1. The virucidal effects against murine norovirus and feline calicivirus F4 as surrogates for human norovirus by the different additive concentrations of ethanol-based sanitizers
- Author
-
Hiroshi Ushijima, Tempei Akasaka, Satoshi Hayakawa, and Yuko Shimizu-Onda
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,Virus Cultivation ,viruses ,030106 microbiology ,ved/biology.organism_classification_rank.species ,Sodium malate ,Biology ,medicine.disease_cause ,Antiviral Agents ,Models, Biological ,Virus ,Cell Line ,Microbiology ,Mice ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,fluids and secretions ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Feline calicivirus ,Ethanol ,ved/biology ,Norovirus ,virus diseases ,biology.organism_classification ,Virology ,digestive system diseases ,030104 developmental biology ,Infectious Diseases ,chemistry ,Cats ,Malic acid ,Calicivirus, Feline ,Disinfectants ,Hand Disinfection ,Murine norovirus - Abstract
Since human norovirus is non-cultivable, murine norovirus and feline calicivirus have been used as surrogates. In this study, the virucidal effects of ethanol-based sanitizers with different concentrations of additives (malic acid/sodium malate, glycerin-fatty acid ester) against murine norovirus and feline calicivirus F4 were examined. The ethanol-based sanitizers at pH 7 showed sufficient virucidal effects, but glycerin-fatty acid ester included in ethanol-based sanitizers at pH 4 or 6 reduced the virucidal effects against murine norovirus. The ethanol-based sanitizers containing malic acid/sodium malate inactivated feline calicivirus F4 in shorter time, but there is no difference between ethanol-based sanitizers with and without glycerin-fatty acid ester. Traditionally, feline calicivirus has been used for long time as a surrogate virus for human norovirus. However, this study suggested that murine norovirus and feline calicivirus F4 had different sensitivity with the additive components of ethanol-based sanitizers. Therefore, using feline calicivirus alone as a surrogate for human norovirus may not be sufficient to evaluate the virucidal effect of sanitizers on food-borne infections caused by human norovirus. Sanitizers having virucidal effects against at least both murine norovirus and feline calicivirus may be more suitable to inactivate human norovirus.
- Published
- 2016