 44 years at diagnosis. Of seven consecutive cancers culled between January 1999 and January 2007, all (100%) originated in the fimbrial or ampullary region of the tube; six had an early (intraepithelial) component. Two were associated with surface implants on the ovary and two required repeated sectioning to detect microscopic carcinomas in the fimbria., Conclusion: The distal fallopian tube seems to be the dominant site of origin for early malignancies detected in approximately 6% of women undergoing ovarian cancer risk-reduction surgery. The greatest proportion of serous cancer risk in BRCA mutation-positive women should be assigned to the fimbria rather than the ovary, and future clinical and research protocols should employ thorough examination of the fimbria, including multiple sections from each tissue block, to maximize detection of early malignancies in this population.

One of the promises of modern biotechnology is to improve medical care by providing accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment to patients who will derive the maximum benefit. Delivery of this promise in the 21st century is the result of major advances in biotechnology over the past 20 years. Sequencing of the human genome and other high-volume data discovery has become possible, owing to relatively inexpensive computation power and automation. The same forces that drove the human genome project are now being focused on cataloging various disease processes at the DNA, RNA and protein levels. As these high-throughput technologies are entering the clinical care environment, the major task at hand is to integrate the complex data and derive clinically useful information. In spite of major breakthroughs in molecular approaches to the diagnosis and prognostication of cancer, there remain significant obstacles in applying these technologies to clinical samples. The time-honored conventional histopathology, for example, is still the backbone of tumor diagnosis and prognostication. The traditional fixation and processing methods are, however, rapidly losing ground, as they do not protect important tissue macromolecules. Formalin, the common universal fixative, is losing its place in histopathology. In addition to its toxicity, it alters macromolecules and renders the tissue unfit for most advanced molecular studies. This has prompted the use of fresh or fresh-frozen biopsy material for most biomolecular discoveries and clinical assays. This of course is impractical, or even impossible, in most clinical settings, particularly since tumors are being detected earlier and smaller. Also, many preneoplastic conditions are impossible to triage for freezing since their accurate diagnosis requires the use of the entire sample for detailed microscopic examination. The focus in this report is on breast cancer, where the value of the innovative approaches of the tissue detection of biomolecular predictors is examined. To this end, novel tissue handling platforms are introduced that are not only suitable for histological diagnosis, but allow the detection of tumor proteome and expression profiles on the same biopsy sample.

Objective: The study was designed to test the feasibility that lower genital tract cytology is a compatible medium for robust germ line genetic analyses., Method: BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 gene mutational analysis was done on DNA isolated from liquid-based cervical or vaginal cytology taken from 17 consenting women (age 29-65 years) who previously had genetic counseling followed by BRACAnalysis (Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT) blood analyses. Eleven women had known mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 (cases) and six had no identified mutations (controls) on entry into the study. Anonymized cytology samples were sent to Myriad Genetics with a request for testing that was limited to the degree of genomic testing previously done on the blood samples., Results: One cervicovaginal specimen from a test-positive woman had inadequate cellular content that precluded gene sequencing and therefore was excluded from this analysis. For the 16 women with adequate cytologic specimens, there was 100% concordance for BRCA mutation test results between blood and genital tract cytology (kappa = 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.0)., Conclusion: We have shown the feasibility of using liquid-based genital tract cytology as an alternative biospecimen to blood for germ line genetic analysis using a clinical approved assay. It needs to be emphasized that any type of testing for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation genotype should only be done in the setting of pretest and posttest counseling.