Oral transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is poorly understood, partly because data on this type of transmission are scarce and inherently problematic to analyze and interpret. Despite recent suggestions that the risk of becoming infected through the oral route may be higher than previously estimated, oral transmission of HIV is 8 to 10 times less likely to occur than vaginal or rectal transmission in humans (41, 50, 61). This is in contrast with studies performed in infant macaques, which are readily infected orally with simian immunodeficiency virus (3, 42). Therefore, it is possible that the oral mucosa in infants has a critical defect in immunity that renders them more susceptible to viral infection. A better understanding of the protection mechanism in the oral environment will likely provide information useful for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. Although the scarcity of data renders it difficult to envision a model for protection in the oral mucosa, there are a number of possible explanations for the relatively low rate of oral transmission of HIV (41, 50, 61). One possibility is that inhibitory factors are responsible for this phenomenon. Interestingly, saliva has been shown to inhibit HIV-1 replication, and several salivary proteins, including anti-HIV antibodies, mucins, thrombospondin, lysozyme, lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, cystatins, complement, statherin, and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, have been characterized as HIV inhibitors (41, 50, 61). Other inhibitory proteins might also reside in the mucosa. β-Defensins, a subfamily of homologous antimicrobial peptides constituting an important component of innate immunity found predominantly in vertebrates, are among the proteins expressed at the highest levels in the oral mucosa (17, 20, 29, 33, 62). Human defensins are cationic and Cys-rich proteins with molecular weights ranging from 3 to 5 kDa. Based on sequence homology and the connectivity of six conserved cysteine residues, human defensins are classified into α and β families. Human α-defensins were first discovered as natural peptide antibiotics (HNP1 to HNP4) stored in the azurophilic granules of neutrophils and released to combat ingested foreign microbes during phagocytosis (16, 48, 56). Other α-defensins, secreted in response to bacterial stimulation, have also been found in intestinal Paneth cells (2, 26, 27). In contrast, human β-defensins (hBDs) are found predominantly in various epithelial cells and tissues (4, 46, 64). hBD1, originally isolated from human blood filtrate (4), is constitutively expressed in the urogenital and airway tracts, suggesting a role in protecting mucosae from microbial infection (64). hBD2, first isolated from lesions of inflamed skin, is transcriptionally up-regulated by inflammatory stimuli such as cytokines and microorganisms (21). hBD3 was isolated originally from inflamed human skin, is inducibly expressed in various epithelia (18, 22, 25, 47), and possesses a broad spectrum of potent bactericidal activities in a salt-insensitive manner against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (18, 22, 25, 46). Genomics studies have identified several new members of the β-defensin family (28, 40, 53). Recently, a circular form of antimicrobial peptides, called θ-defensins, has been characterized in macaques, while in humans all the genes encoding these peptides contain stop codons and are therefore likely to constitute expressed pseudogenes (12). Despite their diversity, defensins kill a broad range of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and certain enveloped viruses, presumably through membrane disruption, and constitute an important component in innate immunity. Thus, they could also affect HIV-1 infection by interfering with its envelope. All classes of defensins reportedly can suppress HIV replication (9, 30, 32, 39, 58, 63). Nakashima et al. described α-defensins as antiviral in 1993 (32), and recent work had suggested that they might play a role in controlling HIV in some subjects (63). θ-Defensins, present only in nonhuman primates, might be part of the cross-species barrier to HIV. Recently, the anti-HIV activity of β-defensins has also been reported (39). However, for two reasons, it is difficult to extrapolate the antiviral activity of α- and θ-defensins to resistance against oral HIV transmission. First, θ-defensins are not expressed in humans (12). Second, α-defensins are not prominently expressed in the oral mucosa (13, 15). In contrast, β-defensins are highly expressed in the oral epithelium (13, 15, 43), with measured local concentration as high as 100 μg/ml in a 100-μm-thick layer (49). Therefore, β-defensins are candidates as components of innate resistance to oral HIV infection. In this report, we show that hBD2 and hBD3 inhibit HIV-1Bal, an R5 isolate, and IIIB, an X4 isolate; hBD2 exerted its antiviral activity without affecting cellular proliferation. Further, our data indicate that inhibition of HIV occurs at an early stage. Surprisingly, our data ruled out a mechanism involving inhibition of membrane fusion, including downregulation of HIV receptors. Instead, our data are consistent with a dual mechanism of inhibition. One component of the HIV-suppressive activity of hBD2 is due to a direct inactivation of virions, while a second component is observed postentry. Therefore, hBD2 inhibits HIV replication through a mechanism, possibly related to that described for α-defensins (9, 9a), which is not merely based on membrane disruption. These results indicate that the study of the antiviral activity of hBD2 and hBD3 could be useful in providing new tools for HIV prevention (for example, as topical microbicides), in therapy (either as such or as a basis for developing new drugs), and as correlates of immunity in the oral cavity.