Search

Background: Voice change is one of the earliest features of Parkinson’s disease. However, quantitative studies of vocal fold dynamics which are needed to provide insight into disease biology, aid diagnosis, or track progression, are few. Methods: We therefore quantified arytenoid cartilage movements and glottic area during repeated phonation in 15 patients with Parkinson’s disease (symptom duration < 6 years) and 19 controls, with 320-slice computerised tomography (CT). We related these measures to perceptual voice evaluations and spirometry. We hypothesised that Parkinson’s disease patients have a smaller inter-arytenoid distance, a preserved or larger glottic area because vocal cord bowing has previously been reported, less variability in loudness, more voice dysdiadochokinesis and breathiness and a shortened phonation time because of arytenoid hypokinesis relative to glottic area. Results: Inter-arytenoid distance in Parkinson’s disease patients was moderately smaller (Mdn = 0.106, IQR = 0.091–0.116) than in controls (Mdn = 0.132, IQR = 0.116–0.166) (W = 212, P = 0.015, r = −0.42), normalised for anatomical and other inter-subject variance, analysed with two-tailed Wilcoxon’s rank sum test. This finding was confirmed in a linear mixed model analysis—Parkinson’s disease significantly predicted a reduction in the dependent variable, inter-arytenoid distance (b = −0.87, SEb = 0.39, 95% CI [−1.66, −0.08], t(31) = −2.24, P = 0.032). There was no difference in glottic area. On perceptual voice evaluation, patients had more breathiness and dysdiadochokinesis, a shorter maximum phonation time, and less variability in loudness than controls. There was no difference in spirometry after adjustment for smoking history. Conclusions: As predicted, vocal fold adduction movements are reduced in Parkinson’s disease on repeated phonation but glottic area is maintained. Some perceptual characteristics of Parkinsonian speech reflect these changes. We are the first to use 320-slice CT to study laryngeal motion. Our findings indicate how Parkinson’s disease affects intrinsic laryngeal muscle position and excursion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), the reflexive eye movements evoked by a moving field, has recently gained interest among researchers as a useful tool to assess conscious perception. When conscious perception and stimulus are dissociated, such as in binocular rivalry—when dissimilar images are simultaneously presented to each eye and perception alternates between the two images over time—OKN correlates with perception rather than with the physical direction of the moving field. While this relationship is well established in healthy subjects, it is yet unclear whether it also generalizes to clinical populations, for example, patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s disease is a motor disorder, causing tremor, slow movements and rigidity. It may also be associated with oculomotor deficits, such as impaired saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements. Here, we employed short-duration, onset binocular rivalry (2 s trial of stimulus presentation followed by 1 s inter-trial interval) with moving grating stimuli to assess OKN in Parkinson’s disease patients (N = 39) and controls (N = 29) of a similar age. Each trial was either non-rivalrous (same stimuli presented to both eyes) or rivalrous, as in binocular rivalry. We analyzed OKN to discriminate direction of stimulus and perception on a trial-by-trial basis. Although the speed of slow-phase OKN was slower in the patients, discriminability of conscious perception based on OKN was comparable between the groups. Treatment with anti-Parkinson drugs and deep brain stimulation improved motor ability of patients, but did not impact on OKN. Furthermore, OKN-based measures were robust and their latencies were shorter than manual button-based measures in both groups and stimulus conditions. To our knowledge, our study is the first to demonstrate that OKN can be used as a reliable indicator of conscious perception in binocular rivalry even in Parkinson’s disease patients in whom impaired manual dexterity may render button-press reports less reliable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]